Union Laws Unlawful Labor Practice Paper

In the case below, an employee files a Section 8(a)1 complaint with the NLRB against his employer for firing him.The employer asserts that it has terminated the employee lawfully.After reading the facts of the case, explain what the decision should be (who should win).Also explain any remedies that are needed.Be sure to identify the legal concepts involved and use details from the case to show evidence in support of your position. Please limit your analysis to 2-3 double-spaced pages.Tip – Consider:Car Dealer’s CaseOrganizationThis company has two dealerships in Springfield, Illinois; one sells trucks, and the other sells luxury cars.Jack, the employee who was fired, began working at the truck dealership in 2002.He changed to the luxury dealership in 2008 where he worked until he was fired in 2014.People InvolvedCompensation PlanThere are three contributing elements to the pay of the salespersons: the first is a 25-percent commission of the profit derived from the sale of the vehicle, the profit being the difference between the selling price and the cost of the vehicle. The second element is based upon volume; in order to qualify for this bonus, the salesperson must sell 12 cars in a month, including, at least, 2 used cars. The final element is the Customer Satisfaction Index, which is based upon survey questionnaires sent to customers who purchased a car.Employee HandbookThe employee handbook included the following rule: (b) Courtesy: Courtesy is the responsibility of every employee. Everyone is expected to be courteous, polite and friendly to our customers, vendors and suppliers, as well as to their fellow employees. No one should be disrespectful or use profanity or any other language which injures the image or reputation of the Dealership.Facebook PostingsThe event pages are entitled: “(luxury) 2014 5 Series Soiree.” On the first page, Jack posted:“I was happy to see that (dealer) went ‘All Out’ for the most important launch of a new (luxury car) in years . . . the new 5 series. A car that will generate tens in millions of dollars in revenues for the dealer over the next few years. The small 8 oz bags of chips, and the $2.00 cookie plate from Sam’s Club, and the semi fresh apples and oranges were such a nice touch . . . but to top it all off . . . the Hot Dog Cart. Where our clients could attain an overcooked wiener and a stale bun.” Underneath were comments by Jack’s relatives and friends, followed by Jack’s responses. On the following page there is a picture of Dutch with his arm around the woman serving the hot dogs, and the following page has a picture of Dutch with a hot dog. Page 4 shows the snack table with cookies and fruit.Page 5 shows one of the sales people holding bottles of water, with a comment posted by Jack:“No, that’s not champagne or wine, it’s 8 oz. water. Pop or soda would be out of the question.”In this photo, a salesperson is seen coveting the rare vintages of water that were available for our guests. Page 6 shows the sign depicting the new luxury 5 Series car with Jack’s comment below: “This is not a food event. What ever made you realize that?” The final two pages again show the food table and Dutch holding a hot dog. The pictures of the truck accident, as well as Jack’s comments, on the Facebook page were: The caption is “This is your car: This is your car on drugs.” The first picture shows the car, the front part of which was in the pond.The salesperson with a blanket around her is sitting next to a woman, and a young boy is holding his head.Jack wrote, “This is what happens when a sales person sitting in the front passenger seat (Former Sales Person, actually) allows a 13 year old boy to get behind the wheel of a 6000 lb. truck built and designed to pretty much drive over anything. The kid drives over his father’s foot and into the pond in all about 4 seconds and destroys a $50,000 truck. OOOPS!” There are a number of comments on the first page, one of which was from an employee of the company in the warranty department, stating: “How did I miss all the fun stuff?” On the second page, under the photo of the car in the pond, Jack wrote: “I love this one . . . The kid’s pulling his hair out . . . Du, what did I do? Oh no, is Mom gonna give me a time out?” Below, there were comments from two of the company’s employees. On a separate Facebook page, one of a service advisor employed by the company, there was Jack’s picture of the car in the pond with the service advisor’s own comment: “Finally, some action at our truck store.”Sequence of EventsUnless otherwise noted, the parties essentially do not dispute these facts.Unless otherwise indicated, all dates referred to here are for 2014.Sometime between June 5 and June 9All the sales people met in Sam’s office to discuss the upcoming event.Sam told them about the event, the incentives being offered, and what was expected of them.Sam testified that someone asked about the food but he doesn’t remember what was said.He did say the sales people rolled their eyes “in amazement.”Jack testified this scenario:He told Sam, “I can’t believe we’re not doing more for this event.” Greg said the same thing and added: “This is a major launch of a new product and . . . we just don’t understand what the thought is behind it.” Sam responded: “This is not a food event.” After the meeting the sales people spoke more about it and Greg told Jack that at a competing luxury car’s dealership they served hors d’oeuvres with servers. Greg also said, “We’re the bread and butter store in the auto park and we’re going to get the hot dog cart.” As to why this was important, Jack testified: Everything in life is perception. X [ is] a luxury brand and . . . what I’ve talked about with all my co-workers was the fact that what they were going to do for this event was absolutely not up to par with the image of the brand, the ultimate driving machine, a luxury brand. And we were concerned about the fact that it would . . . affect our commissions, especially in the sense that it would affect . . . how the dealership looks and, how it’s presented . . . when somebody walks into our dealership . . . it’s a beautiful auto park . . . it’s a beautiful place . . . and if you walk in and you sit down and your waiter serves you a happy meal from McDonald’s. The two just don’t mix . . . we were very concerned about the fact . . . that it could potentially affect our bottom line.June 9The car promotion event occurred at the luxury dealer.The car being introduced was a new model in their “bread and butter” line.The event was significant enough for the car manufacturers to attend and help sell to the customer.Jack took pictures of the sales people holding hot dogs, water and Doritos and told them that he was going to post the pictures on his Facebook page. June 14At the company’s truck dealership, an accident occurred.A salesperson was showing a customer a truck and allowed the customer’s 13-year-old son to sit in the driver’s seat of it while the sales person was in the passenger seat, apparently, with the door open. The customer’s son must have stepped on the gas pedal; the truck drove down a small embankment, drove over the foot of the customer into an adjacent pond, and the salesperson was thrown into the water (but was unharmed, otherwise). Jack was told of the truck incident and could see it from the facility. He got his camera and took pictures of the truck in the pond.June 14Jack posted comments and pictures of the luxury event of June 9 as well as the truck accident of June 14 on his Facebook page. June 15The company representatives had learned of, and had been given copies of, Jack’s Facebook postings for both the event and the accident.Sam asked Jack to remove the postings, which he did.June 16At Harry’s request, Jack met with him, Pete, and Sam in a conference room at the dealership to discuss the postings.Harry tossed copies of the Facebook pages at him and said, “What were you thinking?”Jack responded that it was his Facebook page and his friends:“It’s none of your business.”Harry responded, “That’s what you’re going to claim?”Jack affirmed, “That’s exactly what I’m going to claim.”Harry again asked what he was thinking and Jack said that he wasn’t thinking anything.Harry said that they received calls from two other dealers and that he thoroughly embarrassed all management and “all of your coworkers and everybody that works at the dealership.” Pete then said, “You know, Jack, the photos at the truck dealership are one thing, but the photos at the luxury dealer, that’s a whole different ball game.” Jack responded that he understood. Harry then said that they were going to have to think about what they were going to do with him, and that they would contact him. Meanwhile, he was told to hand in the key to his desk. On the way out, Jack told Sam that there was no maliciousness on his part and Sam told him to let things settle down, and he left. After he got home, Jack called Pete and apologized for what had occurred; Pete testified that he does not recall receiving any apology from Jack. Jack later called Dick and apologized to him as well.Dick told him that he should have apologized during the meeting with Harry, Pete, and Sam. Notes of this June 16 meeting, taken by Pete, state that the meeting was to discuss: . . . several negative articles on his Facebook directly pertaining to situations which happened at the dealership.We were alerted to this action by receiving calls from other truck dealers who saw pictures/comments (negative) on the internet. Harry showed Jack copies of the postings and posed the question what was Jack thinking to do such a . . . thing to the company. (One posting was regarding the accident at truck dealer when a truck was driven into the lake and the second was surrounding our new 5 Series luxury car event.) Harry testified that at the June 16 meeting he handed Jack the postings and asked why he would do that and Jack said that it was his Facebook and he could do what he wanted. He ended the meeting by telling Jack to go home and that they would review this issue and get back to him. June 21A meeting of Dick, Bill, Harry, Sam, Pete, and Bob.Harry later testified that he saw both postings, but:“I will tell you that the thing that upset me more than anything else was the truck issues. The luxury car issue, to me, was somewhat comical, if you will . . . if it had been that, that would have been it. But, no, it was the truck issue.”“It was…making light of an extremely serious situation…somebody was injured and…doing that would just not be accepted.”Harry said the meeting “centered” on the posting of the accident, “it was 90% of the discussion.The other one was mentioned because we had that; but, that’s not why we made a decision to terminate Jack.” Sam testified that during the meeting there was discussion about the June 9 event and the accident, but:“The basis of the decision to terminate was the posting of the accident at the truck store.”June 22Jack was terminated.Jack said Harry told him, “We all took a vote and nobody wants you back…and the only thing that we ask is that you never set foot on the premises.”Jack said he told Harry that he understood and that was the end of the conversation.The memo put in Jack’s personnel file, dated June 22, from Harry, states:I told Jack [of the June 21 meeting] . . . that it was a unanimous decision to terminate his employment because he had made negative comments about the company in a public forum and had made light on the internet of a very serious incident (truck had jumped the curbing and ended up in a pond) that embarrassed the company. I told him that we could not accept his behavior and he was not to return to work. Nov. 30The unfair labor practice charge was filed. July 19, 2015Bill and Harry sent a memo to all employees stating:Because our employee handbook has not been updated since 2007, we have been in the process of updating and amending it for several months.We expect to have the finalized draft to you within the month. However in the meantime, please be aware of the following area in which a significant change is being made.If you have issues relating to these areas prior to the issuance of the new handbook, please see Harry.–Courtesy — This policy is being rescinded effective immediately.While there may be some additional changes and/or additions, the foregoing lets you know, in general terms, where a key change will be.Again, please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.July 21, 2015At the Administrative Law Judge’s hearing, the complaint was amended to include:Since at least August 28, 2007, the company has maintained the Courtesy rule in its employee handbook that contains language that makes it unlawful.The company defended that it had already taken care of that issue by rescinding the policy and notifying the employees.

