prepare a presentation on an organization currently involved in social change. This can be a local, national, or global organization and an organization in which you have membership or is of interest to you. You can use presentation software/programs such as Prezi, Kaltura, Powerpoint, Keynote, or Youtube.

1: Organizations and Social Change, Multimedia assignment
For this assignment, you will prepare a presentation on an organization currently involved in social change. This can be a local, national, or global organization and an organization in which you have membership or is of interest to you. You can use presentation software/programs such as Prezi, Kaltura, Powerpoint, Keynote, or Youtube. Many of these programs offer free basic membership. Please contact the instructor if you would like to use another program for the assignment. Be creative in the assignment–you can include audio and/or video clips from meetings, media coverage, or of yourself, graphs, images, links, etc. The presentation should be creative and visually appealing as well as incorporate each of the following components:
Address your interest in the selected organization or group as well as describe the group itself.
Next, view the website, social media outlets, etc. for the group. How is this group related to social change? How do they gain members/support? Remember that you can include images, links, etc. in your presentation.
Describe their mission and methods.
Next, analyze the group using one of the theoretical perspectives in the textbook. Address the kind of change, level of change, causes of change (internal vs. external), and intentions (from Chapter 1).
What has been the impact of the group at the local/national level?
Finally, incorporate at least two peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that also address the particular type of social change that you are examining.
Be sure to follow standard APA formatting. Include a title slide. Include APA formatted in-text citations and full references for all paraphrased and quoted work from other sources in a reference slide.
A link can be submitted instead of an uploaded assignment if applicable based on the program used. Submit in the “Assignments” section of the classroom. The due date is 11:59 pm on Sunday at the end of week #3.
General requirements:
Use APA format for citations and references
View the grading rubric so you understand how you will be assessed on this Assignment.
Disclaimer- Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.
This course has “Resubmission” status enabled to help you if you realized you submitted an incorrect or blank file, or if you need to submit multiple documents as part of your Assignment. Resubmission of an Assignment after it is grades, to attempt a better grade, is not permitted.

Develop a one-page diagram of theoretical foundation for my project: hypertension in homeless, describing how and why your project should achieve the desired outcome

TheoryLogicModelforaProject.docx

Theory Logic Model for the
Project: hypertension in homeless

A logic model or program theory is a description or model frequently pictorial of how a program is supposed to achieve its expected outcomes and solve the identified problem for which it was created. It creates a logical links between expected outcomes and the activities designed to achieve them and incorporates the evidence-based theoretical assumptions that explain how the activities will lead to outcomes. A program theory or logic model is NOT the theoretical framework on which your project: hypertension in homeless is based although it may be related to a theoretical framework. A theoretical or conceptual framework is a general theory that explains why some things happen. A program theory or logic model is unique to your project and explains how it is supposed to work.

Assignment Prompt

1. Develop a one-page diagram of theoretical foundation for my project: hypertension in homeless, describing how and why your project should achieve the desired outcome. Add references on the second page. You may arrange items in the diagram in any way you choose, but the diagrams should include each of the following components and show the logical connections between them:
a. The need or problem to be addressed by the project: hypertension in homeless, with supporting data
a. The context for the project: hypertension in homeless (attach a reference list with your diagram)
a. The strategy (ies) proposed to address the need/problem
a. The evidence base for the proposed strategies (attached a reference list with your diagram)
a. Factors that will influence the use of strategy
a. The expected outcomes of the project/program
a. The resulting impact of the project/program if the outcomes are achieved.
SAMPLE:

Expectations

· Length: Two pages (1st page for diagram, 2nd page for references)
· APA format with intext citations
· Format: APA Style (7th ed.), one-inch margins with double spacing, proper APA formatting
· Research: Scholarly (peer-reviewed) contemporary reference(s) within the last 5 years
· Writing: Use correct grammar and sentence construction: Clear expression of ideas.
· Plagiarism free
· Turnitin receipt.
image1.png

image2.png

prepare for the final Touchstone, which you will submit at the end of Unit 4. A Touchstone is a project that demonstrates your comprehension of the course material. It will help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. For your reference, there is more information about Touchstones in the student guide.

