Psy thoretical framwork treatment plan

ÿ
Prior to beginning this assignment, read the PSY650 Week Two Treatment Planÿ,ÿCase 16: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Gorenstein and Comer (2014), and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders in Hamblin and Gross (2012).
Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study by addressing the following issues:

Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case.
Consider Dr. Remoc?s utilization of two theoretical frameworks to guide her treatment plan.ÿ Assess the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Describe some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children DHD.
Identify tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy?s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. (There are articles in the recommended resources that may assist you in this portion of the assignment.)
Evaluate the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc and support your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library.
Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. Use information from the Hamblin and Gross ?Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders? chapter to help support your recommendations. Justify your selections with information from the case.

Rise of progressivism discussion | History homework help

Instructions:ÿ
Read the following Discussion question carefully, then submit an original answer.ÿ Your answer should be at least a few sentences to a paragraph in length.ÿ There is no “right” or “wrong” answer, but your opinion should be well-reasoned and based on fact.ÿ (no references needed) this is just an opinion…
The reform movement known as “Progressivism” sprang from many different sources and wasn’t always a uniform program or philosophy.ÿ How were some “Progressive” ideas contradictory to others?ÿ How could conflicting goals both be considered “Progressive?”

Psychological measurement | Psychology homework help

PSY 3094 Psychological Measurement – Scale Construction Project
The aim of this project is to develop a scale measuring a construct related to psychology and to report its psychometric properties. You will work in groups and prepare a report including the following componets given in the table below. The Assessment Rubric summarizes the details that should be included in each part of the report and how they will be graded. Please submit a copy of this rubric with your paper for grading.

Title Page
including the title of the project, the Group No/Name, the Name, Surname and Student No of the group members

Main Text
organized in subtitles of Introduction, Preparation of the Scale, Data Collection, Data Analysis, Evaluation of the Scale
References
in APA style

Appendices:
You should refer to the relevant appendices in text
Adapted from Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research: A Guide to Becoming an Action Research; Florida Department of Education https://tr.scribd.com/doc/132663674/action-research-assignment-and-rubric
SCALE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
Group No / Name: ____________________________________________________ Title of Project: _________________________________________________________
Section

REQUIREMENTS & POINTS

POINTS RECEIVED

Introduction
5 points
3 points
0 points
…
A detailed description/definition of the construct that you are measuring
An adequate description/definition of the construct that you are measuring, but some important details are missing.
No definition of the construct that you are measuring
5 points
3 points
0 points
…
A detailed ? clear description of the importance of measuring the construct
The importance of measuring the construct is stated, but why it is important is not clear.
The importance of measuring the construct and its reasons are not stated.
10 points
5 points
0 points
…
A detailed-clear description/definition of the variable that will be measured for criterion-related/construct validity and why it is selected/how it is related to the construct that you are measuring.
The variable that will be measured for the criterion-related/construct validity is described/defined, but why it is selected/how it is related to the construct that you are measuring is not clear.
No description/definition of the variable that will be measured for the criterion-related/construct validity and no statement about why it is selected
Preperation of the Scale
First version of the scale

– ÿDetailed description of how the first items are created (3 points)
– ÿpresentation of the items (in Appendix) (5 points)
– ÿinformation about the scaling method (2 points)

…
Analysis of Content validity

– ÿCharacteristics of experts (number, age, gender, their expertise level)(2 points)
– ÿHow experts rated the items (2 points)
– ÿThe results of experts? ratings (3 points)
– ÿContent validity coefficient (3 points)

…
Finalization of the Scale

– ÿthe solution for the items on which the experts do not agree (2 points)
– ÿthe final list of the items (in Appendix) (2 points)
– ÿhow the scoring of the scale should be done. ( 1point)

…

Data Collection
Sample

– ÿthe number of participants (1 points)
– ÿhow the participants are recruited ( 2 points)
– ÿdemographic characteristics of participants (required : Age (M, SD, Min, Max), gender distribution; optional:education level, SES, other characteristics that are important for the construct you are measuring etc.) (2 points)

…
Measures/Instruments– demographic information form & presentation in Appendix (3 points)
Information about how the variable that is included for the criterion-related/construct validity is measured. If via a questionnaire, then

