Capella University Do you align more with the traditional or revisionist view of the moral equality on combatants?

In LDR 951S “Power, Status and Influence”, we introduced you to an article by Daniel Strand entitled “Ethical reasoning and military leadership”. (For your reference, this article is attached HERE. The author provided an overview of ethical theories and offered a method for thinking about ethical dilemmas. For this essay, consider the following prompt first, then answer the question below. Moral equality of combatants (MEC) is a key element underpinning international humanitarian law (IHL).The MEC is the principle that soldiers fighting on both sides of a war are equally honorable, unless they commit war crimes, regardless of whether they fight for a just cause. According to a traditional reading of MEC, soldiers should obey their leaders when fighting because they are not well-placed to determine the justness of a war. However, in 2006, philosopher Jeff McMahan began to contest MEC, arguing that soldiers fighting an unjust or illegal war are not morally equal to those fighting in self-defense. According to this revisionist view, a soldier or officer who knows or strongly suspects that their side is fighting an unjust war has a moral obligation not to fight it, unless this would entail capital punishment or some other extreme consequence.A recent (Sagan & Valentino, 2019) study found that the majority of Americans endorse the revisionist view on MEC and many are even willing to allow a war crime against noncombatants to go unpunished when committed by soldiers who are fighting a just war. Question: Do you align more with the traditional or revisionist view of the moral equality on combatants? In responding to this ethical dilemma, justify your answer with using at least one ethical theory: deontology, virtue ethics, and/or consequentialism. Make sure to explain each theory before you use it.

CGTC Biology the Peppered Moth in England Discussion Questions

I’m working on a Biology question and need guidance to help me study. 1.Pine trees that are too tall or too short do not do as well as pine trees that are average in height. The short trees do not get as much light as tall or average trees. The tall trees are more likely to break off in storms. Tell how this is an example of stabilizing selection. Be sure to define stabilizing selection in your answer. 2.There is a moth in England called the peppered moth. Before Britain’s industrial revolution, these moths were usually salt and pepper colored. Because of their coloring, they blended in well with the tree trunks on which they tended to rest. The coloring helped them hide from the birds that ate them. During the British industrial revolution, industry expelled a lot of soot from the burning of coal into the environment. This soot darkened the tree trunks, and it was noted that black-colored moths were becoming predominant. The idea is that with soot in the environment, black-colored moths fared better than light-colored moths. There is some debate as to whether this is actually the case or not, but for the sake of this question, let’s assume it is. In your own words, explain the concepts from the four observations discussed in 12.2 using the moth as an example. In other words, how does the moth illustrate the first observation, the second observation, etc.? 3.Discuss what Darwin observed during his voyage on the Beagle. How did those observations lead to his theory about common descent with modification?Use the scientific method in your discussion.Step 1: What did he observe?Step 2: What was his hypothesis?Step 3: What prediction was made based on his hypothesis?Step 4: How can the prediction be tested using similar observations?Step 5: What was the conclusion?

Epidemiology and Health Promotion Discussion

Question 1 Pick any real world company that you’ve worked for or are interested in and write about what kinds of capital they have raised or are raising.Requirements:Question 2Briefly explain how state and federal regulations affect MCOs. What is the role of the court when there is conflict between state and federal requirements for MCOs?question 3Examine the differences between state and federal regulations of managed care. Which regulations have more impact on managed care? Explain.Requirements:Submit your essay in a Word document. This assignment must be at least 500 words, with at least four references cited properly in APA format, and a title page (APA format). This assignment must be well- written with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.question 4Review managed care programs profiles provided by Medicaid.gov. in the link below. Compare and contrast managed care programs between two states. Make sure to address the following areas:Requirements:Submit your essay in a Word document. This assignment must be at least 500 words, with at least four references cited properly in APA format, and a title page (APA format). This assignment must be well- written with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.question 5 Patients are acquiring infections after visiting a hospital. Visit the CDC website.Question: Describe the types of Health-care associated infections patients are acquiring after being admitted to a hospital. Describe the transmission methods and rates of these infections. Discuss the prevention strategies that could be implemented to reduce the occurrence of Health-care associated infections (nosocomial infections).Your initial post should be at least 200 words question 6Read the case study “Botulism in Argentina”. Work through all of the sections of the case study and answer the 19 questions.Instructions:question 7 Recall a leader you worked for. At what stage of personal diversity awareness was the leaders? Explain. At what stage of diversity awareness are you?”question 8“Describe ways in which you might increase your personal power.”

