Discuss the important clinical considerations when prescribing agents such as SSRIs, SNRIs, and other antidepressants in day-to-day clinical practice.

Description

Antidepressants are an important group of agents for the management of depressive disorders. Address the following using 300–400 words: Discuss the important clinical considerations when prescribing agents such as SSRIs, SNRIs, and other antidepressants in day-to-day clinical practice. Substantiate your post with at least 2 scholarly references; 1 should be from UpToDate.com . Cite all of your references using APA format. Use the following reference articles to inform your response: Hiance-Delahaye, A., de Schongor, F. M., Lechowski, L., Teillet, L., Arvieu, J. J., Robine, J. M., Ankri, J., & Herr, M. (2018). Potentially inappropriate prescription of antidepressants in old people: Characteristics, associated factors, and impact on mortality. International Psychogeriatrics, 30(5), 715– 726. Keks, N., Hope, J., & Keogh, S. (2016). Switching and stopping antidepressants. Australian Prescriber, 4/11/2022 Writers Hub – Freelance Writing https://www.writershub.org/writer/orders/854599#instructions 2/2 39(3), 76–83.

HOW CLIMATE CHANGE AFFECTS BUSINESS

Climate Change Challenge Proposal

CLIMATE CHANGE CHALLENGE:

HOW CLIMATE CHANGE AFFECTS BUSINESS

The purpose of this individual climate change challenge is for you to obtain, firsthand, a closer look and understanding of the implications for business, society, and the world at large, in recognizing this reality. This project will make an attempt to summarize what is known about the causes, current impacts, and likely future consequences of climate change – if the world continues to ignore its state of severity. Through this project, you will have a chance to outline and debate about what should be done; and to explore the implications for the firm/organization and sector in the industry you choose.

Therefore, you would need to choose a company or non-profit organization whose operating model is already being significantly affected by climate change’s physical manifestations and/or related regulation, including threats and opportunities associated with mitigation and/or adaptation. Describe how the organization is directly affected, the steps the organization is taking (if any) to address those effects, and describe and justify what additional steps you think the organization should consider implementing. Finally, make recommendations on how they should implement the changes needed.

For an initial analysis of the phenomenon, read the article (Henderson et al, 2017) about the Climate Change Challenge required of Harvard MBA students, and then visit the additional link so that you can read some of their blogs that describe what companies and non-profits are (or aren’t) doing to address climate change. You will deliver a 5 pages document (including cover and abstract on same page, and last page as references for a total of 7 full pages), describing your proposal.

Visit the link below to obtain more ideas in order to get your project jump started. Enjoy the materials offered here.

https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/more-than-900-examples-of-how-climate-change-affects-business

 

Instructions: Recommended Report Outline

  • Cover Page with Title of Project, Author Name and Contact Info, and abstract.
  • Abstract (1/2 page max): Provide a brief, succinct statement of the purpose of your report, central issue, the methods of your data collection, and your key findings, conclusions, and recommendations. A good overview/abstract provides a clear synopsis of your recommendations and includes a very brief statement on methodology used to justify your conclusions. The overview condenses the entire report into a mini version for those who will not read the full report. Share an overarching question. Hint: Write this last.

Table of Contents is NOT Necessary, instead label your paper parts accordingly, i.e:

  1. Brief Overview of Target Organization (1 page): What is the nature of the business or service provided by the organization? What is its history and mission? How is this organization being affected by climate change? Are Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) being integrated in this firm? Are SDGs listed or presented in any of its CSR/Sustainability reporting? Are the SDGS being prioritized based on local demographic needs? More specifically: does the firm/organization have a diversity and inclusion program in place? Is gender equity being addressed? What is the female manager count? What does the ethical climate look like? How do managers address ethics at work? Please be very specific here.

 

  1. Diagnose the Organization (2 pages): describe the climate change issue being faced by the focal organization; what the current strategic responsiveness have been, and any reported faces of change (Spector, 2013). If a sustainability program already in place, you can, in addition, draw on Benn et al (2019) Phase Models and Phases to understand where the organization is, in terms of integration models and level of engagement in CS.

 

  1. Apply theory to practice (2 pages): Based on your theoretical analysis, what course of action do you recommend that the organization take? Which strategic responsiveness (see Spector, 2013; from Building a vocabulary of change, to key theoretical approaches from any or a variety of chapters in the book) would you suggest this organization follow? What recommendations do you offer to raise its gender equality, ethics and inclusive programs?

 

  1. Conclusion and Next Steps (1 page): What do you foresee as the next steps the organization will need to make to move this project forward in the short term? What about the long term? What will be the major challenges and opportunities moving forward? Which phase model of integration do you now recommend the organization take, and why? (Benn et al 2019). Specifically, to the SDGs, which should be of concern to the firm/organization and why?

