The fair and equitable standard gives modern expression to a general principle of due process in its application to the treatment of investors and [the standard] encapsulates the minimum requirements of the rule of law.” Critically discuss by making reference to relevant case law.

Topic:

The fair and equitable standard gives modern expression to a general principle of due process in its application to the treatment of investors and [the standard] encapsulates the minimum requirements of the rule of law.” Critically discuss by making reference to relevant case law.

Description The module International Investment Law and Arbitration paper format : Text (including quotations) must be in Times New Roman 12 point font. •Line spacing must be one-and–a–half lines; except that indented quotations may have single line spacing. •Margins of at least 2 cm must be used at the top and bottom of the page, and 2.5 cm on the right and left sides of the page. •Footnotes or endnotes must be included within the specified page allowance; each note must be no smaller than 10 point font and must start on a new line. Bibliography should demonstrate, preferably in organized and useful subcategories, at least 12 sources Some resources International investment law and arbitration: commentary, awards, and other materials Book by C. L. Lim; Jean Ho; Mārtiņš Paparinskis- 2018

Describe data-collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.

To prepare for this assessment, ensure that you have finalized your abstracted outline. Make sure to complete the media, which will deepen your understanding. Complete a draft of your literature review and additional empirical research sources if you found more. Remember, you’ll need at least 20 empirical sources in the final version of the literature review.

Introduction

The purpose of the literature review is to provide the context within which the project will be developed and framed. The process of finding, reviewing, synthesizing, analyzing, and writing the literature review provides greater definition to the theoretical framework and gives you a strong foundation from which to work when developing support for the research concept.

You will continue developing your literature review, integrating and synthesizing the information gleaned as you developed your research topic, your LSQ, your annotated bibliography, and your abstracted outline.

In this assessment, you will focus on developing brief, carefully constructed paragraphs supported by the literature and research. You will research and present key findings of your literature review that you may not have addressed or that may need further development. Plan to build upon what you have already presented.

Overview

In addition to the other helpful links provided in Resources, we recommend you use an organizing tool from the Capella University Library Services and Tools page, such as the Scholarly Research Log, to help you track the theories, methods, and findings of the articles you have read.

Instructions

For this assessment, submit the current draft of your literature review for instructor feedback and grading. Using your literature search question (LSQ), the annotated bibliography, and the abstracted outline to support your review, identify themes that emerge from your analysis of what we know so far about your topic. Use these themes to describe how your research builds on prior knowledge.

For instance, if your LSQ is What does the literature in psychology tell us about the utility of treating mild depression in adults with a combination of synchronous and asynchronous labyrinth walking and cognitive behavioral therapy? you might discuss literature that covers the themes of exercise and depression, cognitive behavioral therapy and depression, walking meditation and depression, mindfulness and depression, and so on. Do not organize the paper by referencing each article sequentially; your task is to synthesize concepts pertinent to the LSQ from the articles selected for this review.

• Identify literature that:

• • Describes the chosen area of research and provides rationale for the choice.
  • Describes the significance of the chosen topic:

• • • Explain and justify the implications of the new knowledge for stakeholders, including community members and those who serve the population.
• Summarize sources applicable to the history of the chosen topic:

• • Discuss historical context and dominant themes in the evolution of the topic; connect common themes and present counteropinions.
  • Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, and Clark Moustakas.
• Summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of the chosen topic:

• • Provide information about theoretical underpinnings such as empirical/behavioral or constructivist and humanistic orientations of the literature reviewed.
  • Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, Clark Moustakas, Martha Bernal, and George I. Sanchez.
• Summarize sources applicable to best practices for engaging in research:

• • Describe data-collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.
• Summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology:

• • Indicate how the chosen sources help investigators identify topics that are well understood and other topics that represent gaps in the knowledge base and the need for further study.
  • Create a scenario that illustrates the need for new research.
• Articulate guidelines of the profession applicable to ethical conduct in research practice:

• • Demonstrate ethical conduct associated with the protection of research subject vulnerabilities such as the need for data privacy.
• Identify practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity:

• • Address individual variation and diversity within and across groups. For example, when writing about marriage and family therapy, acknowledge research choices that exclude or include subgroups such as gay and lesbian families or families of particular racial, ethnic, or cultural compositions.
• Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines, including concise and well-organized writing:

• • Organize paper to enhance the message and supporting points; writing should reflect the quality and expertise expected for academic work.
  • Organize and summarize sources thematically.

