Write a 12-15 sentence reflection paragraph explaining what you focused on improving in your revision; discuss how you worked to improve the quality of your organization, content, and language.

Revision Essay

Directions:

Each student must revise a portion of their first essay for a grade. This assignment is designed to revamp your first essay using the knowledge you know now or to bring the essay up to college standards.

 

  1. Revise your thesis and topic sentences (present in outline form at the beginning of the revision)

 

  1. One body paragraph

 

  1. Write a 12-15 sentence reflection paragraph explaining what you focused on improving in your revision; discuss how you worked to improve the quality of your organization, content, and language. Please be as specific as possible in this piece.

 

You will address errors or feedback given to you—not merely fix grammar or errors point directly pointed out to you. The content, examples, and citations must undergo meaningful changes as needed. You should also evaluate how you have used your quotations. You will revise the way you integrated your source material by using the methods we have discussed in class.

  • This means avoiding using “Chopin writes, ‘……’”
  • You may want/need to use ellipses or brackets to integrate your quotes.
  • You may also reduce long clunky quotes and only quote important words or phrases that are essential to prove your point.

You will not receive any credit if you hand in an essay with minimal or no work put in to rewrite it. In other words, if you only fix a few sentences and place a few commas, you will automatically receive a failing grade of a 59/F for this assignment. If you hand me the same essay with 3 or less minor changes, you may receive a ZERO. If you put less than minimal effort into your revision, I will not provide comments or feedback—just a grade.

Some ways to improve your writing:

  • Tighten your thesis statement
    • Make sure it addresses the prompt, is a clear and specific argument.
  • Tighten your topic sentences
    • The first sentence must be the main idea of your entire paragraph.
  • Create more complex sentences
  • Choose better vocabulary
  • Sharpen your details
  • Choose better examples
  • Evaluate your use of quotes (dropped quotes, proper citations, etc…)
  • Make sure you explain your quotes thoroughly (Say it, show it, explain it).
  • Clarify ideas or expand further on them
  • Work on grammar, mechanics, style, and informal writing
  • See me if you need help.

*I will be available for conferences if you want to meet. Please email me to set up an appointment.

*If your paper was in the D or F range, I highly recommend you come to see me, see a tutor via drop in hours, or visit the Reading Writing Center for extra help.

Does welfare state reduce economic inequality ? Discuss.

The word limit is 2,500 words. You may go over or under 10%. Recommended formatting The recommended referencing style is Harvard style, where the surname of the author(s) appear(s) in parentheses in the main text along with the year of publication (and the specific page if needed). Then, all works cited in the text are included in a list under the heading ‘Bibliography’ at the end of the document. The assessment criteria for the essays include the following main items: • The extent to which an argument has been provided in response to the question • The extent to which the argument is supported with accurate use of evidence from the work of scholars and academic literature • The extent of understanding of complex approaches and concepts • The quality and clarity of the analysis and main argument • The use of proper citation & referencing • The extent to which the material is written clearly and fluently. You will be assessed through one written essay, 2,500 words long. You will need to prepare an essay that will address an important political phenomenon from a comparative perspective. Most of the questions stem from the key themes/puzzles we will explore in this module (see below). ANSWER TO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS BELOW, THAT IS THE ESSAY. (pick the one you can answer to best, does not matter which one, but the one you can make look more professional, demonstrating total knowledge on the subject) Questions for assignment [2,500 words]: • Why do some states develop as democracies while others remain authoritarian? Explain these outcomes by drawing on the comparative experience of Zimbabwe and South Africa. • While the recent wave of revolutions in the Middle East (‘Arab Spring’) paved the way for a relatively peaceful transition to democracy in Tunisia, Egypt returned to authoritarian rule shortly after the end of the revolution. What explains these divergent outcomes? • In your opinion, what is the most useful electoral system for a country in times of economic crisis? Some scholars argue that ‘first-past-the-post’ secures stable governments, necessary for effective decision-making, while others maintain that ‘consensus’ models facilitate political consensus. • Why do some democracies experience democratic backsliding? Compare the experiences of Hungary and Poland. • What explains the recent surge of populist parties? Is populism an outcome of rising economic inequalities or cultural backlash? • What is the relationship between political institutions and economic development? Discuss with reference to two cases. • Does welfare state reduce economic inequality ? Discuss.