The primary deliverable for this course is an 2500-3000 (+/- 10%) word paper on your chosen health policy/health equity topic. This assignment consists of two parts: Part 1: Policy Brief Your policy b Nursing Assignment Help

The primary deliverable for this course is an 2500-3000 (+/- 10%) word paper on your chosen healthpolicy/health equity topic. This assignment consists of two parts:Part 1: Policy BriefYour policy brief (2000-2500 words) will include:1. Title Page (Title, honor pledge, word counts of: the executive summary, brief, and equity analysis.The citations list doesn’t count in your word count)2. Executive Summary (does not factor into total paper length or % below; max 200 words; mustinclude a concise summary of the most pertinent facts about your issue, a brief overview of thepolicy proposals, and a final recommendation)3. Introduction/ Background (about 10% of paper length)Introduce the topic (This policy brief examines…). Place the policy problem in BRIEF historical and/orcontemporary context and explain why it is policy relevant.4. Identification of Policy Problem (about 20% of paper length)Write a clear statement of policy problem to be addressed in the brief and supported by anyempirical data that might quantify the magnitude of this policy problem. This section shouldincorporate a brief discussion of who the key stakeholders are with respect to the problem.PUBH 748Rev. 2021-04-21 135. Discussion and Analysis of the Key Policy Options (about 40% of paper length)Explore and analyze two policy options. Please include evidence-based analysis of advantages anddisadvantages of available policy options, including how each option would affect keystakeholders.6. Recommendations and Conclusions (about 20% of paper length)Using quality, substance, and logic, write final recommendation and offer conclusion. Therecommendation should be an analysis of why the option you select is better than the other andshould articulate what factors you considered in making that recommendation.7. List of ReferencesYou should use at least five appropriate sources; ensure all citations are in APA format and have live,clickable links.Part II: AddendumIn the remaining 500-1000 words, describe the following:1) Which public health values you prioritized in developing a solution to your problem2) What policy trade-offs, if any, you found difficult to make and why?3) With respect to the policy option you recommenda. how does your policy solution advance social justice?b. what ongoing equity concerns would you have, if any, even after the implementation of yourproposed policy?
Health Topic: Black Maternal/Infant Mortality in Harris County, Texas

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The chosen health policy/health equity topic for this paper is Black Maternal/Infant Mortality in Harris County, Texas. This policy brief aims to address the critical issue of the disproportionately high maternal and infant mortality rates among Black individuals in Harris County. The paper will provide a comprehensive analysis of the problem, explore and evaluate two policy options, offer a final recommendation, and discuss the public health values prioritized in developing a solution. Additionally, the paper will address the policy trade-offs encountered and examine how the recommended policy solution advances social justice while considering ongoing equity concerns.
Answer to Part 1: Policy Brief:
The policy brief for the Black Maternal/Infant Mortality in Harris County, Texas will consist of the following sections:
1. Title Page:
The title page will include the title of the policy brief, an honor pledge, and word counts for the executive summary, brief, and equity analysis.
2. Executive Summary:
The executive summary will provide a concise summary of the most relevant facts about the issue, an overview of the policy proposals, and a final recommendation. It should not exceed 200 words and will not factor into the total paper length or percentage.
3. Introduction/Background:
The introduction section will constitute approximately 10% of the paper length. It will introduce the topic by stating, “This policy brief examines the issue of Black Maternal/Infant Mortality in Harris County, Texas.” It will provide a brief historical and/or contemporary context to explain the policy’s relevance.
4. Identification of Policy Problem:
The identification of the policy problem will make up around 20% of the paper length. It will present a clear statement of the policy problem and include empirical data, if available, to quantify the magnitude of this problem. This section will also discuss the key stakeholders associated with the problem.
5. Discussion and Analysis of the Key Policy Options:
Approximately 40% of the paper length will be dedicated to exploring and analyzing two policy options. This section will provide evidence-based analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each policy option, along with an assessment of their impact on key stakeholders.
6. Recommendations and Conclusions:
This section will comprise around 20% of the paper length. It will present the final recommendation and offer a conclusion. The recommendation will explain why the selected policy option is superior to the other and detail the factors considered in making that recommendation.
7. List of References:
A list of at least five appropriate sources will be provided in APA format with live, clickable links. The reference list does not count towards the word limit.
Answer to Part 2: Addendum:
The addendum, consisting of 500-1000 words, will address the following:
1) Public Health Values:
Describe the public health values prioritized during the development of a solution to the identified problem. Explain how these values influenced the chosen policy option and its potential impact on improving maternal and infant health outcomes.
2) Policy Trade-offs:
Discuss any policy trade-offs encountered during the policy development process. Reflect on the difficulties faced in making these trade-offs and provide reasons for the selected choices.
3) Ongoing Equity Concerns:
With respect to the recommended policy option, discuss how it advances social justice. Analyze any lingering equity concerns that may persist even after the implementation of the proposed policy. Consider the potential impact on different demographic groups and strategies to address any disparities.
Conclusion:
This policy brief and addendum on Black Maternal/Infant Mortality in Harris County, Texas aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of the issue, policy options, and recommendations. The paper also addresses public health values, policy trade-offs, and ongoing equity concerns. By examining the problem in-depth and proposing evidence-based solutions, it is hoped that this policy brief will contribute to reducing the disproportionate maternal and infant mortality rates among Black individuals in Harris County.

