Case study/ study included | Nursing homework help

ÿ
You will write a case study review which includes your critique. This will be worth 30 points total. Create a detailed case study review in an essay APA format and include as your final page a reference list in APA format. Your review should be double-spaced, 2 pages minimum (not including reference list), with correct grammar and spelling.ÿ
The purpose of this summative assignment is to reflect upon the new knowledge you have obtained from this course and apply it to your chosenÿcase studyÿwhile developing your critical thinking and critique skills. Be sure to consider all information from the course content – discussion board exercises, videos and any additional readings. Revisit readings from your Gilmore text.ÿPut thought into how well you think the case study conducted their assessment, and how you would augment or improve it. Utilizing your knowledge from our course around assessing community needs, provide a detailed description and critique of your case study. Be sure to review your case study carefully to look for any gaps or areas with which improvements could be made, and justifyÿyour thinking. Reference additional scholarly resources to reinforce your justification. Be sure to cite your work appropriately.
Provide a brief (1 – 2 paragraph) description of the population and the health concern or issueÿbeing addressed.ÿExplain how your chosen case study did, or did not, do in the area ofÿdescribing the community,ÿjustifying the need for conducting the assessment, etc. Describe how your case study did with (or if they omitted)ÿconsidering learning styles and theories as well as models to promote health education. Describe how your case study assessed groups and/or individuals (if applicable) and if they considered any factors that impact health education. Using your knowledge around each weekly module, discuss three suggestions for improving your case study. You may present an alternative approach or additional steps that you believe would improve the quality of your case study.ÿConsider these prompts as you complete your critique:

How did the case study identifyÿthe issue and explain the importance of the specific topic within the community?
Did the case study paint a detailed picture of the population?
Does it include a detailed description including information on demographics, barriers and challenges?
Does it justify the need to conduct a needs assessment?
Does it identify and describe community resources and explain why the resources are or are not effective?
Does it explain any process for collecting data?

Remember to discussÿrecommendations. As you have done previously in our discussion boards and weekly modules, apply your critical critiquingÿskills to suggest what improvements are needed. Finish your essay withÿa summative paragraph which includes your final thoughts around how your suggested improvements would enhance this case study toÿmeet the needs, or “fill in the gaps” and provide assistance to the community or population represented.ÿ
Finally, include in APA format, a list of references. This should include a minimum of 2 references which are scholarly sources of information no previously referenced in the course. You may use any of the resources that were referred to throughout our weekly modules. You may also include your text as a resource in addition to your 2 references.

Videogame and Players Aggressiveness Research Paper

Two major assignments comprise the research project: Part One: Contexts Project (CP) and Part Two: Advocacy Project (AP). This first assignment, the CP, asks you to (1) research and deploy various types of sources to describe, contextualize, and analyze a significant contemporary political/social/cultural problem as it relates to videogames; (2) summarize and evaluate conversations and debates happening between credible scholars, thinkers, and organizations about your topic.Together, the actions above comprise expository writing?the guiding method of this project?which means simply that with this first composition you are attempting to describe your project’s central problem and explain its relevance by contextualizing it.Some questions that might help to direct your research includeWhat harm does the problem cause to individuals, communities, institutions, and/or ecologies?Why does the problem exist? When and how did it develop? Do any individuals, communities, or institutions benefit from it?Who is paying attention to and writing or speaking about the problem among journalists, politicians, scholars, other researchers, activists, governmental agencies, and/or industries?Why ?contexts??An informed, authoritative writer understands their topic in context.Context can be historical. Analyzing the past means grappling not simply with events, but with the issues and concerns of the time. It?s not enough to read a contemporary account of the past; we must also look at the work produced in the past?its political speeches, court decisions, and media. Therefore, one goal of this assignment is to learn about the historical contexts of your problem: the laws, legal precedents, and institutional practices that underlie its current form, and economic, social, political, and/or environmental trends that have shaped its development.Context can also be rhetorical. We want to present the stakes that a given community has in the topic of our research, but we also want to interrogate the way those stakes get articulated by journalists, researchers, and politicians. Even within ?scholarly writing,? you should become aware of how various communities (called disciplines) frame the same topic quite differently from one another. Identifying these relevant communities of thinkers and writers, analyzing their perspectives, and bringing their views together will help you gain a comprehensive understanding of your problem, and the authority that understanding entails.As you research for your CP, you will concurrently develop a Working Annotated Bibliography for your entire project that involves summarizing and analyzing individual sources (your instructor will provide you with separate instructions for this portion of the assignment).By the time you complete the CP, you should be able to:Develop effective research note-taking habits through source annotations.Practice information literacy in the research process by locating and critically evaluating relevant and credible evidence from a variety of sources and genres.Understand research as a part of the larger composition process of prewriting, drafting, and revision.Collaborate with fellow researchers to give and receive constructive feedback on the work in progress.Plan, draft and revise an essay with organization and style appropriate for addressing a general academic audience.Arrange and integrate evidence?primary-source, secondary-source, and multimodal?intentionally, with particular attention to its argumentative purpose and rhetorical effect.Integrate and cite evidence in a transparent and ethical manner, using a standard citation system. Learn how and why to avoid plagiarism and patch-writing.

