In your opinion and biblically what should be the goals and purposes of the criminal law?

Description

In your opinion and biblically what should be the goals and purposes of the criminal law? In your opinion, what seems to be the actual goals of the criminal law, as carried out by the criminal justice system? What role should restorative justice play? What role does it play? the thread have to be 275-500 words . For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citations in current APA format and quote 1 Scripture in support of the thread. Any sources cited must have been published within the past five years. Acceptable sources include scholarly journals (not the textbook but should include the Bible, etc.). below is the class book info (CHAPTER 1,3)and attached is the lecture! book info: Criminal Law, 13th Edition Thomas J. Gardner, Terry M. And

Reflect and discuss how we set the standards for the conditions of the ‘good’ and how we flourish.

Topic: Medical Ethics class: Alasdair Macintyre’s “Dependent Rational Animals Why Human Beings Need the Virtues”

Description

Journal prompt reflection entry instructions are to read chapter 7 and then discuss the following in 1-2 pages:”In his chapter 7 on “Vulnerability, flourishing, goods, and ‘good”, he spoke in detail on how we have rational human beings decide what is good and how to flourish. Read over his ideas, especially how he compares them to the sensitive beings of non-human species such as Dolphins. Reflect and discuss how we set the standards for the conditions of the ‘good’ and how we flourish. ” Our grading prompt is as follows: “Student incorporated the medical ethical theories if possible (deotonolgy, utilitarianism, virtues). Student thought: Thinking means comparing, contrasting, and most of all, evaluating. You are thinking when judging something as true or false, good or bad, beautiful or ugly. The judgments that you make need to be based upon logic and reason, not gut instincts and opinion. Therefore, it would be best if you made these reasons clear.”

Prepare PowerPoint slides summarizing APN practice regulation analysis.

PowerPoint slides summarize APN practice regulation analysis. Summarize with no more than 5 slides (exclude your title and references) the significant findings from your assigned state (UTAH) on APN practice. Be sure to compare the information from the 2 states (UTAH vs. NEY JERSEY).

 

CRITERIA
  • Summary of the APRN Paper with pertinent information are included in the presentation
  • Comparison of state assigned, and New Jersey included in the discussion
  • Conclusion and summary are provided
  • PowerPoint presentation is organized in a clear, concise manner, thoughtful, not more than 5 slides, excluding title and references.
  • Valid and relevant references (APA 7th edition format) with at least 5 primary sources less than 5 years.

 

Use the Hunt Library, Google Scholar, and the internet to discover what the thought leaders are saying, best practices, and criticisms.

Instructions

For this assignment, I need an annotated bibliography on the topics below. For this assignment, please complete 2 academic sources that were published in 2017 or later. I have also included a sample of the format to use. Each source summary and analysis must to be a minimum of 80 words + the takeaway and criticism.

Collaborate

After reviewing the weekly resources, collaborate with your group and brainstorm your keywords. These keywords will help you perform exploratory research about this WP’s topic:

  • Critical path scheduling
  • Three-point estimating
  • Gantt chart
  • Z-Score and probability in project management

Research

Use the Hunt Library, Google Scholar, and the internet to discover what the thought leaders are saying, best practices, and criticisms.

With your group, evaluate your research and discuss your findings. For EACH TOPIC, you are expected to collect Two (2) Academic Sources

 

 

create and design a limited menu for hotel Trinity(ficțional hotel) that they can offer as a takeaway service to the public .

Topic:

Your task is to create and design a limited menu for hotel Trinity(ficțional hotel) that they can offer as a takeaway service to the public .Hotel trinity is 4 independent Hotel located on the coasta Swansea,Souht Wales . You must offer wine on the menu and pair a minimum 2 wines with recommended dishes. The menu will need to be designed on an A4 Page format (word,PowerPoint).This can be a singular Page or 2 pages (as this could be printer back to back)

discuss each article in terms of reliability and validity. Do you think their methodology leads to credible results? Why or why not?