Pier review | Engineering homework help

KA7064 PEOPLE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Ressessment Brief (First-Sit and Re-Sit)

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 1 of 7

1 Key Information
1.1 Module title

People in Project Management
1.2 Module code number
KA7064
1.3 Module level and credit points
Level 7 and 20 points
1.4 Summative reassessment component(s) and weighting(s)
1. Coursework (Peer Review) …………………………………………………………………………………… 10% weighting
2. Coursework (Academic Paper) …………………………………………………………………………….. 90% weighting
1.5 Module leader
Dr Allan Osborne
1.6 Reassessment Period
Semester 3 2022-23
1.7 Cohort
Newcastle campus students

2 Reassessment Submission and Feedback
2.1 Reassessment overview

This module has two components of summative reassessment. These include:
1. Coursework in the form of a Peer Review exercise
2. Coursework in the form of an Academic Paper
2.2 Release date of reassessment brief
The module leader released this reassessment brief to you on:
? 09:00 (UK time) on Friday, 23 June 2023
2.3 Medium used to disseminate reassessment brief
You will find this reassessment brief in Content > Reassessment > Reassessment Brief.
2.4 Dates and times of submissions
You are required to submit the reassessment components listed above in Section 2.1 by no later than the
following dates and times:
1. Peer Review …………………………………………………………………… 13:00 (UK time) on Thursday, 24 August 2023
2. Academic Paper ……………………………………………………………. 13:00 (UK time) on Thursday, 24 August 2023

2.5 Return date of your unconfirmed internally moderated marks and feedback

The module leader will post your Peer Review feedback and your unconfirmed internally moderated mark
and feedback for the Academic Paper by no later than the following dates and times:

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 2 of 7

1. Peer Review ……………………………………………………………. 13:00 (UK time) on Thursday, 21 September 2023
2. Academic Paper …………………………………………………….. 13:00 (UK time) on Thursday, 21 September 2023

2.6 Mechanism for return of your unconfirmed marks and feedback

The module leader will use Turnitin feedback studio to return your feedback and unconfirmed internally
moderated marks. You can find the Turnitin digital submission points from which you will access your
feedback and unconfirmed internally moderated marks in Content > Reassessment.

3 Peer Review and Academic Paper

The headline quotation for the Academic Paper and Peer Review is:
“Leadership in a team setting is much less about command and control and more about getting the most
out of a diverse and experienced group of individuals” (Ernst and Young, 2013).

3.1 Peer Review

Peer Review only has one step during reassessment. You can read what this step is in the following sub-
section. There are only two possible Peer Review marks: 0% or 100%. To gain 100%, you must complete
all reassessment tasks and requirements stipulated in this Reassessment Brief for Peer Review. You
cannot apply for a Short Extension of Time for Assessment Component 001 (Peer Review) because the
module leader has notified the Student Engagement Team that it cannot grant you a Short Extension of
Time for Assessment Component 001 (Peer Review).

Peer Review Assignment

The module leader will give you access to two students’ draft Academic Papers for Peer Review once
SLAS has provided the module leader with its official list of reassessment students.
This assessment component requires you to provide constructive, supportive feedback using the
Reassessment Peer Review Questions provided by the module leader. Using the questions, you must
complete a peer review for Reassessment Draft Academic Paper 1 and Reassessment Draft
Academic Paper 2. The questions are mapped to the Module Learning Outcomes (MLOs) presented in
Section 6 below. You must write and submit both peer reviews in a single Microsoft Word 365 document
called Reassessment Peer Review.
Peer Review Submission
The module leader will give you access to the Turnitin digital submission point for Peer Review once
SLAS has provided the module leader with its official list of reassessment students.
You will use a Turnitin digital submission point at Content > Reassessment > Peer Review
(Reassessment) to submit your single Microsoft Word 365 document called Reassessment Peer
Review.
You must be careful when submitting your digital file because your first submission attempt is deemed
final. Therefore, you cannot ask the module leader to give you a second opportunity should you
inadvertently submit an incorrect file. You can find the minimum and maximum word limits for Peer
Review below from Section 4.1. According to Northumbria University’s Late Submission of Work and
Extension Requests Policy, the module leader will penalise unauthorised late submissions.

3.2 Academic Paper

The Academic Paper aims to help you develop your academic skills in literature reviewing, critical
thinking, evaluative academic writing with integrity and accuracy in using in-text citations to underpin your
narrative theoretically.

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 3 of 7

Academic Paper Assignment
When preparing to write your Academic Paper, the module leader expects you to consider the following
two theoretical stands associated with group dynamics:
1. There is a considerable body of knowledge in psychology and the social sciences called group

dynamics that examines how people work in small groups or teams; this research has been collected
over the past century and has developed into a broad base of knowledge about the operation of
groups.

2. The use of teams in the workplace has expanded rapidly during recent decades. Management
researchers and applied social scientists have studied this development to advise organisations on
how to make teams operate more efficiently and develop individual and group competencies.

Taking these strands into consideration, you should unite and contextualise critical theories associated with
team dynamics from psychology and the social sciences with critical theories related to groups, teams, and
management processes from management and organisation sciences to write an Academic Paper that
challenges the following statement:
Understanding the group dynamics within teams does not provide insight into the factors that influence
our behaviour and that of our team members. Neither does it facilitate effective team leadership to
promote team cohesion and success.

Academic Paper Submission

The module leader will give you access to the Turnitin digital submission point for the Academic Paper
once SLAS has provided the module leader with its official list of reassessment students.
You will submit a digital copy of your Academic Paper in Microsoft 365 Word format using the Microsoft
365 Word Template provided by the module leader to a Turnitin digital submission at Content >
Reassessment > Academic Paper (Reassessment). The template is available from Content >
Reassessment > Microsoft 365 Word Template. You must submit your Academic Paper anonymously.
You must be careful when submitting your digital file because your first submission attempt is deemed
final. Therefore, you cannot ask the module leader to give you a second opportunity should you
inadvertently upload the wrong file. You can find the maximum word limit for the Academic Paper below
from Section 4.2. According to Northumbria University’s Late Submission of Work and Extension
Requests Policy, the module leader will penalise unauthorised late submissions.

4 Word Limits
4.1 Peer Review

The Reassessment Peer Review Questions will direct you to answer a short series of questions based
on the MLOs, presented in Section 6 below. Each question has a minimum word count of 50.
However, there is no maximum word limit. The module leader will penalise you by awarding you 0% for
Peer Review if you do not satisfy the minimum word count for each question for each student’s draft
Academic Paper.
4.2 Academic Paper
You must declare the word count of your Academic Paper in the relevant section of the Microsoft 365
Word Template the module leader gave you. The maximum word limit for the Academic Paper is 3,000
words, excluding the Abstract, which has a separate 200-word limit. The Academic Paper word limit
includes the following elements:
? The main body of the text
? In-text citations, e.g., (Smith, 2011) or Smith (2011)
? Direct quotations from primary or secondary source materials
You can exclude the following elements when calculating the word count of your Academic Paper:
? Title
? Abstract (no more than 200 words)

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 4 of 7

? Keywords (no more than three keywords)
? Figures
? Tables
? Reference list
You are not allowed to include the following elements when writing your Academic Paper:
? Table of contents or illustrations
? Appendices
? Bibliography
? Endnotes
? Footnotes
? Glossary of terms

5 Referencing Style

The module leader requires you to write your Academic Paper in an academically acceptable format with
integrity. Using the Harvard Cite Them Right method, you must present your bibliographic citations in the
body of your Academic Paper and reference list. Cite Them Right is freely available to Northumbria
University students at https://www.citethemrightonline.com/. You must enter your Northumbria University
online user credentials to access the online guide.

6 Module Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of the Academic Paper, you will be able to:
6.1 Knowledge and understanding:
1. Define and evaluate selected key theories and concepts associated with the main characteristics and

processes of teams, the issues facing teams, and the organisational context of teams.
2. Critically appraise selected key theories and techniques associated with the groups and teams in an

organisation, organisational structures, and management processes.
6.2 Intellectual/professional skills and abilities:
3. Empowered with the knowledge, skills, and abilities to create, participate in, and effectively lead real

and virtual project-orientated teams.
4. Critically review the literature on team dynamics, management, and organisational behaviour and

engage with what others have written through evaluative discourse.
6.3 Personal values attribute:
5. Exhibit the professional ethics characteristics of a University postgraduate student.

7 Assessment Criteria

The academic staff marking your Academic Paper will use the assessment criteria matrix (see Section 8
below) to grade your submitted work. The Module Assessment Criteria Matrix uses Northumbria
University’s postgraduate descriptor as its educational base.
When you receive your summative assessment feedback, academic staff will give you feedback using the
Triple Plus/Delta Retrospective, which includes ‘three things you did well’ and ‘three things you need to
improve.’

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 5 of 7

8 Module Assessment Criteria Matrix

9 Reassessment: First-Sit or Re-Sit
You must note the module leader cannot give unauthorised students not included in SLAS’s official list of
reassessment students access to reassessment resources. If the module leader has not notified you he will
provide you with access to the reassessment resources when you think you should have access, you should
arrange to speak with a member of the Ask4Help team.

