Project Preparation- healthcare quality improvement initiative

For your course project, you will be creating a healthcare quality improvement initiative in which you will describe the issue at the outset, the setting, the problem to be solved, the parties affected, and the reason why the issue is important to address. You will recommend a concise implementation plan and describe in detail how you plan to evaluate if your implementation was successful.

To complete your course project, you must first select a healthcare organization to base your quality improvement initiative on and locate a set of publicly available data from that organization to analyze. Please remember the data you select must be publicly facing, and you must share a link to that data in this assignment. You should not ask your current organization or any other organization for any data.

Prompt

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Selection of healthcare organization: Describe a clinically or non-clinically based healthcare organization that releases public-facing data that you will utilize for your course project and share a link to their website.

Selection of public-facing data: Describe public-facing data that you will utilize in your course project and share a link to public-facing data.

Discuss your selections: Discuss why you selected the healthcare organization and public-facing data for your course project.

Provide at least two scholarly sources throughout your work to support your claims.

Developing Workplace Critical Thinking

Produce an individual formal report which is to consider the critical analysis of classical management theories relevant to the organisational example and critically assess the impact of these theories on the implementation of the beliefs, and values of the organisation. Critically evaluate the impact on its employees as well as on the wider society in terms of future sustainability and impact on the environment. Finally how would you align your personal Values, attitudes and Beliefs with the organisational example used in your report?

Ensure the report is structured as a formal report and ‘Harvard’ referencing is used

Draft a pandemic law for India to regulate, control and manage epidemics and pandemics / And Explain why India needs a new, comprehensive and exclusive law to regulate epidemics and pandemics

1. India is struck by a pandemic – COVID 19

2. India used THE EPIDEMIC DISEASE ACT 1897 / The Disaster Management Act 2005 / THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 1806 predominantly to control and manage The COVID 19 Pandemic

3. The legal tools employed by India to battle the pandemic were not originally designed or crafted to meet the challenges and disruptive consequences posed by a 21st century pandemic

4. The legal tools employed by India are ancient, colonial, weak and insufficient to deal with a pandemic, of the size and proportion such as the coronavirus

5. Our existing Indian laws did not have adequate provisions to combat the ill effects of the pandemic

6. The Executive had to resort to ad hoc / reactive / impromptu rule making using a multiplicity of statutes to decide its patchwork / fragmented response to the pandemic

7. The Executive Rule Making took the form of Circulars and Notifications issued by the MInistry of Home Affairs under THE DISASTER MANAGEMENT ACT 2005

8. The Indian laws are found deficient and lacking in its substantiative legal provisions

9. ASSIGNMENT – Draft a new exclusive comprehensive Model Law for India to Regulate Epidemics and Pandemics

10. Source to Draft Indian Pandemic law – World Health Organization (WHO) has launched the Covid 19 law lab to collect legal documents from over 190 countries across the world to help states establish and implement strong legal frame works to manage the pandemic. Our Indian pandemic law can be based on the pandemic laws other countries have to regulate pandemics and can be based on the best practices adopted by other nations in the world to control and manage pandemics legally.

LINKS:

1.

2. https://www.who.int/news/item/22-07-2020-new-covid-19-law-lab-to-provide-vital-legal-information-and-support-for-the-global-covid-19-response

3.

4.

5.

Public Health – Health Behavior Model

This order is meant to be a PORTION of an overall MPH dissertation. The dissertation is about a hypothetical intervention to prevent COVID-19 amongst the elderly in Los Angeles County. This section of the paper is to discuss a health theory that will be utilized in the intervention. Please use the Health Belief Model (HBM). Identify constructs within HBM that can be used to stop or change behaviors linked to the elderly contracting COVID-19. Since this is just one section of the dissertation, the topic does NOT need to be introduced. You may start this paper with something along the lines of “The health belief theory best suited for the proposed intervention is the Health Belief Model (HBM).” I have attached the abstract for the dissertation and the framework diagram for the HBM. This should aid you in understanding the overall dissertation and theory and allow you to create a cohesive section about the health theory that will be used.

Instructions: Based on the literature, develop a theoretical framework or conceptual framework (diagram) that best represents the risk factors that are contributing to the health issue (COVID-19). You may use one theory/model (Health Belief Model). Explain your diagram by providing an overview of the theory and constructs chosen, and justify your selected constructs through evidence-based literature. The theoretical framework or conceptual framework will utilize constructs to illustrate the barriers connected to the health issue and health behavior.

