Analyse national preventative public health programmes in terms of distributive justice in health care.

This component is intended to assess the following learning outcomes:
• Analyse national preventative public health programmes in terms of distributive justice in health care.
• Critically examine the different models of health care finance in terms of their sustainability, efficiency and equity.
• Provide a critical review of a public health issue and response from the perspectives of government, provider, and public.
• Assessment details
• Select a health outcome relevant to public health in one specific country (anywhere in the world) and critically evaluate evidence relating to a service or intervention designed to improve this health outcome.
• Your critical evaluation should include discussion of the creation, expansion, contraction or closure of the service or intervention.
• Suggested Structure
1. Introduction (400 words):
• Discuss the significance of the service or intervention in terms of its health, economic and social impact by providing critical analysis of research.
• Describe populations (geographically, socially, economically, etc) that may benefit most from this service (please make reference to specific research evidence to support the information presented). 2.
• Discussion(800words):
• How does the service or intervention fit in with the national healthcare financing strategy?
• How can it contribute to protecting people against the financial risk of paying for accessing health services or interventions?
• How does the service or intervention help the health system to show better efficient use of available national resources?
• How may economic evaluations provide more information about the cost effectiveness of this service of this intervention? 3.
• Conclusion and Recommendations(300)words:
• Briefly summarise the main issues.
• Make recommendations on the creation, expansion, contraction or closure of the service or intervention.
• Make recommendations for actions to be taken by stakeholders, policy makers, practitioners and researchers.
• 4. References:
• Provide a list of appropriately referenced literature supporting your essay.

Analyze the five components of emotional intelligence and their relationship to transformational leadership

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, watch the Week 4 Assignment video above with Dr. Williams G. Woods. Locate articles in the University of Arizona Global Campus Library concerning emotional intelligence and its association with transformational leadership. Further information on
transformational leadership from Chapter 8 of Northouse (2018) should be used to support the assignment. Also, research transactional and situational leadership styles.
Leadership must be effective in order for teams to move toward optimal performance. Understanding culture, multiple leadership styles, and emotional intelligence can prove useful in preparing the leader to lead effective teams.
In your paper,
-Analyze the five components of emotional intelligence and their relationship to transformational leadership.
-Discuss how to use transformational leadership combined with the use of emotional intelligence to improve a situation involving teams at work.
-Distinguish between transactional, situational, and transformational leadership and the usefulness of each in impacting team performance.
-Discuss the impact of culture and ethics on the leadership of teams.
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
Must use at least three US scholarly sources from 2010- 2021in addition to Northouse, P. G. (2018).
Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.).

Set out in detail, using case law examples, the right and its scope that applies to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

Jane Smith in the UK asserts that she has been subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by a public authority. Although she is angry about this, she is unsure of what action she might be able to take or what rights she may have. She has heard of judicial review but doesn’t want to be a nuisance for the courts. Jane’s friend is not affected by the alleged rights violation but feels an injustice is occurring that needs to be addressed. She therefore wants to bring a judicial review claim to highlight the injustice and get remedy for Jane.

Question 1:
Set out in detail, using case law examples, the right and its scope that applies to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Question 2:
Set out the process and conditions for bringing a judicial review claim, looking at both standing and merits.

Question 3:
Can Jane’s friend successfully bring a claim to highlight Jane’s situation and seek remedy? Explain your answer.

Question 4:
Would the position in Q3 be different if Jane was not willing to pursue judicial review based on her having a well-founded fear of persecution by the UK state? Could Jane’s friend, or any person or body other than Jane, now successfully bring a claim? Explain your answer.
Jane Smith in the UK asserts that she has been subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment by a public authority. Although she is angry about this, she is unsure of what action she might be able to take or what rights she may have. She has heard of judicial review but doesn’t want to be a nuisance for the courts. Jane’s friend is not affected by the alleged rights violation but feels an injustice is occurring that needs to be addressed. She therefore wants to bring a judicial review claim to highlight the injustice and get remedy for Jane.