Your task is to present current considerations important to investigators and to indicate ramifications for stakeholders who rely on the current knowledge base. Use illustrative examples to explain and highlight key concepts. Good reviewers share evidence-based assessments of the current state of knowledge with their audiences.

This assessment is one component of the research concept paper. You are expected to refine this literature review before submitting the final project. Use the research concept paper template to complete the literature review. There are additional details in the template to help guide the completion of this assessment.

Additional Requirements

• Formatting: Use the Research Concept Paper Template [DOCX] to complete your assessment. It has been created to reflect the proper structure. To avoid missing content and losing points, please do not modify the template.
• Font: New Times Roman, 12 points, double-spaced, or any other font that complies with current APA guidelines.
• APA: Use APA format and style throughout, including citations.
• Length: The literature review draft assessment should be 5–6 pages, not including references.

conduct a literature review on a specific disorder or problem in living covered in the assigned readings.

Assignment Details

Assignment Description

You will conduct a literature review on a specific disorder or problem in living covered in the assigned readings. From this research, you will write an APA-style literature review and present your findings.

The paper should contain the following elements:

• Clear and explicit description of disorder or problem and its prevalence
• Special treatment planning issues related to the disorder
• Prognosis and empirically-supported treatment strategies, if any
• Summary of your findings

Cite your sources using APA style, and include references at the end.

Critically evaluate your teaching practice and identify measures to enhance this, supporting your answer with evidence from educational literature

Topic:

(a) Discuss your personal epistemology (epistemic cognition) and how this has influenced your teaching practice (30%); (b) Critically evaluate your teaching practice and identify measures to enhance this, supporting your answer with evidence from educational literature (70%).

1- Critically reflect on and evaluate your teaching practice and identify measures to enhance this expect to you to use about 30% of the words to answer part A about 70% of the words to answer part B roughly that’s what that means and, in part, A you have to discuss your personal epistemology and how this has influenced your teaching, practice so for the Professor part discussing your personal epistemology, and then how its influence your teaching, practice, And Part B, we want you to critically evaluate your teaching, practice so that means kind of describe how you teach. and give any strengths and give any limitations or weaknesses or areas you want to improve so find the strengths and areas for improvement of your own teaching, practice. So that’s kind of evaluating it and then the second part is important as well, identify measures to enhance this so don’t just say, I would like to be more student centered, for example but say how you will be more student centered. What is important is that you have to critique your current practice in Part B. and use literature, to support to why it strong or weak so kind of describe your practice and then say what you think is strong what you think is not so strong and then use literature, to support that so you know, to give. evidence that yes, doing this is good for education or doing this isn’t great you kind of use evidence to back it up. And for the second part of that be identify measures to enhance this so give some really concrete examples of what you can do to enhance it so again, for example, if you’re going to say. You want to be more student centered don’t just say you want to be more student centered say exactly what you will do in your particular teaching to achieve that, and again if you use literature, to support this and that and what interventions, you will do so. Then, that will be even better and basically what we’re looking for and Part B is we’re looking for you to to. To develop evidence based teaching, practice, and so in all your clinical rules i’m sure you use evidence based. # you can use any number for resources to support the topic

Critically discuss theoretical approaches to work-life balance and the key issues underpinning disadvantaged workers in the ‘new normal’ work-home interface.

Topic:

Critically discuss theoretical approaches to work-life balance and the key issues underpinning disadvantaged workers in the ‘new normal’ work-home interface.

what future predictions are there for your chosen SBU and the industry?