– ÿwhen and by whom the questionnaire is developed (1 point)
– ÿthe number of items and the scale used for the rating (2 points)
– ÿhow the score is computed (1 point)
– ÿpsychometric properties of the original questionnaire and also in your data (2 points)
– ÿpresentation of the questionnaire in Appendix (1 point)

…
Procedure

– ÿconsent form (1 point)
– ÿpresentation of consent form in Appendix (1 point)
– ÿorder of the measures (1 point)
– ÿpaper-pencil vs. online (1 point)
– ÿduration (1 point)

…
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics of the scale that you are constructing and other scales used for validity analysis – M, SD, Min, Max (3 points)
Information about the analysis of inter-item consistency

– ÿhow it is calculated (2 points)
– ÿreport of the coefficient (3 points)
– ÿInterpretation of the score for inter-item consistency (high-low etc, whether it will change if some items aredeleted) (3 points)
– ÿReport of SEM (3 points)Information about the analysis of the criterion-related/construct validity
– ÿHow it is calculated (3 points)
– ÿReport of the validity coefficient (3 points)
– ÿInterpretation of the score (5 points)Optional: Information about the analysis of split-half reliability (5 additional points)

…
Evaluation of the Scale
Evaluation of the scale that you are developing in terms of its reliability and validity (5 points) Limitations of the study (sample, problem of restricted range, procedural problems etc.) (3 points) A general conclusion ( 2 points)
…
References
5 points
2 points
0 points
…
All citations appearing the text match the reference list. The reference list is consistent in APA style and error free.
References partially match text citations. Reference list is inconsistent with regard to APA style.
References missing or do not match citations. Reference list is not consistent PA style.

Psychology 800 words total | Psychology homework help

Character Analysis-Adult Development Theoryÿ
Prompt:
You will have the opportunity to provide theoretical insight on adult development, by applying the adult development theories and concepts to a character from a film or T.V. show.ÿ You will need to choose a character who is between the ages of 25-105, and generate an 800-word discussion board post applying three concepts and theories from our adult development section. ÿ
Requirements:
Please use less than 250 words as a description/background of the character and focus most of the writing on the analysis.ÿ Again this entire post needs to be a minimum of 800 words.ÿ
Book:
Berger, Kathleen Stassen. (2019).ÿInvitation to the Life-Span.ÿ(4th Ed.). New York, New York: Worth Publishers.

Phe6203 public health informatics suo1

Week 1 Project
Over the next four weeks, you will review and analyze a pre-intervention elementary school asthma database from a community that has four elementary schools. Each week, you will write a short paper describing the role of an informatician in regard to data capture and use within the Public Health Information Management Systems (PHIS) and Public Health Information Network (PHIN). You will explore the data elements, database technologies, analytics, and processes used by an informatician including data capture, scrubbing, coding, warehousing, managing, and reporting of public health information.
In Week 5, you will complete a comprehensive term paper and PowerPoint presentation that demonstrates a public health needs assessment using your primary asthma source data. Your paper and presentation should show why an asthma prevention intervention program is needed in the selected community and summarize how you came to your conclusions. The objective of this five-week project is for you to demonstrate the processes used in public health informatics through its application.
You will begin your course project by explaining how data is collected, scrubbed, coded, and stored within the PHIS. You will then explain how data is organized in databases, using the asthma data provided below. You will describe the data elements in the spreadsheet and the processes of an informatician by answering the questions below.
Click here to download the asthma data for 2013.
Note: Use this Excel spreadsheet throughout the course to complete your weekly data analyses and prepare your written assignments as they relate to public health informatics. Your weekly assignments will provide data to support your final term paper to be submitted in Week 5.
Based on the data in the spreadsheet, prepare a 3?4-page paper addressing the following questions:
Introduction: How is information collected, organized, scrubbed, coded, and entered into the PHIS?
Asthma Database Analyses:
Describe the structural organization of your database.
What is the survey population description?
Define pre-intervention
Define a database record. How many records are in your database?
Define a database field. How many fields are in your database?
Define a database field data definition (DD). What is an example in this database of a DD?
Based on the data collected, what is the purpose and potential use of this asthma survey data?
Summary: From the perspective of an informatician, discuss the asthma database?s key structural components, its organization, and potential uses.
Submission Details:

Give reasons and examples in support of your responses. Cite all sources using APA format
Submit a 3?4-page paper in a Microsoft Word document to theÿSubmissions Areaÿbyÿthe due date assigned.
Name your document SU_PHE6203_W1_A3_LastName_FirstInitial.doc

Phi 445 week 3 assignment

ÿÿ
Case Analysis: Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms
In the Week Three Discussion, you selected a current business problem from the following case categories:
ú Banking
ú Fuel and the Environment
ú GMOs
ú Factory Farming
ú Pharmaceuticals
ú Gender Discrimination
In this written assignment, you will present your work on the case analysis using selected components of an argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Z£¤iga y Postigo, 2015). This written assignment will include a revised and polished version of your discussion work, the presentation and support of two premises, and an analysis of how your chosen ethical theory offers the best moral solution to the business problem in your case analysis.
Using the components of the argumentative essay located in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Z£¤iga y Postigo (2015), your assignment should include the following:
An introduction. This is the ?Problem? portion of the essay that is covered in Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay (Hardy, Foster, & Z£¤iga y Postigo, 2015). This should be an improved version of the introduction in your initial post, revised on the basis of your professor?s feedback and additional research. In this introduction you will need to (a) identify the specific issue or problem that you want to address and give an impartial presentation of the controversy, (b) articulate briefly the characteristics of the economic system that serves as the setting for the business, and (c) examine the laws that affect the operations of the business. The introduction should be one paragraph of around 200 words in length.
A thesis. Start a new paragraph precise and clear sentence in which you state your moral position with regard to the case that you presented in your first paragraph. This is known as stating your thesis. (See the ?Thesis? passage in ?The Argumentative Essay? in Hardy, Foster, & Z£¤iga y Postigo, 2015). The thesis you state here should be an improved version of the thesis in your initial post in the discussion, revised on the basis of your professor?s feedback and your reading of ?The Argumentative Essay? indicated above.
A thesis is only one sentence, so do not write a series of sentences, or a complex sentence with explanatory clauses (e.g., ?because?? or ?since?? or ?according to Dr. Mary Expert, an economist with the Bureau of Labor statistics??, or ?a law that was ratified with 80% votes in favor??). An example of a precise and clear thesis is this: ?Factory farms are not morally justifiable? or, of course, the opposite point of view: ?Factory farms are morally justifiable.? Keep in mind that your thesis in this assignment will be the basis for the argumentative essay of the Week Five written assignment, so take your time when formulating this thesis.
Ethical theory. In the same second paragraph as the thesis statement, identify the ethical theory that supports your moral position. You may choose from utilitarianism, duty ethics, or virtue ethics. Present the characteristics of the ethical theory in a broad sketch, and include citations and references in APA form. Then, apply your chosen ethical theory by explaining how it lends itself to the moral position that you are defending.
Two premises. Present at least two reasons in support of your thesis and these should be presented in the form of a claim. These are called premises. Articulate each premise in one clear and grammatically correct sentence. Review Section 9.1 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, and Z£¤iga y Postigo, 2015). Start a new paragraph for each.
In the rest of the paragraph, support your premise by presenting an analysis of how the ethical theory lends itself to the best solution. This analysis includes articulating the characteristics(s) of the economic system at work that support the claims in your premises. It also includes examining the effects of the law(s) at work that also support the claims in your premises.
Comparative analysis. In the final paragraph, analyze how this application lends itself to a solution that is superior to that offered by one of the ethical theories that you did not select. To do this, provide a clear statement describing the moral solution offered by this other theory. For example, if you chose utilitarianism to apply to your case, then you can choose from either virtue ethics or deontology for your comparative analysis. Explain in no more than three sentences what moral solution would result from the application of this other ethical theory. See the ?Sample Case Analysis? for an illustration of how this would look like. Finally, analyze the strengths of the moral solution presented by your chosen ethical theory in ways that demonstrate how it is superior to the moral solution offered by the other ethical theory.
Once you receive your assignment back from your professor, start working on revisions based on your professor?s feedback. This is the first step in preparing your Final Project and the details are presented on the Final Project?s prompt. You will benefit from starting your Final Project as soon as you receive your assignment back from your professor.
Requirements for Your Assignment:
ú Your assignment should be 1000 words in length, excluding the title page and reference page(s).
ú Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
ú Your assignment should include citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form.
ú You should draw from the sources provided in your chosen case category in the discussion this week.
ú Also refer to Section 9.1: The Argumentative Essay and the introduction to Section 9.2: Strengthening the Argumentative Essay (intro only for the latter) from Hardy, J., Foster, C., & Z£¤iga y Postigo, G. (2015).
ú Your references should include at least two scholarly sources from your own research in the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar (this is not the same as Google), or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. No Wikipedia articles and the like should be included in the references, nor employed to inform your paper. Also keep in mind that dictionary definitions are not references in the academic sense.Your assignment should be submitted no later than the end of Monday (11:59 pm, U.S. Mountain time).
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Physiology sa help needed | Physiology

