Write a research proposal on how child abuse links to offending in the youth justice system

The Research proposal – 3000 words

You will be assessed against the following criteria:

• The research proposal should flow naturally from the problems and unanswered questions highlighted in the conclusion to the literature review.
• It should be clearly structured.
• The proposal should make clear the aims and objectives of the intended research project and its potential scholarly significance. How would the research, should it be carried out, contribute to knowledge in the subject area, over and above what has been learned from the critical literature review?
• What is the rationale/justification for the methodological approach you have chosen? What will be your primary data sources? How will you design a study that meets your research aims? What specific methods (e.g. questionnaire survey, in-depth interviews, observation) have you selected, and what is the justification for choosing these?
• The proposal should demonstrate an awareness and a sensitivity to the practical and ethical considerations necessary when applying these methods to this particular research question (issues to be considered will include sampling, access to participants, data collection methods, and data analysis).
• There should be a clear identification of research outputs and potential outcomes. You should consider what will be produced if the research were carried out, and what impact it would have? How might the research findings inform policy, instigate change or improve practice etc.?
• Consideration must be given to the outcomes or impact the research would have for young people.
• The proposal must demonstrate an awareness of the practical limitations of the research – resource issues, timescale etc. This does not have to be specific to the extent of calculating precise financial costs, but an awareness of the time required to conduct the research and resources such as staff, stationery etc.

My disso is on how child abuse links to offending in the youth justice system, I have attached my CLR and this is secondary research

select and critically review a psychology research article from a list of possible options.

Step 1: Choosing an article to review

You are required to select and critically review a psychology research article from a list of possible options.

Read the articles in the List of articles for critical review. Please see below the 3 articles:

Assignment 1: Additional resources – Articles for critical review

Research topic: Wearing face masks during COVID.

Choose one of the below articles to evaluate. Use the other articles as sources to inform your critical review.

1. Xu, P., & Cheng, J. (2021). Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: The role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude. Personality and individual differences. Vol.175, pp. 1-8.
2. Mahalik, J. R., Bianca, M. D., & Harris, M. P. (2021). Men’s attitudes toward mask-wearing during COVID-19: Understanding the complexities of mask-ulinity. Journal of health psychology. 00, iss. 0, pp. 1-18.
3. Powdthavee, N., Riyanto, Y. E., Wong, E. C., Yeo, J. X., & Chan, Q. Y. (2021). When face masks signal social identity: Explaining the deep face-mask divide during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one. Vol. 16, iss. 6, pp. 1-15.

You may have questions about the articles as you read; leave time to review the learning materials and answer them.

Select only one article to review. You may use the remaining articles as supporting literature to help you build your argument, but a well-constructed review might require you to conduct further research through the Swinburne Library.

Step 2: Writing your critical review

Write a critical review of your selected article, including the following:

• Title Page (not included in word count) – Criterion 1
  • The title page should be in APA format and include an informative title that makes sense.
• Introduction (approx. 100 words) – Criterion 2
  • The introduction should say why the general subject of the research article being evaluated is important or interesting and what you are going to do (e.g. ‘This critical review will … ‘). Your final sentence should state your overall judgment about the strength of the article.
• Body:
  • Summary (400 words)– Criterion 3
    • Provide a summary of the author’s research question/hypotheses, major arguments/ideas, strengths/weaknesses and conclusions.
  • Critical evaluation (approx. 400 words) – Criterion 4
    • You can find information regarding critically evaluating resources in the marking guide below. If you are unsure of how you would go about critically evaluating, please have a go at 5 Activity: Critical review generator as it will provide you with a starting point.
  • Conclusion (approx. 100 words) – Criterion 5
    • The conclusion should provide a summary of the major points of your argument, and your overall evaluation of the research article. Perhaps consider what the article has contributed to your understanding and to the development of knowledge in this area of research.
  • Writing style and structure– Criterion 6
    • Please consider general spelling, grammar and paragraph structure. Must include relevant subheadings and use appropriate topic/linking sentences. All headings and formatting must conform to APA format.
  • In-text referencing/References list (in APA style) – Criterion 7
    • Include a reference list in APA style. It should be presented on its own page with a separate heading. You may find the APA style guide(Links to an external site.)

This Guide to writing critical reviews will assist you.