Question 1:
Set out in detail, using case law examples, the right and its scope that applies to cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Question 2:
Set out the process and conditions for bringing a judicial review claim, looking at both standing and merits.

Question 3:
Can Jane’s friend successfully bring a claim to highlight Jane’s situation and seek remedy? Explain your answer.

Question 4:
Would the position in Q3 be different if Jane was not willing to pursue judicial review based on her having a well-founded fear of persecution by the UK state? Could Jane’s friend, or any person or body other than Jane, now successfully bring a claim? Explain your answer.

Explain Roosevelt’s reasoning, points of emphasis, and his use of rhetoric and tone, as well as how he links ideas.

Task 1
Interpreting Speeches
Listen to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s speech to Congress on December 8, 1941 (known as the “Day of Infamy Speech” or the “Infamy Speech”) after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II. The transcript of the speech is provided here.

Write an analysis of the “Day of Infamy” speech. Pay special attention to factors such as the speaker’s purpose and point of view. Explain Roosevelt’s reasoning, points of emphasis, and his use of rhetoric and tone, as well as how he links ideas. Use both the written and audio versions of the speech to complete your analysis. You might need to do some additional research into the historical background of the speaker and the speech to complete this activity.
Read about Roosevelt’s excellent communication skills, which helped him become an accomplished orator, and more about his life.

What are some of the characteristics of Indigenous film?

Prompt: You will analyze and respond to a film of your choice from the Supplemental Film List provided on the syllabus and below. The film list is divided based on the three units/parts of the class.

● What is the background of the film you chose?
● Who was the film’s writer, director, and production company?
● How does the film you view compare to the films screened in class?
● What are some of the characteristics of Indigenous film?
● Are these characteristics present in the film you watched for your final essay?
● How does the film you watched connect to your understanding of Indigenous film and media?
● Discuss what elements are or are not present in the film. What themes are explored in your film and how do they relate to your understanding of Indigenous film and media?
● Refer to at least one reading and one other film screened in class.

Films for Final Essay

*Prime: Indicates available for streaming for free through Amazon Prime
*Copley: Indicates film is available through USD Copley library

Westerns & the Formation of a Genre
The Paleface (1922)
Northwest Passage (1940)
They Died with their Boots On (1941)
Fort Apache (1948)
She Wore a Yellow Ribbon (1949)
Apache (1954) (Prime)
The Indian Fighter (1955)
Run of the Arrow (1957)
Tell Them Willie Bo is Here (1969)
The Mission (1986) (Copley)
Little Big Man (1970) (Prime)
A Man Called Horse (1970) (Prime)
The Last of His Tribe (1992)
Black Robe (1991) (Copley)
Geronimo: An American Legend (1993/4)
Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee (2007) (Prime)
Hostiles (2017)
Woman Walks Ahead (2018) (Prime)
News of the World (2020)

Challenging Westerns & the Rise of Indigenous Films
Thunderheart (1992)
Dance Me Outside (1994)
Dances with Wolves (1990)
Dead Man (1995)
House Made of Dawn (1996)
You Are on Indian Land (1969) (Youtube)
Once Were Warriors (1994) (USD Law Library)
Incident at Oglala (1992) (Copley)
Geronimo and the Apache Resistance (1989) (Copley)
Chief Wilma P. Mankiller (1992) (Copley)
Surviving Columbus (1992) (Copley)
Spirit Rider (1993) (Prime)
The Tree of Life: three films on Indian Mexico (1999) (Copley)