Evaluate and articulate the function and effect of leasehold ownership, the legal relationship between landlord and tenant, third party rights, covenants and contracts for the sale of land.

Learning outcomes Code Description LO1 Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of the principles of property law and the underlying system of land ownership in England and Wales with consideration of Scottish Law differences. LO2 Articulate the features and impact of common law and statutory provisions. LO3 Evaluate and articulate the function and effect of leasehold ownership, the legal relationship between landlord and tenant, third party rights, covenants and contracts for the sale of land. LO4 Undertake critical analysis of information, draw logical conclusions based on legal principles and communicate arguments and analysis and effectively, using relevant legal terminology. Scenario You are a Chartered Surveyor, working in a multi-disciplinary company with other real estate and building surveyors. Castle Limited occupy a self-contained office building in a City Centre in the North East of England. The premises are held on a 15-year internal repairing and insuring lease from 29 September 2006 at a current rental of £35,000 per annum. The lease is subject to five-year upward only rent reviews, and contains a tenant’s option to break after five and ten years of the term on giving at least six months written notice. The rent review clause states that the revised rent shall be the ‘open market rental value as at the rent review date on the assumption that the premises are let with vacant possession and otherwise on the same terms and conditions as the lease hereby granted save for those provisions as to rent’. In order to initiate the rent review, the landlord is to serve notice on the tenant ‘no later than three months prior to the rent review date’ specifying the proposed rental which is thereafter to be agreed ‘in writing between the parties’ and, in the absence of agreement ‘to be determined by a third party (acting as an Expert) appointed by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors’. During the former lease, Castle carried out substantial improvements to the premises with their landlord’s consent. These improvements have undoubtedly increased the rental value of the premises. The lease allows the tenant to use the premises for ‘offices or any other use to which the landlord may consent. Consent not to be unreasonably withheld’ but, recently, the landlord has been turning a blind eye to the fact that Castle has also been using the premises to sell its products to visiting members of the public. Sarah Guy, the managing director of Castle, has just received a letter from their landlord, Robin Hill, advising that Robin intends to take possession of the premises at the end of the lease as he is in negotiations with another potential occupant which constitutes a better covenant. She has also just received a second letter from Robin’s surveyors pointing out that the last rent review was never implemented and stating that it is now the landlord’s intention to review the rent from 29 September 2016. © University College of Estate Management 2021 Page 3 of 8 Sarah admits that Castle do not use the offices as often as they used to as many employees now work from home meaning that, on some days, they are completely empty. However, she is reluctant to give up possession as the property is centrally based and known to their clients. Robin has recently suggested that, if Castle are prepared to take a new ten-year full repairing and insuring lease at a commencing rental of £45,000 per annum, he may consider granting a new lease to them. Having taken advice from a leading firm of property consultants, however, Sarah has been advised that the open market rental value is currently likely to be in the order of £30,000 per annum. Task You are required to draft a report, for approval by your managing Partner, advising Castle on the following two issues: a. whether Robin is still entitled to review the rent and, with reference to legal authority and making any assumptions you feel are necessary, explain all other relevant factors which will impact on the rent review; b. whether Robin is likely to be successful in obtaining possession of the premises at the end of the lease and, if not, whether Castle are obliged to accept the terms of the new lease. Reference list and bibliography You should include a reference list of at least seven relevant and appropriate sources that you have written about and cited within your work. A bibliography of uncited sources is not required.

What are the most important challenges facing US international dominance? Are this primarily domestic or international?

Description

Write a 1500 essay, being very analytic, comparative, giving examples, current and not so current, demonstrating total knowledge on the topic. It has to be on ONE of these questions: (choose one according to which one you can write better for) AND ADD BIBLIOGRAPHY AT THE END.

Compare and contrast China and India’s relationship to the post-Cold War US led international order. What are the similarities and differences. How, if at all, will the rising relative power of India and China affect the US led-international order?

What are the most important challenges facing US international dominance? Are this primarily domestic or international?

