Which works do you think satirize class/physical appearance most effectively or convincingly in terms of a personal attack?

Concentrate on creating a real argument, not just listing observations about the works (I should be able to disagree with your paper, while still thinking it’s good work). Many of the works we have looked at have chosen, as the focus of satire, one of the two following topics: 1. PHYSICAL APPEARANCE 2. CLASS Choose ONE of these two topics, and show how it functions in at least two works that we have studied so far. I would like you to end your introductory paragraph with a question, and then answer that question in your concluding paragraph. Some ideas to consider, as you’re thinking of how to structure your argument: Which works do you think satirize class/physical appearance most effectively or convincingly as part of a larger social argument? Least effectively or convincingly? Which works do you think satirize class/physical appearance most effectively or convincingly in terms of a personal attack? Least effectively or convincingly? How so? Given that readers/listeners could be sensitive about class/physical appearance, what techniques/strategies do authors come up with to be able to satirize class/physical appearance without alienating an audience? Which works do this most effectively/least effectively? To create and effective argument and opening question, you will need to narrow things down, and then think about the different approaches your chosen works take. As an example: under the category of “class” you might compare and contrast Swift’s and Wilde’s use of class in their larger satires of social hypocrisy: Swift focuses on the lower classes; Wilde on the upper classes. Which strategy do you think is more effective and why? To repeat: THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THE ESSAY MUST END WITH A QUESTION THAT WILL BE ANSWERED AT THE END OF THE ESSAY.