Provide a convincing argument regarding the benefits of a diverse workforce using support from current research.

Scenario

Imagine that your boss (Lorena)follows up with you in an e-mail shortly after reading your views on leadership and collaboration:

Hi,

Thanks for sending me your thoughts last week on the diversity issue at the clinic. Your next step is to select a team of professionals who can help you in this project and prepare an introduction of the project for a first meeting with them.

I want you to prepare a presentation to serve as a brief, but substantive introduction for the first meeting with a group of 4–5 members who will participate on the committee tasked with addressing the diversity issue. Once I review more information about the proposed team, I can help you with the recruitment. The presentation should be 5–7 minutes and use 6–8 slides with detailed speaker’s notes so I can understand your approach.

Do the following:

1. Briefly outline the project goals and highlight 2–3 of the initial priorities to be addressed by the group. Also, explain why they are important.

2. Explain the composition of the team and why you chose them.

Note that you will not know the exact individuals yet, but assume we will recruit the people with the desired qualities and characteristics that you outline in the presentation.

Consider the following:

• Include a group of professionals you believe can help define the problem and ultimately make recommendations on how to address it.
• Make sure each member is either trained in, sensitive to, or has experience with the concept of workplace diversity.
• Give some thought to having some members from outside the organization.
• Provide member profiles: their diversity, qualifications, experience, internal versus external, and so forth.

3. Explain your role and describe how the committee will work together and achieve effective interprofessional collaboration.
   • Describe how the group will communicate. How and when they will meet.
   • Describe how ideas will be shared and decisions made.
   • Describe roles, group function, and structure.
4. Describe the basic characteristics of a diverse workplace.

5. Provide a convincing argument regarding the benefits of a diverse workforce using support from current research.

Instructions

Create a 6–8 slide presentation in response to the content defined in the above scenario

Presentation Guidelines

• Length: 5–7 PowerPoint slides (not including title slide) that would accompany an approximately 5-minute oral presentation.

• Notes: Prepare detailed speaker’s notes describing items on each slide so that the viewer can accurately interpret the deeper meanings and intentions that would have been conveyed orally.
  • Support your claims, arguments, and conclusions with credible evidence from 2–3 current, scholarly or professional sources.

• Visuals: Create visuals that are easily read and interpreted. Use colors, fonts, and formatting and other design principles that make the information clear and generally add to the aesthetic of the presentation.

Critically appraise research and other evidence for its validity and usefulness.

Aims:

This module aims to further develop students’ knowledge and critical understanding of research methods, ethics and governance, in order to critically analyse, safely use, share and apply research findings to promote and inform best professional practice.

Learning Outcomes:

On successful completion of this module a student will be able to:

1. Demonstrate comprehensive evidence searching skills for there trieval of relevant research evidence using appropriate online databases and relevant critical appraisal tool.
2. Critically appraise research design sand methodologies.
3. Critically appraise research and other evidence for its validity and

usefulness.

4. Drawonathoroughandsystematicunderstandingoftheconceptof

literature reviews and present their findings in a critical, coherent and

structured manner.

5. Share and apply research finding stopromote and informbest

professional practice through production of a literature review.

1. Your programme of study aims to develop a range of key skills and competences that employer’s value -–these are

4|Page

1. Cognitive Skills

Level 4: Dealing with different sorts of problems, start making reasoned judgements and reflecting on these judgements.

Level 5: Dealing with a wider set of problems with greater emphasis on assessing risk and drawing conclusions. Drawing conclusions, justifying judgements, attention to detail and the ability to reflect on skills gained.

2. Generic Competencies

Level 4, 5, and 6: Group work, setting goals, influencing, planning, questioning, listening, persuading, interpersonal sensitivity.

Level 4: Writing in different formats with emphasis on clarity, spelling and grammar

Level 5: Writing for different audiences with emphasis on clarity, spelling and grammar.

Level 6: Clear formatting, spelling and grammar within a clear, well-reasoned narrative.

