Review literature of data warehousing trends

For this task, you will use this week?s readings as background information, and conduct a comprehensive literature search. Locate six additional scholarly, peer-reviewed works that provide sufficient background for a literature review on the topic of managing data warehouses. The focus should be on best practices, tool evaluation, and/or review of systems. Each section must be formatted properly and must have a logical flow and transition between them. The final submission must be in APA format and contain a title page, table of contents, and reference list.
For each work covered, be sure to include:
– The work?s purpose.
– A concise summary of its contents.
– Its relevance to the topic.
– An analysis of the contribution?s unique characteristics.
– Your critical analysis of the study?s strengths and weaknesses.
Ensure an intuitive correlation and reference to any works other than those directly annotated that provide additional breadth and depth to the subject matter.
Length: 4 pages, not including title and reference pages. APA.
References: 6 scholarly references
Required Readings:
Simion, D., & Vasile, E. (2017). Applications for businesses that uses relational databases. Internal Auditing & Risk Management
TekSlate. (2016). Data warehouse tutorials.

Research paper – information systems infrastructure | BA 633 Information Systems Infrastructure | Campbellsville University

ÿSelect a topic from the following list on which you would like to conduct an in-depth investigation:

Information systems infrastructure: evolution and trendsÿ
Strategic importance of cloud computing in business organizationsÿ
Big data and its business impactsÿ
Managerial issues of a networked organizationÿ
Emerging enterprise network applicationsÿ
Mobile computing and its business implicationsÿÿ

Research paper basics:ÿ

8-10 pages in lengthÿ
APA formattedÿ
Minimum six (6) sources ? at least two (2) from peer-reviewed journalsÿ
Include an abstract, introduction, and conclusionÿ
See rubric for more detailed grading criteriaÿ

More detail in the attached files.

Project with 3 to 4 papers

ÿ
Part 1: Introduction to the Problem
During this course you will complete a series of projects that will help you understand the components of a research study. You will do this by writing a proposal that supports the extension of a previously published research project. (You will not actually conduct the research; you will be developing a short proposal that explains the need to extend the research.)
Using the ACM database in the Library Portal, find a study related to an area of Information Security that you are interested in to be the basis for your projects for this term. The study can be quantitative or qualitative, but needs to address a problem that you are familiar with. In the conclusions of the study, it should indicate areas for further research.
In Part 1 of the project, you will write a short introduction to the research proposal (3-4 pages) which includes the following:

A description of the problem that was addressed in the selected study
A description of the study population and the sample
A summary of the previous findings
A description of an area of research suggested by the author for further research.
An explanation of why this extension of research could be important or how it might yield more insight into the problem.

Research paper on security architecture and degisn

According to the author of the book “Schoenfield, B. S. (2015). Securing systems: Applied security architecture and threat models. CRC Press”, there are three key attributes of human attackers, as follows:

Intelligence
Adaptability
Creativity

Explain how these three attributes affect threat management. Also, add additional thoughts on the motivations or attributes of human cyber attackers. Need an APA formatted with intext citations and references n abstract, body, and conclusion.ÿ

Psy thoretical framwork treatment plan

ÿ
Prior to beginning this assignment, read the PSY650 Week Two Treatment Planÿ,ÿCase 16: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Gorenstein and Comer (2014), and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders in Hamblin and Gross (2012).
Assess the evidence-based practices implemented in this case study by addressing the following issues:

Explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case.
Consider Dr. Remoc?s utilization of two theoretical frameworks to guide her treatment plan.ÿ Assess the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Describe some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children DHD.
Identify tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy?s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. (There are articles in the recommended resources that may assist you in this portion of the assignment.)
Evaluate the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc and support your statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library.
Recommend three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case. Use information from the Hamblin and Gross ?Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders? chapter to help support your recommendations. Justify your selections with information from the case.

