Write a paper comparing and contrasting Simon Blackburk and Karl Popper views on the nature of science. Apply these differing understandings to a practical scientific example. What are the strengths and limitations of each position, and which one is more compelling?

Write a paper comparing and contrasting Simon Blackburk and Karl Popper views on the nature of science. Apply these differing understandings to a practical scientific example. What are the strengths and limitations of each position, and which one is more compelling?