As a project manager, how would you ensure a project meets its long-term goals as well as its short-term goals.

Individual Discussion Engagement 2 (500 words)

 

Discussion activity: Analysis/Critique – Risk analysis for long-term goals

Large infrastructure projects are often in the media for all the wrong reasons. The disruptions to the community and reported poor performance creates added external pressures to the already tightly constrained project.

Sydney, Australia’s M5 East Tunnel was constructed under strict budgetary and schedule requirements, but given the massive traffic delays now hampering commuters, the requirements may have been excessive.  Due to an inexpensive computer system with a high failure rate, the tunnel’s security camera frequently fails, requiring the operators to close the tunnel due to the inability to react to an accident, fire, or excessive pollution inside the tunnel.  The tunnel was built to handle 70,000 vehicles a day, but it now carries 100,000, so any glitch can cause immediate traffic snarls.  A managerial risk analysis, including the risk of overuse, might have anticipated these problems and mandated a more reliable set of computers once the costs of failure had been included. (PM Network, 2005).

  • Anonymous, Polluted Progress, PM Network. 2005. Polluted Progress. 19(3): 1.

 

  1. Do you think this project was considered a success and on what basis?
  2. As a project manager, how would you ensure a project meets its long-term goals as well as its short-term goals.

Focus your responses to these questions on the risk analysis tools and techniques discussed in the readings and videos.

Critically evaluate your chosen field of research and propose solutions to problems arising from that evaluation.

11 pages + well-structured + cited references

Description

AIM: • Apply the methods and techniques you have learnt throughout the BBA to review, extend and apply your knowledge. • Link theory to practice by undertaking research in a chosen field. • Critically evaluate your chosen field of research and propose solutions to problems arising from that evaluation. WHAT DOES IT INVOLVE: An applied research study into either a real life company* or a company quoted on the London or New York Stock Exchange • A company is failing – you are a consultant who has been hired to investigate what the issue is • In depth, holistic – main focus is your major but consider all you have learnt over the three years of your study. • For example …. Any underlying management issues? Strategy? Marketing? Accounting / finance? WHERE DOES THE RESEARCH FIT IN ? Research the company in depth …. Last five years of financial statements • What do they tell you? • Any other relevant information RESEARCH ETHICS APPLICATION Only required if you intend to conduct primary research – qualitative (i.e. interviews, surveys) or quantitative (i.e. data collection) • Not required if you will only be analysing publicly available financial information i.e. secondary research 4/9/2022 Writers Hub – Freelance Writing https://www.writershub.org/writer/orders/853860#instructions 2/2 • A session will be organised if required based on proposals • NB – if intending to do so, please refer to this when submitting proposals. 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Discussion / evaluation 4. Conclusion 5. Recommendations 6. Bibliography 8,000 to 9,000 words (excluding bibliography)

Explain what an organization is.

Description

Explain what an organization is. A wide range of theoretical perspectives and frameworks provide different answers to this fundamental definitional question. Use the following four theoretical frameworks to answer this question and compare and contrast the definitions: “Organic Organizational Structure”, “Mechanistic Organizational Structure”, “Hybrid Organizational Structure”, and “Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory (as it pertains to Organizational Development)”. How are the definitions impacted or changed if we look at public agencies, non-profit organizations, or private firms? Your response should analyze, synthesize, and evaluate major themes or issues in organizational theory and development through the perspective of your course work and current profession or career. The analysis is required to be 3 pages in length, prepared according to APA Style, supported by a minimum of ten scholarly sources, and synthesize your scholarly perspective regarding organizational theory. Note to author: Please make sure 7 of the scholarly sources are journal articles (if possible). Also, this assignment must be 100% original without any semblances of previously used content and must be unique to my specifications, too. Here is a very helpful resource which will help answer and complete this assignment: Daft, L. R. (2012). Organizational theory and design. 12th Edition. Cengage Learning.

analyse a specific case in all its complexity and explain the elements of its complexity by using a certain theory or combination of theories.

