Develop a 4-6 page position about a specific health care issue as it relates to a target vulnerable population.

A1 Analysis of position papers for vulnerable populations

 

Develop a 4-6 page position about a specific health care issue as it relates to a target vulnerable population. Include an analysis of existing evidence and position papers to help support your position. Your analysis should also present and respond to one or more opposing viewpoints.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Position papers are a method to evaluate the most current evidence and policies related to health care issues. They offer a way for researchers to explore the views of any number of organizations around a topic. This can help you to develop your own position and approach to care around a topic or issue.

This assessment will focus on analyzing position papers about an issue related to addiction, chronicity, emotional and mental health, genetics and genomics, or immunity. Many of these topics are quickly evolving as technology advances, or as we attempt to push past stigmas. For example, technology advances and DNA sequencing provide comprehensive information to allow treatment to become more targeted and effective for the individual. However as a result, nurses must be able to understand and teach patients about the impact of this information. With this great power comes concerns that patient conditions are protected in an ethical and compassionate manner.

Position papers are a way for individuals, groups, and organizations to express their views and intentions toward a specific issue. In health care, many position papers address specific policies, regulations, or other approaches to care. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you should feel empowered to express and advocate for your own views on policy and care matters. This is especially important when it comes to populations you or your organization cares for that are not receiving the quality, type, or amount of care that they require.

An important skill in creating a position paper or policy proposal is the ability to analyze and synthesize others’ views about the population or issue of interest to you. By synthesizing the positive and negative views of an issue, you can become better equipped to strengthen your own arguments and to respond to opposing views in an informed and convincing way.

Preparation

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

  • What is the vulnerable population that most interests you?
    • What is the health issue that is most prevalent or severe in the population?
    • How does the health issue impact the daily lives of members of the population?
    • How does the care environment in your chosen context impact both the population and the level of care related to the health issue?
    • What are the biggest challenges that you would need to overcome to improve the outcomes for the population related to the health issue?
  • What is your position on how to best work to improve the care and outcomes that the population is receiving?
    • What previously published position papers support your position, or the need to work to improve care and outcomes in general for the population?
      • How do these position papers support your assertions?
      • How could one or more of the position papers help you to form a treatment plan?
    • What previously published position papers contradict your position?
      • What, if any, of these differences would make your position stronger if you incorporated them?
      • How could you respond to any irreconcilable differences in such a way as to encourage buy-in for your position from those opposed?

Assessment 1 will be based on an analysis of position papers that are relevant to a health care issue related to a vulnerable population. Think about your experience working with vulnerable populations, and the issues related to health care you have observed for those populations. Refer to the resources listed below:

 

 

  • Guiding Questions: Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations [DOC]. See additional attachments

 

  • Vila Health: Resources for Topical Research.
Submit a research article titled:“Decision making in the Flow of Relief in Areas witnessing LongRunning Armed Conflicts: Case study of NGOs in the Gaza Strip”.

Details:

Task objective:

The research title is: “Decision making in the Flow of Relief in Areas witnessing LongRunning Armed Conflicts: Case study of NGOs in the Gaza Strip”.

Task description: As you can see, there is a slight change in the title, when compared to the previous ones. This order is about selection criteria used during decision making in this particular context: decisions related to procurement process, for NGOs operating in Gaza Strip. We will try to identify gaps in existing literature. The outcome of this order is the elaboration a table enumerating an extended list of references about this topic in this context:  reference,  what methodology was used,  brief summary of the purpose, findings, …  selection criteria used in the reference,  to look for possible research gaps (in relation to selection criteria) that could contribute to this research. PS: Please focus on references about Gaza Strip only.

write a scholarly paper that describes the relationship between a social determinant of health and a specific health outcome (e.g., education and literacy, income and social status, childhood experiences and anxiety, or housing and asthma, income and obesity, etc.).

