Provide equilibrium calculations to verify the stability of building and design for the building foundations.

Description

It is a Group coursework to design 2 identical residential buildings in the Moulsecoomb Brighton UK the group coursework have been divided into different parts for each student my part is the following. 4.2.5 Geotechnical solution for the proposed building :- This will include equilibrium calculations to verify the stability of building and design for the building foundations. Bore hole data from the British Geological survey site of the nearby locations can be used for these purposes. These can be found at https://www.bgs.ac.uk/data/boreholescans/home.html. I have attached the following :- 1. Lectures on how to do the calculations for the foundation 2. General information about the Residential building which is 5 stories (Ground floor + 4 floors) and underground car park. 3. Requirements page Please read them carefully and follow the instructions. You can Reference as many as you need but please Reference anything you research outside of the Lectures.

What explains why Russia interferes in US elections?

What explains why Russia interferes in US elections? Why does the US care about what Russia does in Ukraine? Who defines priorities in Russian foreign policy and in US policy towards Russia? Which theories or frameworks best explain Russian foreign policy and US-Russian relations? The purpose of this capstone class is to help students develop their capstone assignment: a piece of original research engaging with current debates in the field. The thematic focus of this capstone is the foreign policy of the Russian Federation, broadly defined. However, students may develop a project on any aspect of foreign policy as long as it is related to Russia. To do so, they are encouraged to adapt and expand the proposals they developed in their research prep courses. Since this is a capstone, we will not devote significant time to studying the content of Russian foreign policy. Instead, we will focus on theories, debates, and methods, as well as the steps of carrying out a research project. Assignment Learning Goal % Final Grade Article analysis / “peer review” Identify framework and theory; explain position in debate; evaluate methods and data. 10 Case Study Apply a framework to particular situation or problem in foreign relations. 10 Theory comparison Understand how different theoretical perspectives might lead to different explanations for particular problems. 10 Research Proposal Presentation Prepare a research project by engaging with existing debates, identifying questions and methods. 10 Draft paper 20 Final paper 40 NB: The shorter assignments at the beginning of the course are meant to help you prepare for your capstone. You can incorporate parts of the assignments in your final paper. However, to make most effective use of these assignments, you should have a good sense of your topic early in the course. If you are struggling with identifying a topic, please see me ASAP. Article analysis For this assignment, you will write a “peer review” of an academic article that has already been published. Among the questions you will need to answer are: what are the author(s) aims? What are the theories/frameworks with which they are working? Is their understanding of the theory sound? Do they cite up to date scholarship? What is the methodology? Is the evidence presented convincing? What might the author(s) do to make the argument more convincing? Does the article make an important contribution to our understanding of the topic?

Develop a research proposal on Russian foreign policy.

Description

The purpose of this capstone class is to help students develop their capstone assignment: a piece of original research engaging with current debates in the field. The thematic focus of this capstone is the foreign policy of the Russian Federation, broadly defined. However, students may develop a project on any aspect of foreign policy as long as it is related to Russia. To do so, they are encouraged to adapt and expand the proposals they developed in their research prep courses. Since this is a capstone, we will not devote significant time to studying the content of Russian foreign policy. Instead, we will focus on theories, debates, and methods, as well as the steps of carrying out a research project.

What frameworks and theories are other scholars employing, and how does the choice of framework affect the answer to the research question?

