Why is punishment in the U.S. sanctions done by the criminal court? Is criminal justice the best choice to control crime

Females in the Juvenile Justice System **Barrett, D.; Ju, S.; Katsiyannis, A.; & Zhang, D. (2015). Females in the Juvenile Justice System: Influences on Delinquency and Recidivism. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 24(2), p. 427-433. Question #1: “Despite the increasing rates of female juvenile delinquency, particularly for crimes traditionally associated with males, addressing the needs of females in the juvenile system has been a persistent challenge (Boesky 2002; Quinn et al. 2005; Teplin et al. 2002). The American Bar Association and National Bar Association Report (2001) have concluded that there is a critical lack of prevention, diversion, and treatment alternatives for girls in the juvenile justice system.” (Barrett, D.; Ju, S.; Katsiyannis, A.; & Zhang, D. (2015). What prevention methods, diversion, and/or treatment alternatives do you believe should be made to help girls in the juvenile justice system? Question #2: Although the study was able to show that more than 60% of female delinquents who were diagnosed with mental health, and others who were placed in CPS or were victims of child maltreatment, were more likely to end up in the juvenile justice system, there were many limitations to the study. How would you alter the study to determine if there was a direct causal effect of mental illness on delinquency, or what would you do differently to avoid an inaccurate analysis? Mauer, M. Race, Class and the Development of Criminal Justice Policy Ques. # 1 What is Mauer’s argument on the issue of discrimination in the criminal justice system? why the treatment for minority youth different in the criminal justice system? Ques. # 2 Why is punishment in the U.S. sanctions done by the criminal court? Is criminal justice the best choice to control crime

write a persuasive essay detailing why the U.S. was not justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan.

I have to write a persuasive essay detailing why the U.S. was not justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Japan. My Thesis statement is: “While the U.S. military ended world war 2 using nuclear measures, the United States was not justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Japan due to the unnecessary civilian casualties, the diminishing strenght of the Japanese Army, and the far-reaching health ramifications. Cover page info: The U.S. was not justified to drop atomic bombs on Japan SSG Phillip J. Tross III Cyber Center Of Excellence ALC 003-22 SSG Ryele Bertoch March 4, 2022 I need an intro(includes thesis) three main body paragraphs and a conclusion. Included is my grading rubrics

Write a 750-word reflection on the nature and existence of God.

Write a 750-word reflection on the nature and existence of God. Your paper should include (i) a discussion of which of the arguments for God’s existence examined in class (Aquinas 5 Ways + Bulgakov & Maximos on Personalism, Advaita/Nondualism, & the Humility of Dao) you agree with the most and why; (ii) an example from your daily life that shows this theory to be the most reasonable and helpful. You do not need a title page, but please include your name, student ID, and the course name. Use the philosophical vocabulary we learned in class to describe the theories. You do not need references; Please DO NOT cite or use any sources except the course lectures, the moodle readings, or the powerpoint and resources cited in the powerpoint. You can find the powerpoint here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/167YqeQda2F3JR0Bi2rL8mOkmH_-w3UL3Xr5_C9kHCJU/edit?usp=sharing. (If you cannot access this link, let me know and I will send you a copy.) Please compare your preferred theory with the two other theories we learned about, telling me why it is more realistic or helpful than them. Alternatively, you could tell me which two theories you prefer over the third, and why. If you use examples from your personal life in describing and defending your preferred theory/theories, that is good. If not, you can add a second section to the essay in which you explicitly talk about a personal experience and how it relates to your preferred theory. Plagiarism Warning: If I can find your ideas and examples on the internet or in another student’s paper, you will get 0% and will be reported to the Dean. Please only use course notes, course readings, and your own life experience to write your paper. The link to the theories is here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/167YqeQda2F3JR0Bi2rL8mOkmH_-w3UL3Xr5_C9kHCJU/edit#slide=id.p

In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.

Assessment Descriiption Review the IOM report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession. Include the following: Describe the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.” Outline the four “Key Messages” that structure the IOM Report recommendations. Explain how these have transformed or influenced nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development. Provide examples. Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.” Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession. Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers. You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be drafted within the last 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

What are legacy forces?

Use references from the Homeland Security 7th edition by Donald M. Snow Provide at least one paragraph for each of the following questions in your own words. 1. What are legacy forces? 2. What is asymmetrical warfare? 3. What are the characteristics of a DWIC? 4. Why does the text maintain that nontraditional security concerns could become more prominent in the next five to ten years? Do you agree and why?

Compare the rhetorical strategies of Benjamin Franklin to Jonathan Edwards or Patrick Henry. How would you describe their persuasive strategies and rhetorical styles?

Respond to the following essay questions. Be sure to back up your answers with evidence from the texts we have read over the course of the semester and explain your answers. The length of the answers depends on your ability to be concise. There is no minimum length, I am looking for quality; however, I cannot imagine developing complete answers to these questions in fewer than 250 words. Describe what you think are the main features of Puritan theology or thinking. Reference the Puritan texts that we’ve studied this semester to illustrate this Puritan worldview. Describe what you think are the main features of Enlightenment thinking. Reference the Enlightenment texts that we’ve studied this semester to illustrate this Enlightenment worldview. Compare the rhetorical strategies of Benjamin Franklin to Jonathan Edwards or Patrick Henry. How would you describe their persuasive strategies and rhetorical styles? What are the chief characteristics of the rhetoric used by each? In what ways were each effective? What are the limitations of each? I am asking you to compare their writing styles, approach to writing, and specific techniques used. What are the social functions of religion in America before 1800? According to the primary documents you’ve read, what does religion do or attempt to do in this era? How does it influence the way society functions? Compare the poetic work of Anne Bradstreet to the poetry of Phillis Wheatley or Edward Taylor. What are the most interesting similarities? What are the most important differences? What is significant about these similarities and differences? Compare the content and style. It is not necessary to compare rhyming schemes since we have not covered that in class. Which ever question you choose I’ll send the story.

compare and contrast the world religion with Christianity, providing how you would share Christ with a follower of the religion you selected for this assignment.