 ASSIGNMENT: The Touchstone Tasks in this course will help you prepare for the final Touchstone, which you will submit at the end of Unit 4. A Touchstone is a project that demonstrates your comprehension of the course material. It will help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. For your reference, there is more information about Touchstones in the student guide.
There are a total of five Touchstone Tasks throughout the course:

Touchstone Task 1: Planning a Network Infrastructure
Touchstone Task 2.1: Planning Network Printer Connectivity
Touchstone Task 2.2: Planning IP Address Assignments
Touchstone Task 3: Planning a Wireless Infrastructure
Touchstone Task 4: Planning Network Security Measures

There are many benefits to segmenting a network so that all the hosts are not on the same broadcast domain. This Touchstone Task prompts you to think about those benefits, formulate a segmentation plan, propose a subnet mask, and evaluate whether or not using VLANs is an appropriate choice. While all of this technical information may not make it directly into your final Touchstone report, it is useful to think about these considerations because they may inform other decisions you make.
While you will not receive a grade or feedback on this Touchstone Task submission, doing the work now will help you complete your final project. Completing this exercise at this point of the course ensures that you are ready to move on. Further, these Touchstone Tasks build throughout the next Units and form the foundation of the presentation for your final project.
Touchstone Task 2.2 Template
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course.
A. Directions
Step 1: Review Final Touchstone
Review the final Touchstone to learn more about the overall assignment and see how you will be graded. Return to this page to continue your Touchstone Task.
Step 2: Review Greenfield Properties Scenario
Review the scenario and client requirements about Greenfield Properties. You will use this information to answer questions related to IP address assignments. Make sure you also review the additional client expectations related to Touchstone Task 2.2: Planning IP Address Assignments.
Step 3: Answer Questions
Based on the information provided by the client, answer the questions in the Touchstone Task 2.2 Template in 2-4 sentences each. Be sure to explain your answers in detail.
HINTAs you review the scenario and respond to the questions, consider what the client is trying to accomplish and what they have shared about their expectations. Use these perspectives to shape your response to the questions.
Step 4: Upload Completed Questions
Select the submit button at the top of this page and follow the instructions to upload the template with your completed question responses. You will use these answers as a reference when completing the final Touchstone at the end of Unit 4.
B. Requirements
While this assignment is ungraded, we recommend you practice the following conventions, which are required for graded Touchstones:

Composition should be double-spaced with one-inch margins.
Use a readable 11- or 12-point font.
Use professional fonts such as Calibri, Arial, or Times New Roman. Do not use unusual fonts.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment, and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
The submission must include your name, the date, and the title of your composition.
Include all assignment components in a single .doc or .docx file.

· How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose or function of facts in making a judgment.

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
· Textbook: Chapter 6, 7
· Lesson
· Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)
Introduction
“Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts.” (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity Fair, 2010, para. 2)
We form opinions – and make our judgments – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section “An Expert on Hate in America” in Chapter 6, one of the authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Dr. Facione is a leading advocate and one of the most influential voices in the field of critical thinking.
His endorsement of the civil rights organization is unqualified. It is also transparent: Dr. Facione reveals that he is a financial supporter of the organization and has arranged speaking engagements for its founder. This is Dr. Facione’s invitation to you, the reader:
Knowing where you can learn more about the SPLC for yourself, and knowing about Dr. Facione’s endorsement and support of the Center’s work, evaluate this claim made by Dr. Facione: “The SPLC is an expert on hate in America” (p. 124).
The endorsement of the SPLC is contained in the most current edition of the text, whose copyright date is 2016. Since that time Morris Dees, co-founder and former chief trial counsel, has been fired (Hassan, Zraick & Blinder, 2019). Previously, there has been controversy about groups and individuals that are listed by the SPLC as “hate groups” (Graham, 2016; Price, 2018). The organization, which has nearly a half-billion dollars in assets, has also been criticized for how it spends these funds (Robinson, 2019).
Self-Assessment Question
Before you submit your initial post, make sure to read the assigned chapter. Then, ask yourself the following: Did the article in Chapter 6 of the text seem credible and reliable? Why? Be very specific:
· Was it because it is in a textbook?
· Because it was written by a learned and respected person?
· Because of content in the article?
· Because of your previous knowledge of the SPLC?
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:
· Conduct additional research on the SPLC. Did your opinion alter in any way? Why?
Only after you have done some responsible research should you begin to respond to the discussion prompt. The discussion is not about the SPLC; it is not about Dr. Facione. It is about what you have learned about forming opinions.
Your post must answer this question:
· How do you define the term “expert”?
Your post must also discuss 
at least two (2) of the following questions:

· How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose or function of facts in making a judgment.
· How did you respond to the self-assessment question? Since doing further research, have you re-thought the way in which you assess credibility and reliability? What is the importance of factoring the recency of a reference or opinion (i.e., how old is it?) into an assessment of credibility and reliability?
· How would you evaluate Dr. Facione’s claim “The SPLC is an expert on hate in America” (p. 124). Does the SPLC fit your definition of “expert”? Be specific in your answer.

Discuss the disease/abstinence based model versus the harm reduction model and the pros and cons of both.