Please note that the allocation of words to each section is a guideline, and will vary across individual assignments.

Note that your evaluation should go beyond a simple ‘good’ or ‘not good’. Rather, you are evaluating the extent to which the argument is supported by the evidence and the extent to which the methods address the research question. (Tip: Don’t forget the strengths. It is unlikely that the paper is perfect, but as it is a published article, it probably has some strengths as well.)

Critically analyse the relationship between psychopathic traits in childhood and delinquency

Description

Hi. I need an essay of 3000 words. The question of the essay is “Critically analyse the relationship between psychopathic traits in childhood and delinquency” The reference list should have at least 25-30 references of good scholarly quality( journal articles, peer reviewed literature+academic books and hamdbooks. Avoid using anecdotal cases to support the arguments ( cases/case studies are not evidence like Ted Bunndy and other case studies. Suplement older literature with contemporary literature. Thank you.

Critically discuss how and in what terms the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case C-709/20 CG v Department for Communities in Northern Ireland [2021] and the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Fratila and another (AP) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] UKSC 53 have impacted on the interpretation of the principle of non-discrimination on the grounds of nationality in the UK legal system.

 Assessment Task

• This coursework is composed of two parts: Part A and Part B. Part A contains two essay type questions that are each worth 60 marks; part B comprises two problem scenarios that are each worth 40 marks.
• You must answer ONLY ONE question in Part A and ONLY ONE question in part B.
• 2200 Words. Part A answer should be maximum 1200 words; and Part B answer should be maximum 1000 words. This is intended to reflect an approximate average length of the answer.
• The answer must be of appropriate length and compositional style, e.g. formal academic writing. You must ensure that you include legislation and case-law correctly to ensure clarity.
• Your analysis will need to be supported by arguments evidenced by law, jurisprudence and academic research or commentary from academic journals, books and other relevant authoritative sources.
• If you cite a source, you are required to use footnotes in OSCOLA style. However, there is no requirement to include a bibliography. Wikipedia is not appropriate to mention as a source.
• You are reminded that sources, such as cases, legislation and journals, may be accessed remotely through Roehampton Library, Lexis Library and/or Westlaw UK.
• Poor structure, composition or grammar will affect the quality of your submission and may even prevent the marker from understanding your analysis. Therefore, you should proofread your essay before you submit it for marking and make sure you have written what you intend to say.

COURSEWORK

PART A

Answer ONLY ONE of the following essay questions

A.1 ‘The protection of fundamental rights would not be changed after Brexit as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) continues to be applied in the UK legal system’.

With references to case-law critically analyse this statement and discuss the impact of Brexit on the protection of fundamental rights in the UK.

[60 marks]

OR

A.2 Critically discuss how and in what terms the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the case C-709/20 CG v Department for Communities in Northern Ireland [2021] and the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Fratila and another (AP) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] UKSC 53 have impacted on the interpretation of the principle of non-discrimination on the grounds of nationality in the UK legal system.

[60 marks]

PART B

Answer ONLY ONE of the following problem questions

B.1 Ana worked in an office in a small town in Slovenia, and while doing her job, she discovered that her colleagues committed fraud involving EU funds. Ana reported the crime internally and to the public authorities, and her colleagues were investigated and convicted for their crimes. After reporting the crime and supporting the authorities in detecting the fraud, Ana was discriminated against and later dismissed by her employer.

The national legislation currently in force does not protect Ana. Despite this, an EU Directive has recently introduced legal provisions to protect people who report breaches against EU Law against all forms of retaliation and discrimination. The deadline for implementing the Directive expired before the facts occurred, but Slovenia has unfortunately not yet implemented it.

Provide legal advice to Ana on whether and how her rights can be recognised and enforced under EU law, distinguishing between two alternative scenarios:

1. Ana is a public official employed by the Ministry of Economic Affairs.
2. Ana is an employee of a private company.

[40 marks]

OR

B.2 The company Future Motors, based in Spain, is a start-up that manufactures vehicles or part of vehicles and whose products are enormously appreciated and valued by customers. Future Motors already exports its innovative, well-fabricated, and designed products to different countries, including Germany, France, and Italy.