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 6 of 7

Suppose the Chair of the Examination Board (EB) grants you a reassessment attempt of the module,
either a First-Sit or Re-Sit. In that case, the module leader will give you access to the reassessment
resources, either Coursework or Examination (depending upon the Module Specification).
The reassessment period will typically occur after the end-of-level EB. However, the EB may grant you
an early reassessment before reaching your end-of-level stage. You can find details of when
Northumbria University’s Assessment/Reassessment Periods will be in Northumbria University’s
Academic Calendar, which you can access from its website or the Student Portal.
During the reassessment, the module leader recommends that you reflect on the feedback you received
following your First-Sit attempt to make appropriate revisions to your reassessment attempt.
When the reassessment is Coursework, the module leader will require you to revise your First-Sit attempt
submission; however, for an Examination, the module leader will require you to take another Examination
using the Bb Test tool.
The module leader will place any additional resources needed to complete your reassessment attempt in
Content > Reassessment on the Bb module once SLAS has provided the module leader with its
official list of reassessment students. You should read the Reassessment Brief in both cases to
ensure you complete all required reassessment tasks correctly. You can access the appropriate
submission points during reassessment from Content > Reassessment on the Bb module once SLAS
has provided the module leader with its official list of reassessment students.
After receiving official notification from SLAS of the reassessment students, the module leader will contact
you by Bb Message to notify you of your ability to access the reassessment resources and the
submission date(s) and time deadline(s) for the reassessment(s) for Coursework. However, if the
reassessment is an Examination, you will be notified by SLAS when and where the reassessment
Examination will take place. SLAS will publish this information in Northumbria University’s
Examination Timetable in the Student Portal.
You should note that a reassessment Examination will take place on campus. Suppose you are an international
student planning to return home briefly during the summer and would like to request that you take a
reassessment Examination overseas in your home country. In this case, refer to SLAS’s knowledge base article
(KBA) published on the Student Portal here.

Suppose you become eligible to complete a reassessment attempt but cannot do so. Subject to an
approved Personal Extenuating Circumstances (PEC) application, the EB may, by exception, allow
you to re-take the module at the next scheduled delivery. If you pass the module following a Re-Sit
attempt, you will only be awarded the pass mark for level 7 modules, i.e., 50%.

10 Guidance for Students on Policies for Assessment

Northumbria University has many policies for assessment. The Student Portal contains guidance for
current students on these policies, including relevant procedures and forms.
Current students can access the Student Portal and search for information and guidance on a range of
topics, including:
1. Assessment regulations and policies
2. Summary information for students, including how Northumbria University sets assessments, how

Northumbria University marks with fairness and how to act on your module assignment feedback
3. Managing assessments in emergency scenarios
4. Assessment Feedback and Northumbria University’s Anonymous Marking Policy
5. Examinations and conduct in learning environments
6. Late submission of work and extension requests
7. Personal Extenuating Circumstances (PECs)
8. Student appeals and complaints
9. Academic misconduct
10. Disability and unforeseen medical circumstances
11. Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA)

Dr Allan Osborne | KA7064 People in Project Management Page 7 of 7

If you are a current student but do not have access to the Student Portal, you should view the
Assessment Regulations and Policies web page.

1 Key Information

1.1 Module title
1.2 Module code number
1.3 Module level and credit points
1.4 Summative reassessment component(s) and weighting(s)
1.5 Module leader
1.6 Reassessment Period
1.7 Cohort

2 Reassessment Submission and Feedback

2.1 Reassessment overview
2.2 Release date of reassessment brief
2.3 Medium used to disseminate reassessment brief
2.4 Dates and times of submissions
2.5 Return date of your unconfirmed internally moderated marks and feedback
2.6 Mechanism for return of your unconfirmed marks and feedback

3 Peer Review and Academic Paper

3.1 Peer Review

3.1.1 Peer Review Assignment
3.1.2 Peer Review Submission

3.2 Academic Paper

3.2.1 Academic Paper Assignment
3.2.2 Academic Paper Submission

4 Word Limits

4.1 Peer Review
4.2 Academic Paper

5 Referencing Style
6 Module Learning Outcomes

6.1 Knowledge and understanding:
6.2 Intellectual/professional skills and abilities:
6.3 Personal values attribute:

7 Assessment Criteria
8 Module Assessment Criteria Matrix
9 Reassessment: First-Sit or Re-Sit
10 Guidance for Students on Policies for Assessment

The Right to Die with Euthanasia Methods Nursing Assignment Help

Analyze U.S. healthcare policy structures and the role of the nursing leader as a change agent at the public policy table.
Directions
You will decide on a policy issue that needs to be addressed. You may choose a policy issue that interests you. Below are suggested topics for proposed policy change, however if you wish to address another topic please contact your instructor for approval:
Treatment of veterans after deployment and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Cost of end of life care.
Costs of drugs in the United States as compared to other countries.

Quarantine of health care workers that have been exposed to communicable diseases.
Medical care for illegal immigrants.
Right to die with euthanasia methods.
Disclosure of medical records of pilots and other safety sensitive professionals and HIPAA violations.
Restrictions of roles of nurse practitioners and advanced practice nurses in certain states.
Health care reform.
Requirements of meaningful use to meet core measures.
ICD-10 issues.
Entry into practice issues.
Mandatory vaccination of children.
Allowing nurses educated in other countries to practice in the United States.
Faculty shortages in U.S. nursing education programs.
You will write a letter using professional business format to one of your Federal legislators outlining what the issue is and why it is important. The letter will address:
The current policy structure.
The need for the change.

The suggested change.
Cost implications if the change is implemented.

The role the nurse as a change agent will take at the policy table. 
Assignment Requirements
Before finalizing your work, you should:
be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above);
consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and

utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.
Your writing Assignment should:
follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;

display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is important to analyze U.S. healthcare policy structures and the role of nursing leaders as change agents at the public policy table. This topic explores the impact of policy changes on various aspects of healthcare and emphasizes the role of nursing leaders in advocating for necessary changes. The assignment requires students to choose a policy issue, understand the current policy structure, propose a change, assess the cost implications, and discuss the role of nurses as change agents.
Answer:
Title: Analyzing the Role of Nursing Leaders in U.S. Healthcare Policy Structures
Introduction:
In the field of healthcare, policy plays a crucial role in shaping the delivery, accessibility, and quality of care. Understanding the U.S. healthcare policy structures and the role of nursing leaders as change agents at the public policy table is vital for medical college students. This assignment provides an opportunity for students to critically assess a policy issue and explore the potential impact of policy changes. Additionally, it highlights the significance of nursing leaders in advocating for these changes and initiating positive transformations in the healthcare system.
Answer:
When addressing a policy issue, it is essential to thoroughly analyze the current policy structure. This involves examining the existing policies, regulations, and guidelines that govern the particular issue. For example, if the chosen topic is the cost of end-of-life care, students should consider the current reimbursement mechanisms, insurance coverage policies, and healthcare funding allocations related to this aspect of care. Understanding the context in which the issue exists helps students identify areas that require change.
Following the assessment of the current policy structure, students should focus on highlighting the need for change. This involves identifying the reasons or challenges that necessitate policy modifications. For instance, to support the treatment of veterans suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), students may emphasize the increasing number of veterans affected by mental health conditions due to their service and the inadequacy of existing policies to address their specialized healthcare needs. Clearly articulating the need for change creates a strong foundation for advocating policy reforms.
Next, students should propose the change they believe would be beneficial in addressing the identified issue. This requires students to provide a well-reasoned recommendation for modifying the existing policies. For instance, in the case of nurse practitioners and advanced practice nurses facing restrictions in certain states, students may propose expanded scopes of practice or a uniform regulatory framework that allows these professionals to practice to the full extent of their education and training. The proposed change should align with the identified need and offer a viable solution.
Furthermore, it is crucial to assess the cost implications of implementing the proposed change. Students should thoroughly analyze the potential financial impact associated with policy modifications. This assessment should consider the costs related to training, infrastructure, staffing, and resource allocation required to support the intended change. By analyzing the potential costs, students can evaluate the feasibility of their proposed change and consider potential funding sources or cost-saving strategies.
Lastly, students need to recognize the role of nurses as change agents at the policy table. Nursing leaders can leverage their clinical expertise, research skills, and advocacy abilities to influence policy decisions. For example, nurses can participate in policy discussions, engage in lobbying efforts, conduct research to support evidence-based policies, and collaborate with other healthcare stakeholders to drive change. Emphasizing the role of nursing leaders as change agents reinforces their importance in shaping healthcare policy and highlights their influence in ensuring the delivery of high-quality, patient-centered care.
In conclusion, analyzing U.S. healthcare policy structures and understanding the role of nursing leaders as change agents at the public policy table is crucial for medical college students. This assignment provides an opportunity to explore a policy issue, assess the current policy structure, propose a change, evaluate the cost implications, and recognize the vital role of nursing leaders. By engaging in such activities, students will develop a deeper understanding of healthcare policy dynamics and the impact their future roles may have in shaping policy and implementing positive changes in the healthcare system.

