discuss whether the author achieves her goal (proving her argument) and explore what points the author makes to prove her case
Topic: Bronfman, Alejandra. Measures of Equality: Social Science, Citizenship, and Race in Cuba, 1902-1940

Paper details:

Write a 4-5 page review of a monograph. The book must be approved by the instructor. The review should: 1) discuss the general content and scope of the book and explain the author’s purpose; 2) identify the central argument; 3) discuss whether the author achieves her goal (proving her argument) and explore what points the author makes to prove her case; 4) identify the types of sources; 5) consider whether the evidence supports the thesis; and 6) identify strengths and weaknesses in the book. i have also provided a rubric for the writer to follow along with All quotes and sources shouhkzld come from the book

How would AI helps organization to comply with organization cybersecurity standards, governance, rules, regulations and laws?
Topic: Role of artificial intelligence in mitigating cyber risk in transport sector

Paper details:

1. focus on the impact of artificial intelligence and where to organization are going in term of artificial intelligence adoption in cyber risk mitigation and how that is considered as game changer. 2. AI effectiveness in cyber risk mitigation. 3. How AI is going to improve organization cyber security and cyber risk detection, mitigation and prevention. 4. how AI can contribute as predictive cyber risk intelligence? 5 How AI help to detect cyber risk from different aspects such as cyber malware attack, personnel behaviors, system performance….. 6. How would AI helps organization to comply with organization cybersecurity standards, governance, rules, regulations and laws? 7. how would AI help to encourages cyber hygiene that help organization and employees to better utilization of AI for cyber risk mitigation, detection and support organization culture… 8. what are strategihkzes that help to mitigate cyber risk.

Watch Video: “Malcolm X: Make It Plain—Full PBS Documentary.” Write a 1-page Reflection Paper.

Paper details:

Format: MLA and use in-text page references Use The 5Ws: Who, What, Where, When, and Why. Some Writers Add a Sixth Question, How, to the List Due date: Friday, April 15th. 1. Watch Video: “Library of Congress – “The Omar Ibn Said Collection.” And then write a 2-page Reflection Paper on his life story. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvimyD_L35A 2. Read Haddad and Smith, Mission to America, Chaps. 4 & 5. Write a 1-page summary of each chapters—2pages total. *pdf’s attached* 3. Read Haddad and Smith, Muslim Communities…, Chap.2. Write a 1-page summary of chapter. *pdf attached* 4. Read Haddad and Smith, Muslim Communities…, Chap. 5. Write a 1-page summary of chapter. 5. Haddad and Smith, Mission to America, Cahap.3. Write a 1- page summary *pdf attached* 6. Haddad and Smith, Muslim Communities, Chap. 3. Write a 1- page summary. *pdf attached* 7. Watch Video: “Malcolm X: Make It Plain—Full PBS Documentary.” Write a 1-page Reflection Paper. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csWByunwVI8 Only use sources provided

Explain the effect of different sanctions (be specific) to the Russian economy.

Economic implications of sanctions

1) Explain the effect of different sanctions (be specific) to the Russian economy. (400 words)

  • Effect of blocking the central bank reserves (use data on reserves composition to develop your argument)
  • Effect of cutting some banks from the swift system

 

Focus on the macroeconomic effect: inflation, output, exchange rate, trade). Use relevant diagrams where required.

 

2) Explain to what extent these measures are effective (distinguish between a and b). (400 words)

3) Explain what the central bank of Russia can do in response to a devaluation of the rouble and the economic effect of the counter-measures. (400 words)

4) Assess the effect of sanctions on the EU economy in particular and the world economy in general. Try to give a qualitative answer focusing on inflation and output. (400 words)

5) Assume that the rest of the world decides to impose sanctions on the US by blocking the reserves of the Fedearl Reserve. To what extent that would be successful? (400 words)

[in all answers, distinguish between the immediate effect and the effect that they will have in the next few years if there is no peace agreement]

Debt sustainability

Consider two countries: Japan and Italy.

  • Collect data on growth, inflation, interest rate at the relevant maturity. Evaluate public debt sustainability using the basic equation. (400 words)
  • Discuss factors that may improve or worsen the debt sustainability evaluation. Consider possible evolution of interest rates including risk premia, debt maturity, inflation and growth. Consider also the role of the central bank in the two countries (350 words)
Identify one other organization that collects your user data and discuss what they do with the information. Do you agree with how they handle the data?

