Evaluate and collect information from a variety of authoritative sources to inform a choice of solutions to standard problems highlighted in this module
Learning outcomes assessed within this piece of work as agreed at the programme level meeting On successful completion of this module students will be able to

1.     Demonstrate a broad understanding of the knowledge base of systems analysis and design concepts, and their terminology and discourse, including awareness that areas of this knowledge base are open to ongoing debate and reformulation, thus fostering a socio-technical approach to the analysis and design of systems.

2.     Identify and apply principles and concepts underlying the theoretical frameworks highlighted in this module and demonstrate an ability to identify strengths and weaknesses in an analytical fashion.

3.     Evaluate and collect information from a variety of authoritative sources to inform a choice of solutions to standard problems highlighted in this module, by applying the techniques learnt in a business context and evaluating the design decisions.

4.     Evaluate the reliability of data and information provided in this module, using pre-defined techniques and/or criteria, including an understanding of object-oriented systems theory in a wider context.

Type of assessment:            Coursework 1: Individual Systems Design Report (2000 words including system design documentation)

-this will assess learning outcomes 1,2,3.

 

Coursework 2: Individual System Review Report (1000 words)

-this will assess learning outcome 4.

Assessment instructions and deadline: Coursework1: Individual System Design Report Submission by . This should be submitted via Turnitin as a Microsoft Word file

(see the deliverables required in coursework 1).

Coursework 2: Individual System Review and Evaluation Report to be submitted by . This should be submitted via Turnitin as a Microsoft Word file (see the deliverables required in coursework 2)

Kind reminder: You MUST make a reasonable attempt at your assignment and submit it. Failure to do so may result in a CAPPED Resit and/or failure of the module.

It is also the student’s full responsibility to ensure that all assignments are submitted on the correct link and on time before the submission date.

 

 

Assignment Support

 

Firstly, read the scenario below and then design and evaluate a solution using an object-oriented analysis and design approach. You should use Unified Modelling Language (UML) for specifying, visualizing, constructing, and documenting the proposed systems. Your assignment consists of two pieces of coursework. Both pieces are to be done individually.

·      Coursework 1 relates to the analysis and design of a system (worth 60% of the total marks of the assignment). This part of the assessment will assess learning outcomes 1, 2 & 3.

·      Coursework 2 is an evaluation report consisting of a critical commentary on coursework 1 (worth 40% of the total marks of the assignment). This part will assess learning outcome 4.

 

How will your work be assessed?

Your work will be assessed by a subject expert who will use the marking grid provided in this assessment brief.   When you access your marked coursework, it is important that you reflect on the feedback so that you can use it to improve future assignments.

 

How will feedback be provided?

Students will have access to formative feedback on each task set in workshops, thereby helping them to refine their approach to the summative tasks that have been set. However, please note that this feedback is limited to recommendations on improving your work. Lecturers will not confirm any grades or marks.  The feedback can be one-to-one or in-group sessions.

 

 

Assignment support:

 

Although you will be guided throughout the module by your lecturer, you can get extra support for your assignment, just make an appointment with the ACE team for any language, research and study skills issues and/or talk, email the Computing ACE expert for any advice on how to approach your assignment. REMEMBER: they are not here to give you the answers!

 

 

Discuss the strategic opportunities that might exist for MCC through this acquisition

CONTEXT

 

At the end of 2020, Australian construction firm MC Constructions (MCC) announced its acquisition of Singapore-based technology company SeniorConnect. Plans to integrate the business were stalled as a result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and SeniorConnect has therefore largely operated independently since the acquisition with the exception of creating consistency in some company policies and processes. Now, more than a year since the acquisition, MCC is reinitiating plans to integrate the SeniorConnect business.

 

In January 2022, MCC appointed Andi Lafley to the newly created role of Chief Strategy Officer.

 

Your task

 

You are a new Partner in your current Business Unit.

Your company have been asked to accommodate a last minute meeting request with the MCC Chief Strategy Officer Andi Lafley later today. There is an urgency to progress, and Andi’s EA would like to take advantage of a block of time that has recently become available in Andi’s calendar.

