Describe the role of the consultant during the intervention.

Description

The Action Research Case Study assignment in Week 3 had you select a case study, identify the change challenge of the case, and design an action research process for the change process. During Week 4, the Intervention Selection and Application assignment had you select an intervention method that best suited the change challenge within the organization. You are now ready to complete the final paper based on the case study selected in the Action Research Case Study assignment from the Week 3 (Blaze Mining) – Assignment. Be sure to incorporate all instructor feedback from prior weeks’ assignments in your final paper. Consider that you have been hired as a Blaze Mining consultant to help the organization with the change challenge. In your paper, you will introduce the overall purpose of the project as related to organizational development and change challenges. Section 1 4/10/2022 Writers Hub – Freelance Writing https://www.writershub.org/writer/orders/854098#instructions 2/2 For Section 1 of your paper, you will Summarize the Action Research Case Study assignment in Week 3. Justify why it is a problem and the type of problem. Example: is it turnover, diversity, ethical, job satisfaction, downsizing, restructure, or other? Define the selected action research process based on the Week 3 Action Research Case Study assignment paper. Identify the intervention type selected in the Week 4 Intervention Selection and Application assignment. Describe the intervention process. Section 2 For Section 2 of your paper, you will Describe the role of the consultant during the intervention. Categorize the competencies and ethical behaviors needed for the intervention. Define the recommended research methods that will be utilized during the intervention. Describe recommended data collection and evaluation methods during the intervention. Define a timeline for the intervention process. Identify anticipated resistance to the change and the process for reconciliation. Section 3 For Section 3 of your paper, you will Hypothesize the projected outcomes for the OD change project. Validate your reasoning for the projected outcome. Conclusion Conclude your paper with a comprehensive summation of the project

Evaluate why the intervention is applicable to the case study. Interpret the actions involved when utilizing the intervention.

Description

Last week, you prepared the foundation of your final project by selecting a case study and applying the appropriate action research process to the OD challenge. Based on your knowledge of intervention types, you proposed a recommended interaction for the challenge. This week, you will have the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of individual, team, group, and organizational interventions, and what they look like during problem solving and decision-making. Intervention is the “doing” phase of action research. This paper will solidify your intervention selection. You will explain the actions used during your selected intervention and comprehensively apply the process to the case study. The paper must be at least two full pages in length, and must include the course textbook as a reference, as well as three additional scholarly and credible sources to support the content of the paper. In your paper, Select an appropriate intervention for your case study (Blaze Mining). Evaluate why the intervention is applicable to the case study. Interpret the actions involved when utilizing the intervention.

What are the ante-natal services available to women during the Covid -19 period and how consistently do women in England utilise them?