Overview: For this milestone, you will begin your analysis of the studies that you have selected by continuing the work you began in Milestone One. Your analysis will focus on the research design of the studies and how the conclusions are or are not supported by the results of the studies. Use the same three articles you selected for Milestone One and expand upon the methodology. Be sure that your submission addresses the following critical elements: Compare the research methodologies used in your chosen studies and explain why these methodologies were used over other methodologies. In other words, in your comparison you could include why methodologies are informed by the hypothesis created by the author of the study. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not valid. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not reliable. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. Explain why the research designs of your chosen studies ensure that the study is or is not credible. Be sure to support your response with examples and support from the chosen studies. Explain how the results of your chosen studies appropriately support the conclusions that were reached. If the results do not support the conclusions reached, briefly describe the more appropriate conclusions given the results presented. In other words, you could consider the results section and how the authors used that information to reach their conclusions, even if their claims are inaccurate. For more detailed instructions, see the following steps: 1. First copy and paste the title page and reference list from Milestone One into a new document. Hopefully the running head copies over as well, but if it does not, add that back in. Be sure to address any feedback from your instructor on these sections so you have the best version moving forward. 2. Next, begin the new narrative by comparing and contrasting the research methodologies from the three articles. In Milestone One, you simply described the articles. Now you will begin to integrate them into a larger discussion, using material you have learned in this class. How are the methodologies similar? How are they different? Why might the authors have made these methodological choices, given their stated hypotheses? Be sure to incorporate specific points from all three articles to support your arguments. 3. Then, discuss each article in terms of reliability and validity. Do you think their methodology leads to credible results? Why or why not? It is certainly possible that you will reach different conclusions for some of the articles. Talk about how the individual methodology led you to those conclusions. Again, be sure to incorporate specific points from all three articles to support your arguments. Also make sure that for each article, you talk specifically about reliability, validity, and overall credibility (That is, should we trust these results? Beyond reliability, are the results logical? Current? Anything else that might concern or impress you?). 4. Close by discussing the conclusions reached by each of the articles. Again, you described this in Milestone One but now you are using the information developed in Milestone Two to critique the conclusions. Are those conclusions supported? If so, what specifically makes you believe the conclusions are valid? Are those conclusions not supported, given the information provided above? If so, cite specific reasons as to why we should question the given conclusions. Helpful hints for Milestone Two: ● Use citations appropriately so the reader can distinguish between each of the articles and your original thoughts. ● Remember this is a methodological discussion in a research methods course, so while it is OK to use some other information if you feel that is important for your argument, your primary focus should be on the methods themselves. ● If you are making any claims that are not directly from the articles or are not common knowledge, you should use scholarly research to support these claims. For example, you should not make claims such as “Addiction to alcohol comes from a genetic predisposition” or “Children respond better to an authoritarian parenting style” unless you can support them with a peer-reviewed research article. Feel free to reference your textbook if you need to define research terms or other basic methodology. Note that using this additional information or making additional claims is not a requirement, but an option for those who want to further support their arguments. The point is that if you are going to include this information, you are required to cite it. PLEASE NOTE: You are not required to use any new references in this section, but if you do, make sure to cite them in APA style in the reference list. Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, a running head, a title page, and at least three sources cited in APA format. This submission should be approximately 3–4 pages (not counting title or reference page). It is anticipated that you will use the same title page and reference page as submitted in Milestone One, with any feedback from your instructor incorporated.

Write a 4–6-page paper in current APA format explaining how the story/narrative you have created drives an internal integrated marketing communication campaign that touches the organization and produces the desired effect.

Course Project: Paper and Video Assignment Instructions

Overview

This course is all about communicating to a diverse group of employees, also known as internal publics, an internal audience, to positively shape and reshape their perceptions of an organization. Perceptions are best shaped by a story/narrative designed to involve and animate a specific target. The strategic goal of employee communication is to create a positive understanding of an organization.

Instructions

Your Challenge:

You will choose an organization to be the focus of your final project. Around your choice, you will create a story, a narrative that—through the communication tactics, especially the digital ones, that you have learned about in your other Strategic Communication courses—will dive deep into the psyche of the employees of an organization and give them reason to positively think, act, perceive, etc., establishing an emotional connection with the organization. The ideal organization is one that you are familiar with or one where you would like to work.

 

Course Project: Paper and Video

This Course Project Assignment consists of 2 parts, both due at the same time.