SS6002: Assessment 2 (Due 9 th May 2022) Case Study (3000 words) Apply any theoretical approach (or combination of theories) discussed on the module this year to an empirical example. Your empirical example can be based on, but is not limited to: • An ongoing news story • A novel or short story • A TV or film plot • An advertising campaign • An everyday observance • A personal experience (e.g. of work or social relationships) Please discuss your chosen empirical example with me before beginning work on your assessment. ➢ On 18th March the lecture and class will take the form of a case study workshop where ideas can be discussed and we will recap on the theories covered so far. However, do start thinking about your ‘empirical example’ and how you might analyse it. The more consideration you put into this assessment prior to the workshop, the more you will get out of the workshop. The aims of the assignment are: • In general, to assess students’ ability to apply theory • To produce and effectively communicate a detailed analysis of an advanced social theory text (LO3) • To appraise advanced social theories and concepts in relation to their application to ‘real world’ situations (LO4) What is the case study? • You should analyse a specific case in all its complexity and explain the elements of its complexity by using a certain theory or combination of theories. • The case is the ‘real life’ situation or subject; the study is the analysis of the ‘real life’ situation or subject. Key elements of your case study: • A detailed description of the case and its elements • A sense of chronological order – how the situation emerges and evolves over time • A focus on the institution / persons / event[s] / group / representations • A combination of description, interpretation and critical analysis • Application of a theory to ‘test’ it and/or using the theory as a method of critiquing contemporary social phenomena.

Analyse the factors which will affect the merits of a claim in passing off against AAA.

Description 12 PC FONT, DOUBLE SPACED, OSCOLA REFERENCING, 3000 WORDS. Question: Saira is a British-American actor who has appeared in theatre, television and film, as well as running acting courses. Her career has spanned two decades, much of it in the United States, and her work has attracted international acclaim. Due to difficulties in her personal life, Saira is currently taking a break from the spotlight and is focusing on her acting courses, which she runs from her London studio. She uses the adjacent oval logo on her premises and promotional materials. She has not yet registered it as a trade mark. The acting method which Saira teaches derives from the Popov School. Alexander Popov was himself a leading Russian actor in the 1950s. Popov devised a range of dynamic movements, such as floating and flying, which actors can use to find the physical core of a character. Popov published a book containing a series of his own drawings illustrating his technique and its purpose: to enable actors to access their unconscious creative selves through indirect non-analytical means. Popov died in 1967, but his legacy lives on through teachers such as Saira. This is what Popov would have wanted. (A) Whilst surfing the Internet, Saira discovered that another acting studio, Aspiring Actors Association (AAA), is using the mask inside her oval logo to advertise their business. Analyse the factors which will affect the merits of a claim in passing off against AAA. (30 marks) (B) Critically discuss the advantages of trade mark registration as compared to Saira relying on the common law of passing off to protect her logo. (25 marks) (C) It turns out that the mask inside Saira’s oval logo is, in fact, a detail taken from one of the illustrations contained in Popov’s book (see mask on top right had side of image). Assess whether this might render Saira liable for copyright infringement.

What are the differences between men and women in recalling memories of their most significant date?

Description I will attach the protocol template that needs to be filled in for ethical approval which would also serve as a thesis proposal. The dissertation title and question: Recalling memories in adults: What are the differences between men and women in recalling memories of their most significant date? The question would measure if there are any significant differences between men and women in recalling memories from their first date. Participants needs to be between 18 years old and 65 with no memory disability or impairment and no language problem (able to read and understand the questions). The questionnaire that will be used in the study is the BirthMARQ adapted to the question therefore there are going to be implications in adapting a questionnaire such as low Cronbach which needs to discussed. If there are going to be any further questions in completing the protocol please feel free to ask.

Discuss specific problems you had with the procedure and how these errors could have influenced your results.

