prepare and write a ‘literature review’ in legal studies, of a kind suitable for incorporation into LLM essays

1. This third task is concerned with how you prepare and write a ‘literature review’ in legal studies, of a kind suitable for incorporation into LLM essays (and later your LLM dissertation). The skills required will bring together work we’ve done under several different headings already:
➢ searching for, browsing, and seeing the significance of materials including legal authorities and research articles to be found in the library and online
➢ summarising the essential legal elements of reported cases and other materials including: highlighting what is significant, leaving out what is unnecessary or extraneous; and joining up such mini-summaries coherently with material that precedes them and comes next in an essay (i.e. work we did on case notes)
➢ providing correct and sufficient references for material you mention (i.e. work we did on the OSCOLA referencing system, which is the system you must follow in this coursework – don’t just paste in references in different formats)
2. What you have to do is to write a short literature review, building on the template and guidance we provide below.
3. This task is primarily concerned with the scope, structure, coherence and accurate presentation of a “literature review” in legal studies – concerned with whatever legal topic they are about. You can only review a relevant body of legal materials once you’ve decided what the literature is relevant to. So your literature review must be about a given topic. You are free, in this task, to choose your topic (which must however be explicitly delineated in the title of the piece of work you submit). Choose between the two following general headings:
3.1 You can write a literature review that could be used to support investigation of any topic you’ve addressed in an LLM module this term (so long as you do not repeat material you’ve used in any piece of submitted assessed work). You must ensure that the topic you’re providing the literature review of is clearly stated in the title of the piece of work you submit.
Or
3.2 You can write a literature review that supports early investigation of a topic you wish to research as your LLM dissertation. Such a literature review would serve as a sort of ‘scoping exercise’. Again, however, you must ensure that you state the topic you’re providing a literature review of in the title of the piece of work you submit.
4. Here are some key elements you should keep in mind in writing your literature review. There are of course other ways of writing a literature review, and where a piece of work is submitted that goes beyond the essential elements we outline below that may be reflected in a higher grade. But the guidance that follows should ensure you are able to incorporate legal authorities and scholarship appropriately into essays assessed throughout your LLM programme, and that is our aim.
4.1 In legal studies, you need to keep in mind both the distinction and also the connection between (i) professional sources and (ii) academic literature. These two kinds of material have different statuses and play different roles. But they work closely together in legal-academic writing. This is part of what makes writing a ‘literature review’ in the academic study of law different from writing a ‘literature review’ in social science or natural sciences. (In some of those other fields, a literature review is a highly standardised, separate section in a written report, essay or thesis; it usually isn’t in law.)
4.2 In practical terms, a literature review embedded in a law essay must do the following:
• it should refer to the main legal sources (hence why the literature review stage of this module follows on from work we did on case notes , case commentary and case summary);
• it should mention, where appropriate, other kinds of institutional and public document (such as policy or committee reports, including preparatory documents discussing law reform or leading towards legislation);
• it should offer a descriptive overview of relevant academic books and journal articles (How many? This will vary but will be more than 2-3 but not so many that you don’t have space to discuss any of them – the literature review is not a list.)
4.3 Typically, in a law essay or dissertation the literature review is not titled as such and presented separately. It doesn’t usually stand alone as an essay section, as it would in a sociology or natural sciences essay. Rather, a literature review in law is likely to be woven into an essay: as (i) part of the introduction and description of context; or (ii) within a section dealing with defining the problem to be addressed, etc. For instructional purposes only, for this task we’ve separated out the literature review, in order to look more closely at its purpose and main features. That’s slightly artificial, but pedagogically essential.
4.4 A literature review serves a purpose and contributes to an overall argument. It is not just a list or summary. It has to show development if it is to achieve that purpose. The overall aim is to situate a project that an author is developing in his or her essay or dissertation within the larger context of existing legal scholarship.
4.5 To this end, a ‘review of the literature’ is needed as part of the process of defining a topical research issue/question. That’s why you’re not asked in this task to write a freestanding ‘literature review’ of a given topic: simply ‘the death penalty’, ‘breach of confidence’, ‘exemplary damages’, or ‘vertical and horizontal effect’. Each of these would require a neutral report or reference-material approach, or a whole textbook (or many textbooks). By contrast, as you will see from the guidelines above, you’re being asked to write a literature review that would support a particular essay topic containing an interpretive, critical or evaluative dimension: i.e. by serving as a contribution to an essay in which you develop an argument or point of view based in part on the account you offer of the currently available materials.
4.6 Your literature review is likely to begin with a short general statement of how the issue/question you’re writing about is commonly perceived or approached: this is your ‘way in’. You identify some unresolved dimension or aspect that makes your chosen topic worth writing about. This introductory overview is usually placed in a (necessarily simplified) historical context (time, jurisdiction, social climate of opinion, etc.). But it must be historicised in this way: a literature review is the published story of how people have engaged with, investigated, and constantly redefined a topic.
4.7 The main body of the literature review introduces key sources and works, briefly highlighting not only their scope and content but also their type (are they legally authoritative sources, academic reference works, partisan or even polemical arguments?). Where significant, you should indicate how particular documents or publications have been received by other professionals, scholars and/or the wider public, including what influence they may have had (distinguishing for instance between a widely acknowledged study in the field and a relatively unknown article you may have discovered almost by chance).

