Describe the four phases of an audit and discuss the key factors that would help you determine how to plan the audit for this company. Provide specific examples.

Imagine that you are a senior auditor and your firm has been selected to audit a medium-sized company with a single location.Provide an overview of the company.Describe the four phases of an audit and discuss the key factors that would help you determine how to plan the audit for this company. Provide specific examples.Determine both the relationship of risks in the planning of the audit and factors that influence those risks.Speculate on which type of risk creates the most uncertainty for the auditor and recommend at least two ways to plan the audit to mitigate those risks. Provide specific examples.Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.

POST a brief explanation of two potential impacts of using tests not linked to job analyses.

A properly constructed employment examination should result in test scores that predict job success and documentation that convinces the test reviewer that the scores will be valid. A validation study provides evidence to support the use of predictor scores (Drasgow, Whetzel, & Oppler, 2007). As you discovered last week, there are three legal strategies for demonstrating validity: criterion-related validity, content validity and construct validity. Content validity is often the basis for meeting legal and professional requirements. Content validity requires the test constructor to document the link between the job analysis and the selection process. What are the potential implications to an organization if a validation study is not conducted before a test administration process begins? What are the implications of weak validation procedures or incomplete documentation?POST a brief explanation of two potential impacts of using tests not linked to job analyses. Then, explain one consequence of using a misaligned testing process. Support your response with at least two examples from the current literature.

Describe the expected interest groups and there specific arguments

Write a 350 word outline including your introduction and three reference resources to be used. The outline should be detailed to reflect your position in the paper. (see Unit 4 Project below)***PLEASE SEPERATE BOTH DOCUMENTS INTO TWO DIFFERENT WORD FILES***ASSIGNMENT 2: ProjectWrite a 15 page paper with bibliography. Your written assignments must follow APA guidelines. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from the week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Pocket Guide to APA Style to ensure in-text citations and reference list are correct.In 1972 marijuana was placed in Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act as such the US government considered it to have not accepted medical use in treatment. Currently 14 states of the 50 states have enacted protections to citizens using marijuana for medical purpose. In this assignment, you will consider federal legislation on this important issue. The issue before Congress is whether to continue the federal prosecution of medical marijuana patients and their providers in accordance with the federal Controlled Substance Act or to permit the use of marijuana when recommended by a physician.Your paper should do the following:State your position. Your position should take that is opposite to your personal views.Discuss the context of this legislation – name the expected demanders and suppliers as outlined in our textbook, Chapter 3.Describe the expected interest groups and there specific argumentsDescribe the expected interplay between demanders and suppliers, interest groups and analyze the public policy environment.State your strategic policy to enhance or diffuse results of public policy environment.

Explain/discuss the problem(s) or situations the U.S. or each speaker faced and sought to fix/solve.

Speech Review InstructionsYou must select and review two great speeches delivered by two different individuals. They must be speeches that were delivered by two important American politician, political leaders, or former U.S. Presidents.Specific instructionsYou will complete a 2-page review of each speech. Use sub-headings. Approximately, a 5-page for the review of the two speeches is required not including the title page and the reference page. Analyze/review the speeches independently with headings based on the below:a. Analyze the speakers’ use persuasion and tell if they were based on logic.b. Discuss the worldview each speaker based his/her persuasion.c. Did each speaker get the attention of the American people? Explaind. Explain/discuss the problem(s) or situations the U.S. or each speaker faced and sought to fix/solve.e. Explain/discuss the solutions to the problems or situations the speakers provided.f. Did the speakers call the American people to action? ExplainThe paper must be written in current Turabian format. Each speech must have a minimum of three references. If you reference a book or article, you must indicate the page number of the quotation or paraphrased lines or sentences. You must include the links for your chosen speeches or videos along with your review.Check your work in Turnit In for similarity or plagiarism.

What are the advantages of inflating a project based on PERT estimating or incorporating risk

QUESTION: 750-900 words APA FORMATThere are various ways of forecasting the schedule and cost of a project. You know that the forecasting techniques that you use and their accuracy will affect the CIO’s perspective on your work. Your CIO would now like for you to address the following issues in a presentation for the various staff members involved in the project:What are the advantages of inflating a project based on PERT estimating or incorporating risk

What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?

Primary Task Response:Within the Discussion Board area, write 400 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.During the Cold War, the U.S. counterintelligence (CI) mission was clearly defined:It focused on countering the intelligence collection efforts of the Soviet Union and its allies.However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the focus of CI became blurred because of a lack of an identifiable threat.A perception developed throughout the U.S. intelligence community that CI equals human intelligence (HUMINT) collection and that the two disciplines were interchangeable. This, along with an increase in the need for HUMINT to counter emerging threats, further blurred the line between CI and HUMINT.Today, the two disciplines are often grouped together as CI/HUMINT.Some will argue that the grouping together of CI and HUMINT to accomplish the growing HUMINT collection mission has significantly degraded the effectiveness of the CI mission.What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?The main post should include at least 1 reference to research sources, and all sources should be cited using APA format.

Identify one or more contentious areas involved in the agreement and discuss, providing reasoned argument about whether or not Canadian participation is a good thing.

Political paper;2000-2500 words;MLA;3 academic sources AT LEASTTopicà Select a Canadian free trade agreement (such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership of 2015-16) and describe the circumstances of its negotiation (in broad terms), parties, and key elements. Identify one or more contentious areas involved in the agreement and discuss, providing reasoned argument about whether or not Canadian participation is a good thing.** some reference provided, please find more in attachment.

Think about how social psychology and, specifically, Bandura’s social cognitive theory, explains how modeling affects cognitive development and behavior.

Whether we like it or not, we are exposed to environmental influences every day that shape our behavior and how we view ourselves. While the influence of media is undeniable, the first and most profound models of appropriate gender-specific behaviors are our parents or other primary caregivers.From a very early age, children begin to develop their gender identity by observing and emulating behaviors of same-sex caregivers. You can probably easily think of 3-4 behaviors you observed from a same-sex parent or caregiver that you continue to emulate to this day. In this discussion, you will explore this topic in more depth by considering which behaviors of a same-sex adult you possess and why, based on Bandura’s social cognitive theory.Review this week’s Learning Resources on social psychology and sex-linked modeling.Think about how social psychology and, specifically, Bandura’s social cognitive theory, explains how modeling affects cognitive development and behavior.Consider your childhood and select a same-sex adult who influenced your personal development. The same-sex adult could include a primary caregiver, extended member of the family, or family friend with whom you were close as a child.Explain some of the behaviors of the same-sex adult that you learned as a child and now demonstrate. Based on social cognitive theory, explain how you might have acquired the behaviors. Be specific.

write a paper describing this person’s role, source of power, what does the person do, who does the person report to, who provides check and balance on this position.

Pick a position in the Texas Government(i.e. Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General or any other position) and write a paper describing this person’s role, source of power, what does the person do, who does the person report to, who provides check and balance on this position. Also, describe how this position is filled, who is currently in this position, background information, goal, party affiliated to and your opinion on that person. Also, explain major impact of this position in history.APA format, double spaced, should include an abstract page, three written page(introduction, body and conclusion) and work cited page ( four credible sources