The fair and equitable standard gives modern expression to a general principle of due process in its application to the treatment of investors and [the standard] encapsulates the minimum requirements of the rule of law.” Critically discuss by making reference to relevant case law.

Topic:

The fair and equitable standard gives modern expression to a general principle of due process in its application to the treatment of investors and [the standard] encapsulates the minimum requirements of the rule of law.” Critically discuss by making reference to relevant case law.

Description The module International Investment Law and Arbitration paper format : Text (including quotations) must be in Times New Roman 12 point font. •Line spacing must be one-and–a–half lines; except that indented quotations may have single line spacing. •Margins of at least 2 cm must be used at the top and bottom of the page, and 2.5 cm on the right and left sides of the page. •Footnotes or endnotes must be included within the specified page allowance; each note must be no smaller than 10 point font and must start on a new line. Bibliography should demonstrate, preferably in organized and useful subcategories, at least 12 sources Some resources International investment law and arbitration: commentary, awards, and other materials Book by C. L. Lim; Jean Ho; Mārtiņš Paparinskis- 2018

Describe data-collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.

To prepare for this assessment, ensure that you have finalized your abstracted outline. Make sure to complete the media, which will deepen your understanding. Complete a draft of your literature review and additional empirical research sources if you found more. Remember, you’ll need at least 20 empirical sources in the final version of the literature review.

Introduction

The purpose of the literature review is to provide the context within which the project will be developed and framed. The process of finding, reviewing, synthesizing, analyzing, and writing the literature review provides greater definition to the theoretical framework and gives you a strong foundation from which to work when developing support for the research concept.

You will continue developing your literature review, integrating and synthesizing the information gleaned as you developed your research topic, your LSQ, your annotated bibliography, and your abstracted outline.

In this assessment, you will focus on developing brief, carefully constructed paragraphs supported by the literature and research. You will research and present key findings of your literature review that you may not have addressed or that may need further development. Plan to build upon what you have already presented.

Overview

In addition to the other helpful links provided in Resources, we recommend you use an organizing tool from the Capella University Library Services and Tools page, such as the Scholarly Research Log, to help you track the theories, methods, and findings of the articles you have read.

Instructions

For this assessment, submit the current draft of your literature review for instructor feedback and grading. Using your literature search question (LSQ), the annotated bibliography, and the abstracted outline to support your review, identify themes that emerge from your analysis of what we know so far about your topic. Use these themes to describe how your research builds on prior knowledge.

For instance, if your LSQ is What does the literature in psychology tell us about the utility of treating mild depression in adults with a combination of synchronous and asynchronous labyrinth walking and cognitive behavioral therapy? you might discuss literature that covers the themes of exercise and depression, cognitive behavioral therapy and depression, walking meditation and depression, mindfulness and depression, and so on. Do not organize the paper by referencing each article sequentially; your task is to synthesize concepts pertinent to the LSQ from the articles selected for this review.

  • Identify literature that:
    • Describes the chosen area of research and provides rationale for the choice.
    • Describes the significance of the chosen topic:
      • Explain and justify the implications of the new knowledge for stakeholders, including community members and those who serve the population.
  • Summarize sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic:
    • Discuss historical context and dominant themes in the evolution of the topic; connect common themes and present counteropinions.
    • Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, and Clark Moustakas.
  • Summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of the chosen topic:
    • Provide information about theoretical underpinnings such as empirical/behavioral or constructivist and humanistic orientations of the literature reviewed.
    • Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, Clark Moustakas, Martha Bernal, and George I. Sanchez.
  • Summarize sources applicable to best practices for engaging in research:
    • Describe data-collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.
  • Summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology:
    • Indicate how the chosen sources help investigators identify topics that are well understood and other topics that represent gaps in the knowledge base and the need for further study.
    • Create a scenario that illustrates the need for new research.
  • Articulate guidelines of the profession applicable to ethical conduct in research practice:
    • Demonstrate ethical conduct associated with the protection of research subject vulnerabilities such as the need for data privacy.
  • Identify practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity:
    • Address individual variation and diversity within and across groups. For example, when writing about marriage and family therapy, acknowledge research choices that exclude or include subgroups such as gay and lesbian families or families of particular racial, ethnic, or cultural compositions.
  • Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines, including concise and well-organized writing:
    • Organize paper to enhance the message and supporting points; writing should reflect the quality and expertise expected for academic work.
    • Organize and summarize sources thematically.