Describe and evaluate the business financial context, including business structures, financial stakeholders and information, and the accounting profession and financial governance.

Aims of this Unit
Managers are responsible for the performance of their business units within their organisations and financial performance forms part of that responsibility. This unit aims to provide students with the foundations of Financial Management so as to equip them to be able to more effectively meet their responsibility for financial performance. This includes being able to understand and evaluate the financial impact of decisions and activities within
their organisations, and also be able to use financial information more effectively when making decisions.
Students will be introduced to terminology, principles, frameworks and models that underpin Accounting and Finance. These include the structure and content of financial reports, techniques and principles of budget development and control, costing principles and models, techniques for making capital investment decisions, and funding structures and decisions within organisations.
In this unit, theoretical frameworks and models are provided as the foundation for learning, and from there theory is embedded within practical applications – both within students’
organisations and in other practical case studies.
One of the aims of the unit is for students to understand how financial principles and information can be used to better inform their operational and strategic decisions, and to understand how applying these principles ethically underpins responsible financial management and helps build sustainable enterprises.
Knowledge and Understanding
This unit is designed to provide students with an understanding of:
• The business context and its impact and relationship to financial information and practice
• General Purpose Financial Statements (GPFS); including key accounting concepts, terminology and disclosure practices
• Financial analysis techniques and their application to interpreting financial
information on GPFS
• Approaches for analysing costs and examining cost behaviour, and how this applies to effective cost management, including budgeting
• Principles and techniques for adopting a structured approach to making capital expenditure (investment) decisions
• Principles of business financing and its organisational impact
Manging Financial Resources: Unit Guide

Following completion of this course, participants should:
1. Describe and evaluate the business financial context, including business structures, financial stakeholders and information, and the accounting profession and financial governance.
2. Interpret and critically analyse the information contained on financial statements.
3. Demonstrate the use of costing concepts and principles to improve decision making.
4. Develop and manage budgets and associated financial resources to support business objectives.
5. Demonstrate appropriate financial methodologies to evaluate and make decisions in relation to Investment options.
6. Understand the impact and cost of financing decisions and identify sources of financing.
7. Critically consider the potential impact of contemporary business context on financial information.
8. Demonstrate a high order of skill in analysis, critical thinking, communication and professional application.
9. Demonstrate creativity and flexibility in the application of knowledge and skills to new situations, to resolve problems and to think rigorously and independently.

Explain the key lessons learned during each project management phase of your proposed project: initiation, planning, implementation and control, and evaluation and closure.

Complete the “Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure” section of your healthcare improvement project (HIP) paper by doing the following:

Evaluation of the Process
A. Evaluate the development of your HIP proposal by doing the following:
1. Explain the key lessons learned during each project management phase of your proposed project: initiation, planning, implementation and control, and evaluation and closure.
2. Discuss ways you would analyze the final data from the proposed project, and identify the titles of the appropriate experts who you could enlist in reviewing the data.
3. Explain any considerations you would make if you had the opportunity to implement your proposed project, using specific examples from your proposed project.
4. Discuss the possible implications of not meeting one or more key performance indicators (KPIs).
a. Explain how you would use evidence-based data to create a plan to improve the metrics measuring the structure, process, and outcomes of the project.