Assessed Learning Outcomes 1.Identify a specific project area for investigation that is relevant to current health and social care practice. 2.Identify, select and justify the use of appropriate techniques, methods and strategies to gather relevant data and evidence to investigate the project topic. 3.Critically appraise and evaluate the evidence in relation to the project topic to draw relevant conclusions. 4.Present and discuss research findings, justifying their relevance in developing or advancing current health and social practice within the scope of the topic. Submission Deadline: Please refer to the deadline on the VLE WRITING YOUR ASSIGNMENT: • This assignment must be completed individually. • You must use the Harvard referencing system. • Your work must indicate the number of words you have used. Written assignments must not exceed the specified maximum number of words. When a written assignment is marked, the excessive use of words beyond the word limit is reflected in the academic judgement of the piece of work which results in a lower mark being awarded for the piece of work (regulation 6.74). • Assignment submissions are to be made anonymously. Do not write your name anywhere on your work. • Write your student ID number at the top of every page. • Where the assignment comprises more than one task, all tasks must be submitted in a single document. • You must number all pages. 2 SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT: In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline. Work that is submitted late – up to five working days after the published submission deadline – will be accepted and marked. However, the element of the module’s assessment to which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%. Work cannot be submitted if the period of 5 working days after the deadline has passed (unless there is an approved extension). Failure to submit within the relevant period will mean that you have failed the assessment. Requests for short-term extensions will only be considered in the case of illness or other cause considered valid by the Director of Studies Team. Please contact DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. A request must normally be received and agreed by the Director of Studies Team in writing at least 24 hours prior to the deadline. See rules 6.64- 6.73: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf Mitigation: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact the Director of Studies Team – DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. See rules 6.112 – 6.141: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf ASSIGNMENT QUESTION 6000 words Use a literature review as a research method to respond to a research question about a health or social care topic. The topic areas and questions are: Topic Question Palliative care in the UK for persons living with terminal conditions How effectively do palliative care services support persons with terminal conditions in planning a good death? Covid and ante-natal care What are the ante-natal services available to women during the Covid -19 period and how consistently do women in England utilise them? Services for persons with dementia in England How effective are dementia services in meeting the needs of disadvantaged group(s) in England? Choose ONE topic and the related question. Write ONE aim for your project and TWO objectives. Present your findings in a REPORT format (see details below). 3 The Report of the literature review must include the following sections a) Abstract b) Introduction c) Presentation and evaluation of data d) A critique of the findings and data from the literature e) Discussion f) Recommendations g) Reference list ASSESSMENT CRITERIA LO 1 Identify a specific project area for investigation that is relevant to current health and social care practice. (a) Choose an area for research within the defined health and social care topic (LO1). (b) State the Aim of your research to define the scope of the project. Identify two Objectives to allow you to address the Aim. These should allow the focus area to be investigated using a literature review as the research method (LO1). LO 2 Identify, select and justify the use of appropriate techniques, methods and strategies to gather relevant data and evidence to investigate the project topic. (a) Demonstrate the use of relevant research methods and strategies to investigate the topic and the question (LO2). (b) Collate a range of appropriate data and evidence to allow for effective investigation of the topic focus (LO2). LO 3 Critically appraise and evaluate the evidence in relation to the project topic to draw relevant conclusions. (a) Analyse and critique the quality of the sources you have used (LO3). (b) Draw conclusions about the quality of the source and about the quality and relevance of the information produced (LO3). LO 4 Present and discuss research findings, justifying their relevance in developing or advancing current health and social practice within the scope of the topic. (a) Identify and discuss the key findings from your research (LO4). (b) Say how these findings relate to an area of practice or service provision (LO4). (c) Make a recommendation for a change that would have a positive impact on professional practice or service delivery in the area you have studied LO4).

Describe the applications of adjustment and coping you see in your experiences in the workplace, at school, or in your relationships with others.

PSY 328 Project One Template

 

For this project, you will write a theory application paper; you will apply theories of personality to yourself, someone you know, or someone you have read about in a biography or autobiography. Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

 

  1. Identify who you are applying theories of personality to and explain why. Your response should be about 3 to 5 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

  1. Describe how components of a personality theory of your choice relate to your subject. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length and include the following:
    1. Components of personality theory, including but not limited to traits, behaviors, motives, or defense mechanisms
    2. Multiple components from the theory applied to your subject with examples (i.e., behaviors that exemplify the concepts)
    3. Citations when you are describing the theory

[Insert text]

 

  1. Describe how components of a second personality theory of your choice relate to your subject. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length and include the following:
    1. Components of personality theory, including but not limited to traits, behaviors, motives, or defense mechanisms
    2. Multiple components from the theory applied to your subject with examples (i.e., behaviors that exemplify the concepts)
    3. Citations when you are describing the theory

[Insert text]

 

  1. Describe the limitations of each of the two theories you related to your subject. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length and include at least one limitation for each theory.

[Insert text]

 

  1. Explain why taking a holistic approach and applying multiple theories to a subject is better than applying only one. Your response should be about 6 to 10 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

References

[Insert text]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now read Chapter 13 of your text. Next, complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.

 

  • Explain to what extent you value flexibility in yourself. Your response should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

  • Describe your most common responses to stressors. Your response should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

  • Based on the results of your Big Five Personality Test and your own personal reflection, on a scale of low, mixed, or high, describe how you would rate your stress tolerance using the traits of hardiness, optimism, and dispositional optimism. Your response should be about 4 to 6 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

  • Describe how you struggle with traits that negatively affect the coping process. Your response should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

  • Describe the strategies you use when you find yourself experiencing cognitive distortions. Your response should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

  • Describe the applications of adjustment and coping you see in your experiences in the workplace, at school, or in your relationships with others. Your response should be about 2 to 3 sentences in length.