References: Please use APA or MLA for your citation and reference style. APA preferred.

How did the Secret Barrister (2018) challenge your assumptions about the main risk factors which can give rise to misscarriages of justice?

Description

My piece of coursework is for my misscarriages of justice module in my 4th year at university.

The question is “ How did the Secret Barrister (2018) challenge your assumptions about the main risk factors which can give rise to misscarriages of justice?”.

For this piece of coursework you would need to read the full book and then complete the essay. The word count is 1650 (+/-10% leeway in word count) and It is to be in Harvard referencing style with heading and bibliography not included in the word count. I usually achieve in the mid 60s with my average being 63% so would like to achieve around this mark. I’ve attached a link to the book also: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Secret‑Barrister‑Stories‑Law‑Broken/dp/1509841148/ref=asc_df_1509841148/?tag=googshopuk‑ 21&linkCode=df0&hvadid=310762413837&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=8269425350764585503&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9046928&hvtargid=pla‑ 687031468280&psc=1&th=1&psc=1

Based on the article and your current level of exposure to the topic of constitutional criminal procedure, outline your position as to how Dripps’ model would work in the real world.

Description

Based on the article and your current level of exposure to the topic of constitutional criminal procedure, outline your position as to how Dripps’ model would work in the real world. Refer to Watch: Introduction to Criminal Procedure found in Module 1: Week 1. State whether Dripps’ Model of “Contingent Suppression” is in any way compatible with restorative justice. If not, how could it be made more compatible?

Identify one legal factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy.

Description

Use the information provided to you in the TransGlobal Airlines Information document to perform a business environment analysis using the PESTEL method. Your task is to analyze the internal and external business environment of TransGlobal Airlines by identifying the impact of each PESTEL factor on the business environment. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: -Identify one political factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy. -Identify one economic factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy. -Identify one sociological factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy. -Identify one technological factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy. -Identify one environmental factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy. -Identify one legal factor that can affect the company’s business environment and explain any potential impact on acquisition strategy.

Submit A 6000-word literature review project, which critically analyses and evaluates one aspect of professional practice relevant to Mental Health Nursing.

Assessment Details TYPE OF ASSESSMENT: Literature Review DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT: A 6000-word literature review project, which critically analyses and evaluates one aspect of professional practice relevant to Mental Health Nursing. You are required to: • literature relevant to your own area of professional practice (Mental Health Nursing). • Demonstrate a thorough and systematic understanding of research • processes and critiquing skills throughout the review and present the • findings in a critical, coherent and structured manner. • Develop and utilise information and communication technology in order to maintain an understanding of recent innovations and developments in care • Based on evidence outlined, evaluate professional practice in the context • of multi professional and client centred care in order to identify professional, legal and ethical implications. • You are to use between 10 -12 primary research. • Research question (PICO) • Your project will be marked against the Level 6 grading criteria. PROJECT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS: Page Numbering: Pages should be numbered, 1 onwards from first page of text (after abstract), in the centre and at the foot of each page and should continue to the end, including appendices. Paper size and spacing: A4 paper to be used, typed on one side only, Reference list- please ensure line spacing between references; Appendices- single line spacing if possible. There should be a) A title page, which contains the title of the review, your student I D number, the degree for which the project is submitted and the date of submission, word count, School of Health Sciences b) An abstract of no more than 200 words (not included in word limit) which includes an outline of the topic reviewed, the scope of the review in terms of breadth of the literature search, a summary of the main issues addressed and arising, conclusions drawn and recommendations for further investigation, and practice development. c) Acknowledgements to organizations, funding bodies (if appropriate), supervisors, advisors and others who have contributed to the review. d) A table of contents with chapter headings and sub-headings, references, and appendices. e) The main review, divided into appropriate chapters, references, and appendices (see below). The Literature Search The literature search was performed using? What was your inclusion and exclusion criteria? How did you determine the process of elimination? this needs to be clearing discussed as to why some papers were included and some not. The focus of your search is literature articles. You should be demonstrating how different papers were included and excluded. When your key papers are identified, you then move to doing the matrix by using the CASP tool. Following this you will identify key themes which will help your answer your research question. Chapter 2 should be discussion of the key themes that came out of your search. The following chapters should be included: Chapter 1. Introduction This section should outline the rationale, aims and objectives of the review. Background information to the topic reviewed should be provided. The topic/question should be clearly introduced and set within the theoretical / philosophical context of your area of study. For example, how does it relate to the degree studies you are undertaking? Why is it necessary to undertake the review? Key writers in the field must be included to provide a contextual background for your review The aims and objectives for your review must be clearly stated. Parameters set for the literature search should be explained (e.g. time limits relating to the year of publication of the papers reviewed, and language limitations relating to the search, databases searched, key words used and hits achieved). N.B –Allocate approximately 200 words to the parameter section of this chapter Key search terms used (and where relevant MESH terms), including combinations should be identified; the databases searched, and number of hits achieved should be provided. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the studies considered for the review should also be identified. (This can be tabulated and placed within the appendices if required).(Chapter 1 – approximately 1000 words). Chapter 2. Critical Review of the Literature This chapter should be organised according to the themes. Such themes should emerge from the primary research gathered for your review and should be discussed individually. In order to make this manageable it is likely that you will have a minimum of two and a maximum of 3 themes or trends; where more themes emerged you will discuss this in your introduction and give a rationale for why you’ve chosen the themes selected for discussion. When discussing your themes, you will necessarily make reference to the studies you selected for inclusion in your review. However, you should also draw on wider literature to determine whether the same themes/trends are apparent – this helps you to demonstrate that you are able to synthesise and apply your knowledge. Relevant research-based evidence should be described and critically discussed. The quality of the discussion is particularly important. You should attempt a critical analysis, which is both coherent and balanced. You are required to demonstrate a thorough and systematic understanding of research processes by clearly identifying strengths and weaknesses of methodologies/approaches used by authors whose work have been reviewed. The chapter should end with a summary (Chapter 2. approximately 4000 words). Chapter 3. Conclusion Your conclusion should begin by summarising the key issues that led to the review and the themes that arose. Based on your discussion in chapter two, you should now be able to draw some overall conclusions within the context of your professional practice. Implications and recommendations for future practice should also be identified. The limitation of the review needs to be acknowledged. (Chapter 3. Approximately 1000 words). References All materials must be correctly and completely referenced according to accepted School of Health referencing system. Appendices -Must include: 1- A matrix which provides an overview of individual research papers reviewed. 2- Supervision record of contact time with your allocated supervisor. 3-Your presentation slides 4-Any material pertinent to, but not immediately necessary to the review, may be included as an appendix (but be sparing).