However, Germany has recently introduced new legal provisions to limit the use of new powerful vehicles that are not considered efficient. Germany measures impose that these vehicles cannot be driven in Germany during the weekend and every day from 10 am to 6 pm.

As an effect, the trade of the cars sold by Future Motors in Germany is consistently reduced by around 80%. Future Motors is interested to know if the rules adopted by the German authorities can be challenged based on the EU Law.

Moreover, Future Motors is assessing to expand its business, and the UK could be an important export market based on the consultancy received. Hence, Future Motors’ managers are interested in exporting their vehicles in the UK, and are seeking your advice on how the Trade and Cooperation Agreement may assist them.

Provide legal advice to Future Motors:

1. on the compatibility of these measures adopted by Germany with the EU Law
2. about the main legal rules governing the export of vehicles in the UK in the light of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement.

[40 marks]

THE END OF PAPER

As a project manager, how would you ensure a project meets its long-term goals as well as its short-term goals.

Individual Discussion Engagement 2 (500 words)

Discussion activity: Analysis/Critique – Risk analysis for long-term goals

Large infrastructure projects are often in the media for all the wrong reasons. The disruptions to the community and reported poor performance creates added external pressures to the already tightly constrained project.

Sydney, Australia’s M5 East Tunnel was constructed under strict budgetary and schedule requirements, but given the massive traffic delays now hampering commuters, the requirements may have been excessive.  Due to an inexpensive computer system with a high failure rate, the tunnel’s security camera frequently fails, requiring the operators to close the tunnel due to the inability to react to an accident, fire, or excessive pollution inside the tunnel.  The tunnel was built to handle 70,000 vehicles a day, but it now carries 100,000, so any glitch can cause immediate traffic snarls.  A managerial risk analysis, including the risk of overuse, might have anticipated these problems and mandated a more reliable set of computers once the costs of failure had been included. (PM Network, 2005).

• Anonymous, Polluted Progress, PM Network. 2005. Polluted Progress. 19(3): 1.

1. Do you think this project was considered a success and on what basis?
2. As a project manager, how would you ensure a project meets its long-term goals as well as its short-term goals.

Focus your responses to these questions on the risk analysis tools and techniques discussed in the readings and videos.

Critically evaluate your chosen field of research and propose solutions to problems arising from that evaluation.

11 pages + well-structured + cited references

Description

AIM: • Apply the methods and techniques you have learnt throughout the BBA to review, extend and apply your knowledge. • Link theory to practice by undertaking research in a chosen field. • Critically evaluate your chosen field of research and propose solutions to problems arising from that evaluation. WHAT DOES IT INVOLVE: An applied research study into either a real life company* or a company quoted on the London or New York Stock Exchange • A company is failing – you are a consultant who has been hired to investigate what the issue is • In depth, holistic – main focus is your major but consider all you have learnt over the three years of your study. • For example …. Any underlying management issues? Strategy? Marketing? Accounting / finance? WHERE DOES THE RESEARCH FIT IN ? Research the company in depth …. Last five years of financial statements • What do they tell you? • Any other relevant information RESEARCH ETHICS APPLICATION Only required if you intend to conduct primary research – qualitative (i.e. interviews, surveys) or quantitative (i.e. data collection) • Not required if you will only be analysing publicly available financial information i.e. secondary research 4/9/2022 Writers Hub – Freelance Writing https://www.writershub.org/writer/orders/853860#instructions 2/2 • A session will be organised if required based on proposals • NB – if intending to do so, please refer to this when submitting proposals. 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Discussion / evaluation 4. Conclusion 5. Recommendations 6. Bibliography 8,000 to 9,000 words (excluding bibliography)

Explain what an organization is.

Description

Explain what an organization is. A wide range of theoretical perspectives and frameworks provide different answers to this fundamental definitional question. Use the following four theoretical frameworks to answer this question and compare and contrast the definitions: “Organic Organizational Structure”, “Mechanistic Organizational Structure”, “Hybrid Organizational Structure”, and “Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory (as it pertains to Organizational Development)”. How are the definitions impacted or changed if we look at public agencies, non-profit organizations, or private firms? Your response should analyze, synthesize, and evaluate major themes or issues in organizational theory and development through the perspective of your course work and current profession or career. The analysis is required to be 3 pages in length, prepared according to APA Style, supported by a minimum of ten scholarly sources, and synthesize your scholarly perspective regarding organizational theory. Note to author: Please make sure 7 of the scholarly sources are journal articles (if possible). Also, this assignment must be 100% original without any semblances of previously used content and must be unique to my specifications, too. Here is a very helpful resource which will help answer and complete this assignment: Daft, L. R. (2012). Organizational theory and design. 12th Edition. Cengage Learning.

analyse a specific case in all its complexity and explain the elements of its complexity by using a certain theory or combination of theories.

