write a critical analysis reflecting upon one prescribing consultation you led under the supervision/guidance of your DMP
Task details and instructions You should write a critical analysis reflecting upon one prescribing consultation you led under the supervision/guidance of your DMP .

 

A reflective critical analysis of your prescribing practice during one consultation using a recognised consultation model demonstrating safe practice and within a framework of professional development. This will include reflective analysis and appraisal of your approach to

a)    Assessing the patient and taking an appropriate medical, social and medication history from all available sources.

b)    Interpretation of this and relevant investigations necessary to inform treatment options and a diagnosis including the seeking of support and advice when necessary.

c)    Achieving your prescribing decision considering your knowledge of the condition, disease progression and potential treatment outcomes. Having considered the mode of action and pharmacokinetics of the medication alongside information from your assessment and history taking to support your decision.

d)    Critical application, analysis and evaluation of appropriate national guidelines, local protocols and current evidence base to your decision.

e)    Critical application of your professional code, legal frameworks/legislation and ethical principles throughout the process.

f)      Reaching a shared decision with your patient.

g)    Considering the patient’s needs for review and monitoring including other members of the MDT where appropriate to meet the patient’s needs.

h)    The conclusion of your reflection should include an action plan for your continuing professional development identified through the application of reflective processes.

i)      A copy of the prescription and drug monologue should be included as appendices 1 and 2. No other appendices should be submitted.

 

Critically apply, analyse and evaluate appropriate national guidelines, local protocols and current evidence base to your decision

A reflective critical analysis of your prescribing practice during one consultation using a recognised consultation model demonstrating safe practice and within a framework of professional development. This will include reflective analysis and appraisal of your approach to

  1. Assessing the patient and taking an appropriate medical, social and medication history from all available sources.
  2. Interpretation of this and relevant investigations necessary to inform treatment options and a diagnosis including the seeking of support and advice when necessary.
  3. Achieving your prescribing decision considering your knowledge of the condition, disease progression and potential treatment outcomes. Having considered the mode of action and pharmacokinetics of the medication alongside information from your assessment and history taking to support your decision.
  4. Critical application, analysis and evaluation of appropriate national guidelines, local protocols and current evidence base to your decision.
  5. Critical application of your professional code, legal frameworks/legislation and ethical principles throughout the process.
  6. Reaching a shared decision with your patient.
  7. Considering the patient’s needs for review and monitoring including other members of the MDT where appropriate to meet the patient’s needs.
  8. The conclusion of your reflection should include an action plan for your continuing professional development identified through the application of reflective processes.
  9. A copy of the prescription and drug monologue should be included as appendices 1 and 2. No other appendices should be submitted.
Examine organizational theory (select a theory that you are most interested in learning more about) and explain your understanding of how this theory applies to higher education institutions.

Description

Examine organizational theory (select a theory that you are most interested in learning more about) and explain your understanding of how this theory applies to higher education institutions. Responses will involve analyzing readings, comparing and contrasting the views of authors, and critiquing arguments presented by the readings or the class. Papers will be graded for accuracy of interpretation, rigor of argument, and clarity of expression. Papers should be 5 pages in length.

Using enough clinical evidence, support the use of botulinum toxin type A for anti- wrinkle treatment.

Mrs H was prescribed Bocouture to treat her wrinkles. This was the best choice, following evaluation of previous studies, due to its low immunogenic potential. She will be reviewed 2 weeks post treatment to observe the success of her treatment. Although there were other treatment options, Mrs H was at the forefront of the decision to use botulinum toxin type A, with the decision being made taking into account the patient’s best interest. Mrs H was well-informed of the treatment including the implications of not adhering to aftercare advice, minimising the chances of complications arising as a result of poor clinical governance. Professional responsibilities had been accomplished and the prescriber had built a trusting relationship with Mrs H. This has a positive impact on the patient’s treatment as well as her future care.

 

Using enough clinical evidence, support the use of botulinum toxin type A for anti- wrinkle treatment.

How will you share what you have learned in the program with your boss and what ways will you suggest you modify the presentation to ensure that it is engaging and memorable, using brain based strategies?

You have just been hired for your dream job and your first assignment is to co-present a training session to your colleagues with your new boss. You just completed your degree in Cognitive Studies and have learned a great deal about how people learn and the best ways to present material to ensure that it is retained. Your boss is very traditional and has created a very text filled power point for the two of you to read from in the training. How will you share what you have learned in the program with your boss and what ways will you suggest you modify the presentation to ensure that it is engaging and memorable, using brain based strategies?