Your task is to present current considerations important to investigators and to indicate ramifications for stakeholders who rely on the current knowledge base. Use illustrative examples to explain and highlight key concepts. Good reviewers share evidence-based assessments of the current state of knowledge with their audiences.

This assessment is one component of the research concept paper. You are expected to refine this literature review before submitting the final project. Use the research concept paper template to complete the literature review. There are additional details in the template to help guide the completion of this assessment.

Additional Requirements

  • Formatting: Use the Research Concept Paper Template [DOCX] to complete your assessment. It has been created to reflect the proper structure. To avoid missing content and losing points, please do not modify the template.
  • Font: New Times Roman, 12 points, double-spaced, or any other font that complies with current APA guidelines.
  • APA: Use APA format and style throughout, including citations.
  • Length: The literature review draft assessment should be 5–6 pages, not including references.

 

 

conduct a literature review on a specific disorder or problem in living covered in the assigned readings.

Assignment Details

Assignment Description

You will conduct a literature review on a specific disorder or problem in living covered in the assigned readings. From this research, you will write an APA-style literature review and present your findings.

The paper should contain the following elements:

  • Clear and explicit description of disorder or problem and its prevalence
  • Special treatment planning issues related to the disorder
  • Prognosis and empirically-supported treatment strategies, if any
  • Summary of your findings

Cite your sources using APA style, and include references at the end.

Critically evaluate your teaching practice and identify measures to enhance this, supporting your answer with evidence from educational literature

Topic:

(a) Discuss your personal epistemology (epistemic cognition) and how this has influenced your teaching practice (30%); (b) Critically evaluate your teaching practice and identify measures to enhance this, supporting your answer with evidence from educational literature (70%).

1- Critically reflect on and evaluate your teaching practice and identify measures to enhance this expect to you to use about 30% of the words to answer part A about 70% of the words to answer part B roughly that’s what that means and, in part, A you have to discuss your personal epistemology and how this has influenced your teaching, practice so for the Professor part discussing your personal epistemology, and then how its influence your teaching, practice, And Part B, we want you to critically evaluate your teaching, practice so that means kind of describe how you teach. and give any strengths and give any limitations or weaknesses or areas you want to improve so find the strengths and areas for improvement of your own teaching, practice. So that’s kind of evaluating it and then the second part is important as well, identify measures to enhance this so don’t just say, I would like to be more student centered, for example but say how you will be more student centered. What is important is that you have to critique your current practice in Part B. and use literature, to support to why it strong or weak so kind of describe your practice and then say what you think is strong what you think is not so strong and then use literature, to support that so you know, to give. evidence that yes, doing this is good for education or doing this isn’t great you kind of use evidence to back it up. And for the second part of that be identify measures to enhance this so give some really concrete examples of what you can do to enhance it so again, for example, if you’re going to say. You want to be more student centered don’t just say you want to be more student centered say exactly what you will do in your particular teaching to achieve that, and again if you use literature, to support this and that and what interventions, you will do so. Then, that will be even better and basically what we’re looking for and Part B is we’re looking for you to to. To develop evidence based teaching, practice, and so in all your clinical rules i’m sure you use evidence based. # you can use any number for resources to support the topic

what future predictions are there for your chosen SBU and the industry?

Executive Summary 1 mark

8 PESTLE analysis and conclusions. 4 marks

9 Porter’s 5 forces analysis and conclusions, the attractiveness of industry and strongest force. 5 marks

10 Overall market prospects and competition – this should be based on the SBU analysed in Porter’s five forces. 5 marks

11 Opportunities and threats – prioritized and identified main. 5 marks

12 The strategic position of the organisation (at the end of the case). 5 marks

13 A narrative discussion of the likelihood of success/failure of the organisation’s current strategies and whether or not it is well placed for the next 5 years. 5 marks

14 Identification of new future strategies or ‘strategic directions.’  One for the SBU and one for corporate. Note: these should be based on your discussion and conclusions from section 11 and 12 and should be linked to your SWOT analysis. 10 marks

