Paper details:

Critical Reading The intent of this activity is to get students to critically engage with course texts and to develop/extend habits of thinking with a text: i.e., practices for engaging and responding to that text and to others’ readings of that text. Task Clipboard1.png 3 Annotations & 2 Responses After reading and watching this week’s materials, complete the Additive and Reflective engagements below. These require three annotations (grounded in the text) and two responses to peer annotations, and the entries must include tags. For Additive annotations, be sure to offer 3 Paragraphs and anchor those annotations in the text: one addressing the prompt, one addressing the discussion question, and one asking a question (of text/author). For Response Posts, follow the guides below. Criteria For Success Lightbulb1.png ADDITIVE Annotations (Initial Post) PROMPT: Discuss specific instances of complication in our essay. At what points does our author utilize a source that challenges or redirects the trajectory of their essay? DISCUSSION QUESTION: What are some conflicting ideologies being described within this article? MAKE AN INQUIRY: In the body of the essay, make a critical inquiry (i.e., ask a question) of the text or its author. Be sure to avoid “yes or no” questions. Your initial post will be evaluated using the following criteria. In the additive post the student scholar: Uses analysis to construct an academic argument that addresses the prompt in a thorough and logical manner. Situates key textual elements in direct relation to the discussion question. Makes a critical inquiry (of the text or its author). Correctly uses key terms and concepts. Ideas are clear and on-topic. Follows grammar conventions. The writing is concise and easy to read. Writes approximately 125 words (across the three annotations). Adds two (or more) tags to post. Don’t be afraid to add images, videohkzs, and links to your posts.