Why is there a lack of integration in the construction industry even for its very well-known advantages?

Executive Summary

This report will evaluate the application of the increasingly slow integration of prefabrication into the construction industry, particularly in Australia regardless of the benefits, and the importance to put into this use for the good of carbon zero footprint in Australia.

This report will aim to the differences, and comparisons between two methods and the extent to these differences.

This report will also conclude in determining what is needed to change.

Marketing prefabrication is imperative. Education of prefabrication is imperative. Generalizing prefabrication is imperative.

 

Objective

The objective of this report is to evaluate the reasons behind the decisions why the construction industry have been slow in its progression to integrate prefabrication and its recommendations in advancing its development to be come the leading process in building.

 

Specific Objectives

Prefabrication unlike other innovative technologies has evolved slow in this industry. (Jallion, 2010).

Prefabrication is one of the very first parts of the construction processes, in preparing the structure and its components, ordered all beforehand, prepared in the factory, leaving little if no waste behind.

Upon preparing all materials, it will then be assembled where all components come together to then be moved onsite for installation. (Arbulu, 2004)

 

Research Question

Why is there a lack of integration in the construction industry even for its very well-known advantages? (Gibb 2006) There are discrepancies between the traditional methods of construction and prefabrication must be looked at and evaluation in order to consider and implement prefabrication in the industry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Challenges in Implementing Prefabrication

Traditional methods and prefabrication are significantly different. Procurement methods and delivery play a significant role in those differences.

Changes from traditional construction in prefabrication as ‘Gann in 1996 mentioned will involve certain construction materials, similar to car parts to be automated through the manufacturing process.

This report will aim to report and evaluate the popular method used, the design and construction method throughout the construction industry. An individual or developer is the primary user of this method and is mainly used due to the time taken to design plan in prefabrication rather apposed to the shorter period taken for the (construct) period, or the time to construction. This design is favoured due to the most efficient method in the eyes of developers of project delivery. It is also considered as the traditional method and considered as the only method by many due to the lack of knowledge of other methods such as prefabrication.

Builders, developers, construction companies, are all familiarized with the construction phases of a project, where changes or amendments can usually be made throughout the process. Variations are due to arise as were not foreseen or considered in its initial design phase (Chan, 1997), and seems to be lacking motivation in improving these design processes in the ‘traditional method’ as this method gives builders time to make changes throughout the project.

As there is no room for variations in prefabrication, most of the time planning must be demanded in the design phase much rather than the construct phase as this will be too little too late.

There are many advantages and benefits to this process of prefabrication. A clear advantage would consist of the less time used in the construct period which therefore reduces the use of development practices on the work site.

The design and its procedures while using the prefabrication method uses extensive measures and are meticulously articulate. Therefore, once this process is successfully completed, logistical methods and set up will be the next order of process and can be a more effective process than the construct period.

Furthermore, prefabrication method allows for the project to be minimally affected by weather conditions, as this is a huge cause of major sub-contractor issues, along with having too many workers and material on site, play a huge advantage for prefabrication.

 

Implementation Challenges for Prefabrication

There are many reasons that have resulted in the slow progression of prefabrication into the construction industry and is shown in many articles and research papers.

Issues arise when comes to integrating the assessment of how prefabrication can be implemented.

How can the Medicare and Medicaid payment process close the gap for unpaid patients’ length of stay, allowing for better Financial Revenue at a major psychiatric facility in the New York Metropolitan area?

HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION PROBLEM AND PROJECT SCOPE

1.1  Introduction

More than 100 million Americans rely on Medicare and Medicaid medical coverage in the United States. (Berwick & Gilfillan, 2021). Medicaid insurance development was to reduce the cost of Healthcare, primarily for middle-income earners with limited resources and income (Dickman et al., 2017). Additionally, the Medicaid and Medicare policies cover individuals, including personal care services and nursing homes. According to Ghosh et al. (2017), Medicaid is one of the largest sources of funding for middle and low-income earners and persons who may be suffering from any disability and cannot afford to pay for continued medical-related services. While Medicare’s primary aim is to provide healthcare services for people over the age of sixty-five or disabled, Medicaid provides health care services by reducing medical costs, especially for low and middle-income earners (Dickman et al., 2017). Research has shown that due to the many discrepancies present in these insurance covers, increasing the duration of coverage is likely to reduce the significance of these insurance policies (Dickman et al., 2017).

