explain how the two critics differ in their reading of the primary work. What parts of their argument cannot be made to agree? discuss the way they frame their essays in terms of previous arguments about the work. What are the stakes of these two critics’ claims?

explain how the two critics differ in their reading of the primary work. What parts of their argument cannot be made to agree?
discuss the way they frame their essays in terms of previous arguments about the work. What are the stakes of these two critics’ claims?
evaluate their use of primary evidence. What are the most striking ways they use evidence from Parks’s or Austen’s text? What is most useful or insightful about their readings? Have they left any key passages out? That done, show us what argument you can make in the gap these two critics have left: where is there space for you to make a third argument that continues their conversation? And where would you find support for that argument in the text?