War on Terrorism Questions

1.1.  Evaluate Jeffrey Record’s basic argument in Bounding the War on Terrorism. Is he correct or not? Why or why not?2.2.  In a news item during the Bush administration, a reporter for the New York Times noted that, “From the very start of the American occupation of Iraq, at least some in the Bush administration saw an opportunity to curtail the influence of Iran’s radical Shiite leaders by producing an alternative, moderate center of Shiite Islam that would effectively neuter Tehran in ideological, political and strategic terms. This was abundantly clear to Iran’s clerical rulers, whose paramount priority since they seized power in 1979 has been to preserve their revolution and their grip on their own country.”  Has this aspiration by some Bush policy-makers proven true or has some other reality developed? What does this observation say about the nature of war?3.  Does the U.S. Face a Future of Never-ending Sub-national & Trans-national Violence?, Thomas Barnett states that: The post-Cold War era has witnessed an amazing “downshifting” of the source of threats to global stability. In this short span of history, the world has moved from an era in which global nuclear war was the dominant threat, through a transitional era in which it seemed that regional rogues would become the primary source of system instability, to one in which it is increasingly recognized that trans-national or non-state actors will constitute the main source of violence – sometimes of a mass nature – that has the capacity to perturb, even in a significant fashion, the functioning of the global economy. In effect, America’s definition of the threat has de-escalated from an “evil empire” to “evil regimes” to “evil actors.” What are the implications for American strategic planning based on Barnett’s assessment of the global threat environment? A proper response will include examples and references from the assigned readings in this course.4.  In his assessment of the Israeli-Hezbollah War, Anthony Cordesman provided some preliminary lessons learned from that conflict. Demonstrate how a parallel can be drawn between the Israeli-Hezbollah case and that of the United States and Al Qaeda. Discuss the implications of this assessment for the “global war on terror.”

Need help in summarizing an hbr topic called “coca-cola in 2011: in

I need a question answered from HBR case study named: “Coca-Cola in 2011: In Search of a New Model”. The question is: 
An introduction to the case and What are Coca-Cola’s competitive advantages?
The case-brief should be written in a business scholarly tone, include at least 4 scholarly references which . The case-brief should have, organization, structure, use APA, include in-text cites matching all references, and the references must accurately support the ideas for which they are cited. The answer should be HBR case study Coca-Cola in 2011: In Search of a New Model.
Here is the case synopsis:  
Case Synopsis: Muhtar Kent, CEO of the Coca-Cola Company, faced a critical decision in 2011 after closing a $12 billion deal to buy its troubled North America bottling operations from its biggest bottler, Coca-Cola Enterprises. The decision was prompted by several changes in the U.S. market, including the bottler’s inability to make crucial investments, the growth of alternative, non-sparkling drinks, and the growing power of national accounts, such as Wal-Mart. Now that Coke owned most of its North American bottling network, Kent had to decide whether keeping the labor and capital-intensive side of the bottling business was in Coke’s long-term strategic interest. If not, should he re-franchise the bottling business, again, as Coke had done in the past? Or was there a third path? For one of the most successful companies in the world over the last 100 years, Kent’s answers to these questions had the potential to redefine Coke’s business model for the next century. 

Epidemiology and Health Promotion Discussion

Question 1 Pick any real world company that you’ve worked for or are interested in and write about what kinds of capital they have raised or are raising.Requirements:Question 2Briefly explain how state and federal regulations affect MCOs. What is the role of the court when there is conflict between state and federal requirements for MCOs?question 3Examine the differences between state and federal regulations of managed care. Which regulations have more impact on managed care? Explain.Requirements:Submit your essay in a Word document. This assignment must be at least 500 words, with at least four references cited properly in APA format, and a title page (APA format). This assignment must be well- written with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.question 4Review managed care programs profiles provided by Medicaid.gov. in the link below. Compare and contrast managed care programs between two states. Make sure to address the following areas:Requirements:Submit your essay in a Word document. This assignment must be at least 500 words, with at least four references cited properly in APA format, and a title page (APA format). This assignment must be well- written with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.question 5 Patients are acquiring infections after visiting a hospital. Visit the CDC website.Question: Describe the types of Health-care associated infections patients are acquiring after being admitted to a hospital. Describe the transmission methods and rates of these infections. Discuss the prevention strategies that could be implemented to reduce the occurrence of Health-care associated infections (nosocomial infections).Your initial post should be at least 200 words question 6Read the case study “Botulism in Argentina”. Work through all of the sections of the case study and answer the 19 questions.Instructions:question 7 Recall a leader you worked for. At what stage of personal diversity awareness was the leaders? Explain. At what stage of diversity awareness are you?”question 8“Describe ways in which you might increase your personal power.”