Research assignment | Blockchain Technology

Research Assignment
Throughout the course, you will be studying a variety of technology topics that are relevant in enterprise settings. Some of you are students exclusively while others of you work in corporate America. Regardless of your situation, the advances of modern technologies are disrupting the way people work, live, and learn. The goal of this research assignment is to conduct a deep dive analysis on one of the following topic areas. When conducting your research, you need to identify how digital transformation in business is a disruptor to the specific topic area selected. Topic areas to consider include:

Cloud Computing
Mobile Computing
Internet of Things
Wearable Computing
Artificial Intelligence/Cognitive Systems/Machine Learning
Security & Privacy
Social / Collaborative Platforms
3-D Printing
Online Learning & Andragogy

The final paper includes an exhaustive research study using the outline below to substantially support your findings.ÿUsing the following paper structure format:

You are to write a 10-12 page page research paper.
The paper should be, double-spaced following APA format using a Times New Roman 12-point font.
Page counts do NOT include cover pages, references, or abstract.

Treat this as if you had an opportunity to publish in a peer-reviewed business or technology journal.ÿ
The paper structure should be as follows:

Abstract
Introduction
Problem Statement
Research Analysis
General Findings
Strength Identification relative to disruption
Weakness Identification relative to disruption
Why is this an opportunity?
Why is it a threat?
How does this disruption solve problem X?
Further areas of research to consider
Conclusion
References

The grading rubric evaluates the content based on five areas:

Psychological measurement | Psychology homework help

PSY 3094 Psychological Measurement – Scale Construction Project
The aim of this project is to develop a scale measuring a construct related to psychology and to report its psychometric properties. You will work in groups and prepare a report including the following componets given in the table below. The Assessment Rubric summarizes the details that should be included in each part of the report and how they will be graded. Please submit a copy of this rubric with your paper for grading.

Title Page
including the title of the project, the Group No/Name, the Name, Surname and Student No of the group members

Main Text
organized in subtitles of Introduction, Preparation of the Scale, Data Collection, Data Analysis, Evaluation of the Scale
References
in APA style

Appendices:
You should refer to the relevant appendices in text
Adapted from Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research: A Guide to Becoming an Action Research; Florida Department of Education https://tr.scribd.com/doc/132663674/action-research-assignment-and-rubric
SCALE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
Group No / Name: ____________________________________________________ Title of Project: _________________________________________________________
Section

REQUIREMENTS & POINTS

POINTS RECEIVED

Introduction
5 points
3 points
0 points
…
A detailed description/definition of the construct that you are measuring
An adequate description/definition of the construct that you are measuring, but some important details are missing.
No definition of the construct that you are measuring
5 points
3 points
0 points
…
A detailed ? clear description of the importance of measuring the construct
The importance of measuring the construct is stated, but why it is important is not clear.
The importance of measuring the construct and its reasons are not stated.
10 points
5 points
0 points
…
A detailed-clear description/definition of the variable that will be measured for criterion-related/construct validity and why it is selected/how it is related to the construct that you are measuring.
The variable that will be measured for the criterion-related/construct validity is described/defined, but why it is selected/how it is related to the construct that you are measuring is not clear.
No description/definition of the variable that will be measured for the criterion-related/construct validity and no statement about why it is selected
Preperation of the Scale
First version of the scale

– ÿDetailed description of how the first items are created (3 points)
– ÿpresentation of the items (in Appendix) (5 points)
– ÿinformation about the scaling method (2 points)

…
Analysis of Content validity

– ÿCharacteristics of experts (number, age, gender, their expertise level)(2 points)
– ÿHow experts rated the items (2 points)
– ÿThe results of experts? ratings (3 points)
– ÿContent validity coefficient (3 points)

…
Finalization of the Scale

– ÿthe solution for the items on which the experts do not agree (2 points)
– ÿthe final list of the items (in Appendix) (2 points)
– ÿhow the scoring of the scale should be done. ( 1point)

…

Data Collection
Sample

– ÿthe number of participants (1 points)
– ÿhow the participants are recruited ( 2 points)
– ÿdemographic characteristics of participants (required : Age (M, SD, Min, Max), gender distribution; optional:education level, SES, other characteristics that are important for the construct you are measuring etc.) (2 points)

…
Measures/Instruments– demographic information form & presentation in Appendix (3 points)
Information about how the variable that is included for the criterion-related/construct validity is measured. If via a questionnaire, then

– ÿwhen and by whom the questionnaire is developed (1 point)
– ÿthe number of items and the scale used for the rating (2 points)
– ÿhow the score is computed (1 point)
– ÿpsychometric properties of the original questionnaire and also in your data (2 points)
– ÿpresentation of the questionnaire in Appendix (1 point)