15 Discussion on the feasibility of your recommended strategies. This should consider the financial implications, along with any qualitative issues surrounding the potential strategies. For example, if they fit with the vision of the company. 5 marks

16 Selection of winning strategy and identification of the key issues regarding its implementation. This should include any risk management issues. 5 marks

Executive Summary
PESTLE analysis and conclusions

Do NOT simply provide a generic list – this is an industry analysis, not an organizational one! Provide evidence and detail – look at examples of good practice. You should not analyse the company you have been given – it is about the whole industry. You can conclude and explain which elements impact the company at the end.

Remember: you must evidence all the points you list, footnotes should only provide the references of you data – the data should go in the main body of the report.

Good sources: company annual reports and good newspapers, economist, data web sites (showing trends), euromonitor.

 

Porter’s 5 forces analysis and conclusions, attractiveness of industry and highlight the strongest force

This analysis should be based on your SBU chosen from your list of SBUs in your intro. Make sure you clearly state which SBU you will analyse before you start this section. Apply the analysis to this SBU and make sure that you provide a conclusion for each force whether it is a weak, medium or strong force.   Conclude this section by answering ‘Is this an attractive market for existing players to remain in?’

Remember: this is not about the company it is about the SBU you choose or are told to do. Once again data to support your points is vital.

Good sources: Company annual reports, Google Finance and good quality newspapers, regulations sites and data web sites (showing trends), apps on Android or iOS

 

Markets and Critical success factors (CSF)this should be based on your chosen SBU or the one you are told to do.

Markets – what future predictions are there for your chosen SBU and the industry? On the internet there are many prediction produced by analysts. You are asked for two lists 1) the industry predictions and 2) the SBU predictions – four predictions in each list. Remember you must include data and they MUST be FUTURE predictions – not information for this year.

 

CSFs – what do the customers demand from companies competing in this SBU?

Good sources: look online at the top accounting companies like E&Y, PWC and KPMG etc…. they have good industry reports and you do not need to pay, the free information they provide is enough. Also look for industry specific regulators and euromonitor.

Opportunities and threats (O&T) – prioritized and identified main.

List 5 in each section, i.e. 5 opportunities and 5 threats.

Remember: each item listed has come from your own external analysis PESTLE, five forces, markets and CSFs. It is good practice to show where each one has come from – using footnotes and once again you could add the page number of where it has come from.

Good sources: your own external analysis – nothing else!

 
The strategic position of the organisation (at the end of case) :

a)     Description of strategy/-ies adopted to date.

b)    Discussion of the key issues relating to the future of the company including conclusions whether the organization, its strategies and business model are strongly or weakly positioned to deal with these issues.

 

To achieve this:

i)               Explain where the SBU or the analysed company is located on Bowman’s strategic clock.

ii)             Explain what strategies they employ by using the Ansoff matrix and its terminology to help you.

iii)            Explain how they execute these strategies.

iv)            Determine what parental role top management takes –portfolio, synergy or developer?

v)             What international strategies does the company use?

vi)            Is the BCG Matrix useful?

 

 
A narrative discussion of the likelihood of success/failure of the organisations current strategies. Are they in a good position to face the future?
Identification of 2 possible new future strategies or ‘strategic directions’. One for the SBU and the other for the whole corporation – so 2 in total.

Use the Ansoff matrix again to help you identify what type of strategy it is. Explain how, where and what you will do to achieve it – don’t just list generic items. The language you use is very important here and throughout your report. Also use your strengths and weaknesses section and your opportunities and threats section. Does your strategy take advantage of a strength of yours or an opportunity you identified in the market? Or maybe it eliminates a weakness or a threat?

FULL description of recommended strategies– this is where you really sell your strategies. Use your future market predictions to help you. We would expect a good half a page for this.

Remember: use your market predictions to help you sell the winning strategy.

 

Discussion on the feasibility and acceptability of recommended strategies.
– Selection of winning strategy

– Key issues in implementing the strategy

– Risk assessment and risk management

Make sure you use the correct “risk terminology” in this section, refer to your lecture notes.