[Insert text]

 

References

[Insert text]

 

Write a report on Insights into person centred care.

                                 Essentials of Nursing and Care

Assessment 2:            Report

Weighting:                 60%

Length:                      1500 words

 

Please note that reports received after the due date/time will be penalised 5% for each day that it is overdue unless a Special Consideration is submitted (prior to the due date) and approved. All reports need to be submitted via Turnitin.

Task

Watch the video on ‘Person centred care’ (which is available on BB in the Report folder under Assessments). Write a report on Insights into person centred care.

Your report needs to be structured into five sections using the headings Introduction, Results, Discussion, Reflective Review, and Conclusion. Please include these headings in your report.

 

Learning outcome of assessment: To demonstrate your understanding of the foundational knowledge of communication, caring and development of therapeutic relationships that underpins nursing and care practices.

 

What is a Report?

A report is a statement that supports the issue that is being developed. You will need to research the topic and develop a report on ‘Insights into person centred care’. Follow the recommended structure for your report. Use the unit assessor video-recording which provides you with more information on how to proceed.

 

Recommended structure

  1. Introduction: 1 paragraph                    200 words

                                                                                    No references

  1. Results 1 paragraph                    250 words

                                                                                    Reference of video required

  1. Discussion 4 paragraphs                  600 words (or 200 words/paragraph)

                                                                                    References required to support arguments

  1. Reflective review. 1-2 paragraphs               250 words

                   References required to support reflective practice

  1. Conclusion 1 paragraph                    200 words.

                                                                                    No references

 

 

 

Writing of report

Introduction and conclusion. Open the hyperlink to have a better understanding on how to frame your introduction and conclusion.

How to address introduction and conclusion

 

Results

From your viewing of the video provide your insights into person centred care. Provide 3-4 areas of insights.

Examples

-caring communication

-trust and confidence

– patient-nurse relationship

-own attitudes and perceptions

-awareness of patient’s narratives and perspective

– importance of listening

 

 

Discussion (should be based on some important points to these insights)

Paragraph 1: how insights in general can help you as a student nurse e.g.

-provide a better understanding of the nurse’s role

-help in building a therapeutic patient -nurse relationship

-benefits for the patient

-partners in care

-provide a supportive context

-allows for uniqueness of each patient

 

Paragraph 2: Discuss your first insight and support your arguments based on the literature

 

Paragraph 2: Discuss your second insight and support your arguments based on the literature

 

Paragraph 3: Discuss your third insight and support your arguments based on the literature

 

Reflective review

Provide your reflections on how these insights can help you in your role as a professional student nurse.

 

Read about reflective practice: Irwin, P., Coutts, R. 2017. Learning through reflection. SPROUT: A schema to teach reflective practice. Journal of Education and Practices. 8(36), 1-8

https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/viewFile/40431/41578/

 

Conclusion

How to address introduction and conclusion

 

List of references: – Have at least 8 current scholarly references

 

Note: References need to be quality references from academic/peer reviewed journals, government/education websites. Do not use dictionaries /encyclopedias, Wikipedia, online blogs, personal websites. Your Unit Assessor will guide you.

 

The tutorials will cover how to write your report and what you will need to do to complete this task.

 

Frequently asked questions and answers

Q: Are references included in word count?

A: No

 

Q: Can I add other sections?

A: No, stick with the section headings outlined above

 

Q: What types of references should I include?

A: Recent sources of journal articles and books

 

Q: How many references do I need?

No less than 8 references.

 

Q: How do present the list of references?

A: Reference list will be on a separate page at the end of your report

Use the APA 7th (Edition) referencing style to accurately reference your assignment

 

Q: What resources do I need to assist me with the report assessment?

A: Go to the learning zone and determine what you need.

 

Q: How will my report be scored?

A: Check out the marking rubric and breakdown of marks.

 

Report writing

You will be attending a library facilitated session in week 3 (through another unit) which focuses on developing your literature searching skills.

Make sure you use the APA 7th (Edition) referencing style to accurately reference your assignment.