Its-834: emerging threats & countermeasures. discussion, reflection:

ÿSubject: ITS-834: Emerging Threats & Countermeasures
Reading Resources:
ÿWangen, G., Snekkenes, E., & Hallstensen, C. (2018). A framework for estimating information security risk assessment method completeness.ÿ International Journal of Information Security,ÿ 17(6), 681?699.ÿ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-017-0382-0
Goutam and V. Tiwari, “Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing to Enhance the Security of Web Application,” 2019 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON), Mathura, India, 2019, pp. 601-605.ÿ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9036175
G. Yadav, A. Allakany, V. Kumar, K. Paul and K. Okamura, “Penetration Testing Framework for IoT,” 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), Toyama, Japan, 2019, 477-482.ÿ https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8992645
Textbook Title: (ISC)2 CISSP Certified Information Systems Security Professional Official Study Guide ISBN: 9781119475958, Authors: Mike Chapple, James Michael Stewart, Darril Gibson, Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Publication Date: 2018-04-10 ÿ
Discussion: Pen Attack and Cyber Terrorism
ÿWord count: 300+ words
Chapters 15, and 16 in the course textbookÿ
ÿThere are a variety of ways that a cyber-attack can cause economic damage. In many cases, attackers try to ?penetrate? systems in order to steal technology or other sensitive information. When do you think an attack can be classified as cyber terrorism?ÿ
Make sure to back up your statements with scholarly support.
ú Please cite properly in APA 7
ú At least one scholarly source should be used.ÿ
ú Use proper citations and references in your post.
Research Paper:
Number of pages: 4+
ÿPenetration testing is a simulated cyberattack against a computer or network that checks for exploitable vulnerabilities. Pen tests can involve attempting to breach application systems, APIs, servers, inputs, and code injection attacks to reveal vulnerabilities. In a well-written, highly-detailed research paper, discuss the following:

What is penetration testing
Testing Stages
Testing Methods
Testing, web applications and firewalls

Your paper should meet the following requirements:
ú 4+ pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
ú Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
ú Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook.
ú Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.
Reflection: Practical Connection Assignment
Number of pages: 2+ pages
This assignment is a written assignmentÿwhere students will demonstrate how this course research has connected and put into practice within their own career.ÿAssignment:ÿProvide a reflection of at least 2 pages of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of this course have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment.
Requirements:

Provide 2+ pages minimum reflection.
Use of proper APA formatting and citations. If supportingÿevidence from outsideÿresources is used those must be properly cited.
Share a personal connectionÿthat identifies specific knowledge and theories from this course.
Demonstrate a connection to your current work environment.
You should not, provide an overview of theÿassignments assigned in the course. The assignment asksÿthat you reflect how the knowledge and skills obtained through meeting course objectives wereÿapplied or could be applied in the workplace.

Note: plagiarism check required, APA7 format, include References, within 8hrs
This post has 3 individual assignments (discussion, research paper and reflection).
Please provide answers in separate documents.ÿ

