Evaluate the effectiveness of specific legislation in closing current gaps in health care policy.

Policy analysis begins with a review of current literature. Health care leaders must understand how and why laws are created. The best way to explore the historical significance and underpinnings of current legislation is to read the literature. Health policy making and legislation are dynamic processes influenced by multiple factors. A thorough review of the literature helps a policy analyst determine whether specific legislation is having the intended impact and if it has produced unintended consequences. In addition, a literature review enables informed recommendations for policy changes and advocacy.This assignment provides an opportunity for you to complete an in-depth literature review related to the health care legislation you chose to investigate in this course.By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:Competency 2: Evaluate significant federal and state legislation that affects the scope of, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.Summarize findings from the literature on the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.Analyze the effects of at least one piece of legislation on health care access, cost, and/or quality.Competency 3: Analyze the effects of values and assumptions inherent in the changing priorities in health planning and resource allocation.Articulate underlying assumptions, values, and biases in the literature.Competency 5: Recommend possible initiatives available to address current gaps in health care policy.Identify current gaps in health care policy.Evaluate the effectiveness of specific legislation in closing current gaps in health care policy.Competency 6: Communicate effectively, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.ScenarioThe health care think tank board of directors was intrigued by the introduction to your proposed research and has approved your choice of legislation as the focus of your investigation. Consequently, you have been given approval to proceed with the research. Your next step will be to conduct a review of the literature to determine the impact that your legislation has had on the industry and on various stakeholders, including patients.InstructionsConduct a review of current literature related to the research question you developed in your Unit 3 assignment. Chapter 14 of the Teitelbaum and Wilensky (2019) text provides a robust discussion on structuring a policy analysis. Tips in this chapter may help you with this section of your work.Include at least 12 articles, with a focus on how your chosen legislation has affected health care facilities, health plans, communities, and various stakeholders, including patients. Seek literature that will help you answer your research question.Be sure that your review of the literature captures the diversity of views. Most policies are steeped in controversy, and few will agree on the benefits of a particular policy. The more recent the policy, the more likely you are to find diverse opinions.Summarize your findings from the literature. Consider organizing your literature review using subheadings to discern conflicting findings and viewpoints.Document Format and LengthOrganize your literature review as follows:Introduction and the topic legislation.Brief description of the search strategy you used to secure the needed articles.Historical overview or context for the legislation.Current context for the legislation.Intended outcomes and possible unintended consequences.Specific theme of how the legislation affected the specific element of health care (the “Y” part of your research question).Possible gaps in the legislation.Summary.Your literature review should be 6–8 pages of content plustitle and references pages.EvaluationThe following requirements correspond to the grading criteria in the assignment scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.Summarize findings from the literature on the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.What is known, unknown, or uncertain in your findings?What disagreements or controversies did you uncover in your review?Is further research required?Analyze the effects of at least one piece of legislation on health care access, cost, and/or quality.Is the legislation clear in its application and scope?What factors determine its impact on health care access, cost, and/or quality?Articulate underlying assumptions, values, and biases in the literature.How do these factors influence the authors’ arguments and conclusions?How might your perspective or position influence your analysis?Analyze current gaps in health care policy.What evidence do you have to support your findings?Evaluate the effectiveness of the legislation you have chosen to investigate in closing current gaps in health care policy.On which criteria do you base your assessment?What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind.Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements for your sources.

Explain which channel would have been better for the situation and why you think it would have been more effective.

For this assignment, think back of a time where you think you used the wrong channel to convey a message to someone in your life. Examples could be sending a text message to break up with someone, or emailing a boss when in both situations you should have talked to them face to face.In a , written using appropriate spelling/grammar, address the items below. Remember to be descriptive, and use as much detail in your examples as possible.Describe the relationship you have/had with the person in the interaction.Explain which channel you used initially and why you think it was the wrong means to communicate with them.Explain which channel would have been better for the situation and why you think it would have been more effective.