Assignment – Yeast Cloning and Sequencing Project Lab Report This report is the full lab report you are required to write for this course and is worth 8% of your final course grade. The book “A Short Guide to Writing about Biology” by Jan A. Pechenik is an excellent reference for scientific writing. If you do not have this book, you may access a copy in the lab or library. The current edition of Pechenik is on reserve in the library and older editions can be found in the stacks. We have provided a pdf copy of Chapter 9 (pp. 149-220) for your reference. Basic Guidelines for Lab Report • Your full lab report will include a Title page, Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, References, and Appendix sections. • Your report will be a maximum of 10 pages of typed text (excluding the title page, embedded figures and tables, references, and appendix). • Your report will be double spaced, 12-point font, printed one-sided on 8.5 x 11 printer paper and stapled at the top left corner. • Your report MUST be written individually and contain no Academic Integrity Violations. • Reports will be written using APA 7 th edition. Information on the new APA style can be found here: https://libguides.kpu.ca/c.php?g=713337&p=5083418. • Cite other people’s ideas (e.g. other researchers, textbook authors, information in peer reviewed articles, etc.) using APA style in-text citations, and include a minimum of two credible references, other than the lab manual and the required course text. Blogs, Wikipedia pages, or personal websites are not credible sources. Peer reviewed science articles, journal articles, and textbooks are credible sources. Information on university websites, official government websites (e.g. www.genome.gov) or large science organizations (e.g. www.nature.com/scitable/) may be acceptable (review the about page and ask a librarian when in doubt). When considering whether or not a website is acceptable, ask yourself if it is peer reviewed by experts in the field (e.g. Wikipedia is peer-reviewed, but NOT necessarily by experts in the field, as anyone can submit edits, which is why it is not an acceptable source). • Along with content you will be marked on correct spelling, grammar and formatting, clear and concise writing, following scientific conventions, etc. • Include any raw data, rough calculations, and anything else essential to the report in the appendix. Organization of ideas Each section of your lab report serves a particular purpose. While writing your lab report it is important that you put information in the correct section of your report, and that the information within a section is well organized and flows in a logical order. The information provided in the following pages is intended to be used as a guide to help you place information in the correct section of your report. Your role, while writing and editing these sections, is to organize and communicate the information in a way that will make sense to your reader. Yeast Cloning and Sequencing Project Title page Provide a title page in APA format. Instructions on how to make a title page can be found here: https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammarguidelines/paper-format/title-page. Abstract This section should include:  A brief introduction to the lab, brief summaries of methods, major results and interpretation of findings.  The summary of the results should include: (a) if you successfully obtained a sequence, (b) the name of gene identified (if applicable) or indicate that you found a non-coding sequence, (c) E-value of sequence alignment, (d) description of gene function (if applicable), and (e) how your findings relate to those of other researchers. This single paragraph includes only the most relevant information and should be 1/3 to 1/2 of a page in length. Introduction This section should include:  A discussion of yeast (saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model organism including a description, reasons for its use in this project, and reasons for its use in genetic studies.  A discussion of the role of bacteria and specifically why JM101 E. coli cells were used.  A discussion of the role of the pUC19 plasmid and why it was used.  A description of the blue-white screening system.  A clear and concise statement of the purpose of the project.  In-text citations (use 7th edition APA citation style). The content in this section should be clear, concise, well organized and flow in a logical order (i.e. the information does not need to be given in the order listed above). Materials & Methods This section should include:  A reference to the procedure in the lab manual. o Start this section with a general statement such as “The procedures in this experiment were performed as described in the Yeast Cloning and Sequencing Project Parts 1, 2, 3 & 6 (followed by an in-text citation for the lab manual).” o We are giving you permission to use this language, so it will not be considered plagiarism if you use it, however the rest of this section needs to be in your own words.  A brief description of each step in the project. This section of your report will be 6-8 paragraphs in length (1 ½ to 2 ½ pages), depending on how you divide up the experiment and organize the information.  A description of any deviations from the procedure and their rationale (deviations should be included in the summary of the procedure and not added to the end of the report).  A description and discussion of the purpose of all controls used throughout the project. Revised Jan. 26th, 2022 The content in this section should be clear, concise, well organized and flow in a logical order. It should be written in the past tense as the experiment has already been performed. It should include the appropriate level of detail (i.e. provide an overview of the most important parts of the experiment, but not list every single procedural step). Results This section should include: • A written description of (a) the results of the controls, (b) experimental results (e.g. results of the platings, whether or not you obtained a gene sequence, transformation efficiency value, etc.), (c) summary of the results of the BLAST analysis in one to two sentences (e.g. name of gene(s) and/or presence of a non-coding region; E-value, brief summary of gene function, etc.). • Data should be presented as tables and figures and embedded in the written results section where appropriate. Raw data goes in the Appendix. Include the following tables and figures: o A table of transformation results including the controls. o The sequence of the yeast DNA fragment cloned (presented as a figure). • All figures and tables should be appropriately numbered and have detailed captions. Refer to all tables and figures in the written text. E.g. (see Figure 1). Do not interpret the results in this section. Interpretation of findings go in the Discussion. Discussion This section should include: • A discussion of what you cloned (either part of a gene(s) and/or a non-coding sequence) including the likelihood of each result (i.e. how likely are you to clone a gene vs. a noncoding region?). • A discussion of the confidence in sequence identification (E-value) including an explanation of what an E-value is and what your specific E-value means. • If the sequence was part of a gene, discuss the gene’s function(s). • If the sequence was non-coding, indicate if it was intronic or intergenic sequence. • A discussion of how your results compare to that of other researcher (if possible). In other words, describe what else in known about this gene. • Suggestions for future experiments related to the findings of this experiment (hint: you can base your future experiments on your research regarding gene function). • Discuss specific problems you had with the procedure and how these errors could have influenced your results. • A concluding statement. • In-text citations where appropriate (APA citation style). Appendix This section, which will be located at the back of your lab report, should include: • a copy (printed screen-shot) of your E-value page (from the BLAST search), • a copy (printed screen-shot) of the Genome Browser summary page, • transformation efficiency calculations (can be typed or handwritten). Yeast Cloning and Sequencing Project Revised Sept. 3rd, 2021 For more information on how to write each section of a lab report refer to the Appendix of the lab manual and Pechenik. Example of APA Citation Style. In-text citation: Below is a fictitious example of a paraphrased sentence from the Introduction section of a student’s lab report. It gives credit to the original source (this is the first time the source is being cited). The pUC19 plasmid is an ideal plasmid for a transformation experiment because it contains the lacZ gene which can be used for blue-white screening of recombinant molecules (National Center for Biotechnology Information [NCBI], 2020). Note if you reference this source again, subsequent references can be abbreviated to (NCBI, 2020). If you are citing multiple sources with the same author and date, then include a lowercase letter after the year in the intext citation and corresponding reference (i.e. in-text citation would be (NCBI, 2020a) or (NCBI, 2020b)).