Paper details:

Instructions Facebook has had thousands of users complain about the lack of privacy and thousands of users have deleted their accounts on Facebook because of this issue. Facebook collects a massive amount of data from its user population and uses the data to sell advertising. Would this collection of data benefit you or Facebook? How or how not? Identify one other organization that collects your user data and discuss what they do with the information. Do you agree with how they handle the data? Why or why not? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No references or citations are necessary.

Do you believe these collaboration tools are satisfactory? Why, or why not?

Paper details:

Instructions Think of a company that you currently or previously worked for or one that you are familiar with, and describe the tools used for collaboration and teamwork. Do you believe these collaboration tools are satisfactory? Why, or why not? What are some other tools that you would have wanted the company to utilize? Your journal entry must be at least 200 words in length. No referenchkzes or citations are necessary

Discuss how you would disseminate the findings from your study and how implementation might occur.

1. Assessment Question Choice

For this assignment you will need to develop one simple research question (RQ) based around an issue/topic from your area of practice.

  • Keep it simple and something that is manageable
  • Look at the literature on this topic/issue – what do we currently know on this topic/issue – what don’t we yet know on this issue – this is the ‘gap’ in the literature
  • You will develop your research question – from this ‘gap’ in the literature – we do not want to do a study that has already been done – we want you to develop a research question that is going to develop new knowledge on this topic/issue
  • Remember we are not actually doing this study – this is a proposal for a study – telling us how you would go about answering the research question you developed.

 

1.1. Overview of the Assignment

The assignment should  be based on the approach and methods you would use to answer the research question you developed  and encompass the following sections:

  1. Contents page (not in word count)
  2. Introduction (200 words approx. *)
  3. The main body of the assignment which will include:
  • 500 words (approx.) on searching for evidence
  • 2100 words (approx.) research pilot design
  • 500 words (approx.) on dissemination and implementation
  1. Conclusions (200 words approx.)
  2. Reference list – all references should be cited using APA7th referencing style which is attached as SHSC Referencing Guidelines 2020.pdf (not in word count)
  3. Appendices -if used (not in word count).

*Wordcount given for each section are approximations and should not be taken literally. Your total word count should be 3500 words (plus or minus 10%). While there is no formal penalty for being under or over the wordcount, if you are under the wordcount it is unlikely that you will have addressed the assignment requirements fully. If you are over the word count significantly you will have failed to demonstrate that you can write concisely. In both cases, you will lose marks.

 

1.2. Summative Assignment

Your final assessment will comprise of One 3,500 Word Essay which will make up 100% of your overall grade.

Frame your assignment around three main areas:

  • PART 1: Discussing how you would search for evidence and evaluating this selected evidence
  • PART 2: Design a small pilot study, following the stages of the research process
  • PART 3: Discuss how you would disseminate the findings from your study and how implementation might occur.

Part 1 in more detail requires you to:

  • Describe how you will locate relevant evidence for the chosen scenario (including keywords & database)
  • Provide a clear systematic search strategy
  • Retrieve relevant literature (minimum 6 articles)
  • Evaluate the evidence based on hierarchy of evidence

Part 2 in more detail requires you to:

Develop a research proposal based around the following areas:

  1. Developing a research question
  2. Determine research approach – you need to choose from one of the following:

Quantitative – experimental

Quantitative – observational

Qualitative

  1. Determine Setting
  2. Sampling method
  3. Inclusion/exclusion criteria
  4. Recruitment
  5. Ethics
  6. Data Collection
  7. Data Analysis (you will not actually analyse data – but you need to discuss how you might analyze the data if it was collected.)

*You must use literature to demonstrate you understand the research process and to justify the decisions you are making when planning your research.

Part 3 in more detail requires you to:

  • Consider how you would share your work (Dissemination Plan) and implement changes in practice
  • Write about what will help or hinder dissemination and implementation using evidence to support your writing.

 

1.3. Marking Criteria

The criteria that will be used to assess your written assignment is attached as Assessment criteria APR 20.docx.

– please make sure you look at this when structuring and writing your assignment.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU LOOK AT THIS!

This provides you with the information about what we are looking for when you write your assignment. The module team uses this to grade your work.

 

1.4. Correct Referencing and Presentation

Referencing & Presentation in adherence with University Guidelines (Worth 10% of the final mark)

  • Throughout your assignment references must be cited using the accepted format which is attached as SHSC Referencing Guidelines 2020.pdf.
  • Your assignment should read coherently, be proof-read and be grammatically accurate.
  1. Assignment must be presented in accordance with University Guidelines

Your assignment should be presented  in Arial, Size 12 font and double-line spaced.  It should have the accepted front cover correctly completed, a signed plagiarism declaration sheet, contents page and each page should be numbered.