 

Video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qATqN3FTpYw#action=share

Title: Person centred care

 

Reference: for video:

Real Time Health. (2013, November 18). Person centred care. Clip 2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qATqN3FTpYw

 

Describe any new learnings you have gained about the application of statistical methods from having studied this article, highlighting anything that you found particularly interesting.
  • Word count 800, focus on quality and clarity, not quantity.
  • Use ordinary plain language in your report. Do not use textbook definitions or unnecessarily complex
  • technical language. I want to see your understanding, not some copied textbook definitions. Keep
  • explanations concise and clear. Sentences are precious; don’t waste them. Complex sentences are
  • fine, provided the occasion merits it.
  • Some examples: http://www.plainenglish.co.uk/campaigning/examples/before-and-after.html

Brief

Pick a journal article related to your industry which uses t-test and/or ANOVA to analyse survey data.

The articles should use some form of statistical analysis of the data, more than simply presenting bar

charts / pie charts of numbers / percentages. Some articles are more complex, and some are simpler,

so look for a few different ones and choose one that you are comfortable enough in understanding

but be sure that the article employs these statistical methods to a meaningful extent.

Examples of statistical analysis would be chi-square test, t-test, anova, Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney U)

regression, etc, see (Fink, 2003). Some tests, or aspects of them, may be too advanced or difficult to

understand. Try to research what the test does and how it is usually applied and then relate this to

what the article is using the test for.

Write a report on the selected article. Describe in your own words what the article is about, what its

objectives are, what the methods used are, what the results show and what the conclusions drawn

are. Again, avoid overly technical jargon; however, some jargon is unavoidable. Spend some effort on

outlining the method and it’s application in the article.

Describe any new learnings you have gained about the application of statistical methods from having studied this article, highlighting anything that you found particularly interesting.

Outline any points which were difficult to follow and methods you didn’t really have a full grasp of

(or any grasp of). Note that you should try to select an article which you have some overall

understanding of.

Research, design, and critically evaluate a curriculum model for a primary school based on the current National Curriculum or EYFS framework

