Research the court case of United States v. Ressam. Explain the elements of the case, including the background, plaintiff’s arguments, defense’s arguments, and sentencing

T??????????????????????his assignment has two parts. Complete both parts within one document and label them accordingly.Part I: Research the court case of United States v. Ressam. Explain the elements of the case, including the background, plaintiff’s arguments, defense’s arguments, and sentencing.Part II: Compare Executive Order 13769 United States v. Ressam case. In doing so, answer the following three questions.Do you believe a similar order in 2007 would have deterred Ressam from attempting to enter the United States? Why, or why not?Do you believe that the act is a tool of counterterrorism or immigra??????????????????????tion control? Why, or why not?Do you believe that the attempted incursion in 2007 was demonstrative based on religious beliefs? Why, or why not?Your completed assignment must be at least three pages in length, not including a reference page. You are required to use the Executive Order 13769 and the trial transcript of United States v. Ressam (2007) as sources.Include an introduction. In addition to text, you may also incorporate images into your response, but they do not count toward the page count. All sources used, including the textbook, must be cited and referenced according to APA S??????????????????????tyle.

Is it possible for these two people to collaborate on a leadership plan? & what is your recommendation for the new company based for a new strategy because the other one was not working?

Is it possible for these two people to collaborate on a leadership plan? & what is your recommendation for the new company based for a new strategy because the other one was not working?Include information on:– Create shared respect– Create a sense of trust (Lencioni)– Appreciating strengths to build a sense of collective and trust– Create shared processes (timeline, communication, etc.)– Create a shared vision– Create a shared vocabulary – need shared interpersonal communication (direct vs indirect)– Training on professional communication– Unclear responsibilities/accountability/decision making power– Signs of wanting to understand/respect each other’s culture.– They are unwilling to give up any ground on their individual best practices– Lack of mutual respect for cultural– They need to get on the same page to where they have shared common ground or a safe place. Also finding a place they can both feel comfortable to share openly.– Cultural Contingency

Licensure, Supervision, and Autonomy of Practice. Kadushin and Harkness discuss many issues supervisors face. What issues come to mind?

Licensure, Supervision, and Autonomy of PracticeKadushin and Harkness discuss many issues supervisors face, including the conflict between ongoing supervision requirements within agencies, licensure, and autonomy of practice. This debate is still active in theory and in practice.Think about the debate from your own perspective as a licensed social worker and then from the perspective of a supervisor and answer the following:1.What issues come to mind?2. For you, what are the compelling points within the debate?3. How will you balance these perspectives as one person who is both a supervisor and a licensed social worker?4. Support your perspective with credible resources and/or references.Requirements:Length: minimum 250 wordsAPA 7th edition, times roman, 12 pointCite: minimum 3 scholarly sourcesUse a heading for each question response

Analyse Ginsberg’s representations of America in two poems such as “Howl”; and “America” or “Sunflower Sutra”.

E??????????????????????ssay: (4 references altogether scholarly academic article if used briefly, the focus should be on the question).QUESTION BELOW: GINSBERG AND AMERICAAnalyse Ginsberg’s representations of America in two poems such as “Howl”; and “America” or “Sunflower Sutra”. You might want to consider how the speaker portrays America and how Americans relate to their country. In your response you must engage with relevant ideas from the Bennett and Royle chapter on “Ideology”.Instructions on Constructing a Thesis for your Essay:Your Thesis/Argument should be a disputable claim. This means that other people can potentially disagree with it. If no one can disagree with your argument, then it is not a real argument. You must use additional textual examples to support your claims. Organise the analysis around a ce??????????????????????ntral argument or “thesis” and provide textual evidence to support its claims.An academic thesis or argument is not quite the same as an “argument” that you might have with a friend. An academic argument does not need to involve an angry, heated exchange between two people. However, an argument in the everyday sense of the term shares with an academic argument the common characteristic of being disputable and debatable.No Plagiarism Allowed!!Additional research, beyond the relevant chapter from the text (Bennett and Royle), is recommended. Research enhances your understanding of the texts and topic. The important thing is that the research you engage with is relevant to your essay and from a reputable source (e.g. peer reviewed material that you access). Employ an appropriate writing style with minimal spelling, gr??????????????????????ammatical, or other errors.

Build on the work you’ve been doing to effectively analyze at least eight sources that address your topic question

Build on the work you’ve been doing to effectively analyze at least eight sources that address your topic question. Your final revision should include introduction and conclusion paragraphs, both of which should offer an unbiased overview of your issue. A single, comprehensive body paragraph should be devoted to each source. Within each body paragraph, you should evaluate the credibility, bias, and voice of each source. Other points of analysis may include the quality of outside evidence presented (Is the evidence relevant, objective, and comprehensive?) and Aristotle’s appeals (logos, ethos, pathos). You must analyze at least one short, properly framed, direct quotation for each source. Remember: Your purpose is informative and analytical; you should comment on the content and persuasiveness of each source’s perspective, but you should refrain from making your own personal argument about the issue that you’ve selected.Minimum of 6 pages (not including works cited)Minimum of 8 sources (I already have 4 in my draft essay, see attachment)MLA format (double spaced, 12-point font, 1-inch margins; MLA heading, pagination, in-text citations, and works cited list)

Provide a critical summary of BOTH readings. How was it beneficial to the study of criminology/corrections?

Provide a critical summary of BOTH readings (discuss them separately). What did you learn? What did you find interesting? Did the author(s) introduce any new or specialized terminology? Is it clear the author is in favor or against a particular topic? How was it beneficial to the study of criminology/corrections? You can incorporate your answers into your writing. Each critical summary should be at least two pages, so at least four pages total for both readings. If it is a little longer, that is fine. Be sure to apply terms/concept(s) from the readings, and/or the slide presentations. The assignment is called Critical Analysis APPLICATION Paper; therefore, you should apply and connect terms/concepts from the course.Use at least two direct quotes with citations (ASA style) from an academic source (such the articles, text, module slides, or me) per response to support your points. In your discussion, you may relate the articles to your personal lives, current events, and/or class material. Write one summary, then the next, and then include your ONE reference page. It is all one paper, but the discussions are separate.Add a citation page

A patient has been taking valproic acid for mood stabilization from a manic episode but is still not sleeping through the night. His last drug level was 50mcg/ml. The PMHNP notices the patient seems disoriented to time and is flapping his wrist. What should the PMHNP do next?

P??????????????????????lease note the following requirements: A minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted. A minimum of 2 references are required. Peer reviewed scholarly resources should be no more than 5 years old. Example: professional, peer reviewed publications or reports from resources such as CDC, IOM, AACN, etc. These should be written by professionals and scholars in the field. Websites are only scholarly, if written by professionals and experts in the area. Wikipedia is not a scholarly source, for example. A website such as Medscape, CDC, and TIGER Initiative are examples of scholarly sources.??????????????????????A patient has been taking valproic acid for mood stabilization from a manic episode but is still not sleeping through the night. His last drug level was 50mcg/ml. The PMHNP notices the patient seems disoriented to time and is flapping his wrist. What should the PMHNP do next?A. Give the patient lactulose 20 g POB. Draw an ammonia levelC. Increase the dose of valproic acidD. Augment with an atypical antipsychoticThe correct answer for the above question is B. Draw an ammonia levelWhat is the rationale for option B being the correct answer ?Why is option A, C and D are incorrect???????????????????????