You have volunteered to attend this meeting with another Partner*. A meeting has been scheduled to allow you and your peer to prepare for this meeting.

 

  • Client meeting (role play) (30 mins): After your preparation time, you will have 30 minutes to conduct your meeting with the ‘client’ – the Chief Strategy Officer of MCC Andi Lafley.

Supporting information

  • Attachment 1: Information about the meeting with MCC
  • Attachment 2: MCC and SeniorConnect Information Pack
  • Attachment 3: Outputs from a brief desktop review conducted by a graduate

 

 

 

Attachment 1

Information about the meeting with MCC

 

Subject: Meeting

 

Hi – thanks for accommodating this meeting at short notice – we really wanted to take advantage of Andi’s availability today.

 

Andi has requested that I provide you with the following notes about what they would like to cover at the meeting but wanted me to let you know that they are also happy to be guided by your team as to what is covered. Given integration of SeniorConnect was impacted by COVID, there is a strong sense of wanting to regain momentum, so we are keen to understand which professional services partners may be able to partner with MCC on this journey.

 

Andi has shared the following objectives for the conversation:

 

  • Discuss the strategic opportunities that might exist for MCC through this acquisition
  • Meet some members of your firm who may be working with us if we were to appoint you as a trusted supplier
  • Anything else you wish to present or discuss

 

I attach our information pack which we have circulated to interested suppliers in advance of these preliminary conversations.

 

Thanks again,

EA to Chief Strategy Officer

 

Attachment 2

 

MCC and SeniorConnect Information Pack

Overview

 

MCC has historically specialised in medium density residential builds. Recently, industry issues related to construction standards, oversupply and combustible cladding to name a few, have significantly impacted MCC’s pipeline and profitability. These challenges have been exacerbated by COVID-19. Prior to the pandemic MCC had refreshed its 2025 strategy and the key pillars of that strategy were cost leadership and expansion into emerging markets.

MCC acquired SeniorConnect at the end of 2020.

Founded in 2012, SeniorConnect’s mission is to use technology to drive wellbeing, connection and quality of life for older people. Its core business – Networks – connects seniors to assisted living, leisure and wellbeing services in their area (creating a ‘virtual retirement village’). In 2016 it established a Devices division in response to growing interest in the role of technology in aged care.

Headquartered in Singapore, SeniorConnect has experienced strong growth particularly as consumers and their families are more digitally literate than ever before, and have strong preferences (and in south-east Asia, cultural expectations) to ‘age in place’. SeniorConnect has had some success in the nearby markets, but has been interested in expanding in Australia and New Zealand for some time.

The acquisition of SeniorConnect represents MCC’s aspiration to disrupt the global residential aged care marketplace through a ‘home first’ model – luxury residential apartments which happen to be enabled through technology to support older people to age in place, with onsite healthcare and social support. MCC has previously been focused on the provision of mid-market residential and retail builds. The new strategic direction would involve leveraging this construction capability, and building new capability in smarthome and telehealth specifically related to ageing and senior living.

Full integration of SeniorConnect was stalled during 2021 and aside from the implementation of some MCC policies and processes, SeniorConnect has continued to operate largely independently. There was a significant increase in demand for SeniorConnect services due to the pandemic and seniors spending more time at home.

MCC is looking for a commercially-savvy and future-focused partner to support us in successfully defining and executing the new business direction in light of the acquisition. There is a desire to move at pace, having lost a year of momentum as a result of the pandemic. As the scope of work is by its nature, likely to be dynamic, the preference is to partner with a smaller number of providers who can support across the spectrum of likely services and supports over time rather to engage with a larger number of niche providers.

 

 

 

 

Determine whether the law and the ANA’s standards support or conflict with that action.

