research and analyse the factors which are relevant to its international marketing strategy formulation in a globalised marketplace.

Final Assessment

 

  1. You are required to complete the assessment outlined below and submit your completed final document through the RKC Online Campus by the due date mentioned under “Final Assessment” Your grade will be based 100% on this final document, to which you will also receive written feedback.
  2. There is a total word count of 4000(+/- 10%) words for this paper. An indicative break down is provided below.
  3. Please ask any questions about the final assessment in the Forum.

 

Assignment:

In the interim, you have already described how a multinational company of your choice entered and operates in your country. Now you must research and analyse the factors which are relevant to its international marketing strategy formulation in a globalised marketplace.

While analysing this, you need to have considered the following:

– Activities of the company, worldwide operations, country of origin, your country- 1000 words

– A brief overview of its equity structure -listed or not, major shareholders, share price

– 200 words

– Legal and Management structures: –400 words

-Brand and branding: company, product: 1200 words

-Marketing mix as it may be applied: 1200 words

 

You are strongly advised to structure your report in the same order as the assignment tasks set out above.

 

Learning Outcomes to be assessed

This assessment assesses how well you can do the following:

  1. Critical analysis of international marketing within the global business environment and assess how marketing is managed internally and externally by organisations from different industries and how organisations are impacted by elements of the business environment.

2.Critically and effectively assess the value of marketing mix theories, concepts and models in the field of marketing and

3.Evaluate critically, the strategic role of branding and assess the impact branding has on consumers, organisations and society and

  1. Critically review the strategy of an organisation in light of international business issues, applying relevant theories and concepts.

 

Your work should have an interpretative approach by subjecting your discussion to a critical analysis. Ensure that your arguments are clear and logical and draw from academic/peer reviewed sources to support your affirmations. Please show in your list of references an appropriate breadth and depth of references relevant to the topic.

You must strictly adhere to the Harvard referencing system. If you do not cite all sources, then you may be accused of plagiarism, and that in turn may endanger your success in passing the module.

Format

Your assignment should be in a report format, being clearly structured using headings, sub-headings etc. Your assignment should be presented using Times New Roman (TNR) 12 font, 1.5 line spacing, and it should be approximately 4,000 (+/- 10%) words in length. Your word count is from the introduction to the end of the conclusion section.

The submission should be in MS Word.

Describe the sample and measures used in your validation strategy.
Method ·       Describe the sample and measures used in your validation strategy.

·       Do not include scales that you did not use.

·       You can include the following statement under the Procedure sub-section of the Method: ‘An online survey was completed by undergraduate students at an Australian university at a time and place of their choosing.’
Results ·       Present the results from the factor analysis (or analyses if you performed more than one), including a justification for the extraction and rotation method used, factor analysis statistics, and a description of the scale and inter-factor correlations. If items were removed, also describe the process through which the decision was made to exclude these items.

·       Include a reliability analysis of the (revised) measure, including Cronbach’s alpha and related item statistics (e.g. alpha if item deleted) for the composite scale and each of the subscales.

·       Include the descriptive statistics for all measures used.

·       Include correlations, t-tests, etc. as appropriate that address your validation hypotheses.

·       The Assignment 2 table guide (DOCX 29KB)  Download Assignment 2 table guide (DOCX 29 KB)will give you an idea of how these results can be presented.
Discussion This section aligns with what is expected in a discussion from any other lab/research report. It should present an evaluation of your (revised) measure, including the following:

·       Statements about the factor structure, and the extent to which the items align with what realistic optimism, unrealistic optimism, and pessimism are theoretically considered to comprise. Any issues may have implications for the definition and measurement of the construct being investigated.

·       A discussion of the reliability of the final scales.

·       A discussion of the evidence for the validity of the scales.

·       Limitations and implications, including any potential future revisions to the new realistic optimism, unrealistic optimism, and pessimism scales and if needed, recommendations for how they should be validated in the future.

·       A discussion of any revisions to the scale and recommendations for how it should be validated in the future.
References In-text referencing, presentation of the results, and the reference list should be in APA 7th format.
What information should you provide the leadership for a preliminary discussion?

Description

Please read Chapter 9 of the attached text book, then read another two peer reviewed journal articles to answer the below question. You are consulting to a firm that manufactures titanium alloys for industrial and military applications. The company is considering establishing a strategic alliance with a competitor. What information should you provide the leadership for a preliminary discussion? What risks are involved and how might you suggest minimizing them?