Consider to what extent is the UK’s new points-based visa system consistent or inconsistent with the International Convention on Migrant Workers.

Immigration and Refugee Law

Coursework assignment

Critique 4,000 words

 

 

 

Choose one of the following topics and write critical essay of 4,000 words. The word count excludes the bibliography and footnote references.

 

  1. Consider to what extent is the UK’s new points-based visa system consistent or inconsistent with the International Convention on Migrant Workers.

 

  1. Critically analyse the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7 from the point of international law on citizenship and statelessness.

 

In your critique answer you need to make explicit reference to relevant international and regional agreements, customary international law, case law of the relevant courts and/or bodies as well as academic books and peer-reviewed academic journal articles accessed principally through the University Library. You should conduct your own research and use the chapters in the recommended textbooks for this module as your starting point.

 

Please reference your work using the OSCOLA reference system and include a full bibliography of all sources you have used at the end of your work.

 

Module learning outcomes (LOs)

 

1 – Evaluate the various sources, institutions and procedures in the field of international migration and asylum law.

 

2 – Critically appraise the theoretical debates in the field and engage in critical legal analysis of the practice of judicial and other institutions.

 

3 – Critically reflect on the role of the law in shaping the experiences of migrants and asylum seekers, including the protection of their rights.

 

4 – Carry out independent research in the field of international migration and asylum law and policy using both library-based and electronic resources.

 

 

 

 

 

General Assessment Criteria (D)

 

KNOWLEDGE:

 

  1. Clear statement of relevant law
  2. Excellent statement of relevant law

 

APPLICATION:

  1. Obvious and subtle issues dealt with, good application of law
  2. Excellent coverage of issues, excellent application of law

 

EVALUATION:

  1. Good evaluation, critical judgment, and problem solving
  2. Excellent evaluation, critical judgment, and problem solving

 

RESEARCH:

  1. Clear referencing, evidence of some detailed research
  2. Excellent footnote referencing, bibliography, and research

 

COMMUNICATION:

  1. Good spelling and grammar, well organised structure
  2. Excellent spelling, grammar, structure, and presentation

 

Write an abstract for the presentation to attract an audience of non- specialists to watch your presentation.

Contemporary Global Issues 3: Abstract

 

Task:                          Write an abstract for the presentation that you will be giving in week

  1. The purpose of the abstract is to attract an audience of non-

specialists to watch your presentation.

 

Word Length:                       250 words

 

Instructions:            The 4 elements required in an abstract should be explicit in your text:

  1. Background to the issue (why is this issue important or interesting?)
  2. Research/methodology (what research did you do in order to find out about this issue?)
  3. Results (what did you learn about this issue from your research?)
  4. Conclusions/implications (how significant is this research?)

 

You will need to state the aim of your presentation clearly.

 

You do not need to include in-text references (citations) or quotes, but a reference list is required at the end so that your tutor knows which texts you have read. You should use a minimum of 3 sources.