How might resilience and professional learning support you in this reshaping process?

2 pages + well-structured + cited references Description Part B: Personal Teaching Statement Explore the representation of “Teacher as leaner” in more detail. Using your drawing (see the uploaded files for the mind map) to structure your response, write a 1000-word personal teaching statement that responds to the following four questions (250-word response for each question): 1. How has this representation shaped you? Use positive and negative examples. 2. How has this representation shaped the profession? Use positive and negative examples. 3. Which aspect of this representation would you like to reshape (change/modify/extend) in your future teaching practice? Why? 4. How might resilience and professional learning support you in this reshaping process? Your personal teaching statement will draw upon suggested readings (literature), the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers, and unit content. It will be written in an academic manner, use first-person language, use scholarly references (5-8 sources) and APA referencing. PLEASE use the APST that are relevant to “TEACHER AS LEARNER” and why you choose and relate to that particular APST.

Consider how to Minimize Disruption that improves First Responder Safety.

Description Scenario: You are working at a government agency and your section recently received a new intern, River, to learn about critical infrastructures. River will be with your section for at least six months, perhaps permanently. The section chief tasked you to write a short paper on three of the critical infrastructures for River this week and discuss them in terms of physical attacks, cyber events, and natural disasters. You already talked to River about three of them through some casual discussions and you need to cover three of the remaining ones. Determine the ones from your first three discussions that you did not discuss yet. Determine which one of the them you will use to discuss a physical attack, which one for a cyber event, and the remaining one for a natural disaster. You decide that you need to write something that will catch River’s attention and provide the information in an interesting way. You determined to use the following outline for each of the three sections (plus the overarching requirements): TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM SECTOR, CHEMICAL SECTOR, AGRICULTURE/FOOD SECTOR  • Description of a Hypothetical Threat (physical, cyber, or natural disaster) • Brief background on the Critical Infrastructure as it relates to National Security • Elaborate on the known Risks/Threats/Hazards/Vulnerabilities from the Hypothetical Threat • Explain how damage to the from the Hypothetical Threat could impact the Dependencies/Interdependencies between critical infrastructure sectors • Existing Resiliency related to Continuity of Operations • Consider how to Minimize Disruption that improves First Responder Safety. Technical Requirements • Your paper must be approximately 6 pages – 2 pages per critical infrastructure discussed (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit). • Scholarly and/or credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least two sources per page of content. • Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double-spaced. • Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework. • Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc.