Analyze a conflict between two ethical principles (other than justice) that could occur regarding the priority of whom receives a ventilator.

For this assignment you are to write a 3-4 page paper (excluding the title and reference page) in proper APA style. Please do not exceed 4 pages for the paper. Grading will cease at the end of page 4. To earn full credit for this assignment you will need to address all the items in the grading rubric located in My Grades. Late papers will not be accepted. Check the course schedule for the due date for the paper.You need to have a proper title page, use in-text citation for sources of information used in the paper, and a reference list page. It is expected that you will use pertinent information from at least 2 sources outside of the textbook and reference them properly. Please review the plagiarism powerpoint in the week one folder. Using information in your paper without a citation is plagiarism and may result in 0/150 regardless of intent.Your paper must include a short discussion of case study. This is a fictional case which offers you some latitude in the case details. Your introduction can be very brief but it is needed to introduce the reader to the topic. Briefly develop some options for using ventilators as a scarce resource during the stress of a pandemic. Include in your paper an ethical theory that would support your plan.Identify the ethical principles involved in this study and where they came into conflict. This is the opportunity to present the ethical argument in your discussion of the ethical principles. Be sure to include all the principles that apply in this issue to earn full points.The ANA code of ethics has valuable guidance to navigate decision making. Identify at least 2 provisions of the ANA code and apply them to the case study.You will need to present an opposing view to your position. As part of an ethical argument the opposing view will need to be supported by an ethical theory or principle. Part of the ethical argument should include a refutation of the opposing view.Also, address the legal issue of malpractice as required by the grading rubric.Have a concise conclusion to your paper that does not introduce new ideas or information but summarizes what was discussed in the paper.Please proofread your work for grammar and spelling errors. A great way to improve the flow of a paper is to read it out loud. Often when we read our work silently we insert words where they are missing or do not hear the awkwardness of a particular sentence.And most importantly, review the grading rubric before beginning and submitting the assignment.Ventilator Case StudyThe following case study is borrowed from a collection of case studies published in 2011.Allocating Mechanical Ventilators During a Severe Influenza PandemicMarilee LeBon is an infectious disease nurse with a special interest in bioethics. She hasserved for years on her hospital’s ethics committee and recently volunteered to representthe hospital on a statewide committee meeting to develop guidelines for allocatingmechanical ventilators during a severe influenza pandemic. She understands that during asevere pandemic of influenza, many patients with respiratory failure who are able toreceive mechanical ventilation may survive, while patients with respiratory failure who donot receive mechanical ventilation are likely to die. Importantly, it is possible that in theevent of a severe pandemic of influenza, many hospitals and other healthcare facilities willnot have adequate numbers of ventilators to support a major disaster response.If a scarcity of ventilators occurs during a severe influenza pandemic, ventilators wouldneed to be allocated according to different guidelines than during usual clinical care.During a public health emergency, there will be competing priorities for ventilator use frompatients whose need for a ventilator is unrelated to influenza, including the need forchronic ventilator use. In addition, decisions will need to be made regarding whetherpatients should be removed from a ventilator to make way for others who may have abetter chance of recovery and whether there should be suspension of nonemergency surgicalprocedures that might create a need for ventilator therapy.Ms. LeBon’s first challenge is to work on a subcommittee charged with articulating theethical framework they will use. Address the following questions / prompts in your paper:1. What role should the ethical principle of justice play in dictating who should get access to the scarce ventilator therapy?2. Analyze a conflict between two ethical principles (other than justice) that could occur regarding the priority of whom receives a ventilator.3. Apply deontology and utilitarianism to the case study to support an ethical argument.4. Apply at least two provisions of the ANA Code of Ethics to aid Marilee in decision making.

Which group of inmates discussed in this chapter do you think poses the greatest problem for staff?

