Did the decision in the Mabo case mean that the Federal government cannot use s51 acquire land over which Native Title has been granted?

Salvatore Banno and Antonino Banno v Common2 ACSR 605 (1993) 46

A poultry farm owned by brothers Salvatore and Antonino Banno was compulsorily acquired by the Commonwealth of Australia, for the future construction needs of the proposed Badgery’s Creek airport.

You need to include the citation of your case in the bibliography.

12. Darryl made the comment at 1.05 that Australians should “stop stealing other people’s land”. Did the decision in the Mabo case mean that the Federal government cannot use s51 acquire land over which Native Title has been granted? Would they be required to pay compensation? Explain your reason. 2 marks

Your answer may require referencing in footnotes and bibliography.