Student outcome: Each student will produce a written paper on a metaphysical topic from the options below.

Skills: Reading, researching, and writing.

Topic Options:

1. Reconstruct and analyze the principal arguments in Plato’s Theatetus for and against relativism (Protagoras vs. Plato). Explain how Plato refutes the relativist.

In your paper, clearly explain the problem the author is trying to solve, and then step-by-step, reconstruct their argument that attempts to resolve that problem. Be sure to define all relevant technical terms and explain each step along the way. Offer an insightful evaluation of the argument, and whether it resolves the problem or not. If so, draw out any further implicit implications. If not, you must use the text to clearly identify where and why it falls short.

Note 1: Remember that this is a philosophy paper. You must not rely on any faith-based claims or sources. Use human reason alone.

Note 2: If you quote or paraphrase anything from the text, you MUST explain the meaning of the text you are referencing and how it establishes your point. You will receive no credit from quoting and paraphrasing without such an explanation. Teach the text to your reader, don’t just read it to them.

Note 3: If you quote, paraphrase, or rely in any way on any source, you must cite the source in a chicago-style footnote.

Note 4: If you rely in any way on any source but still present material as if it is your own work, even if you cite the source this is plagiarism and will be reported and penalized as such. If it is someone else’s argument or insight, indicate it as such in your paper and footnotes.