Normative Social Influence is low stakes, conforming because why rock the boat.

Informative Social Influence is when something is hard to understand so people follow or they don’t know what to do so they just follow the group.

This assignment is an extended literature review (ELR).

The development of a relevant research question or topic must be clearly demonstrated. An audit trail of the search strategy should be detailed and transparent. Once relevant articles are selected (between 6-10 recommended) a thematic analysis should take place and emerging themes from the findings need to be presented. A discussion should follow offering a critical analysis of the findings indicating any implications for practice and future recommendations.

There is a guide to how to structure this review under assignments in the Blackboard shell CL664

A supervisor will be allocated to you, offering up to 4 hours of one-to-one tutorial support. You are responsible for making contact and keeping your supervisor up-to-date with your progress.

LO 1 Demonstrate a critical understanding of the research process, its principles and benefits to perioperative practice

LO 2 Critically evaluate strategies for collecting and appraising literature to conduct a coherent literature review

LO 3 Demonstrate a questioning and analytical approach to the utilization of research findings in practice, and a sound ability to develop evidence-based recommendations for enhancing perioperative care

Your submitted work must be presented in size 12, Arial font with a minimum of 1.5 line spacing and each page must be numbered. You should include;

– A title page – your name, student number, cohort. Module code and name. The actual word count. The submission date. Your supervisor and module leader’s name.

– Acknowledgements

– Contents page

– Abstract – use the following sub-headings: aim, background, methods, findings, conclusion

– Introduction – outlining how the ELR will progress, offer a terms of reference/definitions as necessary

– Background – outline the chosen topic area and the rationale for choosing this. Indicate the topics relevance to current nursing practice including any relevant background information.

– Methodology – provide a detailed audit trail of the methodology. Use tables as illustrations.

– Findings – present the findings of your analysis as the emerging themes

– Discussion – provide a critical discussion of your findings, considering implications for practice and further research

– Strengths and limitations – consider both strengths and weaknesses of your review

– Conclusion – Summarise key points from review

In your discussions with the CFO, you have talked about the impact of a dividend on your firm’s market price and financial statements. He has asked that you and your team evaluate the impact of issuing a dividend.

Your starting point for analyzing dividends is the Modigliani-Miller (MM) Theorem. If MM assumptions are true, what would be your recommendation for dividends?

Now assume that the only MM assumption that is not true is that payments to debt holders may be deducted as an expense for tax purposes, what would be your recommendation for dividends?

Now assume that the rate of long-term capital gains is lower than the marginal income tax rate for your equity holders, what would be your recommendation for the choice between dividends and share repurchase?

Moving on from MM, now use the income statement and balance sheet provided to make a recommendation for the amount of dividend (if any). How are retained earnings impacted and what does this mean for the organization?

Concept Check: Dividends are distributions of profits to your investors who placed their capital at risk for you. Theoretically, every company should eventually provide a dividend distribution to their investors.

Helpful Hint: Dividends are voted on every quarter by the Board of Directors for a company; the amount of the dividend or if any is paid can be decided at that time.

Develop the first year Taxes Business Plan for “Special Care Coffee” a Limited Liability Company.

Respond to discussion post

• Comparing the threats of internal validity they chose with the ones you chose

• Suggesting ways in which one of their identified threats could be eliminated or its effects reduced when conducting a study

• Add the best reference for this post.

3 discussion post

• What is the difference between internal and external validity?

Internal validity refers to the only exposure to the independent variable produced changes the dependent variable and there are no other factors that account for the changes. External validity refers to finding that are applied beyond the cases that were studied to their population (Yegidis, B. 2018).

• Select two internal validity threats and describe each.

Testing happens when test are repeated, the person being tested could change the outcome by repeating the test more than one time.

History refers to events that happen between the 1st and 2nd measurement.

• After examining each category and list of designs, determine which design controls for all threats to internal validity. Explain how this design controls for all threats.

The Pretest-Posttest control group design controls all the threats. Internal validity produces changes may be the result of treatments.