Read Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc. in Section 21.2 of your textbook. Discuss what duty or duties a business has with regard to checking the background of potential employees before hiring. Do you agree that businesses should be liable for injuries resulting from negligent hiring? Why, or why not?

Read Malorney v. B&L Motor Freight, Inc. in Section 21.2 of your textbook. Discuss what duty or duties a business has with regard to checking the background of potential employees before hiring. Do you agree that businesses should be liable for injuries resulting from negligent hiring? Why, or why not?Guided Response: Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner.Agree or disagree with your classmate’s position. Defend your position by using information from the week’s readings or examples from current events.

Discuss the roles and responsibilities of selected health science professionals.

HS100-2: Discuss the roles and responsibilities of selected health science professionals.GEL-1.02: Demonstrate college-level communication through the composition of original materials in Standard English. GELInstructionsWrite a paper regarding your chosen profession that incorporates the reading and research you have completed in the course so far. Your paper should include the following sections:Overview of the professionEducational requirements including any relevant certifications or credentialsPersonality traits and skill sets required for your profession. Explain how the traits you learned about yourself from the personality profile line up with your field and areas you may need to work on.Summary of your career goalsHow Purdue Global Career Services can assist you in obtaining your career goalsWhere you see yourself in 5 yearsSince this is may be the first paper you are writing for a college level course, you are welcome and highly encouraged to use this template to help you complete this Assignment.Your grade will be determined by both the content of your paper and also your writing and format.Minimum Submission RequirementsInclude an introduction and conclusionInclude topic sentences with supporting statements in each paragraph,ANDThis Assessment should be a Microsoft Word (3-5 full pages) document, in addition to the title and reference pages.Respond to the questions in a thorough manner, providing specific examples of concepts, topics, definitions, and other elements asked for in the questions. Your submission should be highly organized, logical, and focused.Your submission must be written in Standard English and demonstrate exceptional content, organization, style, and grammar and mechanics.Your submission should provide a clearly established and sustained viewpoint and purpose.Your writing should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful.A separate page at the end of your submission should contain a list of references, in APA format. Use your textbook, the Library, and the internet for research.Be sure to cite both in-text and reference list citations where appropriate and reference all sources. Your sources and content should follow proper APA citation style. Review the writing resources for APA formatting and citation found in Academic Tools. Additional writing resources can be found within the Academic Success Center.Your submission should:include a cover sheet;be double-spaced;be typed in Times New Roman, 12 -point font;include correct citationsbe written in Standard English with no spelling or punctuation errors; andinclude correct references at the bottom of the last page.If work submitted for this competency assessment does not meet the minimum submission requirements, it will be returned without being scored.PlagiarismPlagiarism is an act of academic dishonesty. It violates the University Honor Code, and the offense is subject to disciplinary action. You are expected to be the sole author of your work. Use of another person’s work or ideas must be accompanied by specific citations and references. Whether the action is intentional or not, it still constitutes plagiarism.

Summary paper- The purpose of these assignments is for you to review and critically analyze the major topics you are reading in your textbooks

The purpose of these assignments is for you to review and critically analyze the major topics you are reading in your textbooks. The papers are to be at least 5 pages in length using superb grammar, sentence structure, format (APA), and referencing. The paper topic and corresponding textbook readings are ?? The coaching relationship: Moore: Ch 2-4; Jordan: Ch: 8)Required textbooks:-Moore M, Jackson E, Tschannen-Moren B. Coaching Psychology Manual, 2nd Ed. Wolters Kluwer Publishing. Baltimore. 2016. ISBN: 978-1-4511-9526-2-Jordan M. How to be a Health Coach. An Integrative Wellness Approach. Global Medicine Enterprises. San Rafeal, CA. 2013. ISBN: 978-1463627799This paper is just a summary paper, do not add any opinions or discussion, just a pure summary for the book chapters. Use headlines to separate chapters.

Can ‘natural’ food taste good, or does the conventional food industry have an unfair advantage when it comes to creating pleasing, addictive food? Is food packaged as natural also good for you and for the environment? Is it fair trade? Is it ethically produced?