Hsa6200 understanding data collection and performance improvement

Competency
Evaluate healthcare quality measures and their use in diverse populations and settings. 
Scenario
Oakridge Hospital is preparing for redesignation of its Magnet Status, which represents diverse populations in primary, secondary and tertiary settings. As the clinical analyst for the hospital, it is your responsibility to ensure that all of the collected and submitted data meets criteria to maintain the covenant status. The Board of Directors asked The Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) to give an update on the hospital’s Magnet status and redesignation efforts.
Student Success Criteria
View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.
Instructions
You have been asked by the hospital’s Chief Nursing Officer to create a PowerPoint presentation (using speaker notes for each slide or voiceover narration) on Magnet designation, quality measures and patient outcomes to be presented to the Board of Directors. This presentation should include:

Background on Magnet Recognition Program®.
Summary of the Magnet status model components and diverse data elements that can be used in the hospital’s Quality Improvement initiatives that will be measured for redesignation.
Explain the use of hospital, state and national data comparison requirements in Magnet redesignation and quality improvement.
Three goals that align to Magnet status with an explanation of how these goals can positively impact the hospital’s patient outcomes.

A – 4 – Mastery
Clear and thorough background information on Magnet Recognition Program. Included comprehensive details on the model components and data elements that can be used in QI initiatives. Includes multiple supporting examples.
A – 4 – Mastery
Clear and thorough explanation of hospital, state and national data comparison requirements in Magnet redesignation. Included comprehensive explanation with multiple supporting examples for comparison of hospital, state, and national data comparisons quality improvement.
A – 4 – Mastery
Comprehensive list of more than three goals aligned to Magnet status. Included multiple supporting examples of how all of the goals can positively impact the hospital’s patient outcomes.

Nursing assignment 2 ethics | swe

 
Goal:
Analyze and evaluate a middle range theory.  You will select a middle range theory and identify application of nursing theories into clinical practice.
Content Requirements:

Components of the theory

Discuss the major concepts of the theory
Philosophical basis or worldview change, advancing health

Structural aspects of the theory

Discuss the framework of the theory.

Identify an area of your practice where this theory could be applicable

What question does the theory help to answer?
Describe the area of interest in relationship to the theory/theoretical model.
Is it appropriate for the practice setting and is it applicable?
Discuss the strength and weakness of the theory. If there is weakness, discuss what makes it difficult to be used in practice.

Use of theory in clinical practice.

Performing a literature review is essential to completing this section. If there is no literature available about the application of this theory in practice, address reason(s) why based on your findings.

Evaluation of theory

Is this theory used to understand and apply into practice?
What difficulties did you encounter or would anticipate encountering in using this theory?
What would make this theory more usable or applicable to practice?

Information Systems in Business: A Case of Walmart Questions

Write a  summary for each of the below tasks:Task 1: Use the below topics and develop a summary of the organization (Walmart) on how the company is applying strategy and how they use these concepts to compete (See below for sample topics)Defining Information Systems &Management Information Systems: Business Driven MIS, The Components of Information Systems, Networking Communication, The Role of Information Systems, The PC Revolution. The Internet, World Wide Web and E-Commerce, Can Information Systems Bring Competitive Advantage?Task 2:Go to www.nytco.com/investors and check New York Times Company’s recent financial reports.Is the business model working effectively? Can the company’s business model remain sound as more consumers go to the Internet to find general information and stay abreast of current events and news stories? Is its revenue stream from advertisements growing or declining? Are its subscription fees and circulation increasing or declining?Task 3: Go to the Starbuck’s website, click on the investor relations section, and explore Starbuck’s latest annual reports and 10-K filings to see if you can identify the key elements of Starbuck’s strategy. Use the framework provided in your textbook (Figure 1.2) to help identify these key elements. What approach toward winning a competitive advantage does Starbuck’s seem to be pursuing?Task 4: Go to the company Websites for Home Depot ( Task 5: Why is it important to set both strategic and financial goals? Please justify your answer.