The Medicare guidelines provide for one hundred and ninety psychiatric days of coverage for patients, meaning if any patient exceeds their stay in the hospital beyond the allotted days, they will be required to pay for any additional costs they may incur. The lack of maximum coverage by any Medicare recipient increases the burden of Healthcare to the patient, which can be way beyond the patient’s financial capacity.

The lack of insurance policies maximum healthcare cost to lengthy hospital stays can increase the stress and anxiety levels of the patients and consequently reduce their recovery rate. The patient’s family and friends may become overwhelmed due to the financial cost needed to assist their loved one who may be in recovery in helping to promote their wellbeing. With such thoughts in mind, the Medicare and Medicaid process can be revamped to close the gap for unpaid medical costs due to increased hospital stay, thus promoting increased financial revenue at a Major Psychiatric facility in the New York Metropolitan area.

1.2 Capstone Topic

This Project will analyze the payment process at the psychiatric facility in the New York Metropolitan area. The Doctoral Project will shed light on how healthcare administrators see difficulties losing financial revenue relating to Medicare and Medicaid health coverages. This information will show how the gap for unpaid patient revenue is related to a hospital stay, allowing for increased financial gain for the facility.

The roles and responsibilities for healthcare administration include developing effective working schedules for staff members promoting effective communication, which provides for promoting staff training to effective management of patient fees and billing (Popejoy, 2016). Additionally, healthcare administrators ensure that the facility under their care complies with all the health laws and regulations and effectively manages the hospital finances (Rosenbaum, 2019). In this regard, healthcare administrators manage the Medicare and Medicaid process, which covers the portion of patient fees and billing related to their financial management. The Project analyses the payment process at the facility on Medicaid and Medicare health coverage.

It is part of my Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) program with a specialization in Healthcare Administration and advocacy.

The project analysis shows the behavior of the increased revenue losses reported at the psychiatric facility due to the Medicaid and Medicare payment process. More specifically, this facility has been significantly incurring losses whenever the patient’s Medicare days deplete revenue due to increased hospital stay, which is lost revenue related to the facility’s finances.  Additionally, the Medicaid health insurance only covers patients under twenty-one years and those above sixty-five years, especially at the significant psychiatric facility in the New York Metropolitan area, an article 32 facility. Any patients between the gaps not covered by Medicaid generate revenue loss for the facility, regardless of their income and financial status (Taylor et al., 2021). For these reasons, the doctoral Project will analyze policies and practices to ensure Medicaid and Medicare effectively bridge the financial gap present at the psychiatric facility. Closing the gap for unpaid Medicare and Medicaid days will show how this major psychiatric facility have been losing revenue over many years and what recommendations or information can help close the financial revenue gap. The Project aligned with the Healthcare Administration’s strategic changes through an extensive focus on improving the facilities’ financial growth strategy with a focus on their organization’s practices.

1.2.1 Problem of Practice

Medicaid is America’s most significant financial contributor to Healthcare through the Medicaid post-Affordable Care Act, providing care to more than seventy-five million Americans (Rosenbaum, 2019). In collaboration with the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid has had significant outcomes, including reducing mortality rates and reducing diseases, thus improving health care

(Rosenbaum, 2019). The Federal government in the Medicaid disproportionate hospital share (DSH), relating to regulated required payments, hopes to settle unpaid hospital care costs to better access Medicaid and patients without health insurance and income that can stabilize facilities safety-net. The merger between Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act has increased revenue collection in rural hospitals. The union allowed dentists and other medical practitioners can transverse through these areas to help marginalized the poorer regions and patients who live there to have access to dental and other care-related services (Mazurenko et al. 2018).