Reflection
B. Reflect on the successes and challenges for all phases of the entire HIP proposal, using examples that would reflect realistic implementation and evaluation phases.
1. Explain how the professional experience of the project team would have contributed to the successes and challenges of the project proposal.
2. Discuss the methods you would have used to respond to scope creep issues such as deviations from the proposed timeline or not meeting the budget.
3. Discuss the importance of tracking KPIs throughout the project.

Project Closure
C. Discuss how you would celebrate once your proposed HIP is implemented and the processes you would use to close your project.
D. Describe the wrap-up session you would have held with the project team, including details of your team’s recommendations, lessons learned, and the next steps for the project.

Conclusion
E. Write a conclusion that reiterates the rationale and purpose of your project, including how your improvement project addresses a need for a quality change, innovation, or improvement.

Note: Your conclusion should not present new information; rather, it should provide new insight and offer creative approaches to guide future work in this area.

1. Discuss how this improvement project is significant to the role of a nurse leader.

F. Submit your entire HIP paper, which should include the following sections:
• Introduction
• Review of Relevant Scholarly Sources
• Healthcare Improvement Project Initiation
• Healthcare Improvement Project Planning
• Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation Plan
• Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation Plan
• Healthcare Improvement Project Implementation and Control
• Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure
• Conclusion

Note: You are required to submit the entire HIP paper for this task, but only the “Healthcare Improvement Project Evaluation and Closure” section will be evaluated at this time.

G. Incorporate the following components of APA style and formatting in your paper:
• bias-free language
• APA-specific rules regarding verb tense, voice, and perspective
• a title page and headers
• in-text citations and references
• APA-specific formatting rules for margins, spacing, numbering, and indentation for the title page and main body of your paper, including headers, bulleted and numbered lists, and tables and figures

H. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

Discuss an accomplishment, event, or realization that sparked a period of personal growth and a new understanding of yourself or others.

Admission Essay
1.Some students have a background, identity, interest, or talent that is so meaningful they believe their application would be incomplete without it. If this sounds like you, then please share your story.

2. The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?

3. Reflect on a time when you questioned or challenged a belief or idea. What prompted your thinking? What was the outcome?

4. Reflect on something that someone has done for you that has made you happy or thankful in a surprising way. How has this gratitude affected or motivated you?

5. Discuss an accomplishment, event, or realization that sparked a period of personal growth and a new understanding of yourself or others.

6. Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that it makes you lose all track of time. Why does it captivate you? What or who do you turn to when you want to learn more?

7. Share an essay on any topic of your choice. It can be one you’ve already written, one that responds to a different prompt, or one of your own design.

Explain the use of Critical Path Analysis (CPA) in managing a project and consider its use in your project planning

You work as a design engineer for a small manufacturing company and have been asked to meet with a potential customer. The company mass-produces exterior rear view mirror assemblies (wing mirrors), in factories across Asia, the Far East and South America. Currently the mirrors are being sampled and inspected by hand, but errors and damage have occurred on some production lines. They require an adjustable jig that can be used in all the manufacturing facilities, on each of the production lines, and can hold a variety of different exterior rear view mirror assemblies. The jig is to be portable and be attached to a workbench, it should rotate and swivel to allow inspection of the exterior rear view mirror assembly from any angle and both sides. In addition, the final jig design must have a significant focus on safety, as it is intended that the jigs will be in use in a high risk environment, being used by inexperienced operators. The manufacturer anticipates a maximum cost of around £200
for each unit It is intended that all project elements will be monitored at formative feedback points throughout the project duration. -With reference to the customer brief above you should produce a design specification, using a standard template, which meets all the customer requirements. In addition, you should present a project schedule / project plan for the design of the product. You should consider the importance, sequence and timing of each activity within your plan and provide illustrations of these. To determine whether your specification is appropriate you should compare and contrast it with the supplied industry standard specification. To complete this part, the following elements should also be undertaken:
• Research the characteristics of exterior rear view mirrors
considering safety, sizes, profiles and existing inspection jigs/fixtures/techniques
• Study the customers/stakeholder’s design brief requirements, explaining how these influence the preparation of the design specification
• Explain the use of Critical Path Analysis (CPA) in managing a project and consider its use in your project planning
• Explore and evaluate the potential alternative planning techniques available and justify the preferred method. – A design specification and project plan (which can be included as an annex when completing the final report). A written evaluation of around 600 words, to include three potential projects/design solutions with evidence of the use of software in
simulation/modelling/prototyping/feasibility in developing a suggested solution and a justification of a proposed final design solution (this will be incorporated into your final report). -Plan a design solution and prepare an engineering design specification in response to a stakeholder’s design brief and requirements; -Produce a design specification from a given design brief; -Explain the influence of the stakeholder’s design brief and requirements in the preparation of the design specification; -Produce a design project schedule with a graphical illustration of the planned activities; -Evaluate potential
planning techniques, presenting a case for the method chosen; -Demonstrate critical path analysis techniques in design project scheduling/planning and explain its use Some examples are in the attach on what to cover for Project Plan and Specifications; Design specifications should be 3 sketches and
selecting 1 with presenting the evidences why is the best one