What practical approaches will you integrate into your leadership role in order to manage multigenerational employees in the workplace?

Read the following article titled: Cross-Generational Networking Is A Win-Win For Employees And Their Organization. So Why Don’t We Do It?. (hyperlinked). In the article, the author states that “bridging the generation gap will occur when we are open to learning from others and understanding that we don’t always have all the answers.”Reflect upon that statement as you draft out some responses to the questions below:? What practical approaches will you integrate into your leadership role in order to manage multigenerational employees in the workplace?? What are the best methods you plan to use for overcoming multigenerational challenges such as ageism, communication style, and negative stereotypes?? How do you plan on providing individualized feedback to each generation in a way they will find most valuable?? When communicating with other leaders about multigenerational employee makeup, what impacts to business and strategy execution will you highlight in your discussions?Need 4-5 pages with peer-reviewed citations.

What ethical considerations are important to research?

THIS IS A DB AND REPLY POST ( REPLY POST WILL BE POSTED IN MESSAGES)The scientific method allows us to pose questions, test questions, and analyze results. Ethics is always inclusive of research, as we must protect participants and be aware of appropriate methods for obtaining information.Through observation and research we begin to understand the world around us. Consider research you have read about or been a part of: Was the scientific method followed? How? What ethical considerations are important to research?After sharing your thoughts, please respond to at least two other classmates’ posts.

What advice would you give the CEO?

You are the assistant to the CEO of a small technology firm that manufactures quality, premium-priced, stylish clothing. The CEO has decided to see what the opportunities are for exporting and has asked you for advice as to the steps the company should take. What advice would you give the CEO?

How could you apply your knowledge of these principles in a future interaction to prevent or reduce misunderstanding?

THIS IS A DB AND A REPLY POSTGo back and review the Communication Principles in the textbook reading and in this module’s lesson content. Familiarize yourself with the information and address the following in your post.Choose two of the principles of communication.Provide two examples for each of the principles (so you will have a total of 4 examples by the end of your post).How could you apply your knowledge of these principles in a future interaction to prevent or reduce misunderstanding?For your response post, make sure that you write at least 3-4 sentences. In the sentences, you can either bring in more information from the content of the module, suggest a different point of view, or ask a question for further information.Principles of CommunicationCommunication is symbolic: We communicate using words, but the words are only symbols, not the actual objects themselves. Communication involves words, pictures, sounds, and marks, all of which may represent something else.Communication involves a shared meaning: When you speak with a friend, and she tells you of an experience that she recently had, you are able to understand her experience because you have a shared meaning of the words and symbols that she uses to describe the experience.Communication is a process: It evolves over time and after multiple engagements that build upon each other. This ongoing interaction changes the relationship.Communication is culturally determined: We all grow up in a culture and in that culture, we learn to speak and behave according to that culture. So when we communicate it will be based on which culture we grew up in.Communication occurs in a context: When we communicate it takes place in a certain area, and we have certain expectations based on that location. We have to take into account that people talk differently in different situations, you would not act the same in class as you would in a baseball game.Communication is purposeful: We communicate for a reason. There are five key reasons to communicate: Physiological Needs, Safety Needs, Social Needs, Esteem Needs, Self-Actualization Needs

Explain the court’s displeasure with issues like the Christian Burial Speech. What might it mean in the long run to a serious case just as it did with Brewer v. Williams?