Indigenous Perspectives, Filmmakers, & Creators
Skins (2002)
Skinwalkers: An American Mystery! (2004) (Copley)
Christmas in the Clouds (2001)
Rabbit-Proof Fence (2002) (Copley)
Whale Rider (2002) (Copley)
Frozen River (2009) (Copley)
The Lesser Blessed (2012) (Prime)
Finding Dawn (2006) (Copley)
Drunktown’s Finest (2013) (Copley)
Wind River (2017)
We Shall Remain (2009) (choose any episode 1 – 5) (Copley)
Miss Navajo (2007)
Every Emotion Costs (2010) (Prime)
This May be the Last Time (2014)
Empire of Dirt (2015) (Prime)
Mekko (2015)
Te Ata (2017) (Copley)
Rumble (2017)
Roma (2018) (Netflix)
Warrior Women (2018) (Copley)
Basketball or Nothing (2019) (Netflix) (choose any two episodes)
Awake: Dream from Standing Rock (2017) (Copley)
Rutherford Falls (2021) (choose any two episodes)

Summarise the history of the exchange rate regime of a particular country

Content requirements:
Students are required to address three parts in the main body of this essay and content details are as blow:
1. Summarise the history of the exchange rate regime of a particular country;
2. Discuss three relationships that describe the behaviour of exchange rate (CIP, PPP, IFE);
3. Estimate the PPP between a particular country and the US. (Students need to collect monthly data for not less than 5 years to complete this part of the
essay).
Assessment criteria
• Appropriate structure and consistency/logic
• Good presentation
• Reasoned argument and conclusion
• Scope of research
• Originality
• Critical Analysis

discuss one published objection that has been raised against Peter Singer’s poverty ethics

Topic Singer on Poverty In this paper, you’re going to discuss one published objection that has been raised against Peter Singer’s poverty ethics Either [a] defend Singer from the objection or [b] improve the objection, and explain why the new version, unlike the original version, is a success. Or [c] come make your own objection. [Note: if you choose C, don’t turn it into an economics paper. Focus on the ethical argument.

Professors Notes on how to structure the essay
Let’s begin with what it is not.
-It is not merely to demonstrate knowledge of course material (we have exams for that).
-Nor is it simply to summarize, or reflect on, course material. (We do this during class exercises.)
What it is Rather, it is to present and defend your own philosophical argument in a way that engages that material — along with other readings — and advances the discussion.
The idea here is that there is some conversation going in the Ethics & Value Theory literature. Your job is to get involved and move that discussion forward with a sustained philosophical argument, after having undertaken some research.

Identify, develop and evaluate a business idea and distinguish an ‘idea’ from an ‘opportunity

Assignment aim
The aim of the assignment is to show your understanding of a number of entrepreneurship concepts from the module and your ability to apply these to:
• identify, develop and evaluate a business idea and distinguish an ‘idea’ from an ‘opportunity (opportunity is defined as an idea which beats favourable set of circumstances by demand, market push/pull, degree of innovation, desirable, feasible, viable )’
• analyse the entrepreneurial process the role of the entrepreneur and entrepreneurial outcomes.
Assignment task
There are two tasks, you are required to complete BOTH tasks:
Task A. This will require you to generate a potential business idea ‘opportunity’ (social or business enterprise), present it in the form of a ‘Lean Canvas of no more than 1 page in a simplified way (by Ash Maurya)’ and conduct research. Based on your research you will evaluate your original Lean Canvas
and clearly indicate, whether you will be pursuing it, with rationale for your decision. You may consider models such as pentagon model; opportunity selection model; pestle; porters to support your feasibility/competitor analysis.
The first half of the opening paragraph should explain the idea, then move onto the canvas with no assumptions being made ; include your research; make decision to either stay with idea or leave idea.
Task B. Critically discuss, using academic literature, what other factors ‘i.e. Timmons model, mullens 7 domains, personality traits etc’ impact successful entrepreneurship, beyond the ‘Lean Approach’. In doing so, relate your response to an entrepreneur of your own choosing. What do you conclude about successful entrepreneurship?
This will require you to understand and discuss elements of entrepreneurial success, based on frameworks presented in the module and wider reading, to reach a coherent conclusion.
Assignment guidelines
Task A is very much about applying the concepts to determine if there is an opportunity, whereas Task B requires you to utilise academic literature to discuss the factors beyond a ‘lean-approach’. Higher
marks will be awarded based on the following criteria:
• Clarity of depiction of business idea and Lean Canvas.
• Quality and scope of research of ‘idea’.
• Effective analysis, of original Lean Canvas, based on research carried out.
• Clear indication of decision and rationale to pursue or not, using appropriate ‘tools i.e. porters, pestle etc’.
• Discuss the competitive environment, competitors, customers, cash flow
• Application of theory to practice and use of academic frameworks in discussing factors constituting
entrepreneurial success.
• Evidence of wider reading.
• Evidence of synthesis and clarity of discussion

Hiley argues that British counter-intelligence success was achieved at a terrible, perhaps even unacceptable, cost in civil liberties. Do you agree? Why or why not?

subject:
Hiley argues that British counter-intelligence success was achieved at a terrible, perhaps even unacceptable, cost in civil liberties. Do you agree? Why or why not?
PLEASE Argue that yes civil liberties where violated but it was necessary because of the threat that was faced then Audience: Make sure to consider your audience in writing this historical analysis, to include academics and peers.
Sources: Please provide your sources and document them with APA style in-text citations and on a references page.
Make sure the choice of your sources reflects consideration of five major aspects: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage.
Language: Present your paper in a professional, academic way that addresses the designated audience.
Be sure to present well-developed paragraphs that are free of grammatical error and that convey a logical flow of information. Be sure that your language includes key terms, events, and persons that have shaped the discussion and analysis of your topic.
Format your paper according to APA guidelines.

Can film photography, particularly the monochrome (B&W) photography be revived, and if so how, and if not, why not?

Can film photography be revived?
“The best selling camera today is the smartphone” – said an ex Kodak employee shaking his head in disbelief.
Mr. K was part of middle management at Kodak when the company filed for bankruptcy protection in 2012. Mr. K, who is an expert in chemical formations specifically related to applications of the photographic film, then joined Fujifilm. Fujifilm not only survived the digital disruption but about a year ago featured in the Top-20 list of most transformative companies in the world. Mr. K pioneered the application of photographic equipments in the medical industry for FujiFilm, a business that now accounts for a major chunk of FujiFilm’s revenues.
Ironically, Mr. K had invested in a startup in 2012, that was devising nano technology for digital photography. This patented technology is what a majority of smartphones rely upon. The start up was recently acquired by one of the leading smartphone manufacturers in the world for an astronomical amount. Mr. K personally made a fortune and quit his high profile job at Fuji. He has a strong industry reputation and very reliable contacts and sources within the Private Equity network.
Mr. K has approached you as a consultant – with advise on one straight forward questions – Can film photography, particularly the monochrome (B&W) photography be revived, and if so how, and if not, why not?
Pointing out to the academic analysis of comparisons between FujiFilm and Kodak (Ho & Chen, 2018), Mr. K points out that FujiFilm thrived because it embraced the new. He says that Kodak too knew that it would have to embrace the new to survive, but Kodak preferred to die rather than adopt a new identity.
Mr. K is passionate about B&W photography and wants to ensure that the future has the craft available because it is the only form of photography with archival value, i.e. ensures that prints can last generations. Besides, Mr. K says that it truly is an art form.
He also informs you that companies of the likes of Adobe and even FujiFilm would be willing and keen to lead the project if a viable plan be produced.
Mr. K suggests you read the following article in-depth.
Ho, J. C., & Chen, H. (2018). Managing the disruptive and sustaining the disrupted: The case of kodak and fujifilm in the face of digital disruption: Managing disruptive sustaining disrupted. The Review of Policy Research, 35(3), 352-371.
Your job is to individually prepare a report (no more than 3000 words) to answer Mr. K’s question with complete research, assessment, and an explanation of risks, within your recommendations. Use data and support plan where possible

Note: your chosen recommendation should be made at start of the report then build case to justify it
Any assumptions you make made should be declared and state these are made based on the absent data

Some suggestions on areas you can consider
• Mckinsey 7s model
• Ansoff model
• Clayton Christensen disruptive model
• Balance score card version/strategy maps
• Porters generic corporate strategies
• Infographics and tables and decision trees can be used