The topic for this term paper is on the ethical question on whether and under what conditions a ‘higher purpose’ (end) can justify the means—which is commonly seen as unethical or immortal otherwise.
To help you situate the topic in some concrete contexts, you are required to read two essays, “The End Can Justify the Means—But Rarely” (by Warren G. Bovee) and “Why the end doesn’t justify the means, but the means can always justify the end” (by James Schroeder), posted on our course website. The first essay explores means and end relationship in the context of journalism, and the second essay argues, somewhat surprisingly, that the means can always justify the end, not the other way around. You need to read these two essays carefully and really digest them first, and only then can you be properly prepared for writing your own essay.
Contents Requirements:
Your essay will argue for (or against) a position about the relationship between means and end in the context of something you are familiar with (e.g., a job you had or have, a volunteer experience, being a student, being a member of a sport team at school, etc.).
You are going to argue M (means) justifies (or does not justify) E (end), or the other way around, or neither (M or E) justifies the other, and under what specific conditions. You must use concrete examples, at least two examples, to show these conditions.
The paper should appropriate ideas from the two essays above mentioned. At least one quote or paraphrase (both with page reference) from each essay. It is recommended to use more than one quote or paraphrase from each essay.
Format requirements (also serving as parts of the grading criteria):
The title of the term paper should be clear and focused.
The Introduction should be brief, avoiding irrelevant digression, and keeping in line with the title (the promised topic).
It is required that each body paragraph starts with a topic sentence. This is the sentence that captures the gist of the paragraph following it.
When a quote or a paraphrase is used, make sure it integrates into the flow of your text.
Write short and clear sentences; avoid long sentences—a sentence that is three lines long without proper punctuation marks is almost certainly unclear or inarticulate.
Avoid writing empty sentences– sentences that are tautological, which seem to say something but in fact say nothing concrete or specific. (E.g., “Human, since the childhood, was threatened by different diseases”, “Perhaps Socrates is right, and perhaps Socrates is wrong.”)
A paragraph should be consistent and coherent—i.e., the whole paragraph should stick to the promise given in the topic sentence. Do not digress or wander away.
The maximum of words for this term paper is 1000; 800 words in good quality is better than 1000 words with filling-the-blank tricks.
In arguing for your position, you can cover three or more of the following: (a) cite a principle, or/and (b) consequences, or/and (c) examples, or/and (d) consider an objection to your view and respond to that objection, or/and (e) clarify a concept when it is necessary or helpful to do so. (See Tables in the Instructions on Major Project No.2).