3. Personal Capabilities

Level 4: Awareness of the job market (including selection procedures) in relevant degree discipline

Level 5: Practice in applying for jobs, placement and/or internship in relevant degree discipline

4. Technical Ability

Level 4: The practical skills and technologies needed for careers in the discipline and an ability to reflect on these skills.

Level 5: An ability to consolidate these skills

Level 6: More advanced skills (practical and/or technology-based)

5. Organisational Awareness

Level 4: Understanding of organisations and/or structures within relevant sector / entrepreneurship.

Level 5: Understanding of organisational goals and structures. Awareness of issues around management and leadership in sector-related organisations.

Level 6: Awareness of current trends and an understanding of how sectors are linked.

5|Page

6. Practical and Professional Elements

Level 4: Understanding professionalism and the importance of networking. Level 5: Demonstration of professionalism

Level 6: Awareness of own job-readiness regarding professionalism and skills obtained.

7. Developing Professional Online Identity

Level 4: A basic understanding of what a professional online presence means

Level 5: An understanding of what a professional online presence means within the subject discipline

Level 6: An established professional online identity on LinkedIn through relevant posting and contributing to professional discussion on groups.

Specifically, this module will assess the following: Presentation and group work skills and professionalism, dealing with a wider set of problems with greater emphasis on assessing risk and drawing conclusions. Drawing conclusions, justifying judgements, attention to detail and the ability to reflect on skills gained and writing for different audiences with emphasis on clarity, spelling and grammar

Critically evaluate, with reference to nursing practice experience, one aspect of nursing care, focusing upon quality improvement and suggest methods of enhancing or changing this aspect of practice

Description

Title is – Critically evaluate, with reference to nursing practice experience, one aspect of nursing care, focusing upon quality improvement and suggest methods of enhancing or changing this aspect of practice.

How reliable is the service received by the populace via mHealth compared to physical contact with health workers?

The following are some of my research question

1. How reliable is the service received by the populace via mHealth compared to physical contact with health workers?
2. Is there patients confidentiality / data security and privacy via mHealth service delivery
3. How has the mHealth helped tackle lack of accessible self-help
4. Has mHealth reduce waiting time at the hospital
5. How reliable is the mHealth application
6. Is mHealth cost effective

Abstract (1 page).
· Table of Contents.
· List of Figures.
· List of Tables.
· Acknowledgements.
· Chapter 1: Overview, introduction, aims and objectives.
· Chapter 2: Literature review (two literature chapters are sometimes needed).
· Chapter 3: The research setting e.g., the organisation under study.
· Chapter 4: Research methods.
· Chapter 5: Results, analysis, and findings.
· Chapter 6: Discussion of results, managerial implications.
· Chapter 7: Conclusions and, where appropriate, recommendations.
· Appendices (including ethics forms).
· List of References.

Citations for references and bibliographies must follow the Harvard System format

All work which is submitted for assessment must be your own work and appropriately referenced.
Academic dishonesty is a very serious offence and will be penalised accordingly. Being found guilty
of academic dishonesty may have a serious effect upon your academic progression, it may also result
in a University Warning or it may result in your expulsion from the University.
It is important that you have read and thoroughly understood the section on ‘Plagiarism’ in your
Business School Programme handbook and that you have read and understood the University Code
of Practice on the Use of Unfair Means which is published on the University website.
If you are unsure about referencing or plagiarism, please refer to the Business School Study Skills
handbook or seek advice from your dissertation supervisor or module or programme leader the
University Study Advice Centre. Students should do this before commencing work on assignments
etc. Students undertaking dissertations and independent study work should bear in mind that their
supervisors are not responsible for checking their work for plagiarism at this stage.
Please be aware that plagiarism is not permitted in any form of assessed work. In their dissertation,
students should take care to acknowledge the work and opinions of others and avoid any
appearance of representing them as their own.
The plagiarism declaration on the dissertation submission receipt is your personal statement that
the work which you are submitting for assessment is your own.

Write an article about consumer perception or consumers willingness to pay a premium for organic wine in the uk.

