What does it seek to communicate? What makes it interesting both thematically and formally?

1. Basic Facts and Visual analysis (25 points): Tell the reader what object is to be the focus of your paper, provide basic factual information about it. Then translate what you see into an analytical narrative description that takes into account both form and content. What does it seek to communicate? What makes it interesting both thematically and formally? What is represented? What overall impression or effect does the image or object make or have on the viewer? How did the maker use form, materials, and techniques to achieve this 2. Research proposal (25 points): Outline the reason why you have selected the object, what it is you want to find out about it (the questions it raises). This should have to do both with the form and content of the image, as well as emerge from your preliminary research. Does the image raise critical questions about gender, race, class, or politics? Was it the product of an unusual, interesting or important technique or process? Was it controversial in some way? In any case, you must say something more substantial than “I like this object” or “I think it is cool”! It is expected that your research will explore not only the formal structure of the image you choose, but also the circumstances of its production and its social meanings and functions.

In adult patients in an inpatient psychiatric unit with mild depression, would the implementation of a multifactorial fall prevention protocol be more effective compared to patient-centered interventions in reducing fall incidences two months after implementation?

Explain the original intentions behind the monument selected and how later interpretations changed the meaning and cultural understandings.

address in your analysis how these are further exacerbated by the effects of COVID-19, the trauma of racism, ableism, etc. that happens daily, and the related violence witnessed and experienced.

Reflect on strategies that you can pursue in developing portfolios or portfolio elements that focus on academic achievements.

DESCRIBE THE ORIGIN OF IMMIGRATION OF PILGRIMS AND THEIR SEARCH FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM

Discuss how global social and economic pressures affect medical practices.

ASSIGNMENT DETAILS There are two Assignments in this unit. Be sure to complete both as they are graded separately Unit Outcomes addressed in this Assignment: Evaluate the impact of using a holistic or mind/body spirit approach to health, healing, and wellnes Recognize the role of traditional medicine on the shifting paradigm of health, healing, and wellnes Identify the components and benefits of a corporate wellness program. Course Outcome assessed/addressed in this Assignment: HW315-3: Discuss how global social and economic pressures affect medical practices. Assignment 1: Email on corporate wellness Instructions Create an email (1–2 pages) to your supervisor requesting the implementation of a wellness program Your email should include: At least three programs to be included Where the programs should be held Who would facilitate the programs Be sure to justify your requests and include your references. Describe why the program is needed, why those 3 programs to start, and why your choice of facilitator Assignment 2: Research on CAM in your Community What CAM programs are in place within your community? List at least 5 therapies. List your answers and indicate how you obtained the information. If you used a website, what is th what is their name and agency? Submitting your work: HW315 Models for Health and Wellness https://purdueglobal.brightspace.com/d2l/le/content/207962/viewContent/13647981/View 2/2 Reflect in ePortfolio Download Print Submit each Assignment to the appropriate Dropboxes for Unit 4.

explain how you will evaluate whether the intervention is successful.

Intervention Proposal

To propose your intervention. I would much rather see you propose one good intervention and explain it well than a complex set of interventions. Choose one strategy and focus on making it concrete.

Don’t forget to explain how you will evaluate whether the intervention is successful.

Based on what you’ve read, start thinking through the intervention you will propose to the organization. An intervention is a specific program or policy change; simply educating upper management about the problem is not an intervention. Your intervention should be: (a) specific and concrete, (b) feasible, (c) supported by the research literature (that is, you should be able to cite research that backs up your assertion that this is a good idea), and (d) directly addressing the problematic outcome(s) that you identified back in your Topic Proposal Part I (or an updated outcome, if you’ve made changes since Part I).

This assignment should be between one and two pages, double-spaced.

1. Remind/update me about your problem. Give a 1-2 sentence summary of the problem you’ll be focusing on and the outcome(s) you want to change. If you’ve made any changes, give me the updated version here. (1-2 sentences).