Describe the steps you would take to solve this problem.

Regardless of your field of study, you will encounter ethical issues along the way that will require difficult choices. The best way to problem solve is to use your EDU499 Professional Standards by Program   Download EDU499 Professional Standards by Program table as a guide. In this discussion forum, each program has a scenario to read, reflect on, and problem-solve using the knowledge you have gained from your degree program in conjunction with your professional standards.

To prepare for this Discussion,

In the EDU499 Professional Standards by Program   Download EDU499 Professional Standards by Programtable, follow the link corresponding to your program’s professional standards.

In your initial post,

  • List the title of your scenario.
  • Copy and paste the specific professional standard that will help you solve this ethical dilemma.
  • Respond to the following question:
    • Why did you choose the standard you did?
  • Describe the steps you would take to solve this problem.
  • Create an ethical scenario of your own that pertains to your field of study for your peers to solve. Be sure that your scenario is detailed enough so that your peers from a different field of study can understand the situation and problem solve.

 

what would you suggest to compare between the alternatives and one what bases would you select the most proper financing mix for Walgreens

Question:

If you are the CFO of Walgreens, and you are inclining an expansion in the pharmaceutical products, The company needs financing, and you are examining the available alternatives, what would you suggest to compare between the alternatives and one what bases would you select the most proper financing mix for Walgreens

Calculate:The Weighted Average Cost of Capital under Different Leverage Scenarios.

Calculate:

1. Missing Data in the Table

2. The Weighted Average Cost of Capital under Different Leverage Scenarios.

How do you assess Walgreens financial performance under the above statistics, and performance measures?

Assess the best Dividend Payment Scheme, and explain why. Using The Following Table, Calculate :

The Value of the Firm The Fair Price per Share The WACC

Comment on the results of your calculations, and suggest corrective actions if needed.

Write a short statement explaining how you perceive the performance of Walgreens during 2014, and assess the management strategy in managing key performance indicators.

Page 13

Case Study Requirements

Using the data depicted,

1- Write a short statement explaining how you perceive the performance of Walgreens during 2014, and assess the management strategy in managing key performance indicators.

2- Using the following Data:

Leverage

0

25%

50%

100%

Equity

Debt

Total

EBIT@ 12%

Cost of Equity

Cost of Debt

10%

10%

10%

10%

Market Value of Debt

Market Value of Equity

Value of Walgreens

identify creative marketing skills and knowledge in a practical and applied situation.

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Module Title: Principles and Practices of Marketing

Word Limit: 3000

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

Choose one of the following companies:

  • Fashion Home Interiors
  • Hugo Boss
  • Bo Concept
  • Oliver Bonas
  • Heals/ Habitat
  • Primark
  • Ikea

Use a portfolio approach (visuals and written commentary) to critically evaluate how the company:

A. Has used at least four of the seven marketing mix elements in their UK operations, to reinforce its positioning within the last three years. (40 marks)

B. Reflects strategic decisions and relevant taught theories in its marketing efforts. (30 marks)

C. Does/ can evaluate the effectiveness of its marketing efforts. (20 marks)

D. The content of your portfolio must display academic skill and integrity, appropriate to level five studies. (10 marks). You must make reference to taught theories/ models/ strategies throughout your work

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

Knowledge of relevant literature that would permit an understanding of affective marketing mix solutions. This will take the form of strategies and tactical plans that are supported by a sound information base.

• Depth of research and analysis skills that consistently draw on taught theory, models and strategy. • The ability to identify creative marketing skills and knowledge in a practical and applied situation.

The work should demonstrate intellectual originality and imagination. Academic skills appropriate to level five studies. This will include grammar, layout and referencing.

READING REQUIREMENT

Your work must be fully supported with references (cited in the Harvard style)

You must use all of the following:

Kotler, P. Keller, K. Goodman, M, Brady, M. Hansen, T. (2019) Marketing Management. 4th European Edition (4th edition), Pearson.

• Chaffey, D. Ellis- Chadwick, F. (2019) Digital Marketing, Strategy, Implementation and Practice (7th edition), Pearson

• Andrews, J. Shimp, T. (2017) Advertising, Promotion, and other Aspects of Integrated Marketing Communications (10th edition), South West

At least three other academic sources (e.g. publications/ journals)