Allow me to adapt a Shakespearian line in this last assignment, devoted to the study of the relationship between food that is marketed as ‘natural’ and the Slow Food Movement.If you recall the slogan of Slow Food, “Good, Clean, and Fair,” you might remember that the flavour of food and its origin are key aspects of the kind of culinary practices that are invoked by Carlo Petrini. In North America, when we want to turn to healthy food, we tend to gravitate towards food labelled as natural. But is ‘natural’ an unproblematic category? Like ‘authentic’, ‘natural’ is a buzzword that moves millions of dollars. Is ‘natural’ also “Good, Clean and Fair”? This time, you can widen your range of shopping locations to look for food that is labelled as natural to test it for goodness, cleanliness, and fairness. Pick three kinds of food (no wine or spirits) and determine whether they fit the Slow Food guidelines. Remember, this is not a quest for Slow Food, but rather a way of deepening your knowledge of the way food is presented as healthy and natural. One of the issues to consider would be taste. I’m reminded of the time when my son used to tell me that he avoids cereal labelled as ‘natural’ like the plague due to their bland if not awful flavour. Can ‘natural’ food taste good, or does the conventional food industry have an unfair advantage when it comes to creating pleasing, addictive food? Is food packaged as natural also good for you and for the environment? Is it fair trade? Is it ethically produced? There are many questions you can ask your food. Have fun with this final assignment. Write a total of maximum 900 words, minimum 700. In this case, make sure you have an introduction and a conclusion.

According to James Surowiecki in the book “The Wisdom of Crowds:” When “Groups” are involved in making a decision they normally have better than “house odds,” which is 70% of getting it right without having 100% of the facts. What techniques have worked for you in forming groups to solve problems?

According to James Surowiecki in the book “The Wisdom of Crowds:” When “Groups” are involved in making a decision they normally have better than “house odds,” which is 70% of getting it right without having 100% of the facts. When groups make decisions they normally, and consistently hit at about 85 to 90% of the time getting the right answer. However, without the facts being available to any human it lowers the odds to a little over the 50-50 point.When considering working in groups, remember there is strength in harmony and like-mindedness: however, diversity facilitates “thinking outside the box.” “Groupthink” is an example of what occurs when conformity is attributed too much emphasis. The following website provides more information:http://www.afirstlook.com/docs/groupthink.pdf1) What techniques have worked for you in forming groups to solve problems?2) Why do you think the technique worked or didn’t work? Explain.Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 250 words.

Enhanced interogation and ethics – Did Zero Dark Thirty change your perceptions about “enhanced interrogation techniques”? If so, how did they change?Regardless of the semantic question of whether waterboarding is a form of torture, the fact remains that its use presents us with serious ethical dilemmas. Is it ever morally acceptable to subject a prisoner to pain, duress, or humiliation? If so, what circumstances call for such drastic means?

Several recent American films have dealt with ethical issues in international situations and raise thorny questions for students of leadership ethics. One such film is Zero Dark Thirty. If you have not seen the film, you will probably want to watch it, but you can also get a synopsis of the plot on IMDb if you don’t mind spoilers. http://www.imdb.com/There is only one thread for both weeks in this discussion, but be sure you participate at least twice, once to post your own thoughts and once to respond to other students. Of course, if someone engages with you, you should also post a return response. Remember that ethical issues can raise conflicting points of view. It is fine to disagree with a post—we want to generate discussion—but always be respectful.Zero Dark ThirtyZero Dark Thirty is a fictional account of the hunt for Osama Bin Laden and presents us with important ethical questions regarding the morality of torture (“enhanced interrogation techniques”) and the responsibilities of filmmakers to represent the truth.Please post your thoughts on the ethical issues raised by this film by responding to one or more of these questions:Ethical Issues and Discussion Questions1. Did Zero Dark Thirty change your perceptions about “enhanced interrogation techniques”? If so, how did they change? 2. Regardless of the semantic question of whether waterboarding is a form of torture, the fact remains that its use presents us with serious ethical dilemmas. Is it ever morally acceptable to subject a prisoner to pain, duress, or humiliation? If so, what circumstances call for such drastic means? 3. Moreover, if coercive modes of interrogation are ever permissible, where should we draw the line between acceptable and unacceptable interrogation methods, and what criteria should we use to establish that line? Who should have final say? 4. Do filmmakers have a moral responsibility not to misinform their audiences about important issues, or do their artistic licenses trump such concerns? 5. The film’s conflict is resolved by the assassination of Osama bin Laden. Should the U.S. government have done more to capture him alive? If avoidable, was this killing—and indeed, the creation of a “Kill List” of terrorists—ethical?Source: Ethics on Film: Discussion of “Zero Dark Thirty.” (2013) Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs. http://www.carnegiecouncil.org/education/002/film/reviews/0007.html

Why is communication important with stakeholders in a business? Explain in your own words

