Provides insights on the existence of privileges for the white population in academes. Daily effects of white privilege; Factors that shape white privilege; Types of privileges; Association of strength and power with privilege.

SOURCES WEEK 2

Intersectionality

https://openstax.org/books/college-success/pages/9-2-categories-of-diversity

White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack.

Authors:

McIntosh, Peggy

Source:

Independent School
. Winter90, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p31. 5p.

Document Type:

Article

Subjects:

WHITE people

DISCRIMINATION in education

RACISM

UNIVERSITIES & colleges

Abstract:

Provides insights on the existence of privileges for the white population in academes. Daily effects of white privilege; Factors that shape white privilege; Types of privileges; Association of strength and power with privilege.

Lexile:

1310

Full Text Word Count:

2573

ISSN:

0145-9635

Accession Number:

9604164115

Database:

MasterFILE Premier
Translate Full Text:

  

WHITE PRIVILEGE: UNPACKING THE INVISIBLE KNAPSACK 
This content may contain URLs/links that would redirect you to a non-EBSCO site. EBSCO does not endorse the accuracy or accessibility of these sites, nor of the content therein.

Contents

1.

Daily effects of white privilege

2.

Elusive and fugitive

3.

Earned strength, unearned power

Full Text

Listen

I was taught to see racism only in individual
acts of meanness, not in invisible systems
conferring dominance on my group.
Through work to bring materials from women’s studies into the rest of the curriculum, I have often noticed men’s unwillingness to grant that they are overprivileged, even though they may grant that women are disadvantaged. They may say they will work to improve women’s status, in the society, the university, or the curriculum, but they can’t or won’t support the idea of lessening men’s. Denials that amount to taboos surround the subject of advantages that men gain from women’s disadvantages. These denials protect male privilege from being fully acknowledged, lessened, or ended.
Thinking through unacknowledged male privilege as a phenomenon, I realized that, since hierarchies in our society are interlocking, there was most likely a phenomenon of white privilege that was similarly denied and protected. As a white person, I realized I had been taught about racism as something that puts others at a disadvantage, but had been taught not to see one of its corollary aspects, white privilege, which puts me at an advantage.
I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege, as males are taught not to recognize male privilege. So I have begun in an untutored way to ask what it is like to have white privilege. I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was “meant” to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools, and blank checks.
Describing white privilege makes one newly accountable. As we in women’s studies work to reveal male privilege and ask men to give up some of their power, so one who writes about having white privilege must ask, “Having described it, what will I do to lessen or end it?”
After I realized the extent to which men work from a base of unacknowledged privilege, I understood that much of their oppressiveness was unconscious. Then I remembered the frequent charges from women of color that white women whom they encounter are oppressive. I began to understand why we are justly seen as oppressive, even when we don’t see ourselves that way. I began to count the ways in which I enjoy unearned skin privilege and have been conditioned into oblivion about its existence.
My schooling gave me no training in seeing myself as an oppressor, as an unfairly advantaged person, or as a participant in a damaged culture. I was taught to see myself as an individual whose moral state depended on her individual moral will. My schooling followed the pattern my colleague Elizabeth Minnich has pointed out: whites are taught to think of their lives as morally neutral, normative, and average, and also ideal, so that when we work to benefit others, this is seen as work that will allow “them” to be more like “us.”