Please keep question and answer format and use the attached as reference (its important)question 1:Tyler is an 11-year-old boy who lives with his grandmother and two female cousins that are about the same age. Tyler’s died during childbirth and his father is in the military. Tyler was diagnosed with dyslexia in the second grade and has not received the appropriate help for his learning disability. He is in his first year of middle school where there are 1500 students. There are approximately 35 students in each of his classes. Tyler is teased because he struggles with reading and math. He has missed school for 15 days. Recently he was diagnosed with depression. His only friends are his family. The father financially supports Tyler and the grandmother works full-time as a nurse.•What are some of the risk factors (family, school, economic, and student–see chapter 11) in Tyler’s case?•How can family, school, economic, and student needs be addressed in Tyler’s case? (see chapter 11)Question 2: Which group of inmates discussed in this chapter do you think poses the greatest problem for staff?

Consider how well the policy has met the needs of your target population and to what extent it improves the social justice problem you initially researched.

Policy AnalysisAssignment OverviewThis assignment builds on the previous components of this research project, where you identified a social problem and selected a federal policy that affects it. THE LAST ANALYSIS I DID WAS ON NATIVE AMERICANS SO I WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT WITHIN A FEDERAL POLICY RELATED TO NATIVE AMERICANSOnce social workers have located a policy that addresses a social problem, the next step is to analyze the policy’s development and potential impacts. In other words, does the policy resolve or mitigate the issue? Looking at China’s one-child policy, you would want to know whether it is indeed reducing fertility rates. Next, you would want to know if the policy has any unintended consequences that must also be addressed. For example, China’s one-child policy has led to significant labor shortages in the country.By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAs and practice behaviors:Competency 5: Engage in Policy PracticeC5.GP.A: Identify social policy at the local, state, and federal level that impacts well-being, service delivery, and access to social service.Related Assignment Criterion:1. Analyze the development of the chosen policy.Competency 5: Engage in Policy PracticeC5.GP.B: Assess how social welfare and economic policies impact the delivery of and access to social services.Related Assignment Criteria:2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population.3. Evaluate the feasibility of the policy.Competency 5: Engage in Policy PracticeC5.GP.C: Apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, economic, and environmental justice.Related Assignment Criterion:4. Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population.Assignment DescriiptionIn this assignment, you will analyze the federal policy you chose to address your social justice issue, including providing background of the development of the policy and evaluating its effectiveness and feasibility. Remember that the feasibility of a policy relates not only to its economic feasibility, but also to its political and social impact. You will also identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from most effectively reaching your targeted population.Continue to consult Congress.gov, the Government Accountability Office, public policy analysis research and reports, and other peer-reviewed research to support your analysis. Also, use the NASW Code of Ethics Web page to guide your analysis.Assignment InstructionsFor this assignment:Analyze the development of your chosen federal policy.Analyze the historical background that led to the development of the policy.Define the goals of the policy and how these goals are intended to be met, including services and programs intended to achieve the goals.Evaluate the effectiveness of the policy with respect to the target population.Consider how well the policy has met the needs of your target population and to what extent it improves the social justice problem you initially researched. Does the policy seem to ignore, impede, or strengthen the social functioning of the target population?To what extent does the policy meet or improve the social values of the target population?To what extent does the policy adhere to best practice ethics and best practice standards?If the outcome of your analysis is that best practice ethics and standards are not being adhered to, include that information in your analysis as well.Evaluate the feasibility of the policy.Is the policy politically, economically, and administratively feasible? Provide details and rationale.Identify the policy constraints that inhibit the policy from fully addressing the problem for the chosen population. Have other constraints arisen since the passage of the policy that have made conditions worse or better for the chosen population?GuidelinesSupport your claims and recommendation with clear rationale and support from scholarly, peer-reviewed literature.Refer to the scoring guide that will be used to grade your work, before completing this assignment.Reference feedback you received from the previous assignment to improve the quality of your submission. Further feedback from this project component will help you improve your work for the final Federal Policy Analysis and Recommendations course project.Example assignment: You may use the assignment example, linked in the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Discuss the various reasons system implementation fails.