2. Describe your intervention and support. Describe the intervention you are planning and the research/course material that supports it. You can describe in general terms for now; the purpose of this assignment is for me to see if you are heading in the right direction and give feedback before the first full draft. You should focus on one key strategy rather than a complex plan with many aspects. Make sure to cite the research and/or course material you are using to support this as an appropriate intervention and explain why you think it is a good strategy for this particular organization. (1-2 paragraphs)

3. Describe how you will evaluate your intervention. How will you test whether your intervention worked? Draw on relevant principles from class – for example, by this point you know how to validate a selection measure, evaluate a training program, etc. (1 paragraph).

Intervention Proposal Grading Rubric:

Proposing an Appropriate Intervention 4 points
You propose an intervention that is appropriate for your problem and clearly grounded in industrial psychology principles or research. You use appropriate course terms and concepts, clearly explain why this intervention should help address the problem.

Proposing a Specific Intervention 4 points
You explain one focused intervention in enough detail that I can picture what you want to do, even if not all details are fully developed.

Supporting Your Answer   3 points
You use specific citations to primary sources as well as your textbook to support your argument that this intervention is a good solution to this problem. Your citations are generally in correct APA format.

Planning Your Evaluation   2 points
You have a specific, realistic plan for how to evaluate your intervention. Your evaluation plan clearly incorporates industrial psychology concepts and ideas.

Writing Clearly   2 points
You write clearly, use an appropriate professional tone, and organize your thoughts. You proofread your paper so that there are few if any spelling or grammatical errors.

Propose a specific community event to be jointly undertaken by a campus group and a larger group with similar goals and interests.

Major Project #3

A Project Proposal for Collaboration between a Campus Group and a Larger Community Group

Goal

Propose a specific community event to be jointly undertaken by a campus group and a larger group with similar goals and interests. This will be scheduled next year, something to look forward to once we get the COVID all-clear.

Format

APA document format. 5-6 pages, not counting the title page, abstract or references page(s). The standard APA headings (Method, Discussion etc.) won’t really work this time but you have the option of heading sections in some other manner.

Audience

You can assume that you are trying to convince educated, highly motivated adults with years of expertise to consider your plan for community action. You will need to research and chose an actual organization to which your proposal will be directly addressed.

current goals, interests, activities, needs and resources.

Invention / Critical Thinking / Creativity

Once you’ve become familiar with your chosen campus group, you’ll need to imagine a plan for action that will benefit both the student group and the bigger group to whom you’ll direct your plan. You might create an event that raises funds or awareness. You might propose that both groups pool their funds to bring in a speaker. The proposal is up to you, but strive to come up with a project that will clearly benefit both groups and the greater community.

Initial Research 

You’ll need to become very familiar with a specific campus organization. Interview at least one of its officers or long-standing members. Read the group’s mission statement, website and social media posts. Understand the group’s

Additional Research

Learn about your target group, the one that is not a student organization.

Once you have decided on the substance of your proposal, you’ll need to research its feasibility. Anticipate possible costs, time investments and positive outcomes. Research how similar projects have benefitted similar organizations.

Your Introduction will need to clearly summarize the proposed project and give enough context to convince the audience that the project is desirable / necessary. You’ll need to establish that you and the OU group that you represent are credible.

The body of your paper will need to break down the details of your project. Who / what / when / where and how will need to be addressed. Discuss the plan’s logistics and feasibility with logical supposition and appropriate sources. You might refer to similar projects here.

As you conclude the proposal, make your case. Make desired outcomes clear. Convince your reader that you have covered all contingencies and that the proposal’s benefits will be worth the invested resources.

As I evaluate your work, I’ll have the following concerns:

• Is the proposal clear and feasible?
• Is the document clear and on task, organizing information well without unwarranted repetition or tangents?
• Is the information accurate?
• Are all sources framed within the text and properly documented on a references page?
• Is the writing style appropriately professional while retaining the sort of directness, clarity, specificity and sensitivity we would expect from a human being deciding whether or not to commit to your proposed project.?

• Do surface mechanics lead to clarity rather than confusion?

Evaluate the effectiveness of applications if they were directly related to a financial institution, government entity, or an ecommerce website in terms of cybersecurity in preventing crime and abuse.