Kendriya Vidyalaya Current and Emerging Technologies Discussion

Discussion Forum 2Topic: We all had the unfortunate experience of seeing how computers can, at times, make life’s journey abit more difficult. This is especially true in knowledge centric workplaces. Describe an example of a very poorly implemented database that you’ve encountered (or read about) that illustrates the potential for really messing things up. Include, in your description, an analysis of what might have caused the problems and potential solutions to them. Be sure to provide supporting evidence, with citations from the literature. As with the first discussion topic, it is not enough for you to simply create a own posting. You must read the postings of the other members of the class and comment on each of them. Please see Discussion Forum of the class syllabus for additional details on content.Reply 1:-1) According to Martinez (2017), organizations heavily use database systems in the management of their data and information. A good database will make processes of data sharing and access to information across all departments easier and efficient. This in return helps improve how services and processes are being handled within the organization. However, there are incidents when databases can be quite a headache within an organization and this due to the issues that arise due to poor implementation. According to there are so many causes of poor database implementation within an organization. Most of these issues are directly linked with poor design choices of the databases as well as errors that may occur in the processes of developing or designing a database. Some of the errors that could lead to poor database implementation include lack of naming standards or the lack of documentation.One of the common database issues that is encountered within organization is the problem of poor naming conventions. According to Martinez (2017), poor naming conventions is a common mistake that could be easily made more especially when working on an already existing database. This is because one needs to first understand all the information and by what names is the information stored in the tables and columns. This is a task that could be complicated when one starts to relate the tables and columns for more large databases. The names could be messy and create confusion in the whole database, making the database unreadable. To provide solutions to such an issue, programmers or developers of the databases should make use of the existing database naming guidelines that can be found on the internet to reduce the chance of such errors or problems being encountered.Reply 2:A defectively executed database can be dangerous amid work. Right off the bat, it is essential to comprehend what poor people database is. An ineffectively planned database is subject to cause the accompanying issues: connected information can be spread over various compartments or records; the information can be conflicting; the database can be unessentially intricate making it difficult to comprehend, data can be in consecutive making it difficult to get it. This sort of complexities can be exceptionally dangerous particularly in learning driven databases (Kanuka and Adane, 2018). Such issues emerge because of the accompanying reasons: undermining the information reason, excess, insufficient naming practices, poor ordering, essential composite keys, no legitimate usage of DBE machine, couple of limitations or poor referral honesty, deficient normalizations, and so on.Whenever seen from IT’s perspective, the database seems unclear. The database is comprised of codes separated into two areas related to IT. The models for testing the examining consistency in IT associations are not met by the two areas of code. The database seems in reverse for such associations and isn’t even sufficiently able to embrace an adequate evaluating process. from the earliest starting point, most of the organizations engaged with evaluating battle looking for an IT verification prospect for the database. Further, it very well may be surmised that the designers essentially passed by the rules which are actualized in money related frameworks to forestall any episodes of extortion, at the same time neglected the parts of diminishing defenselessness. The database has ceaselessly flopped in its proposed establishment to satisfy the specialized job, the board, and guideline of bookkeeping. The exact specialized viewpoints in respect to the capacity of the framework are ignored by the SOX rulesEven though PCs are executed for a smooth result of works, on occasion they can make the buckle down to do, more so with an ineffectively actualized database. One such case of an ineffectively actualized database that one can run over is the SOX database. SOX, which was executed after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, to battle with the misrepresentation by discovering bookkeeping reviews just as the executives of money related records which are proficient. It ought to be noticed that a database ought to dependably keep two key elements kept up, right off the bat, a specific expectation for which it has been actualized and second, the executives and information associations ought to be well set up. It tends to be gathered that the database engineers flopped in including the aspects of controlling misrepresentation in the framework. Or maybe just the unmistakable violations were focused on. This left enough gaps that could be used to misuse the SOS frameworkTo attack such issues the potential the arrangement can be going for electronic administration rather than physical information and going for information wellbeing. In spite of the fact that this inadequately executed database gave a façade of the executives which was continuously encouraged in numerous organizations before, it very well may be evident that the specialized were influencing the framework. Since the misstep is forthright, this ought to be improved and fixed to improve PC activities.Note:-Its a Discussion and two replies for above questioni need everything in separate documents as 1st document should be discussion , 2nd document should be reply 1 and 3rd document should be reply 2.make sure no turnitin and no plagiarism please dont copy it from any source write in your own words.make sure you write everything in own wordsPlease dont copy from any source we have a turnitin.And send me three documents in different folder.send me files according to attached pic

HCM 630 Impact of HCAHPS on Patient Satisfaction Paper Nursing Assignment Help

Your healthcare facility’s HCAHPS survey score for physician communication has had a drop in the top box score for the last two quarters.
The CEO of the 80-bed hospital has asked you to write a brief paper that offers three specific evidence-based strategies to improve the score and provides a rationale for each of the selected strategies. Your comparison must include the following critical elements:

Three evidence-based strategies to improve the score by the next quarter.
A rationale for each of the three evidence-based strategies identified.
Explanation of how the selected strategies will be evaluated.
Explanation of how selected strategies will be incorporated into the internal structure of the healthcare environment.
A plan for enlisting the cooperation of the medical staff.

In this assignment, you will have the opportunity to engage in a real-world process completed by a healthcare manager that occurs frequently in healthcare organizations. The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey assesses the patient’s healthcare experience and, because of this, receives a good deal of attention from healthcare leadership and staff. In this scenario, you are faced with low provider scores in the area of physician communication. Your assignment is to develop evidence-based strategies to address the issue and explain how these strategies will be implemented in the healthcare organization. 
Prompt: Your healthcare facility’s HCAHPS survey score for physician communication has had a drop in the top box score for the last two quarters. The chief executive officer of the 80-bed hospital has asked you to write a brief paper that offers three specific evidence-based strategies to improve the score and provides a rationale for each of the selected strategies. 
Your comparison must include the following critical elements: 

?  Three evidence-based strategies to improve the score by the next quarter. 
?  A rationale for each of the three evidence-based strategies identified. 
?  Explanation of how the selected strategies will be evaluated. 
?  Explanation of how the selected strategies will be incorporated into the internal structure of the healthcare environment. 
?  A plan for enlisting the cooperation of the medical staff.  

