In this week’s lesson, you learned about the U.S. Census Bureau’s most recent racial and ethnic categories. For this assignment, consider the racial and ethnic categories used in the 2020 Census with the four racial, ethnic, and gender categories used in the 1790 Census: Free white males, free white females, all other free persons, slaves (Pew Research Center, 2015). Analyze the concepts of race, ethnicity, and gender as social constructs, just as sociologists do, by addressing the following:

Explain how you might have been categorized by the 1790 Census and how you would have been categorized by the 2020 Census.

Compare and contrast the two potential categorizations and explain how this exercise shows that the concepts of race, ethnicity, and even gender change over time. Most importantly, explain how this exercise shows that the concepts of race, ethnicity, and gender are social constructs.

Determine and describe what ethnic, racial, and/or gender categories, if any, would be best, in your view, for the 2030 Census, to most accurately show the diversity of the U.S. population and to promote social justice. What categories would be best to reveal the segments of the U. S. population most vulnerable to racial, ethnic, and/or gender inequalities or discrimination? What categories could be listed in the 2030 Census that might best educate the U. S. population on differences between race and ethnicity, and promote social justice? Explain your decisions

Include headings for each of the three main sections of the paper:

What the Census Might Have Called Me

Social Constructs

Better Future Census Categories

Each of the three main sections of your paper must contain scholarly support in the form of quotes or paraphrases with respective citations from assigned reading (the textbook/lesson) and the outside scholarly source that you identify on your own.

*This assignment is adapted from Glaser (2018).

Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 3-4 pages (not including references page)

1-inch margins

Double spaced

12-point Times New Roman font

Page number in the upper right of all pages

Minimum of 3 headings (centered, bold, & title case)

Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style

References page

Title page not required

How will climate change impact global economics and politics? Who are the winners and losers of climate change? Most importantly, will climate change be the cause of the restructure of hegemonic and non-hegemonic states?

About 3 citations per paragraph.

Each paragraph should be an approach to answering your question for the point of view of a realist

Reaction Paper Supplemental Instructions:

Students will be required to submit a *3 page* (double-spaced, one inch margins, 12-pt Times New Roman font) reaction paper to a peer-reviewed, original research criminological article taken from an academic journal.

Using the analytic approach we have developed in class, make sure you select a paper where the author is analyzing data in an original way to make an argument. Make sure the source is peer-reviewed.

Your task in this paper will be to identify the author’s main argument, and critique the quality of the development of the argument in the body of his or her paper (i.e., is the evidence presented adequate? is the argument related to a theoretical worldview?).

***make sure you attach an e-copy of the article you have used.

Steps to the paper – follow these steps to do your assignment:

1. Find an academic peer-reviewed journal article that pertains to a subject within criminology that interests you (which relates to North America). This could be: Developments in policing, courts, corrections, young offenders, Aboriginal justice/issues, racialization etc. Note that you must find article with an empirical topic, and not just a conceptual review/theoretical piece.

2. Read the paper carefully.

3. Identify the general theoretical orientation of the author (whether or not it is explicitly stated by the author). Is this author deploying an individualistic (micro) or larger structural (macro) perspective? Are they more consensual or conflictual in their thinking?

4. How explicit is the author in identifying their theoretical position?

5. Does the author make any policy recommendations, and how do these recommendations relate to their theoretical position?

6. Does the author present sufficient evidence in their paper to justify their theoretical position?

7. What kinds of data might they need to make their theoretical position stronger (i.e., to back up their theoretical argument)?

8. If you were going to do research in this area, what kinds of questions would you ask, what kinds of data would you look for, and what kinds of theory would inform your research (what are the next logical steps for research, based on what you found interesting, but a little bit under-developed in terms of evidence, in the paper you have reviewed)?

1. Tell us what the focus of your chosen author is.

2. Make an argument (A): is the author’s focus macro or micro, and consensual or conflictual?

3. Tell us what kind of evidence the author presents.

4. Make an argument (B): is the evidence very strong, adequate, or inadequate for the arguments that the author has raised?

This should be about two thirds of a page. (/10)

Body of the paper:

1. Following the same order as the points made in the introduction, prove your two arguments. Start with (A): Provide evidence from the paper to substantiate your claim that the author is either macro or micro and consensual or conflictual. (/5)

Just under a page.

2. Provide evidence from the paper to substantiate your argument (B) that the author’s evidence is strong, adequate, or inadequate for their arguments. (/5)

Just under a page.

3. In light of your critique of the author’s work, spend the last half page to page of the assignment outlining the most important next steps to take in that domain of research. The steps you recommend should either be things that the author missed, or, interesting arguments that the author made that did not have adequate evidence. You should indicate what kinds of evidence you would go after to develop the next steps of research you have identified. (/5)

Describe the difference in roles between leadership and management. Explain how the goals of management and leadership overlap and provide one example. As a nurse leader, describe how you can facilitate change by taking advantage of this overlap.

Write a professional article on the ‘professional and legal aspects of confidentiality’ for Imaging and Therapy practice journal.

The article should critically discuss why it is important to ensure that privileged patient information is only used for the benefit of the patient and kept confidential from those who do not have lawful access to it. It is designed to raise awareness amongst radiographers and to inform them of the possible effect upon their career.

You are in the role of the Radiology Services Manager at Karemore Hospital. The Chief Executive has asked you to provide a report in response to the Hearsay Express article of 9th January 2020 and Jeremy suet-Feline’s letter to the chief executive regarding his complaints about inequitable treatment. You are required to respond to and address the inequalities in healthcare provision within the scenario, explaining and justifying the factors that influence the decision making process in prioritising patients e.g. patients’ non-compliance to recommended lifestyle changes, risk assessment of the patient; their clinical indications, severity of symptoms, age, medical stability of patient and any other factors that might influence the prioritisation process.

This is  process analysis essay. Discuss and advise how to decide what to study at college