Read the following scenario: Lena is a community health care nurse who works exclusively with HIV-positive and AIDS patients. As a part of her job, she evaluates new cases and reviews confidential information about these patients. In the course of one of these reviews, Lena learns that her sister’s boyfriend has tested HIV positive. Lena would like to protect her sister from harm and begins to consider how her sister can find out about her boyfriend’s health status.   Consult at least two resources to help you establish Lena’s legal and ethical position. These resources might include your state’s Nurse Practice Act, the ANA’s Code of Ethics, ANA’s Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice, and internal or external standards of care. Consider what action you would take if you were Lena and why. Determine whether the law and the ANA’s standards support or conflict with that action. Question; Description of the actions you would take in this situation, and why. Justify these actions by referencing appropriate laws, ethical standards, and professional guidelines.

Describe how you would communicate with each level of care provider to assure the best outcomes possible.

Scenario You are making a staffing assignment knowing that you are short-staffed. You have five registered nurses (RNs), two licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and two nursing assistants. Those nine employees need to provide a 12-hour shift of services to 30 clients with a high acuity required to a ratio of nurse to client at 1:3. Client acuity level Six acuity level 1 Eight acuity level 2 Nine acuity level 3 Seven acuity level 4 You will use the acuity-based staffing model to develop the staffing assignment based on the needs of the clients. You will use the created template. NUR2832_Staffing Instructions As you create this assignment, include the following in an email to your manager to justify your short-staffing plan: Complete the staffing assignment based on the acuity level. Defend how you would direct the staff to their assigned roles for this shift and provide a rationale for the staffing assignment. Describe how you would communicate with each level of care provider to assure the best outcomes possible. Address how you would ensure client equity in the delivery of services. Provide stated ideas with professional language and attribution for credible sources with correct APA citation, spelling, and grammar.

Did the movie depict the characteristics of the MH illness of the character accurately.  If  so, what features of the film did you find most persuasive related to  the MH presentation?

#7 Movie Think about a movie that you watched recently that had a character that presented with a mental illness Identify the movie and the character you are referencing. What MH issues does the film present? Did the movie provide an stigmatizing presentation of MH issues. Explain your answer Did the movie depict the characteristics of the MH illness of the character accurately.  If  so, what features of the film did you find most persuasive related to  the MH presentation? If not, what features of the film did you believe  were not persuasive and why? If someone you cared about was diagnosed with the same symptoms/mental illness, what treatment options would you advocate for?  1.     Create a thread/initial discussion post. 2.     Write at least 200 words per question. 3.     The majority of your post(s) must be original thoughts, words and ideas. 4.     Identify additional source of all information you use. 5.     Utilize APA formatting for your responses and citations. 6.     Post must be typed in the discussion message box, not attached as a document. Reply Post(s) 1.     Post at least two replies to either peers or the professor. 2.     Write at least 100 words per reply. 3.     Identify additional source of all information you use. 4.     Utilize APA formatting for your responses and citations. 5.     Post must be typed in the discussion message box, not attached as a document.

What is the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement?

Organizational culture is the shared way of thinking or feeling in a given organization. This culture creates the dynamic for a willingness to change and/or improve. For example, if an organizational culture is one in which change is welcomed to improve and all voices are encouraged to be shared, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative will likely be accepted and supported. However, if an organizational culture is one in which the acknowledgement of mistakes are penalized and only leadership voices are respected, the implementation of a quality improvement initiative may be met with hesitation and skepticism. For this Assignment, you will consider the impact of cultural and organizational readiness as it relates to the implementation of quality improvement initiatives. You will consider the leadership strategies needed to support these measures and complete an Organizational Culture Assessment Tool.   Complete the Organizational Culture Assessment Tool for the healthcare organization or nursing practice you selected. Then, address the following: What is the state of cultural/organizational readiness for quality improvement? Is the organizational culture present for quality improvement? What leadership strategies are present in the organization to support quality improvement, positive patient experiences, and healthcare quality?

If the U.S. were to adopt a concept/attribute from Germany’s dualistic board structure to apply to board structures in our health system, what would it be and why?