 

Paper: Write a 4–6-page paper in current APA format explaining how the story/narrative you have created drives an internal integrated marketing communication campaign that touches the organization and produces the desired effect. It will engage your employees/interns/volunteers/associates, producing more of the desired activities. The sections and format you are to use for this paper follow:

Introduction

Briefly summarize the effect you desire, the nature of your choice and target, and the story that provides the foundation for your creative.

Environment

Describe the context in which you are attempting to achieve employee motivation, peace, attitude change, buy–in, etc. What are the characteristics and “hot” buttons you can work with in attempting to communicate and persuade? What are the elements that the target has to overcome, within themselves or in the greater environment surrounding them, in order to be persuaded to go in your direction?

Story–Summary

An effective internal communications campaign is built in large part through touching members of the organization, through involving them in some kind of story with them and the product/organization/service at its center. Remember: An image is largely engineered through the communication of a story through appropriate channels, purposively and deeply touching a specified internal community (target).

 

In this section, describe the story that will be the foundation of your creative message. How do you want it to touch your target? With what effect? Now, step us through the elements of the story you have created. Include detailed descriptions of the beginning, middle, and end of the story as an underlying narrative.

Conclusion

A course that is worth the investment leaves you with something you can later use. What is the takeaway for you, personally, from this assignment? What have you learned that you can use in your career or, for that matter, your life?

 

The written portions of the assignments below are to be written with standard 1″ margins and 12 pt. Times New Roman font and must be double-spaced. Title page Included.

  • Length of assignment: 4 to 6 pages (excluding title page and references)
  • Format of assignment: Current APA
  • Number of citations: at least 1
  • Acceptable sources (textbook or sources with your organization’s information)

 

Video: Write and create a 30-second or 60-second promotional video, either a conventional promotional video or a video meant to be featured online that helps to produce buy-in from employees of an organization. What matters in this is not so much the production values—which can be rough, as this is not a course in video production—but the coherence of the story and its fit to the target. This is a conceptual and not professional production.

  • Length of assignment: 30 to 60 second video
  • Format of assignment Kaltura, YouTube, Vimeo with unlisted link, or various video platforms

Video

Describe the promotional video you have created:

How does it begin?

What is the story line in the middle?

How does it end?

What benefit does it promise for the target?

Put yourself in the shoes of its target. Does it work, why or why not?

 

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

 

• What are the three trends underscoring public health’s need to partner with the business sector?

Description

Heres the link to the Article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022050/?tool=pmcentrez This assignment is based on the Learn item, Read: Public Health’s Inconvenient Truth: The Need to Create Partnerships with the Business Sector, in the assigned Module: Week. Please respond to the following: • Summarize the article’s major points • Describe the three principle changes in the public health landscape driving public health’s need to partner with business. • What are the three trends underscoring public health’s need to partner with the business sector? • Give three examples of public health-business partnerships that have been established in the past 15 years and discuss their purpose. The assignment is to be written as a paper. One source should be given to support your response in addition to citing the assigned article, which is already embedded in the course. You should use APA format, 12 font, double space, and write between 450–500 words maximum. Article Review: Health Care Reform and Equity Assignment This assignment is based on the Learn item, Read: Health Care Reform and Equity: Promise, Pitfalls, and Prescriptions, in the assigned Module: Week. Please respond to the following: In Health Care Reform and Equity: Promises, Pitfalls, and Prescriptions, Kevin Fiscella describes the causes of health care disparities. He argues (in 2011) that the current health care reform activities (i.e., the passage of the Affordable Care Act) offer a unique opportunity for a more equitable health care system. He further states health care reform that includes elements from six health care domains: access, primary care support, enhanced health information technology, new payment models, a national quality strategy informed by research, and federal requirements for health care disparity monitoring are the keys to increased health care equity. He cites several promises, pitfalls, and prescriptions in the six domains that can impact health care equity, ultimately deciding that these, along with effective implementation, improved alignment of resources with patient needs and revitalization of primary care can effectively  produce a more equitable system. Choose two (2) of the health care reform domains and thoroughly discuss whether and how the promises, pitfalls, and prescriptions Fiscella provides dilutes or enriches the biblical worldview of public and community health. The assignment is to be written as a paper. One source should be given to support your response in addition to citing the assigned article, which is already embedded in the course. You should use APA format, 12 font, double space, and write between 450–500 words maximum. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.