Daily effects of white privilege

I decided to try to work on myself at least by identifying some of the daily effects of white privilege in my life. I have chosen those conditions that I think in my case attach somewhat more to skin-color privilege than to class, religion, ethnic status, or geographic location, though of course all these other factors are intricately intertwined. As far as I can tell, my African American coworkers, friends, and acquaintances with whom I come into daily or frequent contact in this particular time, place, and line of work cannot count on most of these conditions.
1. I can, if I wish, arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time.
· 2. If I should need to move, I can be pretty sure of renting or purchasing housing in an area that I can afford and in which I would want to live.
· 3. I can be pretty sure that my neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me.
· 4. I can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that I will not be followed or harassed.
· 5. I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.
· 6. When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.
· 7. I can be sure that my children will be given curricular materials that testify to the existence of their race.
· 8. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.
· 9. I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods that fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser’s shop and find someone who can deal with my hair.
· 10. Whether I use checks, credit cards, or cash, I can count on my skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability.
· 11. I can arrange to protect my children most of the time from people who might not like them.
· 12. I can swear, or dress in second-hand clothes, or not answer letters without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty, or the illiteracy of my race.
· 13. I can speak in public to a powerful male group without putting my race on trial.
· 14. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.
· 15. I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group.
· 16. I can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color, who constitute the world’s majority, without feeling in my culture any penalty for such oblivion.
· 17. I can criticize our government and talk about how much I fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider. 18. I can be pretty sure that if I ask to talk to “the person in charge” I will be facing a person of my race.
· 19. If a traffic cop pulls me over, or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race.
· 20. I can easily buy posters, postcards, picture books, greeting cards, dolls, toys, and children’s magazines featuring people of my race.
· 21. I can go home from most meetings of organizations I belong to feeling somewhat tied in rather than isolated, out of place, outnumbered, unheard, held at a distance, or feared.
· 22. I can take a job with an affirmative action employer without having coworkers on the job suspect that I got it because of race.
· 23. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chosen.
· 24. I can be sure that if I need legal or medical help my race will not work against me.
· 25. If my day, week, or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether it has racial overtones.
· 26. I can choose blemish cover or bandages in “flesh” color that more or less match my skin.

Elusive and fugitive

I repeatedly forgot each of the realizations on this list until I wrote it down. For me white privilege has turned out to be an elusive and fugitive subject. The pressure to avoid it is great, for in facing it I must give up the myth of meritocracy. If these things are true, this is not such a free country; one’s life is not what one makes it; many doors open for certain people through no virtues of their own.
In unpacking this invisible knapsack of white privilege, I have listed conditions of daily experience that I once took for granted. Nor did I think of any of these perquisites as bad for the holder. I now think that we need a more finely differentiated taxonomy of privilege, for some of these varieties are only what one would want for everyone in a just society, and others give license to be ignorant, oblivious, arrogant, and destructive.
I see a pattern running through the matrix of white privilege, a pattern of assumptions that were passed on to me as a white person. There was one main piece of cultural turf; it was my own turf, and I was among those who could control the turf. My skin color was an asset for any more I was educated to want to make. I could think of myself as belonging in major ways and of making social systems work for me. I could freely disparage, fear, neglect, or be oblivious to anything outside of the dominant cultural forms. Being of the main culture, I could also criticize it fairly freely.
In proportion as my racial group was being made confident, comfortable, and oblivious, other groups were likely being made unconfident, uncomfortable, and alienated. Whiteness protected me from many kinds of hostility, distress, and violence, which I was being subtly trained to visit, in turn, upon people of color.
For this reason, the word “privilege” now seems to me misleading. We usually think of privilege as being a favored state, whether earned or conferred by birth or luck. Yet some of the conditions I have described here work systematically to overempower certain groups. Such privilege simply confers dominance because of one’s race or sex.

