In class we covered some key reasons as to why performance ratings from different rating sources (i.e., self, peer, and supervisor) might differ. As covered in class, based on the results of Harris and Schaubroeck’s (1988), and Conway and Huffcutt’s (1997) meta-analyses, which of these key reasons have the most empirical support?
In class we covered some key reasons as to why performance ratings from different rating sources (i.e., self, peer, and supervisor) might differ. As covered in class, based on the results of Harris and Schaubroeck’s (1988), and Conway and Huffcutt’s (1997) meta-analyses, which of these key reasons have the most empirical support?