Hopefully, this practice can be seen in additional metropolitan areas also. Research has shown that the government spends over six hundred billion dollars on Medicaid health cover to ensure that the vulnerable, low and middle-income earners can access affordable, quality, and equitable healthcare services. (Derkyi-Kwarteng. (2021). However, despite the immensely positive change in the healthcare sector, the program has continuously encountered several challenges. One such challenge is a significant lack of innovation in ensuring the policy is effectively adapted from state to state in providing quality metrics compared to its effectiveness in different forms. The inadequate consistency in implementing the minimum standards on individuals and services that should provide has continued to paralyze the program’s functionality.

Additionally, the lack of good collaboration in promoting unison in improving Healthcare, particularly for the vulnerable and low income earning population, and increase in investment in terms of contracts through the federal government support in reducing the effectiveness of these health insurance. Derkyi-Kwarteng. (2021). Implementing a plan of action can improve or minimize the length of unpaid patient stays for an effective financial system.

Vujicic et al. (2021) noted that Medicaid has been insufficient in providing stable health coverage to people who become dependent on the service, regardless of their income levels. Therefore, implementation is needed to promote long-term investment in providing affordable and quality healthcare services with the limitation of Medicare days, which does not consider much for patients with chronic illnesses. With the challenge of the unpaid cost that accumulates after the said period depletes, there is a need for changes in the healthcare sector and its administrators in addressing such challenges created by the laws that govern such coverages cover. The development of Medicaid and Medicare has resulted in an exponential decline in uninsured people across The United States. Consequently, this phenomenon has increased demand for healthcare staff, increasing pressure to utilize available resources (Shaw, 2021). Additionally, the increased number of patients across The United States who cannot afford their medical bills due to the depletion or expiry of the insurance cover brings to light the financial loss of many hospitals and medical facilities. (Berkowitz et al., 2018).

1.3 Purpose of the Project

This doctoral Project will analyze policies and practices that can be implemented to ensure Medicaid and Medicare effectively bridge the financial gap present at the major psychiatric facility in the New York Metropolitan area, which incurs increasingly unpaid hospital stays. Several research papers have shown that Medicare and Medicaid have huge shortcomings in terms of innovation. (Mazurenko et, al. 2018). However, very few articles have explored the problem of financial losses incurred by hospitals occasioned by the failure of Medicare and Medicaid to take care of long stays in hospitals. As such, this paper will explore how to close the gap for Medicare and Medicaid payment process for unpaid patients’ length of stays, allowing for better Financial

Revenue for the psychiatric facility. However, the immense success of Medicaid and Medicare in providing affordable and quality Healthcare for all the American people does not overshadow its challenges that need addressing in conjunction with relevant health and government stakeholders. Despite many patients benefiting from the Medicare and Medicaid healthcare coverages, the confusion and limitations of the process have seen patients financially and emotionally stressed and stretched to incur the high medical cost, which leaves facilities like metropolitan psychiatric facilities in New York incurring huge losses (Alley et al., 2016).

The lack of maximum coverage by Medicare increases the healthcare burden to the patient beyond the patient’s financial capacity. The lack of insurance policies total healthcare cost to lengthy hospital stay increases the stress and anxiety levels of the patients and consequently reduces their recovery rate. The gains achieved through implementations of these covers have seen the development of other provisions and discrepancies that compromise their effectiveness. Strategies to close these insurance coverage gaps are critical in addressing these discrepancies that may ultimately lead to a health crisis.

1.3.1 Project Need

This doctoral Project ensures a mutual benefit between the patient and the hospital. While the patients holistically gain from the Medicaid and Medicare covers, the hospital also collects its revenue through service payment. There is a need for modeling payments processes of Medicare and Medicaid to cater for the cost of patients who are not within the age limit and those that exceed the period of care due to lengthy hospital stays. Resources for the Project include internal information obtained through expert financial staff members directly associated with the unpaid patient stays at the psychiatric facility in New York.