Critically explain the role and objectives of the main participants in the derivatives market. Provide examples to illustrate and support your answer.

The assignment is an assessed piece of work that is to be completed individually. It accounts for 100% of the total marks available for this module.

Each student is required to submit a Word file document containing their answer AND the accompanying Excel spreadsheet file containing the relevant quantitative analysis. The Excel file must be presented fully explained so the reader can readily understand the structure of the calculations. The analytical methods used in the analysis must also be fully explained in the Word file.

INSTRUCTIONS ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK
The assignment is composed of three separate sections:
Task 1
Critically explain the role and objectives of the main participants in the derivatives market. Provide examples to illustrate and support your answer.

Task 2
The task is to collect daily adjusted closing prices for the last five years (the closing prices of Dec 2021 must be included) for 12 companies of choice, making sure that the period fully covers five years. Data need to be collected from official sources either provided by the University (Bloomberg, DataStream) or web-based (Yahoo Finance). In addition to stock prices, each student is required to collect adjusted daily closing prices for the S&P500 index. The list of stocks will form a portfolio and each student can freely choose the weighting of each stock in the portfolio, except equal weighting. The report should include the following:
1. Relevant descriptive statistics of the data set for the 12 equities and the market index (10% of mark).
2. An estimation of the 1-day VaR at 95% and 99% confidence levels for the portfolio with the chosen weights (5% of mark).
3. The 5-days VaR at 95% and 99% confidence levels for the portfolio with the chosen weights (5% of mark).
4. The estimation of expected shortfall (CVaR) for both VaRs in 2 and 3 (10% of mark).

The VaR estimation must be performed using both the variance-covariance method as well as the historical simulation method. Where suitable, students may include graphs to support their argument. Students are required to fully explain the procedure and estimation methods, using references from the academic literature and regulation, rather than textbooks.

Task 3 (50% of the mark |1000 words)
The task is to numerically value 2 options, one call and one put (European or American) on one of the stocks selected in part 1 by using the binomial lattice framework and comparing the result with the Black-Scholes option valuation method.

Guidelines:
1. The options to be valued and the underlying asset is to be selected according to the student’s choice.
2. The two options, one call and one put must have the same strike price and maturity and the maturity must be at least 6 months.
3. Both results obtained using the binomial lattice (15% of the mark) and the Black-Scholes formula (10% of the mark) have to be compared with the market price (5% of the mark).
4. Put-call parity relationship needs to be shown (10% of the mark).
5. The lattice should have at least 200 steps.
Sensitivity analysis should be performed

critically evaluate the role of social-purpose organisations (whether private for-profit businesses or hybrid models) in mitigating a specific global challenge of your choice, in a geographical setting of your choice.

Assignment:

The Management, Governance and Society module has examined the contribution of business firms and hybrid organisational models to a variety of complex social issues. To understand global challenges, the module has referred to the United National Sustainable Development Framework, which highlights 17 Sustainable Development Goals to be globally achieved between 2015 and 2030. Such global goals are equally relevant to all regions in the world, however the actions through which governments, organizations and citizens in specific areas aim to pursue these global objectives will vary depending on the characteristics of the local socio-economic and socio-political environment.

Aim of this assignment is to critically evaluate the role of social-purpose organisations (whether private for-profit businesses or hybrid models) in mitigating a specific global challenge of your choice, in a geographical setting of your choice.

As a first step, you should:

– Select 1 or 2 SDGs. Should you choose more than 1 SDG, they should be clearly interlinked to allow for an integrated discussion;

– Select 1 geographical region of your preference (a country, or a region within a country).