Social Determinants of Health Scholarly Paper (25% of final grade)
(Submitted to Canvas & Turnitin under the Assignment tab in Canvas)

Students will choose a current or past clinical case and write a scholarly paper that describes the relationship between a social determinant of health and a specific health outcome (e.g., education and literacy, income and social status, childhood experiences and anxiety, or housing and asthma, income and obesity, etc.). Using the Introduction-Methods-Results-And-Discussion (IMRAD) format, the paper should include a description of the clinical case/medical issue/background, the relevant social determinant of health that impacts the situation, methods of searching for evidence, results of that search and any critical assessment of it, discussion recommendations for change as demonstrated by the action/intervention of the Registered Nurse, and systemic or health policy related recommendations. Recommendations for change and reasons why (medical and social) should be based on three – five peer reviewed/published articles on the topic. The paper should be no more than 5 pages, not including cover page or references. A two-page Appendix will be allowed.

Students may find the following website helpful in completing this assignment:
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/health-promotion/population-health/what-
determines-health/what-makes-canadians-healthy-unhealthy.html

The paper should be a maximum of 5 pages (excluding references and appendices)
using APA 7th edition format: double-spaced, 12-point font, minimum 1” margins.

develop a project on any aspect of foreign policy as long as it is related to Russia.

Description

The purpose of this capstone class is to help students develop their capstone assignment: a piece of original research engaging with current debates in the field. The thematic focus of this capstone is the foreign policy of the Russian Federation, broadly defined. However, students may develop a project on any aspect of foreign policy as long as it is related to Russia. To do so, they are encouraged to adapt and expand the proposals they developed in their research prep courses. Since this is a capstone, we will not devote significant time to studying the content of Russian foreign policy. Instead, we will focus on theories, debates, and methods, as well as the steps of carrying out a research project.

Is there a statistical relationship between stock returns and GDP, CPI, COVID-19, and ratios of profitability, efficiency, liquidity, leverage, and market capitalization using multifactor models for the top ten companies in the healthcare industry?

Purpose of the Study

This study aims to examine the statistical relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators for the top ten companies in the healthcare industry, using multiple factors and GARCH models. GARCH is a useful statistical model that effectively analyzes different types of financial data, such as high-frequency data as bivariate volatility modeling to include day and night volatility (Marius Matei et al., 2019), thus correctly aligns with the needs of this study. The study also seeks to investigate and discuss whether a relationship exists between stock returns and other factors or financial factors, as some researchers have pointed out that there may be an insignificant or significant relationship between other factors and stock returns.

In this respect, the dependent variable is the stock returns, while the independent variables include economic (GDP and CPI), non-economic (COVID-19), and financial indicators (profitability, efficiency, liquidity, leverage, and market capitalization). For its methodology, this study employs quantitative analysis, such as financial ratios and statement analysis, applied econometrics, and quantitative finance, to examine the relationship between variables and to evaluate the relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators. Multivariate models are designed to study the relationship between other factors, such as the relationship between economic, non-economic, and financial ratios and stock returns. GARCH models are designed to study time series data with heteroscedasticity.

The regression study uses financial or statistical models to evaluate the relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators and evaluate financial statements. Also, financial ratio and statement analysis use five main indicators such as profitability, efficiency, liquidity, leverage, and market value (Beckham, 2021). Profitability ratios are used in a financial matrix to understand how a company’s profits work as revenue. Efficiency ratios evaluate how a company manages its assets and how it converts its assets into cash. Liquidity ratios determine the extent to which a company has immediate access to cash to make payments. Leverage ratios measure the amount of financial leverage or debt a company has at settlement. Market capitalization ratios provide accounting and stock market information. The three statements are the income statement, the balance sheet, and the cash flow statement.

Luna K and Spicer JG (2004) have shown that economic performance is assessed using a nine-unit correlation analysis model that includes quantity, income, price, productivity, markup rate, the quantity of resource, and unit cost of the resource. This nine-unit financial model is used to provide information on the performance of hospitals and the economy in general. The regression analysis may evaluate the top ten companies in the U.S. healthcare industry by revenue in 2020. The reason is that the U.S. healthcare industry is growing, and the U.S. government spends about $10,348 on healthcare from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The top ten companies in the U.S. healthcare industry by revenue growth are Aetna ($50 billion), Anthem ($73.9 billion), Johnson & Johnson ($74.3 billion), Walgreens Boots Alliance ($76.4 billion), Cardinal Health ($91.1 billion), Express Scripts Holdings ($100.9 billion), AmerisourceBergen ($119.6 billion), UnitedHealth Group ($130.5 billion), McKesson ($138 billion), and CVS Health ($139.4 billion).

