What did the judge/s decide and what were their reasons for that decision?

Description

Referencing (citations and footnotes) must follow the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (MULR Assoc, 4th ed, 2018) Link to this type of referencing style: https://www.mulr.com.au/aglc/AGLC4‑2021‑v1.pdf ou are to read the case Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liq) (CAN 118 654 366) (No 3) (2019) 374 ALR 776 You need to locate and read the most authoritative version of the case cited above. You need to write a case note in response to the following headings: a) Introduction: This should include identification of the case name and citation, court and judge/s and some sentences (one or two) reflecting on the topic of the case, its significance etc. b) Material Facts: What are the circumstances that gave rise to the dispute? Think about the facts that are relevant to the legal reasoning. You only need to provide enough factual information to explain how the legal issues arose; you do not need to present facts of no relevance to the legal issues. Identify the parties clearly and be consistent with how you refer to them throughout the assignment. c) Procedural history: Provide an overview of the procedural history of the matter (if any). d) Legal issues: What is the legal issue(s) (or legal questions) that the court has to answer?  e) Legal Reasoning: What did the judge/s decide and what were their reasons for that decision? This is the most important section of the case note. You need to be able to explain each judges reasoning, including pointing to what precedents, legislation or other sources were key in supporting that reasoning. f) Orders: What is the outcome of the case? What orders were made?