Utilize Internet search engines to identify an incident involving corruption or misconduct involving a criminal justice professional. Provide a brief summary of the incident (don’t forget to cite your source). In your opinion, why did this incident occur?

Description

Utilize Internet search engines to identify an incident involving corruption or misconduct involving a criminal justice professional. Provide a brief summary of the incident (don’t forget to cite your source). In your opinion, why did this incident occur? Potential explanations include: 1) Unique personality characteristics of the criminal justice professional; 2) Organizational explanations (e.g., the culture within a department/agency, an ineffective disciplinary system, etc.); 3) Societal explanations (e.g., the message society sends to criminal justice professionals regarding their perceived role, etc.). Additionally, provide suggestions regarding steps that can be taken to reduce the possibility that this type of misconduct will occur in the future. can you make it at least 300 words of content thank u

For any item you are unable to address from the video, explain how you would gather this information and why it is important for diagnosis and treatment planning. 

Assignment: Family Assessment

Assessment is as essential to family therapy as it is to individual therapy. Although families often present with one person identified as the “problem,” the assessment process will help you better understand family roles and determine whether the identified problem client is in fact the root of the family’s issues.

Photo Credit: Getty Images

To prepare:

  • (1)Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide on family assessment. Be sure to review the resource on psychotherapy genograms.

(2)Download the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Template and review the requirements of the documentation. (3)There is also an exemplar provided with detailed guidance and examples.

  • (4)View the Mother and Daughter: A Cultural Tale video in the Learning Resources and consider how you might assess the family in the case study.

(5) Note: This assignment video is sent to the writer in form of a transcript on the file attachment

(6) The Assignment Document the following for the family in the video, using the Comprehensive Evaluation Note Template:

  • Chief complaint
  • History of present illness
  • Past psychiatric history
  • Substance use history
  • Family psychiatric/substance use history
  • Psychosocial history/Developmental history
  • Medical history
  • Review of systems (ROS)
  • Physical assessment (if applicable)
  • Mental status exam
  • Differential diagnosis—Include a minimum of three differential diagnoses and include how you derived each diagnosis in accordance with DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria
  • Case formulation and treatment plan
  • Include a psychotherapy genogram for the family

(7)Note: For any item you are unable to address from the video, explain how you would gather this information and why it is important for diagnosis and treatment planning.

By Day 7

 

 

 

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

 

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.). https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://dsm.psychiatryonline.org/doi/book/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787

 

 

Nichols, M., & Davis, S. D. (2020). The essentials of family therapy (7th ed.). Pearson.

Introduction

  • Chapter 2, “Basic Techniques of Family Therapy”
  • Chapter 3, “The Fundamental Concepts of Family Therapy”
  • Chapter 4, “Bowen Family Systems Therapy

Therapist Aid. (2012–2020). Genograms for psychotherapy. https://www.therapistaid.com/therapy-guide/genograms

Therapist Aid LLC. (© 2012-2020). Genograms for psychotherapy. https://www.therapistaid.com/therapy-guide/genograms

Document: Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Template

Document: Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Exemplar

 

Optional Resource

Kaplin, D. (2021, Nov. 5).  Family systems therapy [Video]. YouTube.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVPENypTc4k

 

Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

 

Gehart, D. R. (2013, August 29). Progress note [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEB1vBObUqc

 

Masterswork Productions. (2003). Mother and daughter: A cultural tale [Video/DVD]. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://video.alexanderstreet.com/watch/mother-and-daughter-a-cultural-tale

 

Sommers-Flanagan, J., & Sommers-Flanagan, R. (2013). Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice [Video]. https://waldenu.kanopy.com/video/counseling-and-psychotherapy-theories-contex

 

  • Family Systems Therapy (starts at 4 hours)
Create an “I Believe” paper on the identified issue.