Description

Think of a change in a company with which you are familiar. Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words or more words use 1-2 Resources: 1. Who were the stakeholders involved in this change? 2. Discuss what concerns different stakeholders might have and how communication is needed to address those concerns. —- Why are stakeholders important in a business? ((((Explain in your own words- Explain in 50 words or more- Do NOT use resource explain in your own words)))) —- Why is communication important with stakeholders in a business? ((((Explain in your own wordsExplain in 50 words or more- Do NOT use resource explain in your own words))))

write a 2000 word self-reflection which: Introduces the focus of your research interests

MA IN SOCIAL RESEARCH

WORKING BEYOND DISCIPLINES

Assignment Brief – Summative

Assignment title(s)

Reflective essay (100%)

You will write a 2000 word self-reflection which:

• Introduces the focus of your research interests
• Outlines your preferred (disciplinary) approach and its underlying philosophical position which underpins it
• Identifies the societal challenge to which your research interests relate
• Outlines and evaluates the different disciplinary perspectives from which that challenge has been explored
• Reflects on the impact of exploring alternative approaches to researching that societal challenge on your philosophical position and planned approach

Guidance on how to articulate your philosophical position and prepare a reflective essay will be provided during the module.

Guidance on how to interpret the assessment criteria for this specific assessment are provided below

Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

• Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.

• • Describe one’s use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement a capstone project.
• Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.

• • Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched one’s initial predictions and document the practicum hours spent with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.
• Competency 4: Apply health information and patient care technology to improve patient and systems outcomes.

• • Assess the degree to which one successfully leveraged health care technology in a capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with a patient, family, or group.
• Competency 5: Analyze the impact of health policy on quality and cost of care.

• • Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of one’s capstone project, as well as any contributions the project made to policy development.
• Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.

• • Assess the contribution of an intervention (capstone project) to patient, family, or group satisfaction and quality of life.
• Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.

• • Assess one’s personal and professional growth throughout a capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.
  • Communicate professionally in a clear and well-organized video.

Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.

Instructions

Complete this assessment in two parts: (a) present your approved intervention to the patient and (b) record a video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program.

PART 1

Present your approved intervention to the patient. Plan to spend at least 3 practicum hours exploring these aspects of the problem with the patient, family, or group. During this time, you may also consult with subject matter and industry experts of your choice

Use the Intervention Feedback Form: Assessment 5 [PDF] as a guide to capturing patient feedback about your intervention. You’ll include the feedback as part of your capstone reflection video.

Part 2

Record a 10-15 minute video reflection on your practicum experience, the development of your capstone project, and your personal and professional growth over the course of your RN-to-BSN program. A transcript of your video is not required.

You’re welcome to use any tools and software with which you are comfortable, but make sure you’re able to submit the deliverable to your faculty. Capella offers Kaltura, a program that records audio and video. Refer to Using Kaltura for more information about this courseroom tool.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in these activities, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations. If you’re unable to record a video, please contact your faculty as soon as possible to explore options for completing the assessment.

Requirements

The assessment requirements, outlined below, correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so address each main point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. In addition, note the additional requirements for supporting evidence.

• Assess the contribution of your intervention to patient or family satisfaction and quality of life.

• • Describe feedback received from the patient, family, or group on your intervention as a solution to the problem.
  • Explain how your intervention enhances the patient, family, or group experience.
• Describe your use of evidence and peer-reviewed literature to plan and implement your capstone project.

• • Explain how the principles of evidence-based practice informed this aspect of your project.
• Assess the degree to which you successfully leveraged health care technology in your capstone project to improve outcomes or communication with the patient, family, or group.

• • Identify opportunities to improve health care technology use in future practice.
• Explain how health policy influenced the planning and implementation of your capstone project, as well as any contributions your project made to policy development.

• • Note specific observations related to the baccalaureate-prepared nurse’s role in policy implementation and development.
• Explain whether capstone project outcomes matched your initial predictions.

• • Discuss the aspects of the project that met, exceeded, or fell short of your expectations.
  • Discuss whether your intervention can, or will be, adopted as a best practice.
  • Describe the generalizability of your intervention outside this particular setting.
  • Document the time spent (your practicum hours) with these individuals or group in the Core Elms Volunteer Experience Form.
• Assess your personal and professional growth throughout your capstone project and the RN-to-BSN program.

• • Address your provision of ethical care and demonstration of professional standards.
  • Identify specific growth areas of which you are most proud or in which you have taken particular satisfaction.
• Communicate professionally in a clear, audible, and well-organized video.

Additional Requirements

Cite at least three scholarly or authoritative sources to support your assertions. In addition to your reflection video, submit a separate APA 7^th edition-formatted reference list of your sources.