Earned strength, unearned power

I want, then, to distinguish between earned strength and unearned power conferred systemically. Power from unearned privilege can look like strength when it is in fact permission to escape or to dominate. But not all of the privileges on my list are inevitably damaging. Some, like the expectation that neighbors will be decent to you, or that your race will not count against you in court, should be the norm in a just society. others, like the privilege to ignore less powerful people, distort the humanity of the holders as well as the ignored groups.
We might at least start by distinguishing between positive advantages, which we can work to spread, and negative types of advantage, which unless rejected will always reinforce our present hierarchies. For example, the feeling that one belongs within the human circle, as Native Americans say, should not be seen as privilege for a few. Ideally it is an unearned entitlement. At present, since only a few have it, it is an unearned advantage for them. This paper results from a process of coming to see that some of the power that I originally saw as attendant on being a human being in the United States consisted in unearned advantage and conferred dominance.
I have met very few men who are truly distressed about systemic, unearned male advantage and conferred dominance. And so one question for me and others like me is whether we will be like them, or whether we will get truly distressed, even outraged, about unearned race advantage and conferred dominance, and, if so, what we will do to lessen them. In any case, we need to do more work in identifying how they actually affect our daily lives. Many, perhaps most, of our white students in the United States think that racism doesn’t affect them because they are not people of color; they do not see “whiteness” as a racial identity. In addition, since race and sex are not the only advantaging systems at work, we need similarly to examine the daily experience of having age advantage, or ethnic advantage, or physical ability, or advantage related to nationality, religion, or sexual orientation.
Difficulties and dangers surrounding the task of finding parallels are many. Since racism, sexism, and heterosexism are not the same, the advantages associated with them should not be seen as the same. In addition, it is hard to disentangle aspects of unearned advantage that rest more on social class, economic class, race, religion, sex, and ethnic identity than on other factors. Still, all of the oppressions are interlocking, as the members of the Combahee River Collective pointed out in their “Black Feminist Statement” of 1977.
One factor seems clear about all of the interlocking oppressions. They take both active forms, which we can see, and embedded forms, which as a member of the dominant group one is taught not to see. In my class and place, I did not see myself as a racist because I was taught to recognize racism only in individual acts of meanness by members of my group, never in invisible systems conferring unsought racial dominance on my group from birth.
Disapproving of the systems won’t be enough to change them. I was taught to think that racism could end if white individuals changed their attitudes. But a “white” skin in the United States opens many doors for whites whether or not we approve of the way dominance has been conferred on us. Individual acts can palliate, but cannot end, these problems.
To redesign social systems we need first to acknowledge their colossal unseen dimensions. The silences and denials surrounding privilege are the key political tool here. They keep the thinking about equality or equity incomplete, protecting unearned advantage and conferred dominance by making these subjects taboo. Most talk by whites about equal opportunity seems to me now to be about equal opportunity to try to get into a position of dominance while denying that systems of dominance exist.
It seems to me that obliviousness about white advantage, like obliviousness about male advantage, is kept strongly inculturated in the United States so as to maintain the myth of meritocracy, the myth that democratic choice is equally available to all. Keeping most people unaware that freedom of confident action is there for just a small number of people props up those in power and serves to keep power in the hands of the same groups that have most of it already.
Although systemic change takes many decades, there are pressing questions for me and, I imagine, for some others like me if we raise our daily consciousness on the perquisites of being light-skinned. What will we do with such knowledge? As we know from watching men, it is an open question whether we will choose to use unearned advantage to weaken hidden systems of advantage, and whether we will use any of our arbitrarily awarded power to try to reconstruct power systems on a broader base.
Permission to reprint this excerpt must be obtained from Peggy McIntosh at the address above or by calling her at 617-431-1453.
This excerpted essay is reprinted here from the July/August 1989 issue of Peace and Freedom, the bimonthly journal of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, based at 1213 Race St., Philadelphia PA 19107.
~~~~~~~~
By Peggy McIntosh
Peggy McIntosh is associate director of the Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. This essay is exerpted from Working Paper 189, “White Privilege and Male Privilege: A Personal Account of Coming To See Correspondences through Work in Women’s Studies” (1988), by Peggy McIntosh; available for $4.00 from the Wellesley College Center for Research on Women, Wellesley MA 02181. The working paper contains a longer list of privileges.
Copyright of Independent School is the property of National Association of Independent Schools and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
image1.wmf

Choose a country other than the United States and analyze the change in inequality between 1980 and 2014.For country data, go to the Choose the country that you would like to compare and filter the data so only the values for 1980 and 2014 are visible.

Choose a country other than the United States and analyze the change in inequality between 1980 and 2014.For country data, go to the Choose the country that you would like to compare and filter the data so only the values for 1980 and 2014 are visible. You will be using this data as the basis for your Lorenz curves. Copy and paste the filtered data (all columns) into a new tab in your spreadsheet.Analyze how the distribution has changed over time:Drawing the two Lorenz curves. Has inequality increased or decreased?

Based on your knowledge of healthcare contracts in Saudi Arabia, discuss the benefits of different parties contracting for healthcare in Saudi Arabia.