Description

• Your position: Your position on the issue is clearly stated and based upon the facts: -E-cigarettes and vaping are unhealthy and do not provide a better alternative to smoking. • Create an “I Believe” paper on the identified issue. This short paper will address what you believe about the topic, must be supported by evidence, and cited accordingly. • The issue: The topic is clearly introduced and presented in the paper. A concise purpose/thesis statement is evident. • The facts: Relevant information is listed clearly. The effects of your issue and impact on the profession are evident. Your topic relates to a current bill in Congress. Professional organization stance on the issue is given/provided if appropriate. Minimum of three references (Provided) SHORT PAPER FORMAT: I. Introduction A. Introduce topic and scope/purpose of paper B. Provide background, including current happenings (Locally, statewide, nationally) C. Clearly state thesis (your position on the issue) II. Counterargument A. Summarize the counterclaims B. Provide supporting information for counterclaims C. Refute the counterclaims D. Give evidence for argument III. Your Argument: Assert Your Talking Points

A. Give your opinion

B. Provide support (Repeat for each talking point) IV. Conclusion: Clearly restate the argument presented in the introduction sections V. References

Compare and contrast these three tests based on the following: The purpose for testing, the content, skills, or constructs assessed and evaluated based on one’s area of specialization or a related profession.

Description Assignment Instructions Three Selected Tests: 1.Halstead Reitan Neuropsychological and Battery, 2. the Second Edition Nepsy, 3. Dean Woodcock Neuropsychological Battery(DWSMB) Compare and contrast these three tests based on the following: The purpose for testing, the content, skills, or constructs assessed and evaluated based on one’s area of specialization or a related profession. The normative sample, sampling procedures, and the intended population and evaluation based on the anticipated populations served by one’s specialization or related profession. The training required to administer, score, and interpret and evaluate based on one’s anticipated assessment training or the training of a related profession Your paper should meet the following requirements: References: A minimum of nine references are required for this assignment. These resources may include all of the reference sources identified in your Psychological Testing and Assessment text but must include: Three MMY test reviews (one for each test if available). If an MMY review is not available for one or more of your selected tests, you must substitute with another type of source. Three test publisher websites (one for each test). If there is no test publisher website for a selected test, you must substitute this with another type of source. Three journal articles (one for each test). Length of paper: A minimum of five double-spaced pages, not including the title page or references (an abstract is not required). APA format: Current APA format and style is required throughout. Be sure to use the correct format and style for each respective type of reference, for example, website site versus journal). Refer to the Academic Writer for guidance.

Comment on whether the scientific evidence supports the position of our client

S. Windel Solicitors Seaview Court Sticham, Adelaide Ref: 0001/LOL 3rd March 2022 Anthony BANKS Dear Sirs/Madam We are aware of your experience in forensic science and blood pattern in particular. We are formally instructing you to act on behalf of our client. Our client, Anthony Banks, has been accused of the unlawful killing of Eric Jones. It is alleged that our client stabbed Jones in the early hours of 1 January this year. Our client denies being part of the death of the now deceased although was known to the deceased and they had been together on the night of 31 December 2015. We request that you provide a statement based on your expertise in the area of blood pattern. We request specifically that you: 1. Crucially evaluate the statement authored by A. B. Stains and reviewed by P. A. Tern (dated 14/2/21) 2. Comment on whether the blood pattern evidence supports the allegation of unlawful killing 3. Comment on whether the scientific evidence supports the position of our client 4. Provide any other information that is relevant to the biological evidence We would welcome your statement by 13th May this year. Yours sincerely A Buser A. Buser for S. Windel & Co “absit inuria”

write a research proposal in the format of a report
Assessment Task  
 

Research Proposal

 

·      You are required to write a research proposal in the format of a report

·      Your report should develop your own research idea and demonstrate your knowledge of research methods

·      Word limit: 2,500 words

·      100% of your grade for this module

 
Duration: N/A Word Count: 2,500
Task specific guidance:

 

Title: The title should reflect the general research aim.

 

1.0 Background to the research (context): In this section, you should introduce your research topic, and explain its relevance and importance. The section should also provide a rationale for the chosen research topic. You should provide some secondary information about the theoretical context, industry, or subject you are researching, which provides rationale for the study. This section should lead the reader logically to the research aim and research objectives. (approx. 500 words)

 

Research Aim: You should develop an overarching aim for your research.   This statement will form the clear theme throughout your research paper and will follow logically from your background section. Your research aim should be written to suit the research approach you have decided to take. (approx. 100 words)

 

Research Objectives: Your research aim should be supported by logical and coherent research objectives. These objectives should contribute to you addressing your overall research aim and should be numbered. (100 words)

 