In Germany, they have adopted a dualistic board structure which is different from the board structures in the U.S. Research the German dualistic board structure and complete a 2- to 3-page comparative analysis of Germany’s dualistic board structure and the board structure(s) in the United States. Answer the following questions in your comparative analysis: If the U.S. were to adopt a concept/attribute from Germany’s dualistic board structure to apply to board structures in our health system, what would it be and why? What would be the benefits? Is a dualistic structure of governance viable for non-profit organizations? For-profit organizations? Why or why not? SLP Assignment Expectations Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to justify/support your comparative analysis. Limit your response to a maximum of 3 pages, not including the title or reference pages. Support your proposal with peer-reviewed articles, with at least 3 references. Use the following link for additional information on how to recognize peer-reviewed journals: http://www.angelo.edu/services/library/handouts/peerrev.php. You may use the following source to assist in formatting your assignment: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/. Georgetown University Library (n.d.) Evaluating internet resources. Retrieved from https://www.library.georgetown.edu/tutorials/research-guides/evaluating-internet-content

With the influence of the recent Human Genome Project and the possibility of predicting open spinal defects earlier in pregnancy, how will maternity care change in the future? 

Instructions: Read the following case study and answer the reflective questions. Please provide rationales for your answers. Make sure to provide citations/references (2016-2021)for your answers in APA format.  CASE STUDY: Active Labor: Susan Wong  Mrs. Wong, a first-time mother, is admitted to the birthing suite in early labor after spontaneous rupture of membranes at home. She is at 38 weeks of gestation with a history of abnormal alpha-fetoprotein levels at 16 weeks of pregnancy. She was scheduled for ultrasonography to visualize the fetus to rule out an open spinal defect or Down syndrome, but never followed through. Mrs. Wong and her husband disagreed about what to do (keep or terminate the pregnancy) if the ultrasonography indicated a spinal problem, so they felt they did not want this information.  Reflective Questions  1. As the nurse, what priority data would you collect from this couple to help define relevant interventions to meet their needs?  2. How can you help this couple if they experience a negative outcome in the birthing suite? What are your personal views on terminating or continuing a pregnancy with a risk of a potential anomaly? What factors may influence your views?  3. With the influence of the recent Human Genome Project and the possibility of predicting open spinal defects earlier in pregnancy, how will maternity care change in the future?

discuss what you believe should be the top 2 healthcare policy concerns for lawmakers and healthcare leaders in your local area relative to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Within the Discussion Board area, write 300–500 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas. For this Discussion Board, please complete the following: As a new healthcare leader you have been tasked with developing policy for local lawmakers, politicians, and business owners with regard to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for COVID-19. For this discussion, you will Explore the Covid Data Tracker and the Covid-19 Policy Tracker for a better understanding of what your local policymakers are doing relative to national infection/virus rates and policy recommendations. Focus your discussion on the following: Based on the data related to infection rate trends (past/current) in your area, and the current policy recommendations at the state/local level, discuss what you believe should be the top 2 healthcare policy concerns for lawmakers and healthcare leaders in your local area relative to the COVID-19 pandemic. If state/local recommendations/policies differ from the CDC policy recommendations related to the Covid-19 Pandemic guidelines (e.g. mask guidelines, quarantine, vaccination requirements in the workplace, etc.) describe what steps you would take and what data you would use to convince local lawmakers to change the polices in the community.

Explain how the role of epigenetics may contribute to pharmacologic action.

As a psychiatric nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat patients, you must not only understand the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders but also how medications for these disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your colleagues. Review the Learning Resources and reflect on the concepts of foundational neuroscience as they might apply to your role as the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner in prescribing medications for patients.  THE QUESTION 1. Explain the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents, including how partial and inverse agonist functionality may impact the efficacy of psychopharmacologic treatments. 2. Compare and contrast the actions of g couple proteins and ion gated channels. 3. Explain how the role of epigenetics may contribute to pharmacologic action. 4. Explain how this information may impact the way you prescribe medications to patients. Include a specific example of a situation or case with a patient in which the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner must be aware of the medication’s action.