Build the team | Management homework help

Step 2: Build the Team
Having the desire to change a situation on your own is often not sufficient to get the job done. More often than not, change requires the help of a team of individuals. Last week you learned about how to create urgency. So now you have the people around you motivated and ready to act. That?s a great start, but what comes next? Can everyone just dive in and get it done? More than likely it will take a bit more planning and coordination than that. You?ll need to create the right team and guide them in the right direction to accomplish the desired change successfully.
Read Step 2 ?Build the Guiding Team? from Kotter and Cohen’s The Heart of Change. First, review the feedback from your instructor on Part 2 along with the discussion on urgency you had with your peers last week. Use any new information you gained from the discussion and feedback from your instructor to revise and improve Part 2 of your project.
Next, compile Part 3 of your project, explaining how you would build your team to address change in your organization. Explain how you would show enthusiasm and commitment to draw in the right team players, how you would model trust and teamwork, how you would structure the team, and how you will inject energy into the group. Be sure to touch on potential pitfalls in this step that you will avoid. You may find page 60 helpful in reviewing the key points of what to do and not do when building your team. Be sure your paper touches on the key elements of each as they pertain to your organization.
Be sure to include at least three scholarly references to support your assertions written in your own words. Do not copy word for word from the course text or any other sources. Your submission this week is Part 3 of the final project.
The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:
ú ÿWrite between 1,000 ? 1,500 words (approximately 4 ? 6 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style.
ú ÿUse font size 12 and 1? margins.
ú ÿInclude cover page and reference page.
ú ÿAt least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
ú ÿNo more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
ú ÿUse an appropriate number of references to support your position, and defend your arguments. The following are examples of primary and secondary sources that may be used, and non-credible and opinion based sources that may not be used.
Primary sources such as, government websites (United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Census Bureau, The World Bank, etc.), peer reviewed and scholarly journals in EBSCOhost (Grantham University Online Library) and Google Scholar.
Secondary and credible sources such as, CNN Money, The Wall Street Journal, trade journals, and publications in EBSCOhost (Grantham University Online Library).
Non-credible and opinion based sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. should not be used.
Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.ÿ

Global warming | English homework help

Explanatory Synthesis
ÿTask: For this paper, we will work with the concepts of research, synthesis, MLA conventions, essay organization and construction, and expository composition. In this paper, you will choose a topic of your own about which to inform us. ÿGenetically Modified Organisms, Organic Farming, Global Warming, Mars Travel, Recycling, or about anything you might want to research a bit yourself will work. You will need to provide a particular focus and develop a research question that you will answer in your essay. In addition, you will need to acquire at least 4 credible and comprehensive sources of at least two ?types? to use in your essay. Of course, you can use more than four sources, but you must use at least 4. You must show synthesis of the information provided in these sources and correctly cite and document them using MLA conventions. You will find the JFK Library online data bases very helpful when researching your topic and we will be attending a library presentation to aid us in research. Be sure to get all of the necessary documentation information you will need when researching so that you won?t have to try to find the source again.
ÿ
What needs to be done is a research exercise, a ?fact finding? exercise. This paper is evidence of a thorough, balanced research of your topic. You need to explore more than one element of your topic: ethics, economics, applications, social, and/or any other relevant aspect of your topic that results from your research. For example, some elements of stem cell research are ethics, economics, social and religious, political, among others, or you might thoroughly research hydroponics as a part of continued deep space exploration or a moon habitation development. A balanced research would look at the position and presentation of those in favor and those opposed to continued stem cell research or space habitat development. From alternative energy to Physician Assisted Suicide, there are no shortages of qualified voices on all sides of an issue. Your job is to find them and represent them fairly in your paper.
THIS IS NOT AN ARGUMENT. While I believe that it is difficult to write anything without some form of persuasion involved, you must remember that your primary goal is to inform your audience. For this paper, your audience is assumed to be other first and second-year composition students who are interested in your topic.
Format: This paper should be two full pages to 2 1/2 pages in length (front & back is okay), not including the Works Cited page, single-spaced, size 10 Arial font with one inch margins. Normally, an MLA paper is no smaller than sized 12 font and is double spaced. Otherwise, the paper will need to conform to MLA conventions and good composition criteria.
Evaluation: In addition to focus, development and support, organization, and good mechanics, your paper will be assessed for depth and clarity and the use of “modes” of expository discourse: comparison, causality, process, analysis, definition, and etc. Your purpose and ideas should be clear to your reader, and your use of sources evident through summary, paraphrase, and critique. This paper should be mechanically correct and is worth 100 points.

New class week 1 assiment

Instructions: For this assignment, you will create a document that includes both the Early Action Research Plan and criteria for your area of focus. The plan you share is the same one posted in the Early Action Research Ideas discussion from this week. Please be sure to consider the feedback you received from peers and your instructor and make necessary changes before including this plan in your assignment submission. For the criteria part of the assignment, consider what you read in “Themes in Education: Action Research” and ?Current Trends in Education.? What topics did you see and read about that lead you toward clarifying a general idea and establishing an area of focus for research? Please refer to the ?Research in Action Checklist Three ? One? (Mills, 2014, p. 44) to establish criteria for your area of focus. Note that writing in the first-person voice during the criteria section of this assignment is acceptable.ÿ ÿÿ ContentThe assignment needs to include the following areas of content.