Based on your knowledge of healthcare contracts in Saudi Arabia, discuss the benefits of different parties contracting for healthcare in Saudi Arabia. Discuss the parties to a contract and how they are affected. Be sure to distinguish between employer, employee, and resident requirements.

You are a medical professor in charge of creating college assignments and answers for medical college students. You design and conduct lectures, evaluate student performance and provide feedback through examinations and assignments. Answer each question separately. Include and Introduction. Provide an answer to this content

Based on your knowledge of healthcare contracts in Saudi Arabia, discuss the benefits of different parties contracting for healthcare in Saudi Arabia. Discuss the parties to a contract and how they are affected. Be sure to distinguish between employer, employee, and resident requirements.

. Do not write who you are in the answer.

What significant  events led to the construction of Clean Air Act policy as we know it today? What are the benefits of this approach? 

 
For  this week’s assignment, students are encouraged to conduct their own  outside research to provide additional support in their analysis to  address the question/objective at hand. 

Select  one of the outlined federal policies (e.g. Clean Air Act, Affordable  Care Act, Immigration Reform Policy, EPA Policy Changes, NPR/School  Choice)
Trace  it through the stages of the policy process model. What significant  events led to the construction of Clean Air Act policy as we know it today? What are the benefits of this approach? 
What are the limitations of this approach? 
Why you think the issue is important; discuss how common the problem is, and how many people it affects.
What current policies relate to this issue?
What  are your recommendations for this policy issue as it evolves? If you  were in a position of power, what adaptations or eliminations would you  make?

Consider the various components in a compensation philosophy.Identify at least one practice within a compensation philosophy.Discuss the benefits of the selected practice as well as possible limitations or drawbacks that can occur if not aligned with an organization’s business strategy.

Consider the various components in a compensation philosophy.Identify at least one practice within a compensation philosophy.Discuss the benefits of the selected practice as well as possible limitations or drawbacks that can occur if not aligned with an organization’s business strategy.Discuss pros and cons of pay transparency.Discuss why you would select either a base pay compensation system or a variable pay compensation system, and why your selection would work best for an organization.

Why is it important to study primates?2-How has DNA and other technologies improved Jane Goodall’s and other primate research?

1-Why is it important to study primates?2-How has DNA and other technologies improved Jane Goodall’s and other primate research? Explain with an example.3-Did Jane Goodall’s research find the evidence about chimp’s tool making? Is the human the only species able to make the tool? How do you correlate this with human culture?4-How useful is primate behavior when it comes to understanding human behavior?5-Is there a very sharp line that separates the chimps from humans? Explain.6-Do chimps recognize themselves in a mirror? If chimps recognize themselves in a mirror then at what age would this occur?7-Did you learn anything different about endangered chimps from her? How about not just harming them but harming ourselves and harming the world? Do you agree with her?8- How can we solve the problem of endangered primates?86-What makes us different from chimps and other species?9-What program did Jane Goodall start in 1991 at Tanzania? What were her reasons to start this program? What is the message that she intends to give to everyone?10-Do you agree with Jane Goodall? What can you do to make a difference in your part individually? Can we make this world a better place?

Think about a recent health encounter you have had with a healthcare provider. Discuss how the visit’s quality was on each domain. What is your overall assessment of the provider’s quality? What recommendations would you make to improve quality?

Donabedian’s framework for measuring healthcare quality comprises of a triad of domains: Structure, process and outcomes. Think about a recent health encounter you have had with a healthcare provider. Discuss how the visit’s quality was on each domain. What is your overall assessment of the provider’s quality? What recommendations would you make to improve quality?

Fargo’s Unauthorized Customer Accounts, from the textbook. This case describes the actions of Wells Fargo, a leading bank and financial services company, which opened more than two million unauthorized checking, credit card. Did Wells Fargo respond appropriately to employees who voiced their concerns about unauthorized accounts? What should it have done differently?

For this discussion, Review Case 5: Wells Fargo’s Unauthorized Customer Accounts, from the textbook. This case describes the actions of Wells Fargo, a leading bank and financial services company, which opened more than two million unauthorized checking, credit card. Did Wells Fargo respondappropriately to employees who voiced their concerns about unauthorized accounts? What should it have done differently?and other accounts without the consent of its customers between 2011 and 2015. You may research online documents or videos about this case, but make sure to cite and reference any outside sources used. You will answering the following questions.1 Describe the “unauthorized customer accounts” referenced in the title of the case. What did the bank and its employees do?  Which stakeholders were helped, and which were harmed by these actions?2 Do you believe Wells Fargo demonstrated an ethical corporate culture? Why or why not?  In your response, please consider both the formal ethics policies of the bank and ethical leadership as modeled by its senior executives and board of directors.3 Did Wells Fargo respond appropriately to employees who voiced their concerns about unauthorized accounts? What should it have done differently?  

Choose an episode of Netflix’s How to Become a Cult Leader to watch.1. Name the episode.2. Which of the three types of power (power-over, power-from-within, or power-with) did the cult leader use? Explain using an example.

Chose an episode of Netflix’s How to Become a Cult Leader to watch.1. Name the episode.2. Which of the three types of power (power-over, power-from-within, or power-with) did the cult leader use? Explain using an example.3. Name at least two bases of power used by this leader.4. Name at least two common power tactics used by this leader.5. Are you surprised so many people followed this person? Why or why not?