Assignment Instructions:
Discuss the disease/abstinence based model versus the harm reduction model and the pros and cons of both.
How To Work On This Assignment(Example Essay/Draft)
The approaches to substance use treatment and harm reduction have been a source of debate among experts for many years. The two most common models used in addiction treatment are the disease/abstinence-based model and the harm reduction model. Each model has its pros and cons, which we will explore in this essay.
The disease/abstinence-based model views addiction as a chronic and progressive disease. According to this model, the addict is powerless over their substance use and must abstain from using drugs or alcohol to recover. The treatment focuses on abstinence as the primary goal, and it is believed that individuals who achieve abstinence will achieve long-term recovery. The 12-step program of Alcoholics Anonymous is a widely known example of this model.
One of the pros of the disease/abstinence-based model is that it emphasizes the importance of complete sobriety, which can be crucial for people with severe addiction. This model also recognizes the need for ongoing support, often in the form of group meetings or therapy. Additionally, the disease model has helped reduce the stigma associated with addiction by acknowledging that it is a medical condition, rather than a moral failing.
However, the disease/abstinence-based model has some cons as well. For example, it assumes that all people with addiction have a similar experience and will respond to the same treatment. This model also does not account for individuals who may not be ready or able to achieve complete abstinence, leaving them without support or resources. Additionally, this model may not be suitable for individuals with co-occurring mental health disorders or chronic pain, as it does not address the underlying issues that may have contributed to their substance use.
On the other hand, the harm reduction model focuses on reducing the negative consequences of drug use, rather than requiring complete abstinence. This model recognizes that not all individuals are willing or able to achieve abstinence and instead seeks to minimize the harms associated with drug use. This approach includes providing clean needles, overdose prevention education, and medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid addiction.
One of the pros of the harm reduction model is that it is inclusive and meets individuals where they are at in their recovery journey. This model provides support and resources to individuals who may not be ready or able to achieve complete abstinence, reducing the risk of overdose and other negative consequences. Additionally, the harm reduction model has been effective in reducing the spread of infectious diseases, such as HIV and Hepatitis C, among people who inject drugs.
However, the harm reduction model also has some cons. One concern is that it may enable continued drug use and not encourage people to seek long-term recovery. Additionally, this model may be seen as condoning drug use, which can increase public stigma and opposition to harm reduction efforts. Lastly, there is a lack of funding for harm reduction programs, which limits their availability and effectiveness.
In conclusion, both the disease/abstinence-based model and the harm reduction model have their strengths and weaknesses. While the disease model emphasizes the importance of abstinence and acknowledges addiction as a medical condition, it may not be suitable for everyone. The harm reduction model, on the other hand, meets individuals where they are at in their recovery journey and provides essential support and resources, but it can also be seen as condoning drug use. Ultimately, the best approach to addiction treatment depends on the individual and their unique circumstances.
 

Exploring the Moderating Role of Personality in the Relationship between Stressors and Counterproductive Work Behaviors: A Study of Hotel Employees

Assignment Instructions:
read the following article and answer the questions:
1. Draw a model that represents the relationships described in the title of the article (refer to the Research Methods/Statistics lecture for some examples).
2. Discuss the variables used in the study. What are they and how are they measured? You should have 3 moderator variables (personality), 3 predictor variables (stressors), and 2 outcome variables (CWBs). (Hint: there’s a table in the paper that lists them!)
3. Did the authors find main effects? In other words, are there significant correlations between stressors and CWBs?
4. Did the authors find moderator effects? In other words, did conscientiousness, agreeableness, or negative affectivity interact with stressors in predicting CWBs?
5. What does this research mean in a practical sense? In other words, how can organizations or I-O psychologists use the results of this research to improve the effectiveness of organizations or the well-being of employees? (Hint: the authors have a few suggestions in a paragraph with the heading “Practical Implications”)
6. How can you relate this to your own work or life experiences? Think about what you know of yourself as a person (or take a short personality test hereLinks to an external site.) and how you react to stressors at your job or in your life. Do you have any examples of instances where you were stressed and wanted to engage in negative behaviors as a result? How might your personality have factored into whether or not you engaged in those behaviors?
How To Work On This Assignment(Example Draft/Essay)

The model in the article represents the relationships between personality, stressors, and counterproductive work behaviors (CWBs). Personality acts as a moderator variable that influences the relationship between stressors and CWBs. Stressors act as predictor variables that influence the likelihood of engaging in CWBs. The model shows that different personality traits may have different effects on the relationship between stressors and CWBs.
The study uses three moderator variables, including conscientiousness, agreeableness, and negative affectivity. The three predictor variables used in the study are role ambiguity, role conflict, and job insecurity. The two outcome variables are deviance and withdrawal. The variables were measured using self-report questionnaires, with the exception of withdrawal, which was measured using supervisor ratings.
Yes, the authors found main effects between stressors and CWBs. The study found that role ambiguity, role conflict, and job insecurity were positively associated with both deviance and withdrawal.
Yes, the authors found moderator effects between personality traits and stressors in predicting CWBs. Specifically, conscientiousness was found to moderate the relationship between role ambiguity and deviance, and between job insecurity and withdrawal. Agreeableness was found to moderate the relationship between role conflict and withdrawal. Negative affectivity did not moderate any of the relationships.
The research has practical implications for organizations and I-O psychologists. The findings suggest that organizations should consider the impact of stressors on employee behavior, and take measures to reduce stressors in the workplace. Organizations can also use personality assessments to identify individuals who may be more susceptible to engaging in CWBs in response to stressors. Additionally, training programs can be developed to help employees better cope with stressors and avoid engaging in CWBs.
Individuals can relate to this study by reflecting on their own personality traits and how they react to stressors in their work or personal life. For example, if someone is highly conscientious, they may be more likely to engage in deviant behavior if they perceive their role to be ambiguous. If someone is highly agreeable, they may be more likely to withdraw from work if they experience role conflict. Understanding one’s own personality traits and how they influence behavior can help individuals better cope with stressors and avoid engaging in negative behaviors.