OverviewWith the justification of an HRIS solidified, you need to show your client how you will implement the HRIS using one of the change models discussed in our text. You will also need to explain and justify cost associated with implementation via a cost benefit analysis. You want to ensure the system is properly maintained and evaluated for continuous improvement. Therefore, you will include a maintenance and evaluation plan in your proposal.InstructionsWrite a 3–4 page proposal, in which you do the following:Change ManagementDiscuss the various reasons system implementation fails. Compare and contrast various change models. Then select a change model to use during system implementation. Provide details of how you will use the change model, and justify why you selected one model over the other models. Explain the various steps that should be included to ensure the change model is effective.HRIS ImplementationDiscuss the activities that are necessary prior to the system going live, and provide a timeline for these activities. Specify which change management team member will be responsible for each activity, and explain their role.Cost Benefit AnalysisCreate a cost benefit analysis matrix for the HRIS vendor you chose during Phase III: Design. Analyze the cost justification strategies that you will use to justify the cost of the HRIS, including data that identify each benefit and cost component examined, estimates of the dollar amount for each, estimates on when the organization will incur each cost and receive each benefit, and documentation justifying each decision you made in listing these benefits.MaintenanceDiscuss how you will ensure the system is properly maintained and evaluated for continuous improvement.ResourcesUse at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as academic resources

Pick an industry, and a company within that industry, to research the effect the recent pandemic has had and is having on it

Pick an industry, and a company within that industry, to research the effect the recent pandemic has had and is having on its :Company within that industry1-Ability to reach and serve their customers2- The effect on their employees3-The effect on the viability of the organizationYou should use at least 3 sources or more for your information. These must include: articles or news reports, personal interviewing and your personal experiences.**All sources must be cited at the end of paper.The report should be 5-7 pages double spacedUse a Cover Page – Name-Project 2-DateWritten Assignment Guidelines:Evaluation: Written assignments and exercises will be evaluated on multiple factors, including:(a) critical evaluation and effective insights into the case/question/problem/situation(b) demonstrated ability to apply course concepts and framework in your analysis/answer/solution(c) logical conclusions and effective recommendations where required(d) effective communication skillsEffective written and oral communications are critically important in the business world. Poor organization, convoluted sentence structures, mangled grammar, misspelled words, and a lack of coherent meaning have no place in effective communications, and these items will be considered in the evaluation of your work and ideas.Format: Each written assignment should comply with the guidelines specified for the assignment. The use of charts, exhibits, or references is encouraged to the extent that they help you make your points. These tools, and any cover pages, reference lists, appendices, etc. will not be included in page counts. The document should be in 12 point Times New Roman, double spaced, left justified, with a one inch margin all around. Appropriate titles and section headers should be used. Hard copy submissions should have a cover sheet and be stapled in the upper left corner. For electronic submissions, the paper must be in MS Office (Word, Excel, etc.) or Adobe pdf format. Classes are primarily based on Preparation, Discussion and Participation. All assignments are due, whether electronically or hard copy, for class participation and/or at specific date and time set by the instructor

Evaluate and complete the QSEN safety checklist and the top 3 safety concerns plan of care table on that patient.

Evaluate and complete the QSEN safety checklist and the top 3 safety concerns plan of care table on that patient. This is followed by a summary paper. The document?should be?double?spaced and follow APA format.?APA format also requires grammatical?correctness, absence?of spelling errors, and?explanations of abbreviations. The document?should include both in text citations and references. Submissions?are thoughtful, logically organized, answer all aspects of the question, and are of at least?2?pages?with support from?a minimum of?two authoritative sources. One source must be from a current (published within the last 5 years) nursing journal article.?The submission must not be more than 3 pages. I have submitted an overview of the “patient” the essay needs to be over, as well as the checklist and table that must be included in the essay, and the rubric to further assist.

As a student, describe how each of the judge’s questionable activities could be explained.

Read Chapter 4 in your textbook and the five canons of judicial ethical conduct, and address the following in 2 pages:??Select at least 1 of the following theoretical concepts:Ethical obiectivism??Ethical universalism o Ethical relativism??Pragmatic morality??Ethnocentrism??Obiectivism??Paternalism??Legal moralism??Offensive conduct??As a student, describe how each of the judge’s questionable activities could be explained.??Speaking from the professional standpoint of the judge, use the five canons as support to explain how you believe the judge could behave ethically.

Explain why you agree or disagree with what they said.