Plan ? Area of Focus (1 point): In no more than two paragraphs, describe your early idea of what the purpose of your study may be.
Plan ? Explanation of Problem (1 point): In no more than two paragraphs, explain a statement of the problem or situation that led to this interest or why you want to pursue this topic.
Plan ? Population (.5 point): In no more than a paragraph, describe the population (age/grade, quantity of participants, students or adults).
Plan ? Population Choice (.5 point): In no more than a paragraph, explain why you have chosen your population for this study, including details about why this population is appropriate for this study.
Plan ? Research Questions (1 point): Develop two to three research questions that align with the area of focus and address what you hope to answer in this study. The questions need to be answerable and presented in list format, and they must appropriately represent the population/participants you identified.
Idea ? Teaching and Learning (.5 points): In at least one paragraph, evaluate whether your idea is an issue that involves teaching and learning. Use relevant literature to support the evaluation.
Idea ? Locus of Control (.5 points): In at least one paragraph, evaluate whether your idea is within your locus of control.
Idea ? Passion (.5 points): In at least one paragraph, describe whether your idea is something you feel passionate about and where this passion originates from for you (e.g., life experiences or professional practice).
Idea ? Inspiration (.5 points): In at least one paragraph, describe how your idea inspires you to implement change or improvement.

Written CommunicationThe assignment needs to adhere to the following areas for written communication.

Page Requirement (.5 points): The assignment must be two to three pages, not including title and references pages.
APA Formatting (.5 points): Use APA formatting consistently throughout.
Syntax and Mechanics (.5 points): Display meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Your written work should contain no errors and be very easy to understand.
Source Requirement (.5 points): Use no less than two scholarly sources in addition to the course textbooks, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page need to be used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

In at least 200 words answer the following

Please review the scenario below; then discuss the issue and possible solution(s) for your team. Note: This is team effort, and every member must contribute his/her suggestions and collectively decide what is best for the offices. You are expected to offer solution ideas of your own and to respond to at least two of your teammates? ideas.
ÿ
Recently Jane was hired as an office manager for a pediatric orthopedic practice in a large city. This practice has the main site at your location and several remote sites where doctors travel throughout the week. Because Jane is the office manager at the main site, she is also in charge of supervising a team of office managers at all remote sites.
ÿ
All students in this course are the team of office managers that Jane is supervising.
ÿ
One of Jane?s first tasks was to create a ?uniform? set of documents that each site will use for basic office tasks. One document is a time tracking document that each office manager fills out. In the past, the ?honor system? was in place, and managers were allowed to fill out the form and turn it in without a supervisor reviewing their document. This process was explained to Jane as a decision made as a sort of ?perk? for all the office managers, as they did not need a supervisor reviewing their work.
ÿ
One day, she decided to review some of the past time tracking documents and immediately noticed that the method of adding up the total hours worked is not always correct in each document. As she continued to look through the documents, she noticed that some of the files are at least 5 years old. Even though this discrepancy existed, she wondered if the time needed to investigate the file was worth it. Jane decided to contact the office managers and inquire about her findings.
ÿ
She wants the team to meet with her and provide her with some solutions that could be implemented in the future throughout the offices.
ÿ
Your task as the team of office managers is to discuss the issue with the time tracking documents and create a solution to be implemented in all offices. You will submit a time tracking document at the end of the week for Jane to review and approve.
ÿ
You will want to discuss the issue with the first-time tracking document and figure out ways to institute supervisory approval as part of the process.
ÿ

Create a solution to this problem by clearly defining what steps you would take to ensure that a situation like this does not happen again. Your solution might include such things as communication improvements and modified documents.

ÿ
Once everyone has agreed on the process, you will create and attach a model time tracking document and tell Jane why the new time tracking document will be beneficial to all the pediatric orthopedic practice offices.
ÿ
Note: You do not actually need to submit or attach a time document, as this is only the planning and brainstorming stage.
Since you will be reviewing this scenario along with your classmates, your answers may be similar; however, please keep in mind that your response cannot have the same answer as another student. Likewise a post of, ?I agree with Jane, and I have nothing to add? will not be considered for grading. Please create an original response, citing sources when necessary and following APA formatting guidelines.