…
Procedure

– ÿconsent form (1 point)
– ÿpresentation of consent form in Appendix (1 point)
– ÿorder of the measures (1 point)
– ÿpaper-pencil vs. online (1 point)
– ÿduration (1 point)

…
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics of the scale that you are constructing and other scales used for validity analysis – M, SD, Min, Max (3 points)
Information about the analysis of inter-item consistency

– ÿhow it is calculated (2 points)
– ÿreport of the coefficient (3 points)
– ÿInterpretation of the score for inter-item consistency (high-low etc, whether it will change if some items aredeleted) (3 points)
– ÿReport of SEM (3 points)Information about the analysis of the criterion-related/construct validity
– ÿHow it is calculated (3 points)
– ÿReport of the validity coefficient (3 points)
– ÿInterpretation of the score (5 points)Optional: Information about the analysis of split-half reliability (5 additional points)

…
Evaluation of the Scale
Evaluation of the scale that you are developing in terms of its reliability and validity (5 points) Limitations of the study (sample, problem of restricted range, procedural problems etc.) (3 points) A general conclusion ( 2 points)
…
References
5 points
2 points
0 points
…
All citations appearing the text match the reference list. The reference list is consistent in APA style and error free.
References partially match text citations. Reference list is inconsistent with regard to APA style.
References missing or do not match citations. Reference list is not consistent PA style.

Rise of progressivism discussion | History homework help

Instructions:ÿ
Read the following Discussion question carefully, then submit an original answer.ÿ Your answer should be at least a few sentences to a paragraph in length.ÿ There is no “right” or “wrong” answer, but your opinion should be well-reasoned and based on fact.ÿ (no references needed) this is just an opinion…
The reform movement known as “Progressivism” sprang from many different sources and wasn’t always a uniform program or philosophy.ÿ How were some “Progressive” ideas contradictory to others?ÿ How could conflicting goals both be considered “Progressive?”

Put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance

Assignment 3: The Big Stage!Due Week 10 and worth 200 points
In the United States, both the federal government and the states have authority to indict for criminal wrongdoing. The federal government and each state have their own criminal statutes, court system, prosecutors, and police agencies. Use your textbook, the Internet, and / or Strayer Library to research articles on crime trial, prosecutor, and criminal investigator.
Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

Put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Further, analyze the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
Review Figure 21.1 ?The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process? in Chapter 21 of the text and specify the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Define a criminal investigator?s role in preparing a case for court. Analyze the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.ÿ
Differentiate not guilty and acquitted. Give your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Support your position.ÿ
Predict one to two (1-2) changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next ÿtwenty (20) years. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Use at least two (2) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
?ÿBe typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
?ÿInclude a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student?s name, the professor?s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Describe the major components of and responsiblities involved in the investigative process.
Recommend improvements to the criminal investigation process in selected areas.
Predict changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next 20 years.
Evaluate the role of the criminal investigator in preparing evidence for presentation and courtroom testimony.ÿ
Use technology and information resources to conduct research in the criminal investigation process.
Write clearly and concisely about the criminal investigation process using proper writing mechanics.ÿ

Problems in benefitting & avoiding harm to patients

View the unit video, and take careful notes, utilizing the pause button when appropriate. In your main post apply some of the ideas of Robert Veatchÿfrom the video and thoughtfully comment on Grabenstein’sÿessay on religiousÿobjections to vaccinations and the anti-vaccination movement.
Robert Veatch ? Revisiting Foundational Concepts: Benefitting & Avoiding Harm to Patients: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4pQObao3Mo(47:00)ÿ
.ÿÿ What the World?s religions teach, applied to vaccines and immuneÿglobulins – JohnÿD.ÿGrabenstein ÿhttp://www.childrenshealthcare.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Vaccine-Grabenstein-article.pdf
(1) “Main Post” – one post should address the discussion topic. (2) “Response Post” – one post should be a response to another person`s post. Each post needs to beÿ15 – 20ÿsentences in length. Also, make sure that you read all or almost all of the posts of your classmates. You are reminded that in your discussion posts you will be expected to show that you are integrating ideas from the assigned unit readings and the other resources provided (articles from newspapers, magazines, journals, and videos) into your posts. Failure to do this will result in a lower discussion grade and a successful discussion post that refers to specific readings and videos will receive a higher discussion grade.