Your response paper should include a concise summary of each assigned reading, it should put each author’s argument into your own words (frequent quotations are discouraged) and briefly explain how they support them and conclude with your personal assessment of the readings. If there are multiple readings for a given week, you need to incorporate all of them (even the Primary Sources marked with a “P”) into your response papers.

Compare and contrast the legal concepts of “reasonable suspicion” and “probable cause.” How does each of these concepts apply to law enforcement officers?

In what situations is it not necessary for law enforcement to have a warrant to conduct a search and/or arrest a suspect? Name four or more exceptions to the warrant requirement and provide examples of how and when each exception would be utilized.

A novice educator expresses to the mentor that he is disappointed to be appointed to the Evaluation Committee because the work never leads to any changes. What would be an appropriate conversation between the mentor and novice educator?

One goal of an educational program is to foster cultural humility. As the educator, you presented a required educational program/unit on this topic; however, in the learners’ evaluations, there was significant dissatisfaction with the activity. Identify two quantitative ways that assessment/evaluation could occur to identify what went wrong and how to improve the program. Identify one qualitative way that assessment and evaluation techniques could identify what went wrong and how to improve the program. You can focus on learners in either an academic setting or nurse professional development.

This week’s assignment focuses on critical infrastructure in a city near you. The reason emergency planners must be aware of critical infrastructure is that whenever a hazard affects critical infrastructure there is a magnified effect on the population. Generally, if one infrastructure is affected there is a cascading effect on other critical infrastructures. In this assignment, you will take the theoretical and demonstrate why it is important to address critical infrastructure in all emergency plans. Each of the cities below have multiple critical infrastructures. You will examine the critical infrastructure and graphically place it on a map and include it in your analysis of the critical infrastructure for your chosen city.

Choose a city with which you are familiar. The city must have an electrical grid that can be accessed through the U.S. Energy Information Administration: U.S. States (Links to an external site.) web page in addition to several other critical infrastructures represented, such as water, sewage, highway, or rail.

You will analyze at least three critical infrastructure sectors (electrical substations, rail lines, and highway transportation) in your chosen city that will allow you to see how these sectors fit together after consulting a critical infrastructure sector map. Then, based on your analysis, you will write a report evaluating the impact of a natural, technological, or terrorist initiated hazardous event in your chosen city.

Include the following elements in your paper:

For your maps,

Create a map of critical infrastructure from a state view.

Access the S. Energy Information Administration: U.S. States (Links to an external site.) web page. On the map, select the state of your chosen city. Then use the zoom feature to identify the electrical sectors, rail lines, and freeways in your state. Ensure you have the energy infrastructure view activated (Note the “Layers/Legend” button in the upper left of your map). You may identify additional critical infrastructure or facilities on your map, such as hospitals, airports or port facilities, rail yards, etc. Once you get the view you seek, take a screen capture. (For assistance with screen capturing, you may wish to access the Take-A-Screenshot (Links to an external site.) web page. Save your screen capture image and insert it into the “Appendix” section of your report.

Create a map of critical infrastructure from a city view.

Now go through the same process to develop a city view. Once you see all of the icons, take a screen capture of the layers/legend window. Insert this image onto a new page. Highlight critical facilities such as hospitals, schools, rail yards, port facilities, water treatment plants, etc. You may wish to access the provided Appendix sample download for guidance.

Save the images of the two maps and develop a legend for your map.

For your report, you will show the relationships between the infrastructure sectors in your chosen city. Your goal is to analyze one critical juncture where multiple infrastructures come together in your city, not all possibilities. Be sure to include all of the following elements:

Identify the locations of intersections between critical infrastructures, single point failures, and the implications of these failures for critical infrastructure in your chosen city using your maps as a guide.

Place a circle on the map around these critical points.

Determine the impact when we remove one of these critical junctures.

For instance, explain how you would reroute traffic. Assess the impact on travel time in such scenario. Or, if you were to have an accident in a rail yard that damaged an electrical substation, discuss the cascading effects of losing the infrastructure on other infrastructures.

Assess the impact to human life should these single-point failures be unavailable due to a natural disaster or terrorist attack in such a densely populated city.

What consideration will you have to consider managing special needs populations?

Analyze the first-, second-, and potentially third-order effect of a hazardous event that incorporates multiple critical infrastructures.

Insert a picture of your map and of the legend into an “Appendix” section at the end of your report. Label the map with the name of your chosen city, and label the Layers/Legend image with “Legend.”

Description

A referenced 3000-word summative assessment which expands on the case submitted earlier. Students are expected to:

o Include the case description from the formative submission having made any amendments recommended by the tutor marking your work and use this description to introduce the topic of your essay

o Demonstrate critical clinical analysis of the case

o Provide an essay that is well balanced by discussing the issue from more than one viewpoint. For example, if appropriate, from a clinician’s perspective and from a patient perspective, or by conflicting opinions from relevant literature. For example, differing guidelines or clinical trials.

o Provide an evaluation that is guided by evidence-based practice and current national guidelines.

o Present/discuss your learning with regard to the issues raised.

o Offer a conclusion that is either of specific relevance to the case or of more general relevance to that patient group.

o Include the perspective of ‘the Physician Associate’.

o Include clinical/personal reflection on the case which considers the evidence you have presented as part of your discussion and feedback obtained from the formative submission to explain how this case will influence your future practice as a PA.

o Highlight issues for further learning/recommendations.

o Use an appropriately high level of written English as this assignment requires evidence of Masters level academic writing. The essay should include both reflection and evidence of a literature review relating to the key issues raised.

o Use the Vancouver system to reference material you have cited within your essay.

Discussion section of the report using the introduction and results and methods section for guidance please focus on the adverse events profiles of each drug mentioned and finish off with what drugs are currently in the pipeline and how they would change the face of arthritis therapy. Use the “Discussion instructions” for more guidance on style of writing etc. The introduction and methods and results are the these sections of this report with the main aim of comparing Rheumatoid arthritis therapies.

The main aim of the research will be to investigate which options are considered better for individuals who are currently suffering from RA. This will focus on both types of therapeutic options for rheumatoid arthritis, monoclonal antibody, and small molecule therapy. Discuss the safety profile, mechanism of action (pharmacology) of each drug and the side effects of therapy and improved options that may be avail be in the future. Most effective treatements in all indications currently etc.