ÿ
This discussion topic is regarding acid-base homeostasis and has two parts.ÿ
Part 1: The link below is for Oregon State University’s open source textbook for their Anatomy & Physiology course. Please read this section (26.4: Acid-Base Balance). This is a supplement to the discussions in Chapters 13 & 14.ÿ
The key here is that you have two systems now working together to address situations where acid/base homeostasis is disturbed.ÿÿ
https://open.oregonstate.education/aandp/chapter/26-4-acid-base-balance/#:~:text=Buffer%20Systems%20in%20the%20Body&text=The%20respiratory%20tract%20can%20adjust,days%20to%20have%20an%20effect.ÿ(Links to an external site.)
Part 2: Clinical Case Study – Diabetic ketoacidosisÿ
Read the case summary below and then answer the questions that follow.
Case: During your shift in the ER, a 21-year old noncompliant male history of type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus was found in a coma.
Labs revealed the following: his blood glucose was high, as well as his urine glucose, urine ketones, and serum ketones. His serum bicarbonate was <12 mEq/L. His respiration was exaggerated and his breath had an acetone odor. His blood pressure was 90/60 and his pulse weak and rapid (120).
Based on your understanding of both the respiratory and renal regulation of blood pH, answer the following:
1. Is this patient experiencing respiratory or metabolic acidosis? Why?
2. How does the following formula represent the respiratory & renal systems’ regulation of acid-base balance:
CO2ÿ+ H2O ↔ H2CO3ÿ↔ H+ÿ+ HCO3?

Portfolio – yahoo security breaches (multiple)

Please create a portfolio – 1000 words minimum about the Yahoo Security Breaches happened in the last decadeÿ
Website –> https://www.cshub.com/attacks/articles/incident-of-the-week-multiple-yahoo-data-breaches-across-4-years-result-in-a-1175-million-settlementÿ
Please use the attached white papers and technical documents as references to write about how a breach like that can be prevented for your organization? ÿ
Review of a security incident or threat, describing it in-depth and proposing controls for future use.ÿ
What measures you can take?ÿ
How you can approach an incident like that in the first place?ÿ
Criteria:
Minimum 2 referencesÿ
References can only be technical documents and white papersÿor journals
APA Citation Formatÿ
I have attached some white papers for your reference.
Feel free to use more but make sure its only technical documents, white paper or journals.ÿ
Due this Friday 04/10/2020ÿ

Poverty and public policy | Government homework help

Search the latest issues of a policy studies journal in the discipline (e.g. Policy Studies Journal, Poverty and Public Policy, Critical Policy Studies, Policy Studies) and find an article on the topic of education policy. ÿCritically analyze the article by (a) identifying the public problem the article attempts to address, (b) summarizing the article?s main policy proposal(s) as solutions to that problem, and (c) evaluating how a Christian could prudentially contribute to the debate in the article from a biblical worldview.
Remember to support your answers t least 2 referencesÿ

Power points | Nursing homework help

ÿ
Develop a 9- to 10-slide PowerPoint Presentation that addresses the following:

Describe the differences between a board of nursing and a professional nurse association.
Describe the geographic distribution, academic credentials, practice positions, and licensure status of members of the board for your specific region/area.

Who is on the board?
How does one become a member of the board?

Describe at least one federal regulation for healthcare.

How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare (e.g., CMS, OSHA, and EPA)?
Has there been any change to the regulation within the past 5 years? Explain.

Describe at least one state regulation related to general nurse scope of practice.

How does this regulation influence the nurse?s role?
How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?

Describe at least one state regulation related to Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs).

How does this regulation influence the nurse?s role?
How does this regulation influence delivery, cost, and access to healthcare?