Assignment DetailsThe concept of the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine stems directly from the Exclusionary Rule. It is a method of explaining the concept of the Exclusionary Rule. It compares the Exclusionary Rule to a Tree that is poisonous and all of the fruit from that tree is also poison. The tree represents actions by law enforcement that are not appropriate and violate the 4th Amendment. Any fruit, which represents the evidence seized as a result of inappropriate actions by authorities is considered “poisonous” and not admissible in the court proceeding.This video examines the concept of “The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree” (Ray Law Criminal Defense Attorneys, 2020):Address the following in 3-4 pages:Describe the Exclusionary Rule and how it is meant to protect citizens of this country.Identify at least 2 methods of demonstrative evidence that would explain the concept of best evidence. You may use scenarios to describe the theory of best evidence.Explain the need for an absolute adherence to avoiding any evidentiary issue that would result in a Fruit of the Poisonous Tree violation (4th Amendment).Explain the court’s displeasure with issues like the Christian Burial Speech. What might it mean in the long run to a serious case just as it did with Brewer v. Williams?Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.Note: For this exercise, do not involve military use of waterboarding on enemy combatants. That is another issue that your investigators will not have to face.This assignment will also be assessed using additional criteria provided here.ReferenceRay Law Crininal Defense Attorneys. (2020, December 12). Explained the fruit of the poisonous tree [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/slB5sK8b1jI

Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? Support your position.

The Exclusionary Rule supports the 4th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Judicial precedence has provided both the Exclusionary Rule and exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule. In general, conservative politicians claim that exceptions are not constitutional while progressive politicians claim that they are.This site looks at why the Exclusionary Rule is important and the following videoexamines how the Exclusionary Rule can be sidestepped (Haber, 2016):Using your reading assignment, the content above, and what you have learned about the Exclusionary Rule, answer the following questions:Should the exclusionary rule be abolished? Support your position.What exceptions would you consider adding to the exclusionary rule?What exceptions would you consider removing from the exclusionary rule?ReferenceHaber, M. (2016, March 8). Exclusionary Rule and how cops sidestep? (68) Michael A Haber Miami Miami criminal lawyer [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/bntI1MybOSMConnect to Content: At least one post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boardsfor help with connecting to the content.

Do you feel that under-represented people or those who are fearful of speaking in public would be able to make their input effectively?

Watch a recording of a previous meeting, a Planning Commission meeting in the San Diego, California jurisdiction.USE THE TEMPLATE*Respond thoroughly and thoughtfully to each of the questions, in order, as set out in the template. I am looking for you to demonstrate that you understand how the actions and discussion reflect (or do not) the technical elements of California land use planning, AND that you are making the larger connections to the cultural, economic, and social dimensions and impacts of land use planning.TEMPLATE:[In the first paragraph, describe the planning environment in San Diego. What are some of the important trends, developments, land use issues, plan or zoning changes, lawsuits, or recent events that form the context for the planning commission’s actions? Get this from news reports or other public sources (Google is your friend here)][In the second paragraph, summarize the overall agenda for the meeting. What were the types of issues or applications discussed (e.g., CEQA, development approvals, policy issues, plan updates, zoning changes, etc.)? Were there topics or actions that were general or informational in nature, in addition to applications for development approval?][In the next two-three paragraphs, choose one item that was considered, and describe the process. First, describe the specific action that was considered (if there was an action) – was it advisory, approval, forwarding a policy or approval to the council? BE SPECIFIC!]. [Next, describe the discussion that took place. Who were the parties involved? Who specifically made a presentation, or otherwise led the discussion? What kinds of comments were made? Were there, for example, people speaking in opposition to a policy? Did some planning commission members or staff take a particularly important role? If so, who? BE SPECIFIC!][Finally, describe the larger planning issues that were discussed, whether these were discussed directly or alluded to by the participants. Were there, as examples, issues of authority, discretion vs. property rights, housing supply, community change, aesthetics, or equity? Did members, for example, comment on the limits of their authority, or the pros and cons of their ordinance? Were policy issues raised directly, indirectly, or not at all? ][Finally, sum up your assessment of the meeting and process. You may use first-person (“I”, “me,” “mine,” etc.) in this paragraph and this paragraph only. How would you characterize the quality and content of the debate? Did you hear thoughtful reflection on land use planning, or were people unproductive? How well was the meeting managed? Do you feel that under-represented people or those who are fearful of speaking in public would be able to make their input effectively? What did you take away from the meeting about the land use planning process?]**You may use four pages, using this template. No less or no more than four!**