Discussion 2: securing accountability | EDSD 7075 – Sustaining and Supporting Effective Practices in Special Education | Walden University

ÿÿ
The push toward accountability seen throughout the P-12 educational settings is now evidenced within teacher preparation programs, ensuring that universities and colleges are adequately preparing future teachers for the task. Such pressures are even more rampant within the field of special education. Special education teachers are tasked with the responsibility of not only ensuring students, individual needs are being met with meaningful curriculum and instruction, but that they are making adequate progress toward their goals and objectives. Student learning rests at the core of accountability within educational systems (Fullan & Quinn, 2016). While internal accountability focuses on individuals? and groups? efforts at continuous improvement and success for all students, external accountability focuses on leaders? responsibility to be transparent with the public about the system?s ability to meet expectations and requirements. Both internal and external accountability are integral to the Coherence Framework, strengthening the vision and collaboration of the organization, thus establishing deepening of learning goals. For this Discussion, you will analyze both internal and external accountability and their role in whole systems change. As the special education leader, how will you secure accountability?
To Prepare:

Review Chapter 5, ?Securing Accountability,? in the Fullan and Quinn text, focusing on the aspects of internal and external accountability. How would you distinguish between internal and external ÿÿÿÿÿaccountability?
Reflect on the Norman and Sherwood (2015) article, considering how internal and external accountability measures have shaped teacher preparation programs.
Reflect on the plans you have created for the case scenario viewed in Modules 2 and 3 so far and reflect on how you would secure accountability if you were a leader of the staff in this scenario.

An explanation of how you would build internal accountability based on the case scenario. What steps would you recommend to ensure effective implementation of external accountability? Include an analysis of each concept and evidence from the case scenario, as well as other learning resources to support your rationale.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Chapter 4, ?Deepening Learning? (pp. 77?108)
Chapter 5, ?Securing Accountability? (pp. 109?126)

Fullan, M. (2015a). Leadership from the middle: A system strategy. Education Canada. 55(4), 22?26. Retrieved from http://www.cea-ace.ca/education-canada/article/leadership-middle
Leadership from the Middle: A System Strategy by Fullan, M., in Education Canada, Winter 2015. Copyright 2015 by Canadian Education Association. Reprinted by permission of Canadian Education Association via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Norman, P. J. & Sherwood, S. A. S. (2015). ÿUsing internal and external evaluation to shape teacher preparation curriculum: A model for continuous program improvement. ÿNew Educator, 11(1), 4-23. Doi: 10.1080/1547688X.2015.1001263
Leko, M.M., Brownell, M.T., Sindelar, P.T., & Kiely, M.T. (2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82(1), 25-43. doi:?10.1177/0014402915598782
Liu, P. (2015). Motivating teachers? commitment to change through transformational school leadership in Chinese urban upper secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(6), 735?754. doi: 10.1108/JEA-02-2014-002
Rock, M.L., et al (2016). 21st century change drivers: Considerations for constructive transformative models of special education teacher development. The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 39(2), 98-120. doi:?10.1177/0888406416640634
Required Media
Grand City Community
Laureate Education (Producer) (2016c). Tracking data [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Go to the Grand City Community and click into Grand City School District Administration Offices. Review the following scenario: Tracking Data.
Required Media
Grand City Community
Go to the Grand City Community and click into Grand City High School. Review the following scenario: Mandate Meeting.

Understanding the work of the it governance board

ÿ
In this final week of your internship, your rotation assignment takes you back to the Chief of Staff’s Office where you started out seven weeks ago.
Among other things, the Chief of Staff’s organization is responsible for organizing meetings and providing support to the various internal governance boards and executive committees that comprise the internal governance infrastructure. Last week, you had a brief introduction to the work of one of these boards — the IT Governance board — when you helped the Chief Financial Officer and CFO staff put together a briefing to inform the board’s members about a technology problem.ÿ
The work of the company’s governance boards and committees is extremely important since these groups plan, design, negotiate, implement and provide oversight for the processes, policies, procedures, and other mechanisms used to guide,ÿ monitor, control, and assess the operations of the company. Each board is comprised of executives who each represent their functional areas or a group of internal stakeholders. Usually, there is a chair position that rotates among the members. If you would like to learn more about corporate governance in general, Deloitte’s report Developing an effective governance operating model: A guide for financial services boards and management teams provides a brief but comprehensive overview (see https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Financial-Services/dttl-fsi-US-FSI-Developinganeffectivegovernance-031913.pdf). You may also find this article What is a management system?, from the International Standards Organization, helpful as it explains what aÿmanagement systemÿis and why standards are needed to define repeatable steps that organizations can use to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of their management activities.
The IT Governance board operates under authority delegated by the corporate governance board. This board’s charter gives it responsibility for governance, risk management, and compliance management (GRC) for corporate IT processes, policies, and technologies. Members of the board each serve for a three year term. Of the 24 members, 8 have just begun their terms.
The IT Governance board focuses upon ensuring that the company achieves maximum value for each dollar spent on information technology capabilities. The board’s members must exercise diligence to ensure that the company complies with laws and regulations that apply to the use of Information Technology (including privacy and security requirements). The board is also charged with ensuring that the company complies with voluntary standards such as PCI-DSS since these have an impact on the company’s business operations (non compliance could result in the company not being permitted to receive payments via credit cards).
The next meeting of the IT Governance board will include a set of orientation briefings for the new members. Your assignment, as a support staffer, is to help prepare for this orientation meeting by developing a short (5-minute) briefing on one of the following IT management / IT security management frameworks, standards, and models.