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The drop in the top box score for physician communication in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey is a concerning issue that requires immediate attention. In this paper, three evidence-based strategies will be proposed to improve the score by the next quarter. A rationale for each strategy will be provided, along with an explanation of how these strategies will be evaluated and incorporated into the internal structure of the healthcare environment. Additionally, a plan for enlisting the cooperation of the medical staff will be outlined.
Answer:
Three evidence-based strategies to improve the HCAHPS survey score for physician communication by the next quarter are:
1. Implement Communication Skills Training for Physicians:
Rationale: Providing communication skills training for physicians is crucial as effective communication plays a vital role in patient-centered care. By enhancing physicians’ communication skills, they will be better equipped to engage with patients, listen to their concerns, and address their queries with empathy and clarity. This training will contribute to improved patient satisfaction and comprehension, ultimately leading to higher HCAHPS scores.
2. Enhance Interdisciplinary Collaboration:
Rationale: Collaborative teamwork among healthcare professionals is pivotal in achieving optimal patient outcomes. By fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, physicians can work closely with nurses, social workers, and other healthcare team members to streamline communication channels. This will result in improved coordination of care, reduced medical errors, and increased patient satisfaction. The implementation of interdisciplinary rounds and shared decision-making processes can facilitate this collaboration.
3. Implement Technology Solutions to Enhance Communication:
Rationale: Integrating technology solutions can significantly improve communication between physicians and patients. Implementation of secure messaging systems or telehealth platforms can facilitate efficient communication, allowing patients to ask questions, receive timely updates, and share concerns with their physicians remotely. Enhancing communication through technology can lead to increased patient engagement and satisfaction, ultimately improving HCAHPS scores.
Explanation of how the selected strategies will be evaluated:
To evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies, the following methods can be employed:
1. Patient Surveys: Conduct regular patient surveys specific to physician communication to assess the impact of the implemented strategies. Analyzing changes in patient satisfaction scores and feedback can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of the interventions.
2. Staff Feedback: Seek feedback from physicians and other healthcare professionals regarding the perceived impact of the strategies on their communication skills and interdisciplinary collaboration. This feedback can provide crucial information on areas that need improvement and highlight successful practices.
3. Review of HCAHPS Scores: Continuously monitor the HCAHPS scores, specifically focusing on the physician communication domain. Regularly reviewing the scores will help in tracking the progress and identifying any fluctuations that may indicate the effectiveness of the implemented strategies.
Explanation of how the selected strategies will be incorporated into the internal structure of the healthcare environment:
The selected strategies will be incorporated into the internal structure of the healthcare environment through the following steps:
1. Training Programs: Establish communication skills training programs for physicians that can be integrated into their professional development curriculum. These programs can be conducted on a regular basis, ensuring continuous improvement in communication skills.
2. Interdisciplinary Meetings and Protocols: Implement regular interdisciplinary meetings and develop protocols to facilitate collaboration among healthcare professionals. This can include setting up standardized communication channels and processes to ensure effective communication and information sharing.
3. Technology Integration: Collaborate with the hospital’s IT department to identify and implement suitable technology solutions for enhancing communication. This may involve integrating secure messaging systems, telehealth platforms, or patient portals into the existing healthcare technology infrastructure.
A plan for enlisting the cooperation of the medical staff:
To enlist the cooperation of the medical staff, the following steps can be taken:
1. Educate and Raise Awareness: Conduct educational sessions or workshops that highlight the importance of effective physician communication in improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. Emphasize how the selected strategies will benefit both patients and physicians.
2. Provide Resources and Support: Offer readily available resources, such as training materials, guidelines, and faculty support, to assist physicians in enhancing their communication skills and participating in interdisciplinary collaboration.
3. Recognize and Celebrate Success: Acknowledge and appreciate physicians who demonstrate exceptional communication skills and actively engage in interdisciplinary teamwork. Establish recognition programs or incentives to motivate others to actively participate and improve their communication practices.
By implementing these steps, healthcare organizations can work towards improving physician communication, leading to enhanced patient satisfaction and improved HCAHPS scores.

week 2 assignment 1 Informed Consent Nursing Assignment Help

Informed Consent
The Belmont Report (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1979) specifically describ es the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects, which came about due to the abuse of human subjects in biomedical experiments during World War II. A significant part of these guidelines relates to ensuring that the people participating in research fully understand the risks and benefits of being part of the study. We define the process of informing study participants of those risks and benefits as “informed consent”. Today, all research involving human subjects must involve informed consent. For this assignment, you will imagine that you are conducting a research study and will develop an informed consent form for it. To begin, read through the following scenario for a potential experiment. Then, using this week’s readings as a guide, draft a formal consent form that each participant will sign prior to agreeing to their participation in the research study.
Scenario:
Imagine that you are the lead researcher at a pharmaceuticals laboratory. You have just discovered a new pill that has the potential to cure Type 1 diabetes in human beings. A five-year randomized controlled study using chimpanzees found that diabetes was cured in the animals who took a daily dose of 500mg of your new drug, DIA123. Specifically, the research found that:
After two years of taking 500mg of DIA123, diabetes was no longer an issue among 78% of the chimps, and they no longer needed insulin injections.
The dosage was decreased to 250mg for year three, and the diabetes never returned.
DIA123 was eliminated in years four and five, and the diabetes never returned.
No additional exercise or dietary restrictions aided in the study. Therefore, the analysis strongly supported the hypothesis that DIA123 was the primary cause of the elimination of diabetes.
While the diabetes issue was eliminated, the research discovered a few side effects:
2% of the chimps suffered from moderate to severe diarrhea, which started within a month of taking the pills. This led to the possibility of dehydration, so careful monitoring of liquids was necessary.
15% of the chimps suffered from excessive heart palpitations during the three years taking DIA123. Due to the length of the study, the long-term impacts of these heart palpitations are unknown.
18% of the chimps suffered from a loss of libido, which did not dissipate after discontinuing DIA123 in years four and five.

25% of the chimps suffered from mild depression while taking DIA123 during years one through three. The depression dissipated for approximately half of the chimps after discontinuing DIA123 in years four and five, but continued for the other half.
Because of the public health implications of such a drug, the Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration approved a new five-year study with the use of male and female human subjects ages 18 to 55. An experiment will be done with humans that is identical to the one conducted with the chimpanzees. The participants will not receive any remuneration for their participation, which is fully voluntary.
Your job is to create the informed consent form for this study. Use one of the sample templates in the resource materials to help guide you. Make sure you address all of the necessary questions that are outlined in the Ethics and Informed Consent (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (University of Connecticut, n.d.) document.
The Informed Consent Form

Must be one to two pages in length, formatted appropriately as an informed consent form.
Must include a separate title page with the following:

Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name

Date submitted

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction: Informed consent is an ethical requirement in research involving human subjects. It ensures that participants are fully aware of the risks and benefits of their participation before agreeing to be a part of the study. This assignment requires the development of an informed consent form for a hypothetical research study. The scenario involves a pharmaceutical laboratory conducting a five-year randomized controlled study on a new drug for treating Type 1 diabetes. The consent form should address all necessary questions outlined in the Ethics and Informed Consent guidelines.
Answer:
Informed Consent Form
Title of Study: Study on the Efficacy and Side Effects of DIA123 in Treating Type 1 Diabetes
Principal Investigator: [Insert Name]
Study Location: [Insert Study Location]
1. Purpose of the Study:
The purpose of this research study is to investigate the effectiveness and side effects of DIA123, a potential treatment for Type 1 diabetes, in human subjects. The study aims to replicate the findings observed in a previous study on chimpanzees, which showed promising outcomes in diabetes elimination.
2. Procedures and Duration of the Study:
Participants will be required to take a daily dose of 500mg of DIA123 for the first two years of the study. The dosage will be reduced to 250mg for the third year, and no medication will be administered in the fourth and fifth years. The study will have a total duration of five years, with periodic evaluations and assessments throughout the study period.
3. Potential Risks and Side Effects:
Participants should be aware of the potential risks and side effects associated with taking DIA123. These include:
– Moderate to severe diarrhea, which may lead to dehydration. Participants will be required to monitor their liquid intake carefully.
– Excessive heart palpitations, although the long-term impacts of these palpitations are currently unknown.
– Loss of libido, which may persist even after discontinuing the medication in years four and five.
– Mild depression experienced by some participants during the first three years of the study. While the depression may dissipate for some participants, it may continue for others.
4. Potential Benefits:
Based on the previous study with chimpanzees, the potential benefits of participating in this study include the elimination of Type 1 diabetes and the cessation of insulin injections.
5. Voluntary Participation and Withdrawal:
Participation in this study is entirely voluntary, and participants have the right to withdraw their consent at any time without penalty or loss of benefits.
6. Confidentiality:
All participant information will be kept strictly confidential. No identifiable information will be shared publicly or with any third party without explicit consent, except as required by law.
7. Contact Information:
If participants have any questions or concerns about the study, they may contact the Principal Investigator at [Insert Contact Information].
I have read and understood the information provided in this consent form, and I voluntarily agree to participate in this research study. I understand that I may withdraw my consent at any time without consequences.
Participant Signature: _______________________ Date: _______________
Printed Name: _________________________________________________
For Researcher’s Use Only:
Participant ID: ________________