Having insight relation to the financial improvement for due patient days will provide the knowledge for this Project, as well as economic statistics showing loss of revenue for unpaid patient days and how it affects the major psychiatric facilities’ bottom line.

1.3.2 Project Question(s)

How can the Medicare and Medicaid payment process close the gap for unpaid patients’ length of stay, allowing for better Financial Revenue at a major psychiatric facility in the New York Metropolitan area?

Discuss the content of the table and how exactly you are going to develop each area in detail.

Task Description: Based on what you have seen in this course (including the two previous assessments), develop a simple development plan that you will implement in the short term (next 6 months after completing this subject) to develop skills and best position yourself for employment after graduation. The plan should be simple, clear, focussed to allow for the successful implementation and execution of your plan. 1- Include a summary based on Assessment 2 to introduce your plan. Do not simply copy your summary of the 5 self-tests from assessment 2 as your reflection and understanding of yourself would have evolved during the term even though it may look similar. In your summary, ensure also that you are discussing relevant areas from assessment 2 that you will be using as part of your development plan. For instance, if teamwork was one of your strengths on the VIA Character and would like to further develop that strength as part of your plan, ensure you will include this area in your summary. Approx. 250 words. 2- Create and use a Word Table format containing 5 columns, you will identify the areas chosen, objectives pursued, key actions that you will take, obstacles (things that may compromise your ability to develop and follow-through), and ways to anticipate and manage obstacles to ensure you follow-through and achieve your objectives (see this as a back-up action), that is, with counter actions. The plan (and examples) will be discussed in detail in class. Approx. 750-1000 words. 3- Discuss the content of the table and how exactly you are going to develop each area in detail. You should write a summary for each area included in the table. A reader (or yourself) should be able to understand your plan without seeing the table. Approx. 750-1000 words. 4- Add a conclusion on how the plan is going to assist you to develop skills for employment. Focus on the benefits of formulating and implementing a professional development plan for your career. Approx. 250 words.

Produce a Michaelis-Menten plot showing enzyme velocity (V0) vs [S].

Description

Using the table provided, please supply each of the dot points below with correct titles, values and descriptions. – Use the initial velocities and your standard curve to determine the rate that pNP was produced at each substrate concentration (this can be considered enzyme velocity shown as [pNP]/time). That is, convert to [pNP]/time from Absorbance/time. – Produce a Michaelis-Menten plot showing enzyme velocity (V0) vs [S]. You may be able to estimate Km and Vmax from this. – Prepare a table of reciprocal V0 and [S] to be used for a Line-weaver Burk plot. Note that reciprocal V0 and [s] simply means 1/V0 and 1/[S]. – Produce a Line-weaver Burk plot (ensure you label each axis correctly). You will need to extend the trendline so that your graph shows where the trendline intercepts the x-axis and y-axis. – Use the Line-weaver Burk plot to determine Km and Vmax. You can use the equation of the line to first determine the -1/Km and 1/Vmax and then rearrange to find Km and Vmax.

Evaluate factors within the case study that may lead to inequalities in health, including health economics and resource allocation within care systems

Case Study 3

Sergio Richards was born to Carl and Monica Richards, their first child 4 weeks ago. The family live in a rented end terrace house with two bedrooms. Carl works as a supervisor in a local fast-food restaurant; often working long and unsocial hours and Monica is on maternity leave from her factory job however she is only eligible for 4 weeks full pay. Although the couple have friends in the area, they have limited other support; Monica’s family live in Eastern Europe and Carl has a temperamental relationship with his own family who live nearby. Carl had the statutory 2 weeks paternity leave when Sergio was born. Luckily for the couple, the COVID pandemic hasn’t impacted on Carl’s ability to work, however Monica has been by herself with Sergio for the last 2 weeks.