COBIT
ITIL
ISO 27001 (ISMS Program Management)
NIST Cybersecurity Framework
NIST Security and Privacy Controls (NIST SP 800-53)
NIST Risk Management Framework (NIST SP 800-37)

See the weekly readings for information about your selected topic. Then, find additional sources on your own. (Each of these standards and frameworks is discussed in freely available materials on the Internet or in articles available through the university’s only library. There is no reason for you to pay for copies of any materials for this assignment.)
After you have researched your chosen framework, standard, or model, develop a written script for your briefing which you will deliver verbatim (as written). You should also prepare a one page handout for the board members to follow as you present your speech.

Pricing strategy and ethics: wet ?n wild case study

Wet ?n Wild is a chain of waterparks that are operated across Australia, the United States, and now China. The first waterpark in the chain was opened on the Gold Coast in Australia in 1984. Since that time they have expanded to eight locations, including Hawaii and Las Vegas.
In 2013, they opened a new water park in Sydney, Australia. Despite Sydney being a major international city with a population of over 5 million, it does not have a major theme or amusement park. Therefore, the new Wet ?n Wild facility was able to obtain a virtual monopoly in the Sydney area.
Obviously, Sydney is relatively well known for its famous beaches, including Bondi Beach. To counteract this indirect competitor, Wet ?n Wild located their new waterpark around one hour inland, away from the beaches. This location was still within large residential areas and easily accessible by road.
Because Sydney was lacking a major theme park, Wet ?n Wild was able to attract significant publicity and media attention prior to opening, particularly as the park was promoted as ?the largest waterpark in the world?. This was supported by significant advertising expenditure, which was primarily focused on selling season pass tickets.
The pricing structure for the new Wet ?n Wild waterpark was designed to sell season passes, rather than individual visits. For example, a season pass cost $120 as compared to a one-day visit pass of $70. This meant that there was a significant incentive to buy the season pass.
As a result, these season passes were enormously popular. The Christmas period in Australia is in the middle of summer, so these season passes became popular Christmas gifts as well.
As you can imagine, as consumers have paid for multiple visits ? many of them want to get great ?value for money?? which means as many visits as possible. As a consequence, the park become very crowded at times. On several occasions, in the middle of summer, the waterpark was at full capacity. That means that season pass holders, who had paid for their tickets, were unable to enter the park because it was full.
The other contributing factor to this overcrowding situation was that Wet ?n Wild was not open every day. Although their season ran from September to April (the warmer months in Australia), they were not open seven days a week ? sometimes only being open on weekends.
With a waterpark operating at full capacity on a hot day, you can imagine that the queues were quite long and uncomfortable. It was not uncommon to wait 1 « to 2 hours for a waterslide. This resulted in significant customer dissatisfaction that was expressed through social media, including Wet n? Wild?s own Facebook site.
Discussion Questions

As a new facility, Wet ?n Wild was keen to recoup their infrastructure investment as quickly as possible. Therefore, do you agree with their pricing strategy or would there be a more appropriate approach to pricing?
As the number of season passes sold was significant, do you think that is ethical of the company to keep promoting these passes or do you think that they have a responsibility to their shareholders to maximize profitability?
Given that season pass holders paid for a service that was not always available (that is, the park was full), do you think that they should be entitled to some form of refund or compensation? If so, how could this be implemented given thousands of people could have been affected.
As there were reasonable numbers of dissatisfied season pass holders, what do you think would be the long-term implications of Wet n? Wild?s objective to sell as many season passes as possible?

Source: https://www.greatideasforteachingmarketing.com/pricing-strategy-and-ethics-wet-n-wild/