Evidence in Nursing Discussion

Please respond with a paragraph to the following question, add citations and references:There are several different methods available to evaluate evidence in nursing. I would choose to use a systemic review and a meta-analysis. They both gives results by using and combining data from studies on similar research topics. The meta-analysis is a system that uses statistic methods for summarizing outcomes of the study. A meta-analysis is a valid, objective and scientific method of analyzing and combining different results (Ahn & Kang, 2018). When the effect of the treatment is accurate and is consistent from one study to another, then the meta -analysis could used to identify common impacts. I would consider meta-analysis to be a very powerful sources in evidence evaluation. However, some results could be misleading due to violations of creating a sound meta-analysis.A systemic review provides answers to research questions which is well defined by a collection and summary pf information (Ahn & Kang, 2018). Systemic reviews assist in identifying, assessing and summarizing the findings of all individual studies which are relevant about medical problems, thus creating the evidence available as more accessible towards the decision makers. The limitations of systemic reviews are that it needs a team and it needs enough data for arriving at conclusions. If one has a lack of understanding about systemic reviews and meta-analyses, it can lead to incorrect outcomes.Its easy to confuse the two methods listed: A systemic review is an objective, reproducible method to find answers to research questions. This is done by collecting studies related to the question, reviewing and analyzing their results. The meta-analysis uses statistical methods on estimates from two or more studies to form an estimate. When performing both methods, if the quality of the studies are not properly evaluated then then results can be biased and the outcomes can be incorrect.Reference:Ahn, E., & Kang, H. (2018). Introduction to systemic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(2), 103-112. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103

The Martian Film Essay

Please compare Guardians of the Galaxy, Volume 1 (2014) and The Martian (2015)Please the requirement carefully! and read the cue sheet example first!The assignment is in three parts: Part 1: you will complete a scene analysis for the first segment of your two films.Using the form provided, complete a scene analysis for your two films. Please see the Scene Analysis breakdown below and the form your chosen films.Part 2: you will compile a cue list of the first 25 minutes of your two films. Using the form provided, complete a cue list for your two films. Please see the Cue Listbreakdown below and the form your chosen films.Part 3: In mini-essay format (prose, full sentences), you will compare your two films by answering a series of questions about the use of music in the two films. For this part, you should watch the two films in their entirety.Part 1: Scene analysisUsing the template form provided (MUS 2310B 2019 Assignment Part 1 Scene Analysis Template), complete a scene break-down for the first segment of your two films.The point of the scene analysis is to identify the various elements of the sound track and their importance in your filmsPart 2: Cue ListUsing the template form provided (MUS 2310B 2019 Assignment Part 2 Cue List Template), complete a cue list for the first 25 minutes of your two films.Steps to follow: 1. 2.Identify the individual cues in the first 25 minutes of your two films.For each scene, note the following:Cue name (original name or one you make up)Start and end times.Pre-existing music should be identified by name, where possible.Placement of the music: Diegetic or nondiegeticAssignment GuidelinesPart 3: Mini essay – compare and contrast (approximately 500-1000 words)Answer the following question in prose format (full paragraphs). You should treat this as a mini- essay in which you compare your two films. Please be sure to address the elements below, however you are welcome to add information that interests, you if you wish.Here is the detailed assignment requirement and all the information you need (include example): 

Wr – mod 2 discussion

Module 2 Discussion – Judaism
66 unread replies.66 replies.
Judaism Discussion
After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, as well as reviewing the Judaism Study Resources.pdf Download Judaism Study Resources.pdfpage, discuss the following:
In your reading of Chapter 10 – Encountering Judaism: The Way of God’s People as well as the other readings for the week, you have gained a better understanding of the central themes of Judaism. As you learned more about the religion, you may have noticed the many similarities that Judaism shares with Christianity as the relationship between the two religions is rather unique. Christianity is rooted in Judaism historically, scripturally, liturgically, and even theologically. No two major world religions have so much in common. Below are a handful of the common elements shared by these two religions, however, it is important to note that even though these religions share several common elements, they articulate them differently. Last week, we expounded upon how some of these themes are understood in the context of Catholicism and now you will describe how they are understood in Judaism.
Note: Yahveh is the most accurate pronunciation of the holiest name of God. Because of the 2nd Commandment (Exodus-Shemot 20:7), most Jews never say it; instead, they substitute either Adonai or HaShem. [Yahweh & Jehovah are popular but erroneous pronunciations.]
Select two themes from the list below and present the Jewish teaching on the chosen theme.

Jewish Understanding of God
Salvation
Creation
Eschatology
Pain and Suffering
Freedom and Free Will
Virtues
Sin 

Each selected theme must:
Submission Instructions:

Your initial post should be at least 150 words. Incorporate different sources, formatted, and cited as the instructor indicated in the announcements. 