Sergio was born at full term, via normal delivery weighing 4.5kg and 38cm head circumference. His parents consented to routine screening for Sergio and results of the New-born blood spot (NBS) screening test, often referred to as the heel prick test, were positive for Cystic Fibrosis. There was no family history of Cystic Fibrosis and the family have little understanding of the condition or the effect that this condition would have on Sergio`s development.

Since birth Monica and Carl report that Sergio had struggled to gain weight; his current weight (aged 4 weeks) is 4.6kg. Monica originally intended to fully breast feed Sergio but due to his slow weight gain Sergio is now exclusively formula fed and the unexpected cost of the formula is putting added pressure on the couple’s finances. Monica feels guilty for not only being unable to breastfeed her baby but also for the unexpected financial implications.

In addition to his poor weight gain, Sergio appeared to be constantly full of mucus and making snuffle type sounds especially from his nasopharynx, a symptom which increases when having his feed. Monica has visited the GP with Sergio on three different occasions with a chesty cough, increased mucus production, breathing difficulties and poor feeding. Sergio also has bowel movements constantly, which both parents’ think may be abnormal.

The increased mucus is more prominent at bedtime after Sergio’s feed which results in him being difficult to settle, and usually ties in when Carl is returning from a 14-hour shift at the restaurant.

Following the positive NBS, Sergio was referred to a Paediatrician at the local District General Hospital who arranged for Sergio to have a Sweat Chloride Test. This test showed a sweat chloride concentration of > 60 mmol/L which supported the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis. Following on from this diagnosis, both Monica and Carl were referred for genetic testing.

Assessment questions

  1. Evaluate factors within the case study that may lead to inequalities in health, including health economics and resource allocation within care systems (LO3).
  2. Explain and evaluate the principles of two prevention strategies; one related to screening and one related to immunisation programmes which will support Sergio to maximise his health and well-being (LO4)
Identify how one relevant theory of health behaviour change may help the nurse to understand Tom’s current heath related lifestyle

Case study 2

Tom has been referred by his General Practitioner (GP) to a community mental health nurse. The referral states that Tom was anxious, experiencing poor sleep and drinking alcohol excessively. Tom had requested hypnotic medication however the GP was reluctant to prescribe this and referred Tom for assessment and possible intervention.

Tom is a 43-year-old man who is employed as a senior manager at a builder’s merchants. He is married to Nicole. They have twin daughters aged 12 years. Nicole’s mother, Diane, also lives with them in an annexe to their house. Diane helps with cooking, cleaning and childcare as both Tom and Nicole have busy and stressful work lives.

Tom started cycling to help him loose weight a few years ago and since he got the “cycling bug” he stopped smoking, rarely drank alcohol, changed his diet, and lost around 10 Kilogrammes of weight. Nicole found some of these changes difficult to adjust to and worries about him after Tom was involved in a road traffic collision with a motor vehicle whilst on a training ride. Tom suffered a broken clavicle, and abrasions to his skin.

Despite making a good physical recovery, Tom has not resumed cycling. He explains that the thought of getting back on a bike terrifies him and he fears history repeating itself. He reports that he often feels “on edge.”. He experiences some nightmares and flashbacks to his accident. He says it made him realise just how dangerous cycling is and that he was lucky to survive the collision. Tom no longer sees his friends from the cycling club. Initially they encouraged him to resume cycling but he “made excuses” and now they have stopped contacting him. Tom is considering selling his bicycles to finance a family visit to Disneyworld.

Tom has not done any form of exercise since the accident. He has resumed eating his mother-in law’s meals. Consequently, he has gained weight and now has a BMI of 28. Tom is also drinking every evening and resumed smoking. The nurse has estimated that Tom is consuming around 60 units a week. Tom says that the alcohol “settles my nerves” and helps him to get to sleep, “at least for a couple or three hours.”

Tom indicates that he is unconcerned about his drinking. However, he is uncomfortable with his weight gain and he misses “having the physique of an athlete.” He regrets starting to smoke again but believes that if he stopped smoking, he would gain even more weight.