 

The list of references for the abstract should be the same as those for your presentation, apart from any which refer to pictures/graphs/charts which you used in your presentation.

 

Reflection (submit one reflection to cover both the presentation and abstract, but this will be 10% of the presentation mark only)

There is no specified word limit for the reflection task, (but approximately 500 words). On completion of your abstract AND presentation, you should write a reflection on how easy/difficult you found it, (ie. What did you think were your strengths and weaknesses?) which skills you feel were tested, and what you think you need to work on to make this type of task easier in future. You should submit this within 24 hours of completing the presentation via the Turnitin tool in the Assessment area of Minerva.

 

This abstract is worth 10% of your mark for this module

 

Please refer to the assessment criteria on Minerva.

Submission Instructions:

 

You should complete and attach a Cover Sheet to the front of your Abstract, which is on Minerva in the ‘Assessment’ area.

 

You must submit an electronic copy of your essay via Turnitin in the ‘Submit my work’ tab of the ELU0036 area on Minerva.

You should submit one reflection covering both the abstract and presentation tasks via Turnitin in the ‘Submit my work’ area of Minerva within 24 hours of giving your presentation.

Give an oral presentation on an interesting issue or recent development in your subject area to a non-specialist audience.

Contemporary Global Issues 3: Oral Presentation

 

 

Task:              Give an oral presentation on an interesting issue or recent development in your subject area to a non-specialist audience.

 

Timing: Your oral presentation must last for 7-8 minutes followed by 2-3 minutes for

questions.

 

Instructions: Your presentation must be related to a recent development or issue that you have chosen and researched independently. You must also be clear in your

introduction about whether your issue is:

  1. an application of this subject to everyday life
  2. a new development
  3. c. a problem people are trying to solve
  4. d. a controversial issue.

 

You must agree on the content you are proposing for the presentation with your tutor.

 

The content of your presentation must match the abstract you are submitting.

 

You will need to state the aim of your presentation clearly. You are going to present this topic/issue to non-specialists so it should not be anything too in-depth or technical.

 

You must include a slide with a list of references at the end of your presentation.

 

 

Your presentation will be recorded for assessment and moderation purposes.

 

You must submit your PowerPoint Slides (pdf) to Turnitin on the day of your presentation. Please ensure that your full name and student ID number are on your first slide.

 

Reflection (submit one reflection to cover both the presentation and abstract):

There is no specified word limit for the reflection task. On completion of your abstract AND presentation, you should write a reflection on how easy/difficult you found it, (ie. What did you think were your strengths and weaknesses?) which skills you feel were tested, and what you think you need to work on to make this type of task easier in future. You should submit this within 24 hours of completing the presentation via the Turnitin tool in the Assessment/Submit my work area of Minerva.

This presentation with reflection is worth 20% of your mark for this module

 

Please refer to the assessment criteria on Minerva

 

 

 

Guidelines:

  • In your introduction don’t forget to introduce yourself, explain which degree programme you are studying next year (with a very brief definition if you think it is needed. For example, what does a degree in ‘medical chemistry’ cover? Also mention what type of issue you are focusing on – a new development, a controversial issue, a problem to be solved, an application of your degree subject to everyday life, or perhaps it is a combination of these.

 

  • The marking criteria ask for ‘excellent coverage & balance in the presentation’, which means that you need to look critically at your ‘issue’ and try to analyse rather than just describe, wherever possible. Are there any drawbacks to the new development you have chosen, for example? How might a new development compare to the older development it is replacing? If you are looking at a ‘controversial issue’, are you giving a balanced viewpoint supported by evidence so that you don’t alienate your audience?

 

  • Make sure you give evidence to support what you are saying and examples to illustrate (‘examples / statistics presented to support ideas’) Remember that your audience don’t know the topic as well as you do and therefore it needs to be explained clearly and with reference to helpful examples. Do not overload with too much subject-specific vocabulary, and explain any terms that you think the audience won’t know (‘the content is appropriate for a non-specialist audience’).

 

  • Finally, try to choose something you are interested in so that this interest is communicated to the audience. Try to get the audience on your side from the start with a hook where it might be a good idea to try and link your topic to something the audience might relate to (‘attempt to interest the audience and to gain and establish rapport’).

 

  • Remember that the list of references for the presentation and abstract should be the same, apart from any which refer to pictures/graphs/charts which you use in your presentation.