  1. References to appropriate literature to support assignment

The references used should demonstrate that you have undertaken wider reading to support your learning.  They should come from a variety of sources such as journal articles, text books and reliable internet sources.

  1. The Assignment should be logical in sequencing and presented as an academic piece of work

The assignment should be presented as an academic piece of work (i.e. have a brief introduction, main body -including the EBP and critique sections- and a brief conclusion).  Each section should have a logical flow to it. You should use third person wherever possible.

  1. Accurate Grammar & Spelling

Remember to use spell check before you submit and consider getting someone to ‘proof-read’ it for you!

  1. Accurate referencing

All sources must be correctly cited in alphabetical order in your reference list using the APA7th system.  N.B. The reference list is not counted in the word count but citations within the essay are.

What do you think was the purpose of this article by Jane Addams? How is she critiquing society?
Discussion Board Sociology

Paper details:

Post at least a 250 word reflection , you will need to have responded to at least two classmates with responses that are at least 150 words each. For your fourth discussion board topic, you will need to read “If Men Were Seeking the Franchise” by Jane Addams, which can be found in the Required Learning Materials for Module 5 or by clicking the link above. Click on reply at the bottom. This will open a dialogue box. Respond to the following: What do you think was the purpose of this article by Jane Addams? How is she critiquing society? For this discussion, you may want to focus on the following key concepts in the course: Gender, Minority Status, Sexism, Prejudice, Discrimination Refer to the discussion board rubric for more information on how to compohkzse your original and response post.

Define and explain the differences between Courts and Tribunals.
Topic: International Tribunal and Courts

Paper details:

THIS IS A RE-WRITE; I have attached the initial assignment as reference: Please note feedback from initial paper: “There are grammar mistakes, wrong word choices (see e.g., “reward” vis a vis “award” p. 6, “using” vis a vis “suing” p.11), as well as multiple sentences which are not clear or unfinished (see p. 6, second paragraph). The writing affects the clarity of ideas in many paragraphs. From the substantive point of view, your COMP mixes references to domestic courts/tribunals and international courts/tribunals, without clarifying why you are talking about domestic bodies like the Supreme Court or Income Tax tribunal (page 3,4,5 and 7). Your essay does not show an organized structure and it is very difficult to read and grasp your main arguments/ideas. Moreover, there are many sentences that make no sense. In page 7 you provide a definition of international tribunal and you define a tribunal “as an international treaty” (how can a tribunal be a treaty?). In page 10 you state that “The tribunal typically starts investment treaties.” (treaties are made by states not by tribunals). Similarly, in page 10 you state that “investment treaties formed under the investment tribunals” (incorrect). In page 10 you state that “investment tribunals like the Bilateral Investment Treaties” (how can a tribunal be a treaty??). You confuse the notion of a treaty (made by states) and the tribunal, who enforces the treaty. This is the very basic foundation of international law. In page 12 you talk about the “least possible standard of treatment” (such standard does not exist in international trade or international investment). Overall, your essay does not reflect a coherent analysis.” _______________ Please use different “examples of Investment Decisions” During the last decades the international community has experienced the emergence of new International Courts and Tribunals. Answer the following questions: 1) Define and explain the differences between Courts and Tribunals. 2) Expand on to the notion of international tribunals in general, and Investment Tribunals in particular. 3) Provide some examples of investment decisions you are welcome to rely on NAFTA Awards Thkzhe file will be available after confirmation

what is the best counterargument for CCS that substantial performance did not occur?

Read the case below and answer the questions that follow.
Cold Case Storage (CCS) provides refrigerated storage facilities for food purveyors. CCS
contracts with Igloo Builders Inc. (Igloo) to build five refrigerated warehouses. The contract
called for type “A1A” brand insulation so that the warehouse would stay between 35 and 40
degrees with minimal energy. Igloo built the first four warehouses using the A1A insulation,
but then ran short of supply. Igloo’s construction manager did not want to miss the completion
deadline because her bonus depended on timely completion. Therefore, she ordered her
workers to substitute B1B insulation for the A1A insulation in the last warehouse. Upon
inspection, CCS refused to pay for the final warehouse, citing expert evidence that, because
the B1B insulation was not as efficient, the extra costs would total $1,000 (more during peak
hot months) per month in cooling costs.
If Igloo argues that it substantially performed by using the B1B pipe, what is the best
counterargument for CCS that substantial performance did not occur?