Curriculum Matters in Primary Education Task (100%): Research, design, and critically evaluate a curriculum model for a primary school based on the current National Curriculum or EYFS framework (4,000 words) Knowledge and Understanding: 1 Reflect upon, discuss, and evaluate social, theoretical and political influences on the construction of a primary school curriculum 2 Demonstrate developing knowledge of statutory curricular frameworks for primary or early years education Abilities: 1. Critically applies theory and policy to practice, selecting and evaluating national and international curriculum design 2. Critically evaluates the influences and constraints of their curriculum model This following is a suggested structure that might form the basis of your written paper: Introduction This should provide an overview of the key sections of your paper; arguments being made within each section, and key theorists/research used. What is Curriculum? In this section you need to critically analyse historical and current conceptualisation of curriculum. You need to look at historical and current theories and debates about curriculum. Within this, you need to discuss, theoretical, social and political influences. You will also need to imbed some critique of policy (Ofsted’s working definition of curriculum, notion of an ‘ambitious curriculum’ etc.). As we know, the concept of curriculum is a ‘slippery’ term (Au, 2011; Young, 2014): you need to illustrate this and critique curriculum issues and definitions. See also Wyse et al., (2013) for discussion on more recent debates on the so-called ‘crisis’ in the curriculum. For Historical perspectives and theorists, you might want to look at: Ralph Tyler (1949): Four steps to curriculum Model Hilda Taba’s 7-step model When considering sociological perspectives of Curriculum (such as Michael Young, Dennis Lawton, Michael Apple), you need to discuss how curriculum is socially constructed, the link between the distribution of power, the interests of the powerful and the curriculum (Young, 1999): i.e. when considering power and construction of the curriculum, this raises questions about ‘who selects?’ (Lawton, 1980, p. vii) and who is advantaged and disadvantaged from these selections. For more Contemporary research and discussion: Dominic Wyse Mark Priestly: a more constructive definition is to view school curriculum as ‘the multi-layered social practices’ (Priestley, 2019, p. 8). Curriculum making as a social practice, and curriculum as a ‘state of becoming’ – it has a temporal dimension (Lingard, 2021, pp. 31-32). 3 dimensions of curriculum. You may also want to draw on some wider definitions that fit your system i.e. if you are looking at democracy and education and the work of Dewey, you may draw upon his definition of curriculum. Remember: you need to critically analyse these definitions – draw out the strengths and weaknesses. 1 The role of Education and the Curriculum In this section you need to discuss historical and current arguments about the purpose of education. You need to discuss how popular notions of education as a progressive force continue to be advanced in official and popular discourse, presenting education as performing numerous positive functions for: 1. the individual 2. The economy, 3. Society (Simmons and Smyth, 2018). Many have benefited socially, culturally and economically from education. You need to consider historical shifts over time: what has the purpose of education been and why? What political, economic and/or social influences have shaped changes in education and the curriculum (see Simmons and Smyth, 2018, pp. 234-235). You might draw on some key historical events and policies where significant changes were made reshaping the purpose and role of education. For example, the shift from progressive ere of education and the so-called ‘secret garden of the curriculum’, James Callaghan’s speech which signalled a redefinition of the purposes of education away from a focus on the individual towards a focus on the needs of society, interpreted more narrowly as the needs of the economy, and the 1988 Education Reform Act and the introduction of the national curriculum onwards. Related to purpose of education is the question of ‘what is worthwhile?’ and the crucial political question is ‘who makes the selections?: Will pupils decide what to learn? What role will teachers have in curriculum matters? Will it be entirely in state hands? In the paper you need to critically discuss whether education should be controlled by government, who designs the curriculum and who receives it. You might place these discussions in the section BUT they may fit elsewhere. You will then need to move beyond historical and contemporary purposes of education towards a critical discussion on the future role of education and the purpose of curriculum. We need education systems that develop knowledge and understanding of the complex worlds – social and natural – inhabited by diverse populations, and which go beyond a narrow focus on the development of competencies (Priestley & Philippou, 2019, pp. 1-2). You might want to discuss the OECD (2018) that identified three important roles for the future of education: 1. Environmental – for example climate change and degradation of natural resources. 2. Economic – for instance creating inclusive and sustainable economic models that do not marginalise whole populations. 3. Social – for example dealing constructively with issues relating to migration and increasing social diversity. Here you need to put forward your aims of education: Economic? social cohesion? knowledge? Collective/personal empowerment? Cultural Transmission? Preparation for Citizenship? Preparation for work? Democratic education/critical consciousness? Sustainable literacy? You need to clearly articulate and justify (using theory and relevant research) the values, purpose and influences underpinning your curriculum design – these are your core aims/dimensions/guidelines for education and the curriculum. These will underpin your argument and curriculum model throughout, so you need to consider how they translate into practice and the strengths and weaknesses of them. The Formal Curriculum: In this section, you need to show an understanding of historical and current policy on the National Curriculum or EYFS. You need to consider theoretical, social, and political influences. You also need to show an understanding of the statutory curriculum (NC or EYFS) e.g. Ofsted’s drive to construct an ‘ambitious’ curriculum (see Parker & Leat, 2021). Within this section you will need to consider (these should be reflective of your aims):  A national or common curriculum?  Will there be core/Foundation Subjects? Will you challenge the divide, if so why? ( 2  What subjects will be taught? Will there be any changes, again, if so why? These changes should be reflective of your aims. E.g. if one of your aims of education is about sustainability, you may add subjects about global and social matters. If it is about social justice, you may place critical literacy at the heart of the curriculum. Remember, there are only so many hours in the day, you must justify choices and consider strengths and limitations of including/ excluding subjects (see Lawton,1973, p.124-125). You will need to consider your curriculum in practice- the strengths and weaknesses of this. Relevant here are discussions around the neoliberalisation of schooling and how, perhaps, you are challenging/refashioning these. You might want to discuss:  Increasing constraints imposed on schools both nationally and locally (Ball, 1987).  Ball (2008): 2 policy technologies driving contemporary schooling.  Consequences of neoliberal regimes and discourse include pressures on teachers to teach to the test, consequently narrowing the curriculum (Priestley, 2010, p. 2).  Pedagogical styles: traditional or progressive? Does this challenge current pedagogy or reinforce it? And why this particular approach?  The term ‘delivery’: teachers are expected to deliver policy, deliver learning outcomes, deliver curricular entitlements(Priestley and Philippou, 2018).  Narrow conceptualisations of implementation constrain the development of more sophisticated understandings about how curriculum is made in diverse settings and about how curriculum making occurs as a non-linear recontextualisation process (Bernstein, 2000) (see Priestley and Philippou, 2018, p153).  See Lingard (2013) for a discussion of ‘economisation’ of schooling policy, pre-packaged curriculum, deskilling of teacher etc. In this section you might also want to discuss curriculum as a process, product, or praxis – which your module is reflective of and the strengths and weaknesses of this. The Hidden Curriculum: The formal curriculum inculcates particular forms of skill and knowledge – ‘know-how’ – learning to read and write, together with learning other skills and subject areas (Althusser, 1971). The hidden curriculum reproduces and instils specific workforces with expected and acceptable attitudes, desired behavioural norms, and personality characteristics – the ‘rules of good behaviour’ In this section you need to consider the social context: the hidden curriculum. You need to give consideration to relations and practices, social structures within schooling: you might want to consider here the effects of certain culture, class, ‘race’ and ethnicity. Will broader structures of the school be imposed on pupils in, will relations be authoritative? Or will you take a more relational approach? You must justify your approach to the hidden curriculum and this should be reflective of your aims and other aspects of the formal curriculum. Conclusion: This section should summarise main arguments throughout and pose some recommendations for practice/theory/broader economic, political, educational structures. You might want to consider: o Young’s distinction between a ‘curriculum of the past’ and a ‘curriculum for the future’ is useful in understanding the extent to which existing curricula reflect past social divisions rather than current trends and possibilities (Young, 1999, p.10). o What qualifications teachers need? Do any broader structural changes needed to be made to contemporary capitalist society? o What about ITT? Do changes need to be implemented here? o Do challenges need to be made to assessment/testing/ examination regime? ****Points to note throughout****: In the paper you need to compare and contrast at least one national model of curriculum and one international model of curriculum.