POLS 3520: Special Topics Research proposal Your research proposal is a document that lays out your research topic and questions, how these questions relate to ongoing discussions in the field, how you plan to answer your questions, and includes an annotated bibliography. Introduction 1-2 pages The introduction is an extended version of the “pitch” you wrote in October. Beyond that, the introduction should summarize your engagement with the existing literature and frameworks, your methodology and source base, and your research question(S). Introductions, as the word suggests, introduce your reader to your topic, your question, and your way of looking at the problem. They should not be a lengthy pre-history of the topic, nor should they be full of broad statements (the Russian peasantry was always subjugated! The Russian people have always been traditional!). Rather, they should briefly set the scene for your discussion, or even briefly state the existing debate (in broad terms) on your topic. If you have a “soft” opening paragraph that relates a story or anecdote, make sure that the story or anecdote you chose actually connects to the question you are going to pose. Remember, the point is to show the reader, in a manner as efficient as possible, what your research project is going to be about and why it matters. After the opening paragraph, briefly introduce the state of the field. What are the main explanations for the problem/conflict you are studying? Then, in the final paragraph, introduce your main research question and sub-questions. You may choose to do this in a more openended way, the way someone working in the humanities tradition would, or in a way more common in Political Science, with clear hypotheses. Finally, explain how you will answer the question/test the hypotheses. State of the Field 2-3 pages In this section, you will explain the debate on the topic and related issues as it exists today. The questions that you will want to address here include: What are the main points of agreement and disagreement? What are the methodologies and sources that have led people to particular conclusions? What frameworks and theories are other scholars employing, and how does the choice of framework affect the answer to the research question? How and why has the debate changed over time? A good “state of the field” section will not simply summarize the existing literature, but explain why scholars have asked certain questions, reached particular conclusions, and so on. You don’t have to cover every single piece written on the topic: rather, give the reader an analysis of how the debate has evolved. Start with the relevant frameworks (if applicable) and move down to the more specific literature. In the final paragraph of the section, explain how you will intervene in the ongoing debate. Do you want to test a theory? Challenge a particular interpretation? Take sides in a disagreement between groups of scholars? Source Base/Data and Methodology (2-3 pages) In this section, you build on the work you did in the source analysis to explain what kind of sources and methods you will use to answer the research questions you posed earlier and to test your hypotheses. First, explain what kind of sources you are going to use. If they are textual source, explain how and why they were produced, in what context, for what audience, etc. If data, explain how and why this data is collected. Either way, make sure you take note of potential biases and problems and explain how you will address them. Second, explain where these sources/data can be found. Third, give an example of a source, the way you did in the source analysis assignment. And finally, explain how these sources help you answer the questions you are posing, and how the source base/data/methodology you plan to employ is similar or different to the source base/data/methodology employed by other scholars you discuss in the “State of the Field” section. Annotated Bibliography Here you simply include a revised and updated version of the annotated bibliography you submit in November. Make sure that the updated version includes all literature you cite in the research proposal.

What made him change his mind, and what can that tell us about the Soviet collapse more broadly?

Suppose you wanted to know why the USSR collapsed in 1991. That is a big question, and obviously beyond the scope of a first year research paper (or even a PhD thesis). So you might try to find a more specific angle to look at – an event or development that was part of the collapse and whose explanation might help us understand the larger story. We might ask why Russian President Boris Yeltsin decided to stop collaborating with Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev on signing a new Union treaty in the fall of 1991 and instead negotiate a separate agreement with the other republics. No we have a particular historical actor, a limited time frame, and a specific action or decision that required investigation.

 

“Between June 1991 [when Yeltsin was elected president of the Russian Federation] and December 1991 [when Yeltsin chose to ignore Gorbachev], Boris Yeltsin was willing to work towards a treaty that would preserve the USSR with Russia at its core. What made him change his mind, and what can that tell us about the Soviet collapse more broadly?”

 

NB: avoid “how” questions: they tend to call for a long narrative discussion rather than an argument and an analysis.

explain by way of well-developed paragraphs what the authors think contributes to the US budget and debt crisis.