This study analyzes the top ten companies listed above from America through regression analysis using ratios and statement analysis, applied econometrics, and quantitative finance. The dependent variable is stock return, but the independent variable can be other factors, such as COVID-19, or financial factors, such as the five primary ratios and the ratios in the statement. This study aims to gain insight into the U.S. healthcare industry using regression analysis and the relationship between returns and other factors. In addition, the goal is to assess the current state of the U.S. healthcare industry and predict the future of the industry through regression analysis.

Introduction to Theoretical or Conceptual Framework

Stock returns have fluctuated in markets and been affected by the economy and pandemics. Stock returns in investment are the percentage of earnings from the investment to investors as the sell price deducted original price divided by the original price. Su et al. (2021) note that downside risk positively impacted the stock markets, especially stock returns. This means that high-frequency data may have positive impacts on stock returns, such as financial crises. In the oil industry, the direct or indirect resources may be affected by financial crises, indicating that the economic, non-economic, and financial indicators may affect the healthcare industry. The reason is that financial crises or the economy have positive impacts on stock returns, and financial ratios would discuss later.

Economic, non-economic, and financial indicators include the economic, non-economic, and financial ratios, so economic indicators are an example of GDP, CPI and etc., but non-economic indicators are the example of education level, marital status, and time-invariant indicators. Financial ratios include activity ratios, leverage ratios, liability ratios, and profitability ratios. Although financial ratios are calculated from financial statements, they would have a statistical relationship with stock markets, such as stock prices or returns. Chen (2021) states that researchers investigated the relationship between the financial indicator and stock prices fluctuations, and there is a true relationship by using artificial intelligent systems. Some researchers argue that hospitals have financial insufficiency, although profit is not the goal or their missions. However, profit may make hospitals stay financially sustainable. The results show that financial performance is not expected and causes resource waste, meaning hospitals should maintain quality, access, productivity, and efficiency (Matos et al., 2021). This also means that hospitals should maintain and improve performance to avoid lower performance. So, it is necessary to discuss financial performance in hospitals or the healthcare industry.

As for the introduction of the types of stock return fluctuations, what is called volatility in the financial circle represents the degree of variation in the return of an asset within a certain period (conditional), such as conditional variance or conditional standard deviation, as a proxy for volatility. Kunst et al. (1991) state that there are two hypotheses for time series data, such as randomness and stability, but the conclusion is that instability and stock volatility were estimated during the time 1985 to 1990 as a violation of assumptions. Tsay (2000) summarizes the stock return volatility with the following characteristics:

Unobservability

This characteristic pertains to the stock market. For example, the variance of IBM stock cannot be directly known from the return rate of IBM stock on a certain day, because it has only one observation value unless there is intra-day data. Multiple observations can be used to calculate intra-day volatility. The volatility of stocks is derived from intra-day volatility and intra-day changes, and because it cannot be directly observed, it is difficult to evaluate forecast performance using conditional variance models.

Volatility clusters

Mandelbrot (1967) found that changes in stock market returns are correlated before and after, although there is no correlation between price changes and returns over time. Independence, when the price has a large (small) change, is also followed by a large (small) change, which is the well-known “volatility cluster” in finance.

Volatility as continuous

Volatility does not have jumps; it continuously changes over time.

Volatility as stationary

The volatility will change within a certain interval, and its mean, variance, and self-covariance are all constant and limited.

Asymmetry

Cheung & Ng (1992) have found that the volatility of stock returns has an obvious asymmetry; that is, volatility is affected by positive return shocks and negative returns as leverage effects. This feature and impacts play an important role in the future development of volatility estimation models.

Regression analysis is the basic method used by businesses because it is simple and convenient. Although financial ratio analysis requires the calculation of the ratio, it must use traditional theory as the basis of the analysis. However, fundamental analysis is not enough for a dissertation, so this study will use applied econometrics and quantitative finance to study the relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators by running multifactor and GARCH models.

Figure 1
Theoretical/Conceptual Framework

Introduction to Research Methodology and Design

This quantitative study examines the relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators by regression analysis such as applied econometrics and quantitative finance. This study states two research questions to see whether there is a relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators by multiple-factor models and GARCH models. Also, an important question is whether the business problem such as bad turnover ratios is evaluated from regression analysis. The data was collected from financial statements on the public as available resources for the top ten companies by revenues in this industry. Lai Ping-fu and Cho Kwai-yee (2016) state that they examined the relationship between financial ratios and stock returns in the Hong Kong stock market by the regression, but the result shows that there may not be a relationship between all financial ratios and stock returns because the old study and conclusion are violated. This means that this study assumes that there may be a relationship between variables by models.

