Among the Beasts of Burma: Animals and the Politics of Colonial Sensibilities. Analyzing Secondary Sources1.) Is there a central argument? Does the author’s bias (point of view!) affect how you are reading the source? 2.) With which major themes from the course does this reading engage? What kinds of evidence or narrative does the author present? 3.) What are your criticisms of the reading? Does the author convincingly demonstrate his/her thesis?
Among the Beasts of Burma: Animals and the Politics of Colonial Sensibilities.
Analyzing Secondary Sources1.) Is there a central argument? Does the author’s bias (point of view!) affect how you are reading the source? 2.) With which major themes from the course does this reading engage? What kinds of evidence or narrative does the author present? 3.) What are your criticisms of the reading? Does the author convincingly demonstrate his/her thesis?