In your essay, you should:

– Develop an analysis of the current situation and historical evolution of the region over the past two decades, with respect to the chosen SDG area (ca. 500 words);

– Examine the role of national and international policies to foster improvement in the selected area(s). At least 2 policy interventions (one national, one international) should be described and critically analysed, by highlighting their advantages and disadvantages (ca. 700 words);

– Examine the role of social-purpose organisations in addressing the identified problems in the selected area(s). At least 2 organisations of different kind (e.g. one social enterprise and one public-private partnership or one business firm and one multi-stakeholder partnership) should be described and critically analysed, by highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of their strategies (ca. 1000 words);

Formulate recommendations for policy and practice, by considering the interdependences between the chosen policies, the social-purpose organisations, and the regulatory, socio-cultural and socio-economic environment

Write a fully referenced research project report based upon the proposal you submitted and incorporate the assignment work that you completed earlier in the semester.

Learning outcomes

LO1 Identify a specific industry problem and to select appropriate research methodology in order to report upon the research topic.
LO2 Demonstrate the ability to obtain and analyse data from primary and secondary sources; to critically evaluate contemporary research, concepts, arguments, assumptions and opinion; and to make reasoned judgements.
LO3 Conduct an applied research project effectively, deploying techniques of analysis and enquiry; project, time and problem management; theory, specialist knowledge, skills and experience.
LO4 Demonstrate the ability to reflect constructively and critically on the activities undertaken, specialist knowledge and the role of the professional in communicating information, ideas, problems and solutions to specialists and non-specialists.

Task
Write a fully referenced research project report based upon the proposal you submitted and incorporate the assignment work that you completed earlier in the semester.
The research project report represents 75% of the module mark. Before preparing your report, it is assumed you will have read fully the project guidance notes and associated directed reading and have completed appropriate primary and secondary research.
Submission note: Following submission of your first assignment for this module, you will have until Week 40 to complete research on, and write up a report for, the project title you have selected.
Your research project report is expected to:
• provide a clear indication of the purpose and importance of your research and how you conducted your investigation;
• involve analysis as well as a description, demonstrating your ability to construct, explain and justify your own perspective on the issues;
• organise and present facts and data clearly, and offer coherent arguments built from them;
• relate facts and data to theory and practice discussed in the course;
• summarise concisely all the main points you discuss, offering any insights,
recommendations or conclusions;
• recognise gaps and deficiencies in the research, indicating where further work is required;
• be written in a professional style, making appropriate use of English, with correct grammar, spelling, paragraphing and referencing;
• submitted in accordance with the ‘Guidance and submission notes for Assessment 2’ set out below.
Your report should include the following items:
• Title page
• Abstract
• Declaration
• Table of contents
© University College of Estate Management 2021 Page 3 of 8
• List of tables, figures and other materials
• Acknowledgements
• Main body of text
• Word count (refer section 2.2, below)
• References and bibliography
• Appendices

Calculate the descriptive statistics of the US Effective Federal Funds Rates. Based on the results you obtained, discuss the information about the mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, median and first and third quartiles of the time series.

Quantitative Method and Economics
Coursework Assignment
The coursework requires you to use the methods you have learnt to analyse the data in the
Excel file coursework data.csv. The data set contains information on the Crude oil prices, Dow Jones Industrial Average, US CCI (Consumer Confidence Index) and US Effective Federal Funds Rate, during the period between January 2009 and December 2018.
(1) Use the information that can be obtained from the time series plot and acf plot of the data to discuss the stationarity of each time series in the data set. Please also include the graphs you obtained as part of your answer to the question.

(2) Calculate the descriptive statistics of the US Effective Federal Funds Rates. Based on the results you obtained, discuss the information about the mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, median and first and third quartiles of the time series. Please also include a table containing the results you obtained as part of your answer to the question.

(3) Use all time series given in the data set and the relevant results you obtained in the above two questions to estimate a linear regression model and show the details of your analysis.
Please include the following in your answer to this question: your research question, a brief explanation of why you can use a linear regression model to answer your research question, a table containing the estimation results you obtained, and the detailed work of your analysis

How should George respond to this proposal?

Use the Instructions for Case Analyses to craft a response to this case, articulating the main issues and ethical dilemma. Review the assessment criteria below before you begin writing.