The quantitative research methodology was the best fit for my research and study because this study uses quantitative analysis such as regression analysis to examine the relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators for different companies in this industry. Some researchers used financial statement analysis to investigate problems, so this means that regression analysis is the best fit (Pavone et al., 2021). Moreover, compared to Fema-Franch models, multiple-factor models are better to analyze the relationship or the problem by some researchers’ opinions (Ahmed et al., 2019). This means that five or six factors are better for the research, so this study may include many financial ratios or financial factors to analyze the relationship. Compared to other models, researchers state that GARCH models are better for researchers to estimate returns series within lots of companies, so this means that my methodology is the best fit to analyze returns for the top ten companies (Yelamanchili, 2021).

The regression study is the best fit for my research because some researchers conclude that regression analysis aims to investigate relationships between independent variables and dependent variables. Taloba et al. (2022) state that healthcare costs are related to other factors such as BMI, aging, etc., but the important thing is that the accuracy of the regression study is almost 97.89 percent. This means that compared to other models, such as the random forest algorithm, the regression model is better for the research to investigate relationships through model testing and selection. Moreover, time-series data refers to selecting data as equal to the better time intervals for using time series analysis. Researchers state that time series analysis is practical for the widespread domains, and the stock price fluctuates to reflect the time. Also, the purpose of this research aims to build a statistical model to estimate and predict the stock price (Sheikh Mohammad Idrees et al., 2019), so my research aims to use GARCH models to predict stock returns and other time-series data.

The quantitive research methodology in my study includes multiple factor models and GARCH models, especially multivariate GARCH models. Multiple factor models were developed from CAPM and Fama-French models as multiple factors, so it aims to include many factors such as economic, non-economic, and financial ratios in my study. The goal of this model aims to know the relationship between indicators and stock returns. Moreover, my study would include the GARCH models to know the correlation and heteroskedasticity among models and variables. Although most researchers are familiar with the regression, the standard error and confidence interval are narrow because of the heteroskedasticity of time series data. Due to the heteroskedasticity of time series data, GARCH models can be used to forecast the variance with correct error terms (Scherer Perlin et al., 2021). My study would use specified GARCH models such as multivariate GARCH models to investigate volatility between variables such as each indicator and each stock return (Bauwens et al., 2006). The question is whether the volatility of one indicator causes the change of each stock return at the top ten companies in the healthcare industry.

Research Questions

This paper aims to investigate whether there is a statistical relationship between stock returns and economic, non-economic, and financial indicators by multiple factors and GARCH models. This paper will use regression analysis, applied econometrics, and quantitative finance to investigate problems, relationships, and outcomes, including financial ratio and statement analysis. Applied econometrics is included in this paper, such as GARCH models called time series analysis for financial applications. Moreover, this paper would use Multiple Factor models to examine the relationship between other factors and returns. Although Multiple Factor models can be tracked in 1992 by the scholar, his paper is well-known to demonstrate three factors, including risk premiums, macroeconomic factors, and firms’ factors. Thus, the following questions address the objective of this paper:

RQ1. Is there a statistical relationship between stock returns and GDP, CPI, COVID-19, and ratios of profitability, efficiency, liquidity, leverage, and market capitalization using multifactor models for the top ten companies in the healthcare industry?

RQ2. Is there an asymmetric effect of indicators from RQ1 on stock returns using multivariate GARCH models for the top ten companies in the healthcare industry?

write a full lab report based on the combined data (the report must be an individual write up) from the field research.

INSTRUCTIONS ON ASSESSMENT:

 

This assignment is a qualitative lab report.

After having conducted and transcribed an interview individually (on a topic set by the module team), and then being provided with additional interview transcripts, the students are required to write a full lab report based on the combined data (the report must be an individual write up) from the field research. Students will apply the 6-stages of Thematic Analysis to the combined dataset.