Executive Summary 1 mark

8 PESTLE analysis and conclusions. 4 marks

9 Porter’s 5 forces analysis and conclusions, the attractiveness of industry and strongest force. 5 marks

10 Overall market prospects and competition – this should be based on the SBU analysed in Porter’s five forces. 5 marks

11 Opportunities and threats – prioritized and identified main. 5 marks

12 The strategic position of the organisation (at the end of the case). 5 marks

13 A narrative discussion of the likelihood of success/failure of the organisation’s current strategies and whether or not it is well placed for the next 5 years. 5 marks

14 Identification of new future strategies or ‘strategic directions.’  One for the SBU and one for corporate. Note: these should be based on your discussion and conclusions from section 11 and 12 and should be linked to your SWOT analysis. 10 marks

15 Discussion on the feasibility of your recommended strategies. This should consider the financial implications, along with any qualitative issues surrounding the potential strategies. For example, if they fit with the vision of the company. 5 marks

16 Selection of winning strategy and identification of the key issues regarding its implementation. This should include any risk management issues. 5 marks

Prepare an article for the business magazine that reports on, and critically analyse the objectives, operations and outcomes of a social enterprise or sustainable tourism business or special topic

Subject: Business Ethics and Sustainability Article and Critical Analysis report Alternative iii – note on B-Corporations: B-Corporations are a relatively new form of business that require certification and have objectives centred around balancing the triple bottom line – economic, social & environmental responsibility. Assessment Details Prepare an article for the business magazine that reports on, and critically analyse the objectives, operations and outcomes of a social enterprise or sustainable tourism business or special topic – and include performance data and photos where possible. The magazine (it could be a fashion mag; a travel mag; a hospitality mag; a sustainability mag; a professional mag {like HBR, Fortune, Forbes etc.}; or some other mag) is expecting: great content in a feature which is engaging, and exhibits a clear and crisp writing style. Article quality not quantity is the key – include illustrations. – Word count: 1,300 Words (excluding references) Assessment Instructions Topic “Clean hands, Clean keepCup” KeepCup’s response to COVID-19 – moving forward in the post pandamic world. Keywords 1) KeepCup business https://au.keepcup.com/keepup/what-does-it-mean-bcorp 2) Australia’s B Corporations https://bcorporation.com.au/ 3) Covid19 Instructions 1. Evaluation of the case a. Outline the various pieces of the case study you are focusing on b. Discuss what is working / what is not in this case c. Discuss why these parts of the case are working / not working 2. Proposed solution / Changes a. Provide a specific/realistic solution(s) / changes needed b. Explain why this solution was chosen c. Support this solution with solid evidence such as: – Concepts from class (articles / discussions / lectures) – Outside research – Personal experience (anecdotes) 3. Recommendations / Concluding remarks a. Determine and discuss specific strategies for accomplishing the proposed solution b. If applicable, recommend further action to resolve some of the issues c. What should be done and who should do it? 4. Research Appendix (if have) ** Note plagiarism – the use of others’ words without attribution – is considered a severe offence, and will lead to serious consequences (including subject failure)

When are sales recognized under the cash basis of accounting? When are expenses recognized? Explain.

Topic:

When are sales recognized under the cash basis of accounting? When are expenses recognized? Explain.

Description Book:Survey of Accounting Carl S. Warren, 2018 Cengage ISBN.13: 978-1-305-96188-3 Length: Approximately 350-500 words. Assignment instructions: Sources are listed in two places. The first, a citation, is briefly listed within your answer. This includes identifying information that directs the reader to your list of references at the end of your writing assignment. The second, a reference, is at the end of your work in the list of references section.

Based on the results, what conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of your chosen intervention for the health condition or illness under review?