Grading Rubric 
Your assignment will be graded according to the following rubric: Rubric – Judaism Discussion.pdf

Children’s Hospital of Chicago Presentation

2 powerpoint each one is about 12 slides the whole context must be about the Finishes that they used and what did they did right and what’s wrong in the interior design like the nature and the daylight the colors large windows view to nature things like that Pulled points – enough context enough pictures – that is 12 to 15 minutes talk the first powerpoint must be about and the second one must be about THE Johns Hopkins Hospital ( make sure that it is the one in Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan Tower or the one in The Charlotte R. Bloomberg Children’s Center but NOOOT BOTH ONLY ONE OF THEM )the whole project is all about interior design and what did they do well in the design and what did they do bad the whole sources must be from good articles and add reference page two good articles to be usedrequirement Objective:Presentation Format:Each person will have 15 min to present 1 of their 2 projects in a power-point presentation to the class on Wednesday, May 30th.Please be prepared to also provide PDF uploadAll work and images MUST be cited. Use APA format. Try to withhold the use of direct quotes. Put into your own words and all paraphrased work must be cited as well.Grading Criteria:ONLINE RESOURCES *available through e-journal at Reinsch The Center for Health Design EBD 101 Introduction Video: CAMA EBD 101 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.According to The Center for Health Design, Evidence-Based Design (EBD) is the process of basing decisions about the built environment on credible research to achieve the best possible outcomes. Included in this process are the following eight steps:

Methods of Evaluating Evidence Discussion

Respond with a paragraph to the following question, add citations and references:There are different methods of evaluating evidence. The two common methods of evaluating evidence are Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The two methods help in the determination of the relevance and validity of the evidence. The two methods of evaluating evidence are both similar and differentSimilaritiesBoth the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses are considered the highest quality of evidence for clinical decision making and can be used above all the other methods of evaluating evidenceBoth the methods for evaluating evidence are similar because they involve the collection of data from different sources and summarizing the all the evidence and results of the studiesDifferencesWhile systematic review collects and summarizes all the empirical evidence, the meta-analysis uses statistical methods to summarize the results of the studiesSecond, Meta-analysis is a statistical method used to combine the numerical results from such studies, if it is possible to do. On the other hand, Systematic review is a formal, systematic and structured approach to review all the relevant literature on a topicThird, the rationale for Meta-analysis is that through the combination of samples from different studies the overall sample size is increased, while the rationale for systematic reviews is that when data is pooled together from different sources a greater reliability would be obtained.Reference:Melnyk, B. M. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

University of California Los Angeles Art Question

Write a 500+ Word Paper that Analyses a Work of Art in Relation to Critical Discourse Analyze a work of art from course materials (lectures, discussions, readings, etc.). Pdfs of all lecture slides are available on eLearn.   Be sure to include the artist, title, and date in your paper as well as an image of the artwork. Incorporate a discussion of one or two critical concepts into your essay (i.e. an idea that comes from an academic source other than yourself). You may chose to use course readings or conduct addition research using the UCR Library. Use quotes and citations effectively: Select one or two quotes that support your analysis. Choose carefully: in 500 words, you must be focused and precise in order to address concepts and incorporate quotes effectively. See Using Quotes Effectively (written by Professor Liz Kotz) Download Using Quotes Effectively (written by Professor Liz Kotz). Cite your sources using a recognized citation format, such as MLALinks to an external site. or Chicago (Links to an external site.). Hints and Suggestions Read your essay aloud: does it flow? Does it make sense? Have a friend proofread your paper. Once you have a draft, consider taking your paper to the Academic Resource Center: Visit

PU Psychology Participating in Physical Activities Essay

Stop/Start Reaction Journal  Choose 1) a behavior you want to STOP during this course, or 2) a behavior you want to START during this course. Either way, choose something challenging. This should be a time of personal growth, and the assignment should also enhance your awareness of the issues and challenges involved in changing a behavior. Anything you journal will be kept in STRICTEST confidence. You do not need to disclose any information that makes you uncomfortable. During this class, as you journal, the aim is to see some personal growth and reflection in your journal entries. It is expected that you will write much more than a line or two, so avoid superficial entries. The point of this journal is to track your experience in either stopping an unhealthy behavior, OR starting a healthy behavior. For example, you may choose to stop smoking, or to start exercising. So, gear up for the stop/start experiment, journal your thoughts, responses and experiences. Stretch yourself, grow, and go for the challenge! As you journal your responses, struggles and victories, consider the following: 1) What led to your choice to start/stop a behavior? 2) How might your journey to start/stop have some similarities to a client struggling to attain sobriety? 3) What are some of your struggles? What made it difficult? 4) What are some of your victories? 5) What behaviors/emotions/thoughts accompanied this journey? 6) In your final entry: Discuss the insights gained from writing this journal, as they apply to your role as a future counselor