Critically assess and compare the approach taken by the English courts applying traditional English common law rules with that of the EU Court of Justice applying EU legislation.
Question:
Critically assess and compare the approach taken by the English courts applying traditional English common law rules with that of the EU Court of Justice applying EU legislation. You must consider the issues of jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in cases of
EITHER
tort
OR
contract
You must provide a critical assessment of the current relationship between the two sets of rules and forums at the current time.
2021-2022 Academic Session
Rules for the Production and Submission of Coursework
IMPORTANT: The following rules for production and submission of coursework must be followed and will form part of the assessment in respect of demonstrating an ability to follow, apply and comply with instructions. You will lose marks if you do not follow the rules listed below.
- Producing and Presenting your Coursework: Format
(a) You must produce your work in accordance with the latest version of the School of Justice Coursework Guidance Booklet (there is a copy on your Blackboard page) – the Guide contains advice on spacing, fonts, justification of text, footnotes, word counts, referencing and citation and bibliographies.
(b) Your work must not be produced using ‘unfair means’ (collusion, plagiarism and other such forms of cheating) – see ..
(c) We prefer your work to be word-processed in 12-point font AND double spaced so tutors can read with ease and have sufficient room to insert comments.
(d) Case names must be in italics.
(e) All citations to cases, statutes, books and journals must be referenced fully, as must websites used (with the date last accessed specified) using the OSCOLA style reference guide.
(f) All pages must be numbered.
(g) You must count the words used (excluding the words used to write the footnotes and bibliography) and this must be declared honestly and accurately on your assignment. Failure to declare the words used will mean your work will not be marked and inaccurate declarations of words used will lead to disciplinary proceedings.
- Submitting your Coursework
(a) All written assessments (unless otherwise directed by your module leader) must be produced and submitted electronically through a ‘Turn-it-In’ submission box. The e-submission box will be located on your Module Blackboard space. Your module tutor will inform you where the precise location is.
(b) You must not write your name anywhere on your assignment because all work is marked anonymously. Instead, please ensure your student ID number is clearly marked on your work.
(c) You must submit ONE copy of your coursework only: an electronic submission via Blackboard (so we can verify submission, word counts and plagiarism and insert feedback via Grademark).
(e) We do not accept e-mail, faxed, or postal submissions of coursework.
(f) Try and submit your work well in advance of the deadline.
(g) If you have an authorised extension of between 1 and 5 working days your work will not be penalised.
(h) If you submit your work late without an authorised extension, we will only accept it for marking up to 5 working days after the deadline and the work will be capped at 50%. PLEASE NOTE: unauthorised late submission at resubmission (i.e., a re-assessment) will automatically be a awarded a mark of 0% for that element of assessment.
(i) All work submitted more than 5 working days after the agreed deadline (and without an authorised extension) will be awarded a 0% grade
- Results
(a) Individual feedback will be available within the 15 working days (excluding holidays periods when the University is closed and weekends) after the submission date. Feedback on end of unit assessments will be after the relevant Programme Board has met.
(b) Your coursework will be returned via Grade-Mark on the turn-it-in platform by the feedback date stated on the assessment front cover sheet.
(c) All marks remain provisional until after the final examination board has met.