Summary of Introduction and method Set the context of the Systematic Review by providing a very brief account of the background and the method as a reminder to the reader. Results Should include how many papers were identified by the search strategy and how you decided which to include in the review. Explain how/why you selected these papers (for example, selecting the 5 most recent or those with largest sample sizes). Details of papers included in the review should be provided in a table as an appendix and therefore excluded from the word limit (for an example see Table 1 in Michie, S. and Williams, S. (2003) Reducing work related psychological ill health and sickness absence; a systematic literature review. Occup. Environ. Med. 60:3-9 (pdf provided on Succeed). These papers should then be reviewed and critically evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Tool (CAT) provided. This gives each paper a quality rating score. ( for the critical appraisal you can see ‘ Barriers to voluntary participation in sport for children: systematic review’ This section included: 1- Selection of studies 2- Study characteristic 3- Outcome measures 4- Methodological strength 5- Methodological weakness Discussion/Conclusions Based on the results, what conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of your chosen intervention for the health condition or illness under review? This section include: 1- Discussion 2- Future research 3- Conclusion the topic is ‘the effectiveness of written emotional disclosure with breast cancer women to reduce psychological distress ‘ *I have chosen only five RCT articles after meeting the criteria. These are the article I want you to write about. (UK) – Gellaitry, G., Peters, K., Bloomfield, D., & Horne, R. (2010). Narrowing the gap: the effects of an expressive writing intervention on perceptions of actual and ideal emotional support in women who have completed treatment for early stage breast cancer. Psycho‐Oncology, 19(1), 77-84. (UK) – Owen, J. E., Klapow, J. C., Roth, D. L., Shuster, J. L., Bellis, J., Meredith, R., & Tucker, D. C. (2005). Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 30(1), 54-64. (Denmark)- Jensen‐Johansen, M. B., Christensen, S., Valdimarsdottir, H., Zakowski, S., Jensen, A. B., Bovbjerg, D. H., & Zachariae, R. (2013). Effects of an expressive writing intervention on cancer‐ related distress in Danish breast cancer survivors—Results from a nationwide randomized clinical trial. Psycho‐Oncology, 22(7), 1492-1500. (US)-Henry, E. A., Schlegel, R. J., Talley, A. E., Molix, L. A., & Bettencourt, B. (2010, November). The feasibility and effectiveness of expressive writing for rural and urban breast cancer survivors. In oncology nursing forum (Vol. 37, No. 6). (US)Mosher, C. E., DuHamel, K. N., Lam, J., Dickler, M., Li, Y., Massie, M. J., & Norton, L. (2012). Randomised trial of expressive writing for distressed metastatic breast cancer patients. Psychology & Health, 27(1), 88-100. Based on these criteria: Method: Eligibility Criteria: Types of studies: For an article to be considered for selection, Quantitive Articles which peer reviewed and published in English only were considered eligible for the present study. An article had to be based on a randomized control trial design to be included. Female adult above the age of eighteen and under the age of seventeen will be included. Since the research will examine only a breast cancer patient, other types of cancer will be excluded. Finally. PICO’s framework will be used to device the question and search strategy (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome). Population: The population of interest are adult female from WEIRD sample who’s have breast cancer and under psychological distress. Women diagnosed with cancer are experience high risk of physical and physiological impairments which cause poor quality of life. Emotional disclosure is a technique to help patients decrees and manage their distress-related-cancer. Adult diagnosed with another type of cancer will be excluded. Women above the age of eighteen will be included, as inclusion criteria animal study and patient above the age of 70 will be excluded as well as children.

Analyse the external factors that drive the need for Leadership and Management within the organisation.

Task 1 must be submitted as a PowerPoint presentation slide deck file, with the majority of the narrative in the notes section under each slide. Slides should be used for visuals and brief bullet points. Add the AC# to each slide.

TASK TWO – Guidance Document (2,900 words) +/- 10%

Task 2 must be submitted as a word document (Use the template provided)

You must include both long and short references

You should make reference to the case study where possible in your answers

You should use relevant theory where possible in your answers