Assignment Rubric: Written Assignment 1 (15%): How Does the Media Portray Nutrition Science? Oftentimes the public consumes nutrition and health information not from original research but from media r Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Rubric: Written Assignment 1 (15%): How Does the Media Portray Nutrition Science?Oftentimes the public consumes nutrition and health information not from original research but from media reportsof research. For this assignment, you will write a review article evaluating the credibility of a popular press portrayalof a published nutrition research paper. You will be provided the media article and the research paper during thefirst week of class. The overarching goal of this essay is to make an argument about the implications of the media’srepresentation of scientific research, using the media article and the scientific paper. This review should be between2,000 and 2,500 words. Your review should have an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. The introductionshould contain a thesis statement or your main argument about how well the media article portrayed the researcharticle. Within the body of your review, you should include the following:a. How well does the media portray the study design? What, if any, are key misinterpretations orinformation gaps in the media article portrayal of the study design?b. What are the key findings in the scientific paper? How well does the media portray the keyfindings? Were key findings omitted? What are the implications of these omission ormisrepresentations?c. Does the title of the media article portray the findings of the article? If not, suggest a new titlethat is more accurated. Are key limitations of the scientific article acknowledged in the media article? Can you think of anyother limitations not mentioned in either article that should be included?e. Does the media article provide adequate background information on the topic? If not, whatadditional context would be helpful to readers?f. What are the implications of potential misrepresentation of scientific studies? Be specific aboutthe scientific paper’s coverage in the media, if you think the media misrepresented aspects of thestudy. Also, comment more broadly on how misrepresentation of scientific research, especially when itcomes to food and health, could be problematic.Students may quote passages from the texts to strengthen their arguments; however, these should be used tohighlight and exemplify arguments rather that comprise the entirety of the paper.
Guidelines: Assignments should be in Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced with 1-inch margins. Whennaming your assignment file, be sure to include your last name and the first initial of your first name and theassignment number (e.g., BeckM_Assignment2). References should be formatted according to the AmericanPsychology Association (APA) style guide and should be submitted on a new page in the document, instead ofdirectly below the assignment text. Using a reference manager such as RefWorks or Mendeley is highlyrecommended for formatting references and can help save time. Be sure to spell-check your paper. Put the totalword count after the title of your assignment. Submit as a Word document or PDF file to the assignment link in 2CH. Papers that exceed the maximum word limit will receive a 2-point deductionfor each 100 additional words. Paper submitted late will receive a deduction of 1 point for every 24 hours late. Word count 2000-2500 words.Papers later than 72 hours will be given a 0
Criteria: 
Introduction
Study Design
Author Viewpoints of Key Findings of Article
Analysis
Title
Limitations
Background
Misrepresentation
Summary Paragraph and Conclusion
Research Article: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl8007
Media Article:

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The media plays a critical role in shaping public perception and understanding of various topics, including nutrition science. Often, the general population relies on media reports of research rather than accessing original scientific studies. This assignment aims to evaluate the credibility of a popular press portrayal of a published nutrition research paper. By analyzing both the media article and the scientific paper, students are tasked with making an argument about the implications of the media’s representation of scientific research. This review article should critically assess the media’s portrayal of the study design, key findings, title accuracy, limitations, background information, and potential misrepresentation of scientific studies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the media’s impact on the public’s perception of nutrition science.
Answer:
Within the introduction, students should clearly state their main argument or thesis about how well the media article portrayed the research article. This will set the tone for the rest of the review and guide the reader’s understanding of the author’s viewpoint.
Study Design:
In the body of the review, students should assess how well the media portrayed the study design. They should identify any key misinterpretations or information gaps present in the media article’s portrayal of the study design. Students should analyze whether the media accurately explained the experimental design, sample size, control groups, and any other methodological aspects that are relevant to the research study.
Author Viewpoints of Key Findings of Article:
Next, students should evaluate how well the media portrayed the key findings of the scientific paper. They should highlight whether any key findings were completely omitted in the media article’s portrayal and discuss the implications of such omissions or misrepresentations. It is important to critically analyze whether the media accurately conveyed the significance and implications of the study’s findings.
Analysis:
Students should offer a thorough analysis of the media’s portrayal of the research article. This may involve comparing and contrasting the media’s presentation with the scientific paper. It is essential for students to provide evidence and examples from both sources to support their analysis.
Title:
In this section, students should determine whether the title of the media article accurately portrays the findings of the research article. If not, they should suggest a new title that is more accurate. Additionally, students should assess whether the media article acknowledges any key limitations of the scientific article. If there are limitations that were not mentioned in either article, students should identify and discuss them.
Background:
Students should evaluate whether the media article provides adequate background information on the topic. If not, they should identify the specific areas where additional context would be helpful to the readers. The goal is to assess whether the media article sets the stage appropriately for understanding the research study.
Misrepresentation:
In this section, students should discuss the implications of potential misrepresentation of scientific studies. They should be specific about the scientific paper’s coverage in the media and identify instances where the media may have misrepresented aspects of the study. It is important to comment more broadly on how misrepresentation of scientific research, especially in the context of food and health, can be problematic.
Summary Paragraph and Conclusion:
The review should conclude with a summary paragraph that summarizes the main arguments made throughout the paper. The conclusion should reiterate the main thesis statement and provide a clear and concise closing statement about the implications of media representation of scientific research in the field of nutrition science.
It is important for students to support their arguments with evidence and examples from both the media article and the scientific paper. Additionally, proper formatting according to APA style, correct spelling, and adherence to word count guidelines are necessary for a successful submission.

Theories of Health Promotion and Diversity Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

Read chapter 4, 13 & 14 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentations.  Once done, answer the following questions;

Discuss various theories of health promotion, including Pender’s Health Promotion Model, the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action.
Discuss at least two definitions of health.
Critically analyze racial and cultural diversity in the United States.
Describe the importance of air, water and food quality as a determinant of health.

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
In the field of medical education, it is vital for medical college students to acquire a strong foundation in various aspects of health promotion, understanding definitions of health, analyzing racial and cultural diversity, and recognizing the importance of environmental factors on health. As a medical professor, it is my responsibility to provide comprehensive lectures and design assignments that enhance students’ understanding of these critical topics. In this document, I will provide answers to the assigned questions regarding theories of health promotion, definitions of health, racial and cultural diversity, and the impact of air, water, and food quality on health.
Answer to Question 1:
Various theories of health promotion play a fundamental role in guiding healthcare professionals’ efforts to enhance and maintain the health of individuals and communities. Four notable theories in this field are discussed below:
a) Pender’s Health Promotion Model: Developed by Nola J. Pender, this theory emphasizes the role of personal behaviors and individual characteristics in promoting health. The model highlights the importance of self-efficacy, perceived benefits and barriers, interpersonal influences, and situational influences on health-promoting behaviors. It acknowledges that individuals have the ability to take control of their health through proactive decision-making and the adoption of healthy behaviors.
b) Health Belief Model: This theory suggests that an individual’s belief in the severity of a health condition, susceptibility to it, benefits of taking preventive action, and barriers to such action influence their likelihood of engaging in health-promoting behaviors. It emphasizes the significance of perception and motivation in adopting preventive measures and has been widely used to understand individuals’ decision-making processes regarding healthcare.
c) Transtheoretical Theory: Also known as the Stages of Change Model, this theory proposes that individuals go through distinct stages when adopting health behaviors. The stages include precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. This model recognizes that individuals have different readiness levels to change and provides strategies to tailor interventions accordingly. It highlights the importance of understanding an individual’s stage of change to effectively promote health-related behavioral changes.
d) Theory of Reasoned Action: This theory focuses on behavioral intentions as a predictor of behavior. It suggests that individuals’ intentions to engage in a particular behavior are influenced by their attitudes toward the behavior and the subjective norms associated with it. This theory considers the role of social influences and individual beliefs in promoting health-related behaviors.
Answer to Question 2:
Health can be defined and interpreted in various ways, with different perspectives presenting unique aspects of well-being. Here are two definitions of health:
a) World Health Organization (WHO) Definition: The WHO defines health as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. This definition highlights the holistic nature of health and emphasizes the importance of multiple dimensions, including physical, mental, and social aspects of well-being.
b) Biomedical Model Definition: The biomedical model of health defines health as the absence of disease or illness. This definition focuses primarily on the physiological or biological state of an individual and may not encompass the broader aspects of well-being.
It is essential to note that these definitions represent different perspectives, and healthcare professionals often adopt a broader and holistic understanding of health, considering multiple dimensions beyond the absence of disease.
Answer to Question 3:
Racial and cultural diversity significantly impact healthcare in the United States. Critical analysis of this diversity involves recognizing the influence of various cultures, race, socioeconomic status, and healthcare disparities on individuals’ health outcomes. By understanding racial and cultural diversity, healthcare professionals can provide more effective and culturally sensitive care. Some key points to consider regarding racial and cultural diversity in the United States include:
a) Healthcare disparities: Racial and ethnic minorities often experience healthcare disparities, including limited access to quality care, higher rates of chronic diseases, and poorer health outcomes. These disparities are influenced by factors such as discrimination, socioeconomic status, language barriers, cultural beliefs, and healthcare system biases.
b) Cultural competence: Healthcare providers need to be culturally competent, which involves understanding and respecting the cultural beliefs, values, and norms of diverse populations. Culturally competent care improves patient-provider relationships, enhances patient satisfaction, and promotes better health outcomes.
c) Health literacy: Racial and cultural diversity impact health literacy levels in the United States, with some communities facing challenges in understanding and accessing healthcare information. Healthcare providers must employ effective communication strategies and provide culturally appropriate health education materials to address these disparities.
By critically analyzing racial and cultural diversity, healthcare professionals can foster an inclusive and equitable healthcare system that meets the diverse needs of all individuals.
Answer to Question 4:
The quality of air, water, and food plays a crucial role as determinants of health. Here are the key points highlighting their importance:
a) Air Quality: Exposure to pollutants in the air, such as particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, can have detrimental effects on respiratory health, cardiovascular health, and overall well-being. Poor air quality contributes to an increased risk of respiratory diseases, allergies, asthma, and even lung cancer. It is essential to address air pollution through environmental regulations and promote public health initiatives that aim to reduce pollution levels.
b) Water Quality: Access to clean and safe drinking water is essential for maintaining good health. Contamination of water sources with harmful substances, bacteria, viruses, or chemicals can lead to waterborne diseases and other health hazards. Ensuring adequate water treatment, sanitation infrastructure, and monitoring systems are critical for preserving water quality and preventing waterborne illnesses.
c) Food Quality: The quality of the food we consume directly impacts our health. Poor food quality, such as consuming processed foods high in saturated fats, added sugars, and artificial additives, can contribute to the development of chronic conditions like obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Promoting access to fresh, nutritious, and culturally appropriate food options, as well as educating individuals about healthy eating habits, is crucial for improving overall health outcomes.
Recognizing the importance of air, water, and food quality as determinants of health allows healthcare professionals to advocate for environmental policies, educate individuals about healthy choices, and address public health issues related to these factors.
In conclusion, as a medical professor responsible for creating college assignments and evaluating student performance, it is crucial to address key topics related to health promotion, definitions of health, racial and cultural diversity, and environmental determinants of health. By providing comprehensive answers to these questions, students can enhance their understanding of these crucial aspects of medical education and practice.