SS6002: Assessment 2 (Due 9 th May 2022) Case Study (3000 words) Apply any theoretical approach (or combination of theories) discussed on the module this year to an empirical example. Your empirical example can be based on, but is not limited to: • An ongoing news story • A novel or short story • A TV or film plot • An advertising campaign • An everyday observance • A personal experience (e.g. of work or social relationships) Please discuss your chosen empirical example with me before beginning work on your assessment. ➢ On 18th March the lecture and class will take the form of a case study workshop where ideas can be discussed and we will recap on the theories covered so far. However, do start thinking about your ‘empirical example’ and how you might analyse it. The more consideration you put into this assessment prior to the workshop, the more you will get out of the workshop. The aims of the assignment are: • In general, to assess students’ ability to apply theory • To produce and effectively communicate a detailed analysis of an advanced social theory text (LO3) • To appraise advanced social theories and concepts in relation to their application to ‘real world’ situations (LO4) What is the case study? • You should analyse a specific case in all its complexity and explain the elements of its complexity by using a certain theory or combination of theories. • The case is the ‘real life’ situation or subject; the study is the analysis of the ‘real life’ situation or subject. Key elements of your case study: • A detailed description of the case and its elements • A sense of chronological order – how the situation emerges and evolves over time • A focus on the institution / persons / event[s] / group / representations • A combination of description, interpretation and critical analysis • Application of a theory to ‘test’ it and/or using the theory as a method of critiquing contemporary social phenomena.

Analyse the factors which will affect the merits of a claim in passing off against AAA.

Description 12 PC FONT, DOUBLE SPACED, OSCOLA REFERENCING, 3000 WORDS. Question: Saira is a British-American actor who has appeared in theatre, television and film, as well as running acting courses. Her career has spanned two decades, much of it in the United States, and her work has attracted international acclaim. Due to difficulties in her personal life, Saira is currently taking a break from the spotlight and is focusing on her acting courses, which she runs from her London studio. She uses the adjacent oval logo on her premises and promotional materials. She has not yet registered it as a trade mark. The acting method which Saira teaches derives from the Popov School. Alexander Popov was himself a leading Russian actor in the 1950s. Popov devised a range of dynamic movements, such as floating and flying, which actors can use to find the physical core of a character. Popov published a book containing a series of his own drawings illustrating his technique and its purpose: to enable actors to access their unconscious creative selves through indirect non-analytical means. Popov died in 1967, but his legacy lives on through teachers such as Saira. This is what Popov would have wanted. (A) Whilst surfing the Internet, Saira discovered that another acting studio, Aspiring Actors Association (AAA), is using the mask inside her oval logo to advertise their business. Analyse the factors which will affect the merits of a claim in passing off against AAA. (30 marks) (B) Critically discuss the advantages of trade mark registration as compared to Saira relying on the common law of passing off to protect her logo. (25 marks) (C) It turns out that the mask inside Saira’s oval logo is, in fact, a detail taken from one of the illustrations contained in Popov’s book (see mask on top right had side of image). Assess whether this might render Saira liable for copyright infringement.

What are the differences between men and women in recalling memories of their most significant date?

Description I will attach the protocol template that needs to be filled in for ethical approval which would also serve as a thesis proposal. The dissertation title and question: Recalling memories in adults: What are the differences between men and women in recalling memories of their most significant date? The question would measure if there are any significant differences between men and women in recalling memories from their first date. Participants needs to be between 18 years old and 65 with no memory disability or impairment and no language problem (able to read and understand the questions). The questionnaire that will be used in the study is the BirthMARQ adapted to the question therefore there are going to be implications in adapting a questionnaire such as low Cronbach which needs to discussed. If there are going to be any further questions in completing the protocol please feel free to ask.