PU Psychology Self Awareness Gained from The Meetings Essay

Attend 2 DIFFERENT 12-Step/Some type of recovery meetings of their choosing (e.g., Cocaine Anonymous, Gamblers Anonymous, Alcoholics Anonymous, Al-Anon, and/or Narcotics Anonymous). Students need to submit a paper. Listed below are some guidelines: 1. Attend two (2) Open 12-Step Support Group meetings (e.g., AA, NA, CA, CODA, AlAnon, etc…) These must be 2 DIFFERENT meetings, i.e. an AA and an NA group). 2. One must be face to face (the other may be an on-line meeting) 3. Submit a paper.a. List dates and what types of 12 Step meetings you attended b. Body of the paper (Do not provide a documentary of the meetings’ content) but rather your personal reactions to meetings (This part of the paper does not need research/citations) i. Discuss self-awareness gained from attending the meetings 1. Biases? 2. Judgments? 3. Fears? 4. Surprises? c. Integrate one or two theories of addiction counseling and how the 12-step meetings may play a role in recovery/relapse prevention (Include 2 or more scholarly citations) d. Clarify how you may incorporate the use of support groups in working with clients. 4. Support your responses to parts c and d with outside, scholarly support

Nurse Leaders and Organizational Climate Discussion

1. Describe the organizational characteristics of the facility in which you currently have a clinical assignment. Include the following:a. Type of organizationb. Overall climate of the facility c. How the organization is structured d. Formal and informal goals and processes of the organization 2. Why is the work climate of an organization important to nurse leaders and managers?3. What are the ways in which a nurse can enhance his or her expertise?4. Explain “shared governance,” and describe how it can affect the power structure of a health-care organization. 5. Why is it important for staff nurses to understand the culture and real goals of the organization in which they work? 1. Describe your ideal organization. Explain each feature and why you think it is important.2. Interview one of the staff nurses on your unit. Find out what practices within the organization help to empower the nurses. Compare this list of practices with those discussed in the textbook. 3. Recall the last time you walked into a hospital, clinic, or physician’s office for the first time. What was your first impression? Did you feel comfortable and welcome? Why or why not? If you could change the first impression this facility makes, what would you do?4-What changes could be made at a very low cost? What changes would be expensive?Finally, discuss why it is important for a health-care facility to make a good first impression.

Letter to legislator | Nursing homework help

Letters and emails are highly effective ways to communicate with elected officials. Many legislators believe that a letter represents not only the position of the writer but also many other constituents who did not take the time to write.  
You may address a healthcare issue that is ongoing in your state, including items to be voted on in the near future.  If you are writing to support or oppose a particular legislative bill, state the topic and include the bill number and the author.  However, writing a letter about a Bill or Rule that has already been voted on is not permitted for this assignment, nor is a thank you letter. Do not address the LGBT community or abortions.
Your State Nursing Association and Advanced Practice groups are good places to find this information.   You must communicate clearly to your legislator that you live in their district.  Do not use FNU letterhead.  If you want to use a letterhead it should include your personal information.
You may also find this link helpful in finding an active issue in your state.Links to an external site. https://legiscan.com/

Methods of Evaluating Evidence Discussion

Respond with a paragraph to the following question, add citations and references:There are different methods of evaluating evidence. The two common methods of evaluating evidence are Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The two methods help in the determination of the relevance and validity of the evidence. The two methods of evaluating evidence are both similar and differentSimilaritiesBoth the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses are considered the highest quality of evidence for clinical decision making and can be used above all the other methods of evaluating evidenceBoth the methods for evaluating evidence are similar because they involve the collection of data from different sources and summarizing the all the evidence and results of the studiesDifferencesWhile systematic review collects and summarizes all the empirical evidence, the meta-analysis uses statistical methods to summarize the results of the studiesSecond, Meta-analysis is a statistical method used to combine the numerical results from such studies, if it is possible to do. On the other hand, Systematic review is a formal, systematic and structured approach to review all the relevant literature on a topicThird, the rationale for Meta-analysis is that through the combination of samples from different studies the overall sample size is increased, while the rationale for systematic reviews is that when data is pooled together from different sources a greater reliability would be obtained.Reference:Melnyk, B. M. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.