Cultural Diversity and Environmental Health Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

Discuss various theories of health promotion, including Pender’s Health Promotion Model, the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action.
Discuss at least two definitions of health.

Critically analyze racial and cultural diversity in the United States.

Describe the importance of air, water and food quality as a determinant of health.

Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
In order to gain a comprehensive understanding of health promotion and its various theories, it is important to discuss models such as Pender’s Health Promotion Model, the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action. Additionally, the concept of health itself can be approached from various perspectives, each providing a unique definition. Furthermore, understanding racial and cultural diversity within the United States is crucial for healthcare professionals. Lastly, recognizing the significance of air, water, and food quality as determinants of health is essential. Let us now delve into each question and provide detailed answers.
Question 1: Discuss various theories of health promotion, including Pender’s Health Promotion Model, the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action.
Health promotion theories provide frameworks that guide healthcare professionals in advocating for and implementing strategies to enhance the overall well-being of individuals and communities. Among the prominent theories in this field are Pender’s Health Promotion Model, the Health Belief Model, the Transtheoretical Theory, and the Theory of Reasoned Action.
Pender’s Health Promotion Model emphasizes the importance of individual characteristics and experiences, as well as behavior-specific cognitions and affect, in promoting health-enhancing behaviors. It suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in positive health behaviors if they possess self-efficacy, perceive the benefits of the behavior, and believe in their ability to influence their own health outcomes.
The Health Belief Model focuses on how people’s beliefs about the severity of a health problem, the perceived benefits of action, and the barriers to taking action influence their readiness to act. It suggests that individuals are more likely to engage in preventative health behaviors if they perceive the threat as significant, believe that taking action will be effective, and believe that the benefits outweigh the costs.
The Transtheoretical Theory, also known as the Stages of Change model, proposes that individuals go through specific stages when attempting to change health behaviors. These stages include precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance. The theory emphasizes the importance of tailoring interventions to an individual’s stage of change to maximize the chances of success.
The Theory of Reasoned Action posits that individuals’ intentions to engage in a behavior are shaped by their attitudes towards that behavior and subjective norms. Attitudes reflect an individual’s evaluation of the behavior, while subjective norms refer to the perceived social pressure to perform or not perform the behavior. Interventions based on this theory aim to modify attitudes and subjective norms to influence behavioral intentions and ultimately promote positive health behaviors.
Question 2: Discuss at least two definitions of health.
Health can be defined from different perspectives, each providing unique insights into the concept. Two commonly acknowledged definitions are:
1. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. This definition recognizes that health is not solely determined by the absence of illness but encompasses all aspects of a person’s physical, mental, and social functioning.
2. The biomedical model of health, on the other hand, views health as the absence of disease or impairment. It focuses predominantly on diagnosing and treating specific diseases or conditions. Under this definition, an individual is considered healthy if there are no apparent signs or symptoms of illness.
It is important to note that both definitions have their merits and limitations. The WHO’s definition highlights the holistic nature of health, considering physical, mental, and social well-being. However, critics argue that this definition may be too idealistic and difficult to attain in practice. The biomedical model, while useful in diagnosing and treating diseases, may oversimplify the complexity of health by reducing it to a binary state of presence or absence of disease.
Question 3: Critically analyze racial and cultural diversity in the United States.
Racial and cultural diversity in the United States is a complex and multifaceted topic that plays a significant role in healthcare. It is crucial for medical college students to critically analyze this diversity in order to provide equitable and culturally competent care to all individuals.
The United States is known as a melting pot of cultures, with people from various racial, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds. This diversity brings both opportunities and challenges in healthcare. Understanding and respecting cultural diversity can help healthcare professionals deliver personalized care that aligns with patients’ beliefs, values, and preferences. It also enables them to be aware of and address health disparities that may exist within different racial and ethnic groups.
However, racial and cultural diversity in healthcare can also present challenges. Language barriers, cultural misunderstandings, and lack of cultural competence among healthcare providers can impede effective communication and hinder the delivery of optimal care. Additionally, racial and ethnic minorities often face disparities in access to healthcare, quality of care, and health outcomes. Recognizing these disparities and actively working towards eliminating them is essential for healthcare professionals.
In conclusion, medical college students should critically analyze racial and cultural diversity in the United States to enhance their cultural competence and deliver equitable care. By understanding diverse backgrounds, healthcare professionals can provide care that respects and incorporates patients’ cultural beliefs and practices while striving to eliminate health disparities among different racial and ethnic groups.
Question 4: Describe the importance of air, water, and food quality as determinants of health.
Air, water, and food are fundamental elements necessary for sustaining life. The quality of these essential resources directly impacts the health and well-being of individuals and communities. Understanding their significance as determinants of health is crucial for healthcare professionals.
Air quality is a critical determinant of health as it can profoundly affect respiratory and cardiovascular health. Exposure to pollutants and allergens in the air, such as particulate matter, ozone, and carbon monoxide, can lead to respiratory diseases, exacerbate existing conditions, and increase the risk of cardiovascular events. Monitoring and improving air quality through regulations and interventions can significantly reduce the burden of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases.
Water quality is equally important for maintaining good health. Contaminated water sources can harbor various pathogens, chemicals, and pollutants that pose significant health risks. Ingesting contaminated water can lead to waterborne diseases, such as cholera and dysentery. Ensuring access to clean and safe drinking water through effective sanitation and water management practices is vital for preventing waterborne diseases and promoting overall health.
Food quality plays a crucial role in overall health and well-being. Poor nutrition, including the consumption of processed foods high in saturated fats, added sugars, and sodium, is a major risk factor for chronic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Access to nutritious and culturally appropriate food, as well as education about healthy eating habits, are essential for preventing and managing these conditions.
In conclusion, air, water, and food quality are significant determinants of health. Monitoring and improving these aspects through appropriate regulations, interventions, and education can have a substantial positive impact on the health outcomes of individuals and communities. Healthcare professionals should advocate for policies and practices that prioritize the quality of these essential resources to promote and maintain good health.