The typed report should not exceed the word length identified above and this word length includes the Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results and Discussion, but does not include the Title Page, References and Appendices. Quotes are also not included in the word count.

The Appendices must contain: Reflexivity, interview schedule, transcribed and coded interview transcripts, and any other material the student believes is important but which does not fit neatly into the main body of the practical.

Appropriate referencing is required in this assignment. All references must be in accordance with APA guidelines.

Discuss findings in relation to research aims and research question, and contribution in relation to previous literature.

The Module Learning Outcomes that this assignment assesses can be found on the module specification for this module which can be found on the eLP (Blackboard) site for your module. By satisfying this assignment brief you will have addressed the module learning outcomes.

 

The assessment criteria (used in conjunction with the marking rubric)

 

A successful report should include the following:

  • A logical structure, good use of written English, clearly-presented results, complete and correct referencing, and appropriate use of appendices.
  • A clearly-written abstract, detailing sufficient information for readers to understand the aims, methods and results of the study.
  • A clear introduction, with a critical review of the relevant literature, leading to a clear rationale for the study and aims, and clear and succinctly expressed research question.
  • A comprehensive and clear description of your methods, materials and measures, participants, and recruitment process. Your description should be sufficient to allow someone to replicate your study.
  • A strong and appropriate presentation of your findings.
  • Discussion of findings in relation to research aims and research question, and contribution in relation to previous literature. Evaluation of the strengths and limitations of the study, and recommendations for further study.
  • A title page, references and appendices.
Critically analyse internal and external environments and strategic options available to an organisation.

Criteria for Assessment This assignment is designed to assess learning outcome 2 (LO 2): LO2. Critically analyse internal and external environments and strategic options available to an organisation. This table details the weightings of the criteria by which your assignment will be assessed: Criteria Proportion of CW mark We will consider this guideline for grading Critical analysis of the External Environment (the macro environment) 35% – Relevance of the content (understanding of the requirements of the assignment) – Evidence of research and engagement with relevant literature – Correct application and critical evaluation of the theories/frameworks – Appropriate balance of opinion with facts – Development of arguments – Accurate citations and referencing – Clarity and coherence of the report – Grammar and spelling Critical analysis of the Internal Environment 35% Recommendations 30% Total 100% Word Count The word count is 2000 words. There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more. The word limit includes quotations and citations, but excludes the references list.

draw some conclusions and provide recommendations for the company on how tailor their strategies to better appeal to health-conscious consumers considering the findings from your external and internal analysis.

The following structure should be followed in the report: Front page with report title, Selected company name, total word count Introduction [approx. 150 words] • An Overview of the organisation • Its Financial and Key Performance Indicators(KPIs) e.g., turnover, profitability, market share in different regions, main competitors • Main product lines/brands Main body Section 1 – Critical evaluation of the External Environment. [approx. 700 words] You should provide an in-depth analysis of the macro-environment of the company by critically evaluating the impact of political, economic, social, cultural, technological, ecological, and legal factors on the industry in which the company operates. Your analysis should be supported by a range of data. Applying relevant theories and frameworks you need to identify both the opportunities and threats (challenges) resulting from macroenvironmental factors with particular consideration of the impact of the global pandemic. Section 2 – Critical analysis of the Internal Environment of your selected organisation and identification of the organisation’s strategic capabilities [approx. 700 words] Apply a relevant framework (Such as VRIO or Value chain analysis) to identify and critically discuss resources and capabilities that provide the company with a sustainable competitive advantage. As part of this you need to first identify the company’s resources and capabilities and then discuss if they are threshold or distinctive and if they are leading to a sustainable competitive advantage. Section 3 – Recommendations [approx. 450 words] In this section you need to draw some conclusions and provide recommendations for the company on how tailor their strategies to better appeal to health-conscious consumers considering the findings from your external and internal analysis. References (not included in word count) – You must include at least 5 academic sources other than the recommended textbook

Cancer cells often use lymph vessels as pathways to other parts of the body, where they continue to divide. Why does this characteristic make cancer especially dangerous?

While the cancerous tumour is still walled in by the basal membrane in diagram C, the tumour breaks through the membrane in diagram D. At this stage, the tumour may spread to other parts of the body. Cancer cells often use lymph vessels as pathways to other parts of the body, where they continue to divide. e) Why does this characteristic make cancer especially dangerous?