Respond to each student’s discussion. Explain why you agree or disagree with what they said. More instructions are attached.Student 1: Discussion Board 13Understanding that the war against drugs began “June 17, 1971, President Nixon branded substance use as “public enemy number one” (Farber, 2021)”. Over the last few years, one trillion dollars waging the war on drugs. Thirty million arrests and millions of imprisonments have occurred in the United States (Farber, 2021). Not only is the price of incarceration high, “excessive use of incarceration as a drug control measure which the experts identify as the biggest contributions to higher rates of HIV and Hepatitis C infection among drug users (Farber, 2021)”. Incarceration of individuals for substance use impacts public health exposures to HIV and Hepatitis C infection as it has been proven to correlate with incarceration rates due to drug use (Farber, 2021).As the legalization of cannabis decreased, technical violations of probation resulted in “Lesser overdose deaths and lesser HIV infections among the user has plummeted (Ingraham, 2016). In Portugal, the decriminalization process has long-term benefits such: as courts being freed up for other important work, substance abuse has been cut in half since decriminalization, and recovery in rehab being more likely than in jail (UHS Admin, 2020). In addition, addiction treatment and rehabilitation are less expensive than incarceration, and productive members of society much more quickly than convicted felons’ counter-cultural drug use are changed when seen as a disease versus crime (UHS Admin, 2020).Policy such as legalizing cannabis significantly decreases incarceration rates and the criminal justice system. According to Farber, “the war on drugs has become good politics (2021)”. According to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, If the U.S government decriminalized drugs, 45.2% of the prison population would be released from prison (2022). If the U.S government decriminalized drugs, politicians would not have a point of argument as substance use has been a primary argument between republicans and democrats in the United States. Also, the decriminalization of substances would support individuals to get social supports in hopes of recovery being more attainable as a result.ReferencesFarber, D. (2021, June 17). The War on Drugs turns 50 today. It is time to make peace. The Washington Post. https://canvas.fsu.edu/courses/215371/modules/items/4132327.Federal Bureau of Prisons. BOP Statistics: Inmate Offenses. (2022). https://www.bop.gov/about/statistics/statistics_inmate_offenses.jspIngraham, C. (2016, March 24). Top Medical Experts Say We Should Decriminalize All Drugs and Maybe Further. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/03/24/top-medical-experts-say-we-should-decriminalize-all-drugs-and-maybe-go-even-further/UHSAdmin. (2020, August 24). Pros and cons of decriminalizing drug addiction. Foundations Recovery Network. Retrieved November 13, 2022, from https://www.foundationsrecoverynetwork.com/pros-and-cons-of-decriminalizing-drug-addiction/Student 2: I think that policies affect incarceration rates and criminal justice reform by reducing some of the stigmatization associated with the targeted population of marginalized communities and people of color. The criminalization of cannabis has sparked racial disparities in drug law enforcement, particularly in the United States (Ingraham, 2016). Decriminalization is not the same as legalization and many hold polarizing views about this. Criminal justice reform can help remove some of the barriers and inequality in drug conviction sentencing among marginalized groups. In Portugal, possession, and use of drugs are handled as a public health problem and not criminal activity (Ingraham, 2016). People who have SUD have an increased chance of success when substance use is treated as a public health concern instead of a criminal act. Since Portugal has treated substance use as a health concern and decriminalized substance use addiction rates have been cut in half over the past decade (Ingraham, 2016). I do not think that the fear of criminal charges has deterred people who have a substance use disorder, nor do I believe or have found evidence that this policy would entice people to be more likely to experiment. Criminal justice reform could lead to removing barriers to employment, new opportunities for people of color, and a countercultural essence of drug use being changed when society sees it as a disease and not a crime.ReferenceIngraham, C. (2016). Top medical experts say we should decriminalize all drugs and maybe go even further [PDF]. The Washington Post.

Explain how the brain reorganizes this region of the brain in response to this damage (be very specific, focusing on the neural pathways dedicated to touch of this area of the body)

1. Provide one example of neuroplasticity of the somatosensory cortex that results from damage to a body part (focusing on touch sensations)2. Explain how the brain reorganizes this region of the brain in response to this damage (be very specific, focusing on the neural pathways dedicated to touch of this area of the body)Video for informationpart 1 part 2 part 3