Description

I have to publish an article for the Economic wine journal. I need 4 articles with different topics from my phd , as my professor told me I can do that. So I hope we can continue to work on other articles too. 1- I need an article about consumer perception or consumers willingness to pay a premium for organic wine in the uk. The writer can talk and use my results from my phd , my methodology ,,, and for sure the writer needs to add some new results because my PhD is from 2018 and I’m sure we have new results from other papers or scholars in recent years… 2- I need to publish in an Economics wine journal. 3- I ordered 8 pages , because your colleagues told me references are not including the pages so main pages are 8 pages and then of course pulse references.

Explain how are you planning on using systematic review to support your research?

Description

Discussion Board:

The aim of this Discussion Board is for you to learn more about two topics with systematic reviews, as evident by the two chapter supplements: Chapter Supplement A: Publication Bias in Systematic Reviews Chapter Supplement A.pdf Download Chapter Supplement A.pdf Chapter Supplement B: Supplementary Resources for Qualitative Evidence Chapter Supplement B.pdf Download Chapter Supplement B.pdf Please take a moment to read both documents. Select one of the two documents for the response. Provide a brief synopsis of what you learned from the document. Explain how are you planning on using systematic review to support your research? Please provide one reference to support your answer.

how effective is lifestyle changes compared to medication compliance to lower HgA1C blood level within the first six months after diagnosis?

Topic:

picot question, In african American adult patients newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2, how effective is lifestyle changes compared to medication compliance to lower HgA1C blood level within the first six months after diagnosis?

obtain a representative sample of the literature which describes the concepts related to the phenomenon of interest and the research results applicable to the clinical/practice question and identify what gaps need to be further researched.

Clinical Practice Question and Literature Review

(100 points possible)

The purpose of this assignment is to state your clinical/practice question (PICOT) and explore the literature pertaining to your clinical/practice problem. When conducting a literature review, the goal is to obtain a representative sample of the literature which describes the concepts related to the phenomenon of interest and the research results applicable to the clinical/practice question and identify what gaps need to be further researched. Please follow the rubric below. Your work for this paper can be used as a foundation for your MSN capstone project. Paper length is no more than eight (8) pages, excluding references and title page.

The paper should be written in APA 7^th Edition Professional Paper style, not Student Paper Style. This means your title page should have a running head, and the paper includes an abstract.

The company declared a cash dividend of €0.80 per share. It goes ex-dividend tomorrow. Ignoring any tax effects, what is the cum-dividend price and the ex-dividend price?

Case 2: Dividend policy. The balance sheet for Zeta Corporation is shown below in market value terms. There are 1.000 shares outstanding. Market value balance sheet Cash 200 Equity 4200 Non-current assets 11000 Liabilities 7000 Total 11200 Total 11200 a. The company declared a cash dividend of €0.80 per share. It goes ex-dividend tomorrow. Ignoring any tax effects, what is the cum-dividend price and the ex-dividend price? b. What will the market value balance sheet look like after the dividends are paid? c. What if instead of cash dividend, the company has announced it is going to repurchase €800 million worth of equity. What effect will this transaction have on the equity of the firm? How many shares will be outstanding? d. What will the price per share be after the repurchase? e. Are the two strategies equivalent? Why, or why not?

Which project has the highest expected payoff?

Case 1: Capital structure. Novapharm must choose one of three different investment strategies. The payoffs (after-tax) and their likelihood for each strategy are shown below. The risk of each project is diversifiable. Strategy Probability Pay-off A 90% 180 10% 30 B 50% 320 50% 0 C 20% 550 80% 50 a. Which project has the highest expected payoff? b. Suppose Novapharm has debt of $100 million due at the time of the project’s payoff. Which project has the highest expected payoff for equity holders? c. Suppose Novapharm has debt of $250 million due at the time of the project’s payoff. Which project has the highest expected payoff for equity holders? d. If management chooses the strategy that maximizes the payoff to equity holders, what is the expected agency cost to the firm from having $100 million in debt due? e. What is the expected agency cost to the firm from having $250 million in debt due? f. From a theoretical perspective, what is the market imperfection that generates the agency costs highlighted in the previous questions?