Case Study: The Pizza Puzzle
Topic: Deceptive Advertising
Involved Parties:
George Hansen, General Manager of Augusta Marigold Inn, a Subsidiary of Hospitality Enterprises
Sharon Coombs, Food Services Manager, Augusta Marigold Inn
George Hansen is General Manager for the Marigold Inn in Augusta, Georgia. Sharon Coombs is Restaurant and Food Services Manager for the Inn. She reports to George. Two years ago, Sharon noticed a decline in room service business, the highest margin portion of her operation. This decline
coincided with an increase in the national sales of pizza delivery and carryout firms as well as an increase in the number of empty pizza boxes from these firms being left in guest rooms in the Inn. Her immediate response was to install a pizza oven in the kitchen and offer room service pizza to guests.
The effort met with modest success, though it was well below her expectations. Questionnaires completed by departing guests revealed a problem of product quality.
Focusing on this problem, Sharon improved the Inn’s pizza until blind taste tests judged it at least equal in quality to the products of the two major pizza delivery competitors in Augusta. Sales did not improve, convincing Sharon that the problem was a perceived mismatch between the hotel’s image and guests’
expectations of pizza makers. Guests simply did not seem to believe that the traditional steak and seafood restaurant at the Inn could make a high-quality, authentic pizza. Based on this conclusion, Sharon presented the following proposal to George:
Sales of room service pizza are stagnant due to guests’ misperception that our product is lower inquality than that of competitors. This misperception is based on the belief that until we disassociate our pizza from the Marigold Inn name. Therefore, to capture more room service pizza business, we should
create a ‘Napoli Pizza’ image for our guest room delivery service by:
Preparing ‘Napoli Pizza’ brochures for each guest room, complete with a phone number with a prefix different from that of Marigold Inn.
The number will reach a special phone in room service, which will be answered, “Napoli Pizza,
authentic Italian pizza from old, family recipes.”
Using special ‘Napoli Pizza’ boxes for delivering room service pizza to guests.
Issuing ‘Napoli Pizza’ hats and jackets to room service personnel for use in pizza delivery. Room service waiters and waitresses will wear these garments to deliver pizza. They will change to their regular uniforms for other deliveries.
How should George respond to this proposal?
Case analsysis Instructions:
Use these guidelines along with the stated assessment criteria to craft your case analyses.
Relevant Facts –
(A) Overview of pertinent points.
(B) Describe the background of the situation or business that is relevant to the ethical problem(s) or dilemma(s) of the Case.
(C) Highlight information that sets the context for analysis.
Ethical Issues –
(A) State the ethical problem(s) or dilemma(s)
(B) Demonstrate a comprehension of ethical concepts.
(C) Describe the ethical aspects of the Case.
Identifying Stakeholders –
There are always a set of “usual suspects” in a Case, so be sure to list everyone who might be connected. Remember that business decisions have far reaching effects, so consider anyone who might be affected by the ethical considerations of the Case.
Possible Alternatives –
(A) Identify solutions can be described for each ethical issue identified.
(B) List all solutions and approaches to identified ethical issues.
(C) Alternatives may be drawn from the Case, Readings, or personal experience including
outside readings
Ethics of the Alternatives –
(A) Critically assess the alternatives identified for possible recommendation.
(B) Describe the ethical implications of each alternative.
(C) Consider external and internal aspects of ethical proposals.
(D) Apply the “utilitarian” perspective (costs and benefits).
1. Which of the alternatives would provide the greatest benefit to the greatest number?
2. What are the costs in each of the alternatives?
3. Which of the alternatives has the highest “cost” factor associated with it?
4. Do the benefits of honesty at all costs outweigh the benefits of obeying the directive?
of a supervisor?
(E) Apply the “rights” perspective.
1. What does the stakeholder have the right to expect?
2. Which of the alternatives would you want if you were each of the stakeholders?
(F) Apply the “justice” perspective (benefits and burdens).
1. Which alternative distributes the benefits and burdens most fairly among the
stakeholders?
2. Which stakeholders are most affected by each alternative?
Practical Constraints –
(A) Possible obstacles to the implementation of the identified alternatives.
(B) Ethical problems that may come up in executing each alternative.
(C) What unwanted outcomes may result from each alternative?
(D) What aspects of the market might obstruct each alternative?
Specific Action –
(A) Make a recommendation
(B) Analysis should provide context for whatever is recommended.
(C) Support recommendations with the readings or other literature.