Explain the reasoning behind why the data collected, used and disclosed in C-ITS messaging should be considered personal information for the purpose of Australian privacy legislation.
| 4. | “Explain the reasoning behind why the data collected, used and disclosed in C-ITS messaging should be considered personal information for the purpose of Australian privacy legislation. (2 marks)”
|
|
|
|
| 5. | “Locate a suitable diagram of possible information flows in C-ITS and explain in your own words. Ensure that you provide a full citation and reference to your source (2 marks)”
|
|
|
|
| 6. | “APP Findings (8 Marks)
For each of the following APP findings explain the implications for a) Organisations providing and operating C-ITS devices (e.g. vehicle manufactures, transport operators, road infrastructure providers) b) Governance c) Vehicle and road users”
|
| APP | Finding
|
C-ITS Device Organisations | Governance | Vehicle and road users |
| APP 1: Openness and Transparency | “Participants in C-ITS (including any centralised function or central hub that may be established) are required to develop specific C-ITS privacy policies to comply with the openness and transparency principles in APP1.” | |||
| APP 3: Collection of solicited personal information | “Collection of solicited personal information is likely to be in accordance with APP3, although some aspects of collection are still to be determined.
No sensitive data is collected.” |
|||
| APP 5: Notification | “The C-ITS framework (here and abroad) does not yet include a standard approach regarding the provision of notice to drivers. Compliance with APP 5 presents a significant challenge for C-ITS” |