Description

1. Summarize the book in about three pages—what are the major topics, ideas, arguments covered in the book? This is not the place to comment on how well the authors address the book’s purpose or major arguments of the book—use this section to explain by way of well-developed paragraphs what the authors think contributes to the US budget and debt crisis. Use the data offered by the authors to support your explanation. 2. Criticize the author’s work in about one page—what was not covered or was not clear in the presentation? Conversely, what are the strengths of the book? 3. Offer some conclusions and recommendations in about a page–what is the relevance of the book to budgeting practice and this course? What did you learn that helps you understand budgeting and the US financial crisis? Using subtitles for the sections explained in 1 through 3 above would help organize your review. Quality of Summary Clarity &Mechanics Critical Analysis and Connection to Budgeting

How might the photojournalist approach issues of gender identity and representation

Topic: How might the photojournalist approach issues of gender identity and representation

Description

1500 words excluding bibliography, quotes, citations and references. Total 1600 words. There should be some photos for comparison of gender equalities and representation the photos should be evidence for this. The pictures supposed to have dates and proper citations as well each paragraph ought to contain quotes. There should be some arguments and examples overall it should cover whole topic.exploring and evaluating all sides of the argument from different theoretical positions and drawing to a conclusion with several academic references. • Use a font such as Arial, Times New Roman or Calibri • Use font size 10 or 11 or 12 • Use 1.5 line spacing • Use the appropriate academic referencing style (APA) • ONLY submit work in formats such as .doc or .docx

Discuss your own leadership style in depth and compare your selected leadership style to at least three other styles of leadership.

Research Paper: Leadership Philosophy Paper Assignment Instructions

Overview

In this assignment, you will identify a leader who projects a style you feel is most valuable to the field of public safety. You will then identify their leadership style and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of their leadership style. Additionally, you will assume the role of a leadership within a public safety setting. You will identify and select a leadership style you feel is most beneficial for you in that role and you will discuss your selected leadership style in depth. Why did you select this style? Why do you feel it would prove most beneficial in the field of public safety? How might you determine your success? Additionally, please be sure to discuss and compare your selected leadership style to at least three other leadership styles.

Instructions

The paper should consist of at least 10-12 full pages (not including any title, abstract, and reference pages) in current APA format and must discuss the points required. Follow the guidelines provided below:

  • Identify and discuss a leader and leadership style.
  • Discuss how their leadership style would offer value to the field of public safety.
  • Assume the role of a leader in public safety and then select your own, preferred leadership style.
  • Discuss your own leadership style in depth and compare your selected leadership style to at least three other styles of leadership.
  • Please be sure to incorporate Biblical concepts/passages into your paper.
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Make sure each section is clearly labeled with headings (i.e. Identified Leader Name, Leadership Style, etc.)
  • All papers should consist of 10-12 full pages (not including any title, abstract, and reference pages) in current APA format
  • At least 10 citations (in addition to the Bible)
  • Acceptable sources (e.g. scholarly articles published within the last five years)

 

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Explain the reason which offer should the committee accept or be better not accepting any offer with reasons for your explanation with comparison of the offers for your decision.

Your report should be presented in this format: 30%

Contents Page:

A. Executive summary (250 – 500 words) (Note- this should be posted in task 3b discussion forum)

B. Body of the Report (total 30 Marks) (body of the report should comprise the following)

1. Cost Analysis & Break even Analysis: (Here you must differentiate cost as fixed cost / variable cost and state the reason why they are fixed / variable related to their cost behaviours and

recommendations to transform from variable to fixed costs or would that be better to stay as variable costs according to the cost behaviour and driver calculate your BEP using the BEP formula so you need your Fixed cost and variable cost per unit calculated for each room and find out what the Breakeven rooms per day and propose the committee what would be the BEP in units and dollars for 80% occupancy.) (750 – 1000 words) (5 Marks)

2. Analyse and Calculate ADR, REVPAR, profit for Laila and Marys offers (Here you need to calculate the ADR and REVPAR with the data provided and comment on the ADR and RevPAR (10 marks)

C. Decision / Recommendation (Explain the reason which offer should the committee accept or be better not accepting any offer with reasons for your explanation with comparison of the offers for your decision (10 marks) (750 words)