How to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis.? In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience.?

tyu.docx

Berwick, D., Snair, M., & Nishtar, S. (2018). Crossing the global health care quality chasm: A key component of universal health coverage. 
Journal of American Medical Association, 320(13), 1317-1318. 

Read the Berwick article and reflect on the concepts and practices you have learned in NR506 on healthcare systems, politics, and health policy. Reflections should include the following: 
1. How to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis.? In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience.?  
2. Describe how one will apply content from this class to the upcoming clinical courses

Reflect on the knowledge you have gain in the course “Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence Based Practice”, your expectations and final outcomes.

  
Instructions: Reflect on the knowledge you have gain in the course “Advanced Nursing Inquiry and Evidence Based Practice”, your expectations and final outcomes.
COURSE DESCRIPTION : 
This course examines the progression from nursing inquiry to nursing practice under the framework of nursing theory.  Students will examine the historical foundations of nursing theory and the impact of these models on nursing research. Students will examine the role of nursing research in advanced nursing practice and evaluate models used to guide evidence-based practices. The course focuses on the critical assessment of relevant quantitative and qualitative research and examines how these data are applied in the development of change initiatives in the healthcare delivery system.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES:
 

Integrate theory, evidence,      clinical judgment, research, and interprofessional perspectives using      translational processes to improve practice and associated health outcomes      for patient aggregates.
Support the ethical conduct of      research and translational scholarship.
Analyze evidence for improving      advanced nursing practice using critical appraisal techniques.
Report to a variety of      audiences the evidence base for practice decisions, including the      credibility of sources of information and the relevance to the practice      problem confronted.
Translate research and other      forms of knowledge to improve practice processes and outcomes.

Requirements:
– Formatted and cited in current APA 7 
– The discussion must address the topic
– Rationale must be provided
– Use at least 600 words (no included 1st page or references in the 600 words)
– Use 3 academic sources. Not older than 5 years
– Not Websites are allowed.
– Plagiarism is NOT allowed

Which study design is the most powerful for generating evidence?

 Which study design is the most powerful for generating evidence?
According to Tracy, O’Grady, and Phillips (2023), when taking all study designs into consideration, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) remains the gold standard research design for generating evidence. RCT remains the gold standard because it is based on three critical elements which includes manipulation of an experimental intervention; comparison of the group receiving the experimental intervention versus the group receiving the placebo; and randomized assignment to the experimental or control groups. Randomized assignment to the aforementioned groups helps to prevent bias from being introduced into the study and increases validity (Tracy et al., 2023).
References
Tracy, M. F., O’Grady, E. T., & Phillips, S. J. (2023). Hamric & Hanson’s Advanced Practice Nursing: An Integrative Approach (7th ed.). https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9780323777131

What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the course Comprehensive Project? How did you leverage knowledge gained in the intellipath assignments

 Assignment
Minimum Weekly DB Expectations

Post an original and thoughtful Main Post to the DB prompt.
Respond to at least 2 other posts from learners and/or the instructor (Response Posts).
The first contribution (Main Post or Response Post) must be posted before midnight (Central time) on Friday of each week.
Two additional responses are required after Friday of each week.
For DB assignment prompts with a Part One and Part Two, Part One should be addressed in the first week of the unit with a Main Post and minimum of 2 Response Posts, and Part Two should be addressed in the second week of the unit with a Main Post and a minimum of 2 Response Posts.

More on DBs
At the end of each unit, DB participation is assessed based on level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion. DBs allow learners to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB are accepted after the end of the unit. Learners must demonstrate an appropriate depth of understanding of course content to receive credit for having submitted substantive posts. Typically, this is achieved with 3–4 strong paragraphs for Main Posts and 2–3 strong paragraphs for Response Posts.
Competencies and Knowledge
What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the course Comprehensive Project? How did you leverage knowledge gained in the intellipath assignments (Units 1–4) in completing the Comprehensive Project? How will these competencies and knowledge support your career advancement in management?