Note: This section should be evidence-based, meaning accompanied with appropriate citations. Theoretical framework diagram or conceptual framework diagram should be referenced or discussed, but should be added. 2 pages max.

A study of risk identification and mitigation in software development project in the united kingdom

The research aim of this project is geared toward investigating Risk identification and mitigation in software development projects. To achieve this the following aim are specified

– Discuss extensively on the varied form of software development project

– Identify risk pertaining to software development projects

– Discuss possible controls in mitigating the risk identified in (b)

– Recommend the most appropriate controls in (c)

Scope

This research delimit itself to IT business project. Therefore proffering mitigating controls and possible recommendations outside IT business project will not be considered..

 Abstract

 Introduction – The definition of the problem including the project aim and objectives

 Literature review.

 Research methodology

 Presentation and Analysis of primary and/or secondary data

 Discussion and interpretation of Results

 Conclusions,

 Recommendations and proposals for further work

 References – The Harvard Style MUST be used (this refers to work cited in the report)

 Bibliography (this is different to references and refers to background reading)

 Appendices

Climate change impact on global economics and politics

Page 1: Answering the ‘So What?’ Question and Stating your argument (2 paragraphs).

• “So what?”: Paragraph One, Page One

• This first paragraph should tell me and your reader, more broadly, why you have chosen your topic. You are basically answering the reader’s, and for the love of God my, skepticism about your topic, with a general, explanatory paragraph about why this topic is important, who this issue might affect, and ultimately, why anyone should care about what you are writing about.

• Stating your Argument Paragraph: Two, Page One

• This paragraph should serve as the first committed statement of your argument, this can go a few ways.

 It can read something like, I am arguing that X directly affects Y.

 Meaning that maybe you argue that poverty directly contributes to specific acts of terrorism.

 Your statement should be clear, and at least at the outset unequivocal. If you are using someone else’s argument this can mean that there is a fair amount of citation here. Meaning that, “According to (Blank, 2003) and (Blanky, 2007) the argument that poverty causes terrorism is convincing, to test this argument I stipulate their original points and will use their work to support my own.”

Page 2: Definitions and Theoretical Specifics (2 Paragraphs)

• Definitions Paragraph One, Page One

• In this paragraph you will define things that need defining for your piece.

 Let us say you are claiming that poverty equals terrorism. Herein, you will be relating how you are defining those ideas. Is it absolute poverty? Is it relative poverty? Is it cultural poverty? Etc. Or defining terrorism, always fun since there are many ways to define terrorism. Maybe, this is state terrorism. Maybe, this is non-state actor terrorism. Either way, I should be clear about your definitions from here on out. Make sure these definitions are clear, and if it is the case, make use of others that have defined your ‘variable’, as in (Blank, 2017; Blankety, 2017) argue that terrorism is this, and this is how I am using that definition in my study.

• Measurement Page Two, Paragraph Two

• Based on the definitions stated above. Here you will tell your reader how you are measuring these ‘variables’ in your piece.

 Maybe, you are measuring poverty using GDP per capita, or PPP. Maybe, you are using acts of terrorism, as in those that target non-military infrastructure.

 Either way, from here on out I should be very clear about how you are going to measure what you are saying is occurring.

 If this is statistical you make use of economic stats to relate your topic, if it is narrativized, you will provide individual and group level narratives that describe how inequality has affected the people or populations you are describing. Or, maybe it is a marriage of the two. Maybe, you are using narratives and economic data to provide multiple brush strokes that convey how and why the things you are measuring are interacting in the ways you describe.

 Page 3-5 Description of your case studies (6-10 Paragraphs)

• Each page should be devoted to one of your case studies.

• I should know the 5 Ws and an H.

 Terrorist groups (specific names and details)

What Acts of terrorism (measured as describe above)

Where

Specific states, regions, territories, or localities (be very specific)

When

What years, time periods, or in what ‘eras’ (be specific and define the temporal period you are discussing).

Why

How

This is your evidence en toto it provides an overview of your work and the connections you are making.

This is an addition to the attached essay. Please use the previous references

Pathophysiology: Knowledge Check

Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders

You will demonstrate your understanding of the topics covered. This Knowledge Check will be composed of a series of questions related to specific scenarios provided. It is highly recommended that you review the Learning Resources in their entirety prior to taking the Knowledge Check, since the resources cover the topics addressed. Plan your time accordingly.

One source or more is needed. Which means one source as noted in announcements can be from your text and the other needs to be from another source < 5 years a medical or nursing peer-review journal article, not an editorial or an opinion of work.

Cite and reference each question. Each question should be no more than a paragraph.