Assessment questions:

  1. Identify how one relevant theory of health behaviour change may help the nurse to understand Tom’s current heath related lifestyle (LO5)

 

  1. Evaluate two interactive strategies that a nurse could use to promote Tom’s health. Please provide a rationale for your suggested strategies. (LO2)
Discuss the principles of infection control and prevention in relation to John’s indwelling catheter in the case study.

Assessment

Case Study 1:

John Reesbeck is a 62-year-old gentleman who has been admitted to hospital via his GP. He has a moderate learning disability and is accompanied by his support worker David. John lives at The Willows – a supported living environment where he is visited by his support workers several times a day. His girlfriend Michelle lives in the same setting and they often attend group activities at the centre.

John is normally independent in his hygiene and dressing needs, has a good appetite but has drunk less recently because it means he must go to the toilet more often. He is asthmatic and the condition is well controlled with inhalers. His support workers help John to stay in a routine with his personal care, housework, cooking, support with budget management and remind him to take his medication. John can be unsettled in unfamiliar environments.

Investigations and observations during John’s admission have identified that he has a Benign Prostate Enlargement (BPE). With support from the hospital’s learning disability nurse, the diagnosis was explained to John and he was catheterised to relieve his urinary retention and referred for elective prostate surgery.

John has been in hospital for 3 days and his observations have not raised any concerns. As each attempt to remove the catheter have resulted in John going into retention plans are being discussed for his discharge home with the catheter in situ until his surgery can be scheduled later this month.

Although infection prevention and control in relation to the catheter have been discussed with John and with David his support worker, during his stay in the ward John has been dependent on nursing staff to support him with caring for his catheter. He has also been reluctant to drink more despite staff providing drinks John has said he likes. John is anxious about going home with the catheter particularly emptying it and being able to go out. He is looking forward to seeing his girlfriend Michelle as he usually sees her everyday but is worried about how she will feel if they can’t have sex.

 

Assessment questions:

  1. Discuss the principles of infection control and prevention in relation to John’s indwelling catheter in the case study. (LO1)

 

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of three strategies which a nurse can use to support John. One strategy should support managing his catheter, one strategy to prevent and one to detect infection. (LO6)
Discuss the principles of infection prevention and control, pathogenesis, immunology, epidemiology and genomics
Module Code & Title: Promoting Health & Preventing Ill health
 
Description of Summative Assessment Task and Purpose: Evaluation of case study

 

Assessment brief – For the summative assessment of this module, you will be asked to look at 3 case studies and answer 2 questions related to each case study (total 6 questions). Students need to complete the questions for all 3 case studies. The case studies are included at the end of this document

The taught content and the self-directed study that you will complete during the module, should be used to inform your answers. The purpose of the assessment is for you to demonstrate an understanding of the module learning outcomes and and therefore, be able to apply theory and evidence of health promotion and prevention of ill health theory and evidence to practice situations.

Total word count; 3000 (500 words per question) +/- 10%

Assessment Format: The assessment should be completed as a word document including your answers to the 6 questions and your reference list.

All assignments must to be word processed and formatted in the following way:

§   Use only Arial font – size 12

§   Use 1.5 line spacing throughout

§   Leave a line space between paragraphs

§   Number all pages

Please write the assessment in an academic style, paying attention to spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Please reference the work using the University of Lincoln Harvard referencing system: https://guides.library.lincoln.ac.uk/ld.php?content_id=26426164

Knowledge & Skills Assessed:

Learning Outcomes: LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4, LO5, LO6

Knowledge, Skills & Behaviours: K 4, 9, 10, 11, 39 & 45 and S14, 15, 16, 17, 20 & 21

Learning Outcomes: must be met

 

1. Discuss the principles of infection prevention and control, pathogenesis, immunology, epidemiology and genomics (SoP2.2)

 

2. Discuss the range of communication skills and strategies required to proactively promote health for people, across all stages of life and with a range of health challenges (SoP1.11, 2.1)