OVERVIEW The experience of a personal conversation and/or interview with a person of another faith other than Christianity is great way of understanding his or her religious beliefs and religious worldview (meaning what that person believes about a god or god(s) or no god, and how he or she relates to that deity). By means of engaging with people of other faith positions, you will gain a much deeper insight into their beliefs and religious perspectives, which in turn will aid you in ministering to them as a Chaplain and potentially reaching them for Christ in our pluralistic world with so many religious options. INSTRUCTIONS To ensure success for this assignment, you will select a major world religion, interview a participant or religious leader of the selected religion, and write a paper detailing your interview and research discoveries. Based on your research of the religion by using academic sources and based on your interview with a participant of the religion you choose for this assignment, you will report the interview findings, and then compare and contrast the world religion with Christianity, providing how you would share Christ with a follower of the religion you selected for this assignment. (Other religions besides the major world religions may be selected for this interview assignment with the Instructor’s permission). Based upon your interview and engagement with a participant of the world religion you selected for this assignment, you will prepare your paper using 1,800 to 2,700 words and include the following:  A title page  A table of contents  An introduction  Footnotes in current Turabian formatting  A description of the religion based on your use of academic research  A report of your interview and your research discoveries  A section on how you would share Christ with a follower of the selected religion  A conclusion  A bibliography with at least 5 scholarly sources. Course textbooks may be used as sources.

explain why this document is significant to our understanding of a particular era of military history.

You will write this about a primary source document of your choice that we will have read by the time the essay is due. Analysis means “breaking something apart” to understand it better, and that is what you will do with a primary source document. The goal of this assignment is to explain why this document is significant to our understanding of a particular era of military history. You should provide information from lecture and/or class readings to support your argument and analysis, but the majority of your evidence should come from the primary source document itself. In 750-800 words, you do not have room for a long introduction. Get to the point right away and do not bother with space-wasting filler sentences in your first paragraph. Provide just enough historical context to explain the document’s position in time and space. Within four or five sentences, your introduction should make it clear what document from what era of military history you are analyzing, and what your argument is (in other words, your thesis statement––see the model below). The body paragraphs of your essay should develop and support the argument you make in your thesis statement. For every claim you make about the meaning, importance, or implications of the document, you should be able to point to a specific piece of evidence––from the document itself or elsewhere from class. No research is necessary or expected for this assignment. Model for analytical thesis statements: Your thesis statement should be no longer than two sentences at the end of your introduction, and should clearly contain all these elements (not necessarily in this order): (Argument/“What do I know,”), (summary of the Evidence you will use/“How do I know this”), and (Significance/“So what? Why does my argument matter on a broader scale, beyond the fact that I have to write an essay for this class?”). Grading rubric for Analytical Essays A range: Presents relevant historical context and clear analytical thesis statement with all three components (argument, summary of evidence, significance). Evidence is chosen and analyzed carefully to support the argument and explain its significance.

How would the socialist economy, according to Lotta, differ from our capitalist economy, and how would the United States relate to and interact differently with the rest of the world?

Logistics: 3-4 pages (although it can be longer if needed), double-spaced, 1 inch margins, Times New Roman font, 12-font size, American Sociological Association (ASA) format. Instructions: Watch the 27 minute video posted in the Moodle assignment portal, titled “EARTH DAY 2021 Capitalism Is Destroying Our Planet. We Need: Revolution—Nothing Less!” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9DmNijBhyE), and write an essay about it. This video, and this paper, coincide with the second unit of this course–The Environment, Technology, and Society. Keeping in mind what you’ve read and written (in your forum posts) for this unit, this provocative video should provide a useful summary of the scale and scope of the climate crisis, as well as a particular, revolutionary communist, perspective on what drives this crisis, why it cannot be dealt with under a capitalist system, and the need for a new, socialist society based on principles of socialist sustainable economic development. I want to be clear–you do not have to agree with everything (or anything at all, in fact) that the speakers convey in this video. That being said, an important part of being a scholar and critical thinker is engaging with a wide array of different perspectives, ideas, and theoretical approaches to various social and environmental problems. This video compellingly argues that climate change, and the climate crisis more generally, is driven by the very nature of capitalism. This is an important argument, and one that should be carefully considered, regardless of your political or ideological persuasions. I’m guessing that this might be a perspective you haven’t ever been introduced to. This video also presents a vision for a different society, and a different future–a socialist society, and a future with an economy based on meeting human needs in an ecologically sustainable way–that is also worth your consideration and engagement. So, with all this in mind, I want you to do the following in your midterm essay: 1) Provide a brief summary of some of the ideas presented in the video. Note that you do not have to summarize the entire video, or even most of the video. Instead, you can focus on a particular part or parts that interested you or caught your attention. 2) What do you think about the video narrator’s argument, and the argument presented in the interview with political economist Raymond Lotta, that climate change cannot be solved under capitalism? How do they make this argument? In other words: What evidence do they present to back their claim? 3) What is it about this new socialist society described by Raymond Lotta that would make it ecologically sustainable? How would the socialist economy, according to Lotta, differ from our capitalist economy, and how would the United States relate to and interact differently with the rest of the world?