2.0 Literature review: You must identify the main theoretical underpinnings of your work and the key authors in your field and provide a succinct summary of key areas of literature. You should refer to key authors and themes from academic literature relevant to your proposal. The purpose of the literature review is to explain what we already know in your chosen area of research. This will show your understanding of the key concepts in your research question and the relationships between them. Indicate any models that you may wish to apply, test or review. (800 words)

 

Present a conceptual framework which reflect your literature review. This sets out formally the concepts you intend to include in your data collection and the proposed relationship between them. The conceptual framework becomes a guide for your data collection and analysis. This should normally be presented in a diagram with some narrative explanation. (approx. 100 words)

 

3.0 Methodology: This section must detail the approach you have decided to take for your research and provide appropriate justification for and details of that approach. This section needs to provide specific explanation of how you are planning to collect and analyse data to answer your research aim/objectives and explain why you think the methods you choose are appropriate for answering your research question. You should structure this section as follows:

 

a.    Research approach. Specify the research approach you intend to adopt. This will normally be either quantitative or qualitative. Justify why you have chosen this and link to your research question/objectives. (approx. 200 words)

b.    Data collection. How do you intend to collect your data? This will normally be using questionnaires or interviews. Describe the process and justify why it is appropriate for your research question/objectives (approx. 300 words)

c.     Sample. Who are you intending to collect data from? Explain why this is an appropriate and representative sample to enable you to address your research aim and objectives. Research ethics should also be a consideration. (approx. 300 words)

d.    Data analysis. How do you propose to analyse your collected data? Describe how you would analyse your data. (approx. 100 words)

Please ensure there is a direct link between the research aim/ objectives and the methods you choose.

 

4.0 References

Please provide a full list of references used in your proposal.

 
General study guidance:

 

·      Cite all information used in your work which is clearly from a source. Try to ensure that all sources in your reference list are seen as citations in your work, and all names cited in the work appear in your reference list.

 

·      Reference and cite your work in accordance with the APA 7th system – the University’s chosen referencing style.  For specific advice, you can talk to your Business librarians or go to the library help desk, or you can access library guidance via the following link:

o   APA 7th referencing: https://library.hud.ac.uk/pages/apareferencing/

 

  • The University has regulations relating to academic misconduct, including plagiarism. The Learning Innovation and Development Centre can advise and help you with how to avoid ‘poor scholarship’ and potential academic misconduct.

 

·      It is possible to arrange 1:1 consultation with a LIDC tutor once you have planned or written a section of your work, so that they can advise you on areas to develop.

·      Do not exceed the word limit.

 

 

Assessment criteria
 

  • The Assessment Criteria are shown the end of this document.  Your tutor will discuss how your work will be assessed/marked and will explain how the assessment criteria apply to this piece of work. These criteria have been designed for your level of study.

 

  • These criteria will be used to mark your work and will be used to support the electronic feedback you receive on your marked assignment. Before submission, check that you have tried to meet the requirements of the higher-grade bands to the best of your ability. Please note that the marking process involves academic judgement and interpretation within the marking criteria.
  • The Learning Innovation Development Centre can help you to understand and use the assessment criteria.

 

 

 

 

Learning Outcomes
 

This section is for information only.

 

The assessment task outlined above has been designed to address specific validated learning outcomes for this module. It is useful to keep in mind that these are the things you need to show in this piece of work.

 

On completion of this module, students will need to demonstrate:

 

1.     Demonstrate critical awareness of a range of methodological approaches used in research in their field of study

2.     Demonstrate knowledge of social research methods in a contemporary subject area relevant to their award

3.     Act autonomously in the conceptualisation and design of research relating to their area of study

4.     Make a proposal for a piece of relevant subject research

Please note these learning outcomes are not additional questions.

 
Find one English or American poem that deals with urban life in the 19th century and another that deals with urban life in the 20th Write an essay in which you compare and contrast these poems.
  1. Find one English or American poem that deals with urban life in the 19th century and another that deals with urban life in the 20th Write an essay in which you compare and contrast these poems. What do they say about urban life, are they positive / negative, which aspects of urban life do they focus on? Does either of the poems (or both) illustrate Georg Simmel’s characterization of metropolitan life (in ‘The Metropolis and Mental Life’) in any way(s)? Provide biographical and historical background information if relevant. Include the full text of both poems in an appendix (these should NOT be included in the word count). If you google a combination of: city / urban / poetry or poems you’ll find plenty of texts. You can add Victorian / American / 19th or 20th century to narrow down your search].