Analyze the book Sarah’s Key, developing parallels between literary lenses, literary devices, and themes in the Wars

Instructions:

 

Analyze the book Sarah’s Key, developing parallels between literary lenses, literary devices, and themes in the Wars etc.

 

8 slides in the presentation and they should include:

 

  • Your chosen piece of literature must shed light on the entire course this includes:
  • literary theories
  • literary devices
  • poetic devices and themes found in poems studied in ENG4U
  • short stories and the themes found in the stories studied in ENG4U
  • themes found in The Wars by Timothy Findley

 

  • Your presentation should include analysis (links to ideas, characters and events from course material) and not just a summary

 

 

discuss how information technology is reshaping healthcare 
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Application of Course Knowledge

 

40 53 This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Compare their competency results to that of their Week 2 assessment; identify competencies that  may be useful as an APN and why ; discuss how information technology is reshaping healthcare ; and  explain which competencies were achieved in this course.

 

 

Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources

 

20 27 This category is evaluated on the quality of the student’s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources ; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis ; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match , and minimize or appropriately  format direct quotations.

 

  60   Total CONTENT Points=60 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category Points % Description
Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format 15 20 Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation  and APA*  errors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.

* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.

**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must  add substantively to the discussion

 

State one of the basic designs (descriptive, correlational, predictive correlational, experimental, or quasi-experimental) and describe a possible study that could be done using that design. What are the strengths and weaknesses of that design?

Description

Answer the following questions and reply to at least two colleagues:

State one of the basic designs mentioned in Chapter 8 (descriptive, correlational, predictive correlational, experimental, or quasi-experimental) and describe a possible study that could be done using that design. What are the strengths and weaknesses of that design? Be sure to cite the source of your information. Post your initial response of Module 2 and post your replies of Module 2. Late posts do not get any credit. Posts must be substantive and reflect thought and effort in the discussion. If you see your peer got something wrong, point it out to them. It is better to let them know now, because in a future assignment they will have to identify this type of information for a grade. Always remember to cite and reference your resources appropriately using APA format. You should be using in-text citations in your initial response. Use in-text citations as needed in your replies. GUIDELINES Use this space to provide specific guidelines for students to follow. Please see the sample below. Your initial response should be 100-200 words in length, reflecting on the prompt above. Reply to at least two classmates’ posts. Your response to your classmate’s discussion should be around 50 words (each) and add to the discussion (i.e. reflecting on their response, asking questions, etc.).