critically analyse policy and strategic development, leadership and collaborative working for implementing and achieving health improvement.

Critically discuss the advantages and limitations of the Planning model you selected in comparison to other models, using peer-reviewed literature.

Critically discuss the intervention you proposed, using peer-reviewed literature.

Critically discuss the advantages and limitations of the Health Promotion and Behaviour Promotion model(s) you selected in comparison to other models, using peer-reviewed literature.

Explain the ethical considerations, to ensure no intragenic (accidental harm) effects or worsening of existing disparities.

 

Conclusion (150 words)

Briefly reflect upon the choices made and acquired learning.

How this assignment contributes to your learning on your programme

The programme specification for your programme of study outlines the learning that you are expected to have gained during the course of your studies. Each module contributes certain skills to that learning.  This table shows you the types of evidence that the marker will be looking for to assess whether you have developed relevant skills during this module.

 

Attributes Assessed from the Programme Specification Evidence in the CMNR7007 assignment  
Academic literacy

  1. Demonstrate understanding and critical analysis of epidemiological surveillance, assessment of global population health and wellbeing, and public health intelligence systems.
  2. Demonstrate understanding and critical analysis of evidence and quality frameworks for assessing and improving the effectiveness of preventive health and healthcare interventions, programmes and services.
  3. Demonstrate understanding and critical analysis of policy and strategic development, leadership and collaborative working for implementing and achieving health improvement.
  

 

1.   The background, planning model, intervention, and critique are evidence-based.

2.  Correct choice and application of peer-reviewed evidence.

3.   Correct application of the planning model.

4.   Critical analysis of research evidence in the context of health promotion.

5.  The presentation and product are high-quality academic standard.