Analyse national preventative public health programmes in terms of distributive justice in health care.

This component is intended to assess the following learning outcomes:
• Analyse national preventative public health programmes in terms of distributive justice in health care.
• Critically examine the different models of health care finance in terms of their sustainability, efficiency and equity.
• Provide a critical review of a public health issue and response from the perspectives of government, provider, and public.
• Assessment details
• Select a health outcome relevant to public health in one specific country (anywhere in the world) and critically evaluate evidence relating to a service or intervention designed to improve this health outcome.
• Your critical evaluation should include discussion of the creation, expansion, contraction or closure of the service or intervention.
• Suggested Structure
1. Introduction (400 words):
• Discuss the significance of the service or intervention in terms of its health, economic and social impact by providing critical analysis of research.
• Describe populations (geographically, socially, economically, etc) that may benefit most from this service (please make reference to specific research evidence to support the information presented). 2.
• Discussion(800words):
• How does the service or intervention fit in with the national healthcare financing strategy?
• How can it contribute to protecting people against the financial risk of paying for accessing health services or interventions?
• How does the service or intervention help the health system to show better efficient use of available national resources?
• How may economic evaluations provide more information about the cost effectiveness of this service of this intervention? 3.
• Conclusion and Recommendations(300)words:
• Briefly summarise the main issues.
• Make recommendations on the creation, expansion, contraction or closure of the service or intervention.
• Make recommendations for actions to be taken by stakeholders, policy makers, practitioners and researchers.
• 4. References:
• Provide a list of appropriately referenced literature supporting your essay.