 

3. Analyse factors that may lead to inequalities in health, including health economics

and resource allocation within care systems (SoP 2.3, 7.3)

 

4. Explain and evaluate the principles of prevention strategies, including the evidence

base for screening and immunisation programmes (SoP 2.5, 2.11)

 

5. Identify appropriate opportunities to discuss health-related lifestyle choices and

critically discuss contemporary approaches towards behaviour change (SoP 2.4, 2.8)

 

6. Evaluate the effectiveness of infection prevention and control mechanisms; including,

communicable disease surveillance and anti-microbial stewardship and resistance

(SoP2.12)

 

Knowledge, Skills & behaviours:

 Knowledge: 

 

K4: Understand research methods, ethics and governance in order to critically analyse, safely use, share and apply research findings to promote and inform best nursing practice

 

K9: Understand the aims and principles of health promotion, protection and improvement and the prevention of ill health when engaging with people

 

K10: Understand epidemiology, demography, genomics and the wider determinants of health, illness and wellbeing and apply this to an understanding of global patterns of health and wellbeing outcomes

 

K11: Understand the factors that may lead to inequalities in health outcomes

 

K39: Understand and accept the need to accept and manage uncertainty, and demonstrate an understanding of strategies that develop resilience in self and others

 

K45: Understand the principles of health economics and their relevance to resource allocation in health and social care organisations and other agencies

 

Skills 

NB. The following skills are also assessed throughout the Practice Assessment Documents in practice across the programme.

 

S14: Apply the principles of health promotion, protection and improvement and the prevention of ill health when engaging with people

 

S15: Use all appropriate opportunities, making reasonable adjustments when required, to discuss the impact of smoking, substance and alcohol use, sexual behaviours, diet and exercise on mental, physical and behavioural health and wellbeing, in the context of people’s individual circumstances

 

S16: Promote and improve mental, physical, behavioural and other health related outcomes by understanding and explaining the principles, practice and evidence-base for health screening programmes

 

S17: Use up to date approaches to behaviour change to enable people to use their strengths and expertise and make informed choices when managing their own health and making lifestyle adjustments

 

S20: Promote health and prevent ill health by understanding and explaining to people the principles of pathogenesis, immunology and the evidence-base for immunisation, vaccination and herd immunity

 

S21: Protect health through understanding and applying the principles of infection prevention and control, including communicable disease surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship and resistance

 

what method would you use to analyze the data and determine areas for improvement?

Assessment Goals:

Good description of the personal goals for completing the assessment.  What are the goals in relation to assessment of the organization? What do project the findings of the assessment to be and how will they impact patient care and/or outcomes?

Introduction

Are you assessing the Houston Methodist Hospital seems that you are assessing the hospital, You do provide some detail on assessment at the macro and micro system levels.

 

Staffing

Will you interview someone in HR or who is responsible for hiring/training staff?

Interprofessional Collaboration and Coordination

While pharmaceutical companies are stakeholders, is it realistic that you will be able to obtain feedback from them? While the government may be a stakeholder, how would you assess the collaboration and coordination? What about other health professionals such as PT, OT, ST, social workers, chaplains, respiratory therapists, dietician/nutritionists, pharmacists etc.?

Integrated Health Technologies

How will you assess technology at the macro and microsystem levels?  How will you know that tech advancements are used?

Quality & Safety

Are there CMS or JCAHO quality and safety measures that are applicable? Is there a quality and safety committee or the equivalent in the organization?

Policies and Procedures

Where in the organization can you find policies and procedures?  Would you look at the current policies and procedures and then talk to staff to assess compliance?

System Elements

What method would you use to assess the alignment of the data with the goals, mission, etc. of the organization?  Would you do a SWOT analysis or fishbone diagram for example?

Opportunities for Improvement of Patient Care Outcomes

what method would you use to analyze the data and determine areas for improvement?